Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments

Abstract Objectives This study investigated the correspondence between measures of physical activity facilities obtained through self-report and objective audits; and identified the socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral characteristics of those who perceive their physical activity environment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive medicine 2008-09, Vol.47 (3), p.294-298
Hauptverfasser: Ball, Kylie, Jeffery, Robert W, Crawford, David A, Roberts, Rebecca J, Salmon, Jo, Timperio, Anna F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue 3
container_start_page 294
container_title Preventive medicine
container_volume 47
creator Ball, Kylie
Jeffery, Robert W
Crawford, David A
Roberts, Rebecca J
Salmon, Jo
Timperio, Anna F
description Abstract Objectives This study investigated the correspondence between measures of physical activity facilities obtained through self-report and objective audits; and identified the socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral characteristics of those who perceive their physical activity environment to be less supportive than objective measures indicate. Methods Self-report surveys were completed by 1540 women recruited from 45 neighborhoods in Melbourne, Australia. Women reported perceived access to physical activity facilities within 2 km from home, and also socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral factors. Objective data on physical activity facilities within a 2 km pedestrian catchment area around women's homes were sourced. Results There was relatively poor agreement between measures of access to physical activity facilities obtained via self-report and objective assessment. Mismatch between perceived and objectively-assessed environments was more common amongst younger and older women, and women of low income, with low self-efficacy for physical activity, who were less active, who reported using fewer facilities and who had lived in the neighborhood for less than 2 years. Conclusions Future studies of environmental determinants of physical activity should consider incorporating objective indices of access to facilities, or accounting for the systematic bias that may result from relying on self-report perceptions as an indicator of the actual physical activity environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69546647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0091743508002156</els_id><sourcerecordid>57301936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-561a03a6a3b2ab9a9bda559987093bb00d331c1ef1318276be20ea5d46e7547f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoM4ONfRXyBIVu5aT5qPNgsFGRwVRmYxug5pesqk9sukvdJ_bzr34sLNrMLhPO8JPC8hbxjkDJh63-XbPGCTFwBVDjIHYM_IgYFWGRQKnpMDgGZZKbi8JC9j7BLAFIgX5JJVUgih-IHcf_dxsIt7oDUufxBHOmNw6I_YUDs2dKo7dEsa6YA2rgEjnVo6P2zRO9tTu-_8slEcjz5M44DjEl-Ri9b2EV-f3yvy8-bzj-uv2e3dl2_Xn24zJ0EvmVTMArfK8rqwtba6bqyUWlclaF7XAA3nzDFsGWdVUaoaC0ArG6GwlKJs-RV5d7o7h-n3inExg48O-96OOK3RKC2FUqJ8EpQlB6a5SiA_gS5MMQZszRz8YMNmGJhduunMo3SzSzcgTXKaUm_P59d63_3LnC0n4MMJwGTj6DGY6DyODhsfkl3TTP6JDz7-l3e9H_cCfuGGsZvWMCbRhplYGDD3e-977VABFEwq_hfuKqlq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57301936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Ball, Kylie ; Jeffery, Robert W ; Crawford, David A ; Roberts, Rebecca J ; Salmon, Jo ; Timperio, Anna F</creator><creatorcontrib>Ball, Kylie ; Jeffery, Robert W ; Crawford, David A ; Roberts, Rebecca J ; Salmon, Jo ; Timperio, Anna F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives This study investigated the correspondence between measures of physical activity facilities obtained through self-report and objective audits; and identified the socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral characteristics of those who perceive their physical activity environment to be less supportive than objective measures indicate. Methods Self-report surveys were completed by 1540 women recruited from 45 neighborhoods in Melbourne, Australia. Women reported perceived access to physical activity facilities within 2 km from home, and also socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral factors. Objective data on physical activity facilities within a 2 km pedestrian catchment area around women's homes were sourced. Results There was relatively poor agreement between measures of access to physical activity facilities obtained via self-report and objective assessment. Mismatch between perceived and objectively-assessed environments was more common amongst younger and older women, and women of low income, with low self-efficacy for physical activity, who were less active, who reported using fewer facilities and who had lived in the neighborhood for less than 2 years. Conclusions Future studies of environmental determinants of physical activity should consider incorporating objective indices of access to facilities, or accounting for the systematic bias that may result from relying on self-report perceptions as an indicator of the actual physical activity environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18544463</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Built environment ; Environment Design ; Environmental Health ; Exercise - psychology ; Female ; Health Behavior ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Neighbourhoods ; Objective audits ; Perceptions ; Physical activity ; Recreation ; Recreational facilities ; Residence Characteristics ; Selfreport ; Sociodemographic aspects ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Victoria ; Women</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 2008-09, Vol.47 (3), p.294-298</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-561a03a6a3b2ab9a9bda559987093bb00d331c1ef1318276be20ea5d46e7547f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-561a03a6a3b2ab9a9bda559987093bb00d331c1ef1318276be20ea5d46e7547f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743508002156$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,30979,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18544463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ball, Kylie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Rebecca J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timperio, Anna F</creatorcontrib><title>Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives This study investigated the correspondence between measures of physical activity facilities obtained through self-report and objective audits; and identified the socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral characteristics of those who perceive their physical activity environment to be less supportive than objective measures indicate. Methods Self-report surveys were completed by 1540 women recruited from 45 neighborhoods in Melbourne, Australia. Women reported perceived access to physical activity facilities within 2 km from home, and also socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral factors. Objective data on physical activity facilities within a 2 km pedestrian catchment area around women's homes were sourced. Results There was relatively poor agreement between measures of access to physical activity facilities obtained via self-report and objective assessment. Mismatch between perceived and objectively-assessed environments was more common amongst younger and older women, and women of low income, with low self-efficacy for physical activity, who were less active, who reported using fewer facilities and who had lived in the neighborhood for less than 2 years. Conclusions Future studies of environmental determinants of physical activity should consider incorporating objective indices of access to facilities, or accounting for the systematic bias that may result from relying on self-report perceptions as an indicator of the actual physical activity environment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Environment Design</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Exercise - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Neighbourhoods</subject><subject>Objective audits</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Recreational facilities</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Selfreport</subject><subject>Sociodemographic aspects</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoM4ONfRXyBIVu5aT5qPNgsFGRwVRmYxug5pesqk9sukvdJ_bzr34sLNrMLhPO8JPC8hbxjkDJh63-XbPGCTFwBVDjIHYM_IgYFWGRQKnpMDgGZZKbi8JC9j7BLAFIgX5JJVUgih-IHcf_dxsIt7oDUufxBHOmNw6I_YUDs2dKo7dEsa6YA2rgEjnVo6P2zRO9tTu-_8slEcjz5M44DjEl-Ri9b2EV-f3yvy8-bzj-uv2e3dl2_Xn24zJ0EvmVTMArfK8rqwtba6bqyUWlclaF7XAA3nzDFsGWdVUaoaC0ArG6GwlKJs-RV5d7o7h-n3inExg48O-96OOK3RKC2FUqJ8EpQlB6a5SiA_gS5MMQZszRz8YMNmGJhduunMo3SzSzcgTXKaUm_P59d63_3LnC0n4MMJwGTj6DGY6DyODhsfkl3TTP6JDz7-l3e9H_cCfuGGsZvWMCbRhplYGDD3e-977VABFEwq_hfuKqlq</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Ball, Kylie</creator><creator>Jeffery, Robert W</creator><creator>Crawford, David A</creator><creator>Roberts, Rebecca J</creator><creator>Salmon, Jo</creator><creator>Timperio, Anna F</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments</title><author>Ball, Kylie ; Jeffery, Robert W ; Crawford, David A ; Roberts, Rebecca J ; Salmon, Jo ; Timperio, Anna F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-561a03a6a3b2ab9a9bda559987093bb00d331c1ef1318276be20ea5d46e7547f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Environment Design</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Exercise - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Neighbourhoods</topic><topic>Objective audits</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Recreational facilities</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Selfreport</topic><topic>Sociodemographic aspects</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ball, Kylie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Rebecca J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timperio, Anna F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ball, Kylie</au><au>Jeffery, Robert W</au><au>Crawford, David A</au><au>Roberts, Rebecca J</au><au>Salmon, Jo</au><au>Timperio, Anna F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>294</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>294-298</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives This study investigated the correspondence between measures of physical activity facilities obtained through self-report and objective audits; and identified the socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral characteristics of those who perceive their physical activity environment to be less supportive than objective measures indicate. Methods Self-report surveys were completed by 1540 women recruited from 45 neighborhoods in Melbourne, Australia. Women reported perceived access to physical activity facilities within 2 km from home, and also socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral factors. Objective data on physical activity facilities within a 2 km pedestrian catchment area around women's homes were sourced. Results There was relatively poor agreement between measures of access to physical activity facilities obtained via self-report and objective assessment. Mismatch between perceived and objectively-assessed environments was more common amongst younger and older women, and women of low income, with low self-efficacy for physical activity, who were less active, who reported using fewer facilities and who had lived in the neighborhood for less than 2 years. Conclusions Future studies of environmental determinants of physical activity should consider incorporating objective indices of access to facilities, or accounting for the systematic bias that may result from relying on self-report perceptions as an indicator of the actual physical activity environment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18544463</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7435
ispartof Preventive medicine, 2008-09, Vol.47 (3), p.294-298
issn 0091-7435
1096-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69546647
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adult
Built environment
Environment Design
Environmental Health
Exercise - psychology
Female
Health Behavior
Humans
Internal Medicine
Middle Aged
Motor Activity
Neighbourhoods
Objective audits
Perceptions
Physical activity
Recreation
Recreational facilities
Residence Characteristics
Selfreport
Sociodemographic aspects
Surveys and Questionnaires
Victoria
Women
title Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mismatch%20between%20perceived%20and%20objective%20measures%20of%20physical%20activity%20environments&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Ball,%20Kylie&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=294&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=294-298&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57301936%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57301936&rft_id=info:pmid/18544463&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0091743508002156&rfr_iscdi=true