Variations in treatment need using four screening methods
The study models of 100 Grade Seven students were used to compare the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), the Dental Health Component (DHC) and the Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and the Danish Ministry of Health (DMH) screening system. The basis for comparison...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Australian orthodontic journal 1999-04, Vol.15 (4), p.214-218 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 218 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 214 |
| container_title | Australian orthodontic journal |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Freer, E Freer, T J |
| description | The study models of 100 Grade Seven students were used to compare the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), the Dental Health Component (DHC) and the Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and the Danish Ministry of Health (DMH) screening system. The basis for comparison was the agreed subjective assessment of two orthodontists for each subject. Disagreements between the subjective assessment and each screening method were further analysed in an attempt to identify the specific occlusol traits responsible for the disagreement. The DAI under-estimated treatment need in cases with displaced canine teeth, incisor crowding or rotations and increased overbite. The DAI over-estimated treatment need in cases with increased overjet in otherwise well-aligned arches. The DMH guidelines over-estimated treatment need in cases with increased overjet and crowded arches. The DHC was found to be over-sensitive in cases with increased overjet and contact point displacements greater than 2 mm. The AC under-estimated treatment need in cases with excessive overjet and buccally displaced canines, and over-estimated treatment need in cases with spaced arches and deep overbite. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69527463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.986750388870567</informt_id><sourcerecordid>69527463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p175t-8ec99e21b19253c5506804d0e119946d17abc85ef2343f258471f134591a1eb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z01LxDAQBuAcFHdZ9y9IT94KSfMNXmTxCxa8qNeQplPN0iY1SQ_-e-vuOpdh4OFl3gu0xlzJmmqsVmib8wEvIxrBCLlCK0I0pZTzNdIfNnlbfAy58qEqCWwZIZQqAHTVnH34rPo4pyq7BBD-zhHKV-zyNbrs7ZBhe94b9P748LZ7rvevTy-7-309EclLrcBpDQ1piW44dZxjoTDrMCw_aCY6Im3rFIe-oYz2DVdMkp5QxjWxBFpON-j2lDul-D1DLmb02cEw2ABxzkZo3kgm6AJvznBuR-jMlPxo04_5L7uAuxNIoy_GxWEAd2x-sCUbgg2lRBgf-ngEWgnJMVVKScyFpL9t2mKH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69527463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variations in treatment need using four screening methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Freer, E ; Freer, T J</creator><creatorcontrib>Freer, E ; Freer, T J</creatorcontrib><description>The study models of 100 Grade Seven students were used to compare the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), the Dental Health Component (DHC) and the Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and the Danish Ministry of Health (DMH) screening system. The basis for comparison was the agreed subjective assessment of two orthodontists for each subject. Disagreements between the subjective assessment and each screening method were further analysed in an attempt to identify the specific occlusol traits responsible for the disagreement. The DAI under-estimated treatment need in cases with displaced canine teeth, incisor crowding or rotations and increased overbite. The DAI over-estimated treatment need in cases with increased overjet in otherwise well-aligned arches. The DMH guidelines over-estimated treatment need in cases with increased overjet and crowded arches. The DHC was found to be over-sensitive in cases with increased overjet and contact point displacements greater than 2 mm. The AC under-estimated treatment need in cases with excessive overjet and buccally displaced canines, and over-estimated treatment need in cases with spaced arches and deep overbite.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0587-3908</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11933355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Aesthetic aspects ; Child ; Cuspid - pathology ; Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) ; Dental Arch - pathology ; Dental Models ; Dentistry ; Esthetics, Dental ; Female ; Humans ; Incisor - pathology ; Male ; Malocclusion ; Malocclusion - classification ; Malocclusion - diagnosis ; Mass Screening - methods ; Needs Assessment ; Observer Variation ; Occlusion (Dentistry) ; Orthodontics, Corrective ; Queensland ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rotation ; Statistics as Topic ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Australian orthodontic journal, 1999-04, Vol.15 (4), p.214-218</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11933355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freer, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freer, T J</creatorcontrib><title>Variations in treatment need using four screening methods</title><title>Australian orthodontic journal</title><addtitle>Aust Orthod J</addtitle><description>The study models of 100 Grade Seven students were used to compare the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), the Dental Health Component (DHC) and the Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and the Danish Ministry of Health (DMH) screening system. The basis for comparison was the agreed subjective assessment of two orthodontists for each subject. Disagreements between the subjective assessment and each screening method were further analysed in an attempt to identify the specific occlusol traits responsible for the disagreement. The DAI under-estimated treatment need in cases with displaced canine teeth, incisor crowding or rotations and increased overbite. The DAI over-estimated treatment need in cases with increased overjet in otherwise well-aligned arches. The DMH guidelines over-estimated treatment need in cases with increased overjet and crowded arches. The DHC was found to be over-sensitive in cases with increased overjet and contact point displacements greater than 2 mm. The AC under-estimated treatment need in cases with excessive overjet and buccally displaced canines, and over-estimated treatment need in cases with spaced arches and deep overbite.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Aesthetic aspects</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cuspid - pathology</subject><subject>Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI)</subject><subject>Dental Arch - pathology</subject><subject>Dental Models</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisor - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion</subject><subject>Malocclusion - classification</subject><subject>Malocclusion - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Occlusion (Dentistry)</subject><subject>Orthodontics, Corrective</subject><subject>Queensland</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>0587-3908</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1z01LxDAQBuAcFHdZ9y9IT94KSfMNXmTxCxa8qNeQplPN0iY1SQ_-e-vuOpdh4OFl3gu0xlzJmmqsVmib8wEvIxrBCLlCK0I0pZTzNdIfNnlbfAy58qEqCWwZIZQqAHTVnH34rPo4pyq7BBD-zhHKV-zyNbrs7ZBhe94b9P748LZ7rvevTy-7-309EclLrcBpDQ1piW44dZxjoTDrMCw_aCY6Im3rFIe-oYz2DVdMkp5QxjWxBFpON-j2lDul-D1DLmb02cEw2ABxzkZo3kgm6AJvznBuR-jMlPxo04_5L7uAuxNIoy_GxWEAd2x-sCUbgg2lRBgf-ngEWgnJMVVKScyFpL9t2mKH</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>Freer, E</creator><creator>Freer, T J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>Variations in treatment need using four screening methods</title><author>Freer, E ; Freer, T J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p175t-8ec99e21b19253c5506804d0e119946d17abc85ef2343f258471f134591a1eb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Aesthetic aspects</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cuspid - pathology</topic><topic>Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI)</topic><topic>Dental Arch - pathology</topic><topic>Dental Models</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisor - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion</topic><topic>Malocclusion - classification</topic><topic>Malocclusion - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Occlusion (Dentistry)</topic><topic>Orthodontics, Corrective</topic><topic>Queensland</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freer, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freer, T J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian orthodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freer, E</au><au>Freer, T J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variations in treatment need using four screening methods</atitle><jtitle>Australian orthodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Orthod J</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>214</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>214-218</pages><issn>0587-3908</issn><abstract>The study models of 100 Grade Seven students were used to compare the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), the Dental Health Component (DHC) and the Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and the Danish Ministry of Health (DMH) screening system. The basis for comparison was the agreed subjective assessment of two orthodontists for each subject. Disagreements between the subjective assessment and each screening method were further analysed in an attempt to identify the specific occlusol traits responsible for the disagreement. The DAI under-estimated treatment need in cases with displaced canine teeth, incisor crowding or rotations and increased overbite. The DAI over-estimated treatment need in cases with increased overjet in otherwise well-aligned arches. The DMH guidelines over-estimated treatment need in cases with increased overjet and crowded arches. The DHC was found to be over-sensitive in cases with increased overjet and contact point displacements greater than 2 mm. The AC under-estimated treatment need in cases with excessive overjet and buccally displaced canines, and over-estimated treatment need in cases with spaced arches and deep overbite.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>11933355</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0587-3908 |
| ispartof | Australian orthodontic journal, 1999-04, Vol.15 (4), p.214-218 |
| issn | 0587-3908 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69527463 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adolescent Aesthetic aspects Child Cuspid - pathology Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) Dental Arch - pathology Dental Models Dentistry Esthetics, Dental Female Humans Incisor - pathology Male Malocclusion Malocclusion - classification Malocclusion - diagnosis Mass Screening - methods Needs Assessment Observer Variation Occlusion (Dentistry) Orthodontics, Corrective Queensland Reproducibility of Results Rotation Statistics as Topic Treatment |
| title | Variations in treatment need using four screening methods |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A45%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variations%20in%20treatment%20need%20using%20four%20screening%20methods&rft.jtitle=Australian%20orthodontic%20journal&rft.au=Freer,%20E&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=214&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=214-218&rft.issn=0587-3908&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69527463%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69527463&rft_id=info:pmid/11933355&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.986750388870567&rfr_iscdi=true |