The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up
Introduction The treatment of hernias remains controversial, with multiple prosthetic meshes being exalted for a variety of their characteristics. In the event of incarcerated/strangulated hernias and other potentially contaminated fields the placement of prosthetic material remains controversial be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2008-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1941-1946 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1946 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1941 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Franklin, Morris E. Treviño, Jorge M. Portillo, Guillermo Vela, Itzel Glass, Jeffrey L. González, John J. |
description | Introduction
The treatment of hernias remains controversial, with multiple prosthetic meshes being exalted for a variety of their characteristics. In the event of incarcerated/strangulated hernias and other potentially contaminated fields the placement of prosthetic material remains controversial because of increased risk of recurrence and infection. Porcine small intestinal submucosa mesh (Surgisis, Cook Bloomington, IN) has been demonstrated safe and feasible in laparoscopic hernia repairs in this scenario. We present our 5-year experience, with placement of Surgisis mesh in potentially or grossly contaminated fields.
Methods
From May 2000 to October 2006, 116 patients (52 male, 64 female) with 133 procedures were performed. Placement of Surgisis mesh for either incisional, umbilical, inguinal, femoral or parastomal hernia repairs in an infected or potentially contaminated setting were achieved, and studied in a prospective fashion.
Results
All procedures were laparoscopically with two techniques [intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) and two-layered “sandwich” repair]. Mean follow-up was 52 ± 20.9 months. Thirty-nine cases were in an infected field and the rest in a potentially contaminated field. Ninety-one procedures were performed concurrently with a contaminated procedure. Twenty-five presented as intestinal obstruction, 16 strangulated hernias, and 17 required small bowel resection; 29 were inguinal hernias, 57 incisional, and 38 umbilical. In 13 patients more than two different hernias were repaired. Eighty-five percent 5-year follow-up was achieved, during which we identified 7 recurrences, 11 seromas (all resolved), and 10 patients reporting mild pain. Six second looks were performed and in all cases except one the mesh was found to be totally integrated into the tissue with strong scar tissue corroborated macro- and microscopically.
Conclusions
In our experience the use of small intestine submucosa mesh in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields is a safe and feasible alternative to hernia repair with minimal recurrence rate and satisfactory results in long-term follow-up. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-008-0005-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69509481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1548139761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-8261a4428c1f3012e31ecd58354fa8e22ef4e71cdae4e3a10f1c93e6de934f7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kduKFDEQhhtR3HH1AbyRIOhda059iHfL4gkWvFmvmzJd2cmSTtokjcwr-ZTWMIMLgpCQwP_VX0n9TfNS8HeC8-F94Vz3uuV8pM279vCo2QmtZCulGB83O24Ub-Vg9EXzrJR7YrQR3dPmQoydoavZNb9v98i2giw5tqZsfURWFgiB-VixVB8hsLL9WDabCjAoDNiaU6l7rN6yBSpmT4hLmQVYgSSbVlL2mKMHlnEFn8mMlkNbcWYQZ2pVMVYqDAdmU6ywUKOj6DyGuXxgIcW7lrwXcg4h_Wq39XnzxEEo-OJ8XjbfP328vf7S3nz7_PX66qa1uu9qO8pegNZytMIpLiQqgXbuRtVpByNKiU7jIOwMqFGB4E5Yo7Cf0SjthlldNm9PvvTPnxvNYFp8sRgCRExbmXrTcaNHQeDrf8D7tGUaWJmkMLoThiuCxAmyNJqS0U1r9gvkwyT4dExxOqU4UYrTMcXpQDWvzsY0eJwfKs6xEfDmDECxEFyGaH35y0ne90oOA3HyxBWS4h3mhxf-v_sfvC65KQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219451903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Franklin, Morris E. ; Treviño, Jorge M. ; Portillo, Guillermo ; Vela, Itzel ; Glass, Jeffrey L. ; González, John J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Morris E. ; Treviño, Jorge M. ; Portillo, Guillermo ; Vela, Itzel ; Glass, Jeffrey L. ; González, John J.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
The treatment of hernias remains controversial, with multiple prosthetic meshes being exalted for a variety of their characteristics. In the event of incarcerated/strangulated hernias and other potentially contaminated fields the placement of prosthetic material remains controversial because of increased risk of recurrence and infection. Porcine small intestinal submucosa mesh (Surgisis, Cook Bloomington, IN) has been demonstrated safe and feasible in laparoscopic hernia repairs in this scenario. We present our 5-year experience, with placement of Surgisis mesh in potentially or grossly contaminated fields.
Methods
From May 2000 to October 2006, 116 patients (52 male, 64 female) with 133 procedures were performed. Placement of Surgisis mesh for either incisional, umbilical, inguinal, femoral or parastomal hernia repairs in an infected or potentially contaminated setting were achieved, and studied in a prospective fashion.
Results
All procedures were laparoscopically with two techniques [intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) and two-layered “sandwich” repair]. Mean follow-up was 52 ± 20.9 months. Thirty-nine cases were in an infected field and the rest in a potentially contaminated field. Ninety-one procedures were performed concurrently with a contaminated procedure. Twenty-five presented as intestinal obstruction, 16 strangulated hernias, and 17 required small bowel resection; 29 were inguinal hernias, 57 incisional, and 38 umbilical. In 13 patients more than two different hernias were repaired. Eighty-five percent 5-year follow-up was achieved, during which we identified 7 recurrences, 11 seromas (all resolved), and 10 patients reporting mild pain. Six second looks were performed and in all cases except one the mesh was found to be totally integrated into the tissue with strong scar tissue corroborated macro- and microscopically.
Conclusions
In our experience the use of small intestine submucosa mesh in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields is a safe and feasible alternative to hernia repair with minimal recurrence rate and satisfactory results in long-term follow-up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0005-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18594919</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUREEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Absorbable Implants ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bioprosthesis ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology ; General aspects ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Herniorrhaphy ; Humans ; Intestinal Mucosa ; Intestine, Small ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Proctology ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgical Mesh ; Surgical Wound Infection ; Swine ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2008-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1941-1946</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-8261a4428c1f3012e31ecd58354fa8e22ef4e71cdae4e3a10f1c93e6de934f7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-8261a4428c1f3012e31ecd58354fa8e22ef4e71cdae4e3a10f1c93e6de934f7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-008-0005-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-008-0005-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20663277$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18594919$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Morris E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño, Jorge M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portillo, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vela, Itzel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, Jeffrey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, John J.</creatorcontrib><title>The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Introduction
The treatment of hernias remains controversial, with multiple prosthetic meshes being exalted for a variety of their characteristics. In the event of incarcerated/strangulated hernias and other potentially contaminated fields the placement of prosthetic material remains controversial because of increased risk of recurrence and infection. Porcine small intestinal submucosa mesh (Surgisis, Cook Bloomington, IN) has been demonstrated safe and feasible in laparoscopic hernia repairs in this scenario. We present our 5-year experience, with placement of Surgisis mesh in potentially or grossly contaminated fields.
Methods
From May 2000 to October 2006, 116 patients (52 male, 64 female) with 133 procedures were performed. Placement of Surgisis mesh for either incisional, umbilical, inguinal, femoral or parastomal hernia repairs in an infected or potentially contaminated setting were achieved, and studied in a prospective fashion.
Results
All procedures were laparoscopically with two techniques [intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) and two-layered “sandwich” repair]. Mean follow-up was 52 ± 20.9 months. Thirty-nine cases were in an infected field and the rest in a potentially contaminated field. Ninety-one procedures were performed concurrently with a contaminated procedure. Twenty-five presented as intestinal obstruction, 16 strangulated hernias, and 17 required small bowel resection; 29 were inguinal hernias, 57 incisional, and 38 umbilical. In 13 patients more than two different hernias were repaired. Eighty-five percent 5-year follow-up was achieved, during which we identified 7 recurrences, 11 seromas (all resolved), and 10 patients reporting mild pain. Six second looks were performed and in all cases except one the mesh was found to be totally integrated into the tissue with strong scar tissue corroborated macro- and microscopically.
Conclusions
In our experience the use of small intestine submucosa mesh in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields is a safe and feasible alternative to hernia repair with minimal recurrence rate and satisfactory results in long-term follow-up.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Absorbable Implants</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bioprosthesis</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa</subject><subject>Intestine, Small</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kduKFDEQhhtR3HH1AbyRIOhda059iHfL4gkWvFmvmzJd2cmSTtokjcwr-ZTWMIMLgpCQwP_VX0n9TfNS8HeC8-F94Vz3uuV8pM279vCo2QmtZCulGB83O24Ub-Vg9EXzrJR7YrQR3dPmQoydoavZNb9v98i2giw5tqZsfURWFgiB-VixVB8hsLL9WDabCjAoDNiaU6l7rN6yBSpmT4hLmQVYgSSbVlL2mKMHlnEFn8mMlkNbcWYQZ2pVMVYqDAdmU6ywUKOj6DyGuXxgIcW7lrwXcg4h_Wq39XnzxEEo-OJ8XjbfP328vf7S3nz7_PX66qa1uu9qO8pegNZytMIpLiQqgXbuRtVpByNKiU7jIOwMqFGB4E5Yo7Cf0SjthlldNm9PvvTPnxvNYFp8sRgCRExbmXrTcaNHQeDrf8D7tGUaWJmkMLoThiuCxAmyNJqS0U1r9gvkwyT4dExxOqU4UYrTMcXpQDWvzsY0eJwfKs6xEfDmDECxEFyGaH35y0ne90oOA3HyxBWS4h3mhxf-v_sfvC65KQ</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Franklin, Morris E.</creator><creator>Treviño, Jorge M.</creator><creator>Portillo, Guillermo</creator><creator>Vela, Itzel</creator><creator>Glass, Jeffrey L.</creator><creator>González, John J.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up</title><author>Franklin, Morris E. ; Treviño, Jorge M. ; Portillo, Guillermo ; Vela, Itzel ; Glass, Jeffrey L. ; González, John J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-8261a4428c1f3012e31ecd58354fa8e22ef4e71cdae4e3a10f1c93e6de934f7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Absorbable Implants</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bioprosthesis</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa</topic><topic>Intestine, Small</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Morris E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño, Jorge M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portillo, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vela, Itzel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glass, Jeffrey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, John J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Franklin, Morris E.</au><au>Treviño, Jorge M.</au><au>Portillo, Guillermo</au><au>Vela, Itzel</au><au>Glass, Jeffrey L.</au><au>González, John J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1941</spage><epage>1946</epage><pages>1941-1946</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><coden>SUREEX</coden><abstract>Introduction
The treatment of hernias remains controversial, with multiple prosthetic meshes being exalted for a variety of their characteristics. In the event of incarcerated/strangulated hernias and other potentially contaminated fields the placement of prosthetic material remains controversial because of increased risk of recurrence and infection. Porcine small intestinal submucosa mesh (Surgisis, Cook Bloomington, IN) has been demonstrated safe and feasible in laparoscopic hernia repairs in this scenario. We present our 5-year experience, with placement of Surgisis mesh in potentially or grossly contaminated fields.
Methods
From May 2000 to October 2006, 116 patients (52 male, 64 female) with 133 procedures were performed. Placement of Surgisis mesh for either incisional, umbilical, inguinal, femoral or parastomal hernia repairs in an infected or potentially contaminated setting were achieved, and studied in a prospective fashion.
Results
All procedures were laparoscopically with two techniques [intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) and two-layered “sandwich” repair]. Mean follow-up was 52 ± 20.9 months. Thirty-nine cases were in an infected field and the rest in a potentially contaminated field. Ninety-one procedures were performed concurrently with a contaminated procedure. Twenty-five presented as intestinal obstruction, 16 strangulated hernias, and 17 required small bowel resection; 29 were inguinal hernias, 57 incisional, and 38 umbilical. In 13 patients more than two different hernias were repaired. Eighty-five percent 5-year follow-up was achieved, during which we identified 7 recurrences, 11 seromas (all resolved), and 10 patients reporting mild pain. Six second looks were performed and in all cases except one the mesh was found to be totally integrated into the tissue with strong scar tissue corroborated macro- and microscopically.
Conclusions
In our experience the use of small intestine submucosa mesh in contaminated or potentially contaminated fields is a safe and feasible alternative to hernia repair with minimal recurrence rate and satisfactory results in long-term follow-up.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18594919</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-008-0005-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2008-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1941-1946 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69509481 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Absorbable Implants Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Animals Biological and medical sciences Bioprosthesis Digestive system. Abdomen Endoscopy Female Follow-Up Studies Gastroenterology General aspects Gynecology Hepatology Herniorrhaphy Humans Intestinal Mucosa Intestine, Small Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Laparoscopy - methods Male Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Orthopedic surgery Proctology Prospective Studies Surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgical Mesh Surgical Wound Infection Swine Wound Healing |
title | The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A14%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20porcine%20small%20intestinal%20submucosa%20as%20a%20prosthetic%20material%20for%20laparoscopic%20hernia%20repair%20in%20infected%20and%20potentially%20contaminated%20fields:%20long-term%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Franklin,%20Morris%20E.&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1941&rft.epage=1946&rft.pages=1941-1946&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.coden=SUREEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-008-0005-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1548139761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219451903&rft_id=info:pmid/18594919&rfr_iscdi=true |