Multislice CT Angiography in the Follow-up of Fenestrated Endovascular Grafts: Effect of Slice Thickness on 2D and 3D Visualization of the Fenestration Stents

Purpose: To investigate the effect of multislice computed tomography (CT) protocols on the visualization of target vessel stents in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with fenestrated endovascular grafts. Methods: Twenty-one patients (19 men; mean age 75 years, range 63–86) underg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endovascular therapy 2008-08, Vol.15 (4), p.417-426
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Zhonghua, Allen, Yvonne B., Mwipatayi, Bibombe P., Hartley, David E., Lawrence-Brown, Michael M.D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 426
container_issue 4
container_start_page 417
container_title Journal of endovascular therapy
container_volume 15
creator Sun, Zhonghua
Allen, Yvonne B.
Mwipatayi, Bibombe P.
Hartley, David E.
Lawrence-Brown, Michael M.D.
description Purpose: To investigate the effect of multislice computed tomography (CT) protocols on the visualization of target vessel stents in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with fenestrated endovascular grafts. Methods: Twenty-one patients (19 men; mean age 75 years, range 63–86) undergoing fenestrated endovascular repair of AAA were retrospectively studied. Multislice CT angiography was performed with several protocols, and the section thicknesses used in each were compared to identify any relationship between slice thickness and target vessel stents visualized on 2-dimensional (2D) axial, multiplanar reformatted (MPR), and 3-dimensional (3D) virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) images. Image quality was assessed based on the degree of artifacts and their effect on the ability to visualize the configuration, intra-aortic location, and intraluminal appearance of the target vessel stents and measure their protrusion into the aortic lumen. Results: There were 7 different multislice CT scanning protocols employed in the 21 patients (25 datasets, with 2 sets of follow-up images in 4 patients). The slice thicknesses and numbers (n) of studies included were 0.5 (n=3), 0.625 (n=6), 1.0 (n=1), 1.25 (n=9), 2.5 (n=3), 3.0 (n=1), and 5.0 mm (n=2). Of these CT protocols, images (especially 2D/3D reconstructions) acquired at 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm were significantly compromised by interference from artifacts. Images acquired with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm were scored equal to or lower than those acquired with a submillimeter section thickness (0.5 or 0.625 mm), with minor degrees of artifacts resulting in acceptable image quality. Conclusion: Visualization of the target vessel stents depends on the appropriate selection of multislice CT scanning protocols. Our results showed that studies performed with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm produced similar image quality to those with a thickness of 0.5 or 0.625 mm. Submillimeter slices are not recommended in imaging patients treated with fenestrated stent-grafts, as they did not add additional information to the visualization.
doi_str_mv 10.1583/08-2432.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69477704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1583_08-2432.1</sage_id><sourcerecordid>69477704</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-4667ae3ed3d5404ff048113e00a56880b21e547555b7aac5117be45794e3cf8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkc1uEzEURi0EoqWw4AWQxQKJxRRf_4wn7Ko0KUhFLBrYWs7MncRlYgfbAyoPw7PiaYMiwcrW1fG5n_wR8hLYOahGvGNNxaXg5_CInIKSqgKl2OPpzuuqZrw5Ic9SumWMAwd4Sk6g0Xymajglvz-NQ3ZpcC3S-Ype-I0Lm2j32zvqPM1bpMswDOFnNe5p6OkSPaYcbcaOLnwXftjUjoON9CraPqf3dNH32OYJvbl3rrau_VbeJBo85ZfU-o6KS_rVpdEO7pfNrswLfb_pr3ya3WT0OT0nT3o7JHxxOM_Il-ViNf9QXX---ji_uK5aISFXsq61RYGd6JRksu-ZbAAEMmZV3TRszQGV1Eqptba2VQB6jVLpmUTR9o0VZ-TNg3cfw_expDA7l1ocBusxjMnUM6m1ZrKAr_8Bb8MYfclmyteCUErzAr19gNoYUorYm310OxvvDDAzNWZYY6bGDBT21UE4rnfYHclDRcdoyW7wuO1_0x-iDpv9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211135572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multislice CT Angiography in the Follow-up of Fenestrated Endovascular Grafts: Effect of Slice Thickness on 2D and 3D Visualization of the Fenestration Stents</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sun, Zhonghua ; Allen, Yvonne B. ; Mwipatayi, Bibombe P. ; Hartley, David E. ; Lawrence-Brown, Michael M.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhonghua ; Allen, Yvonne B. ; Mwipatayi, Bibombe P. ; Hartley, David E. ; Lawrence-Brown, Michael M.D.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To investigate the effect of multislice computed tomography (CT) protocols on the visualization of target vessel stents in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with fenestrated endovascular grafts. Methods: Twenty-one patients (19 men; mean age 75 years, range 63–86) undergoing fenestrated endovascular repair of AAA were retrospectively studied. Multislice CT angiography was performed with several protocols, and the section thicknesses used in each were compared to identify any relationship between slice thickness and target vessel stents visualized on 2-dimensional (2D) axial, multiplanar reformatted (MPR), and 3-dimensional (3D) virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) images. Image quality was assessed based on the degree of artifacts and their effect on the ability to visualize the configuration, intra-aortic location, and intraluminal appearance of the target vessel stents and measure their protrusion into the aortic lumen. Results: There were 7 different multislice CT scanning protocols employed in the 21 patients (25 datasets, with 2 sets of follow-up images in 4 patients). The slice thicknesses and numbers (n) of studies included were 0.5 (n=3), 0.625 (n=6), 1.0 (n=1), 1.25 (n=9), 2.5 (n=3), 3.0 (n=1), and 5.0 mm (n=2). Of these CT protocols, images (especially 2D/3D reconstructions) acquired at 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm were significantly compromised by interference from artifacts. Images acquired with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm were scored equal to or lower than those acquired with a submillimeter section thickness (0.5 or 0.625 mm), with minor degrees of artifacts resulting in acceptable image quality. Conclusion: Visualization of the target vessel stents depends on the appropriate selection of multislice CT scanning protocols. Our results showed that studies performed with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm produced similar image quality to those with a thickness of 0.5 or 0.625 mm. Submillimeter slices are not recommended in imaging patients treated with fenestrated stent-grafts, as they did not add additional information to the visualization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-6028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1583/08-2432.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18729561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiography - methods ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - therapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Digital imaging ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Linear Models ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Protocol ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>Journal of endovascular therapy, 2008-08, Vol.15 (4), p.417-426</ispartof><rights>2008 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-4667ae3ed3d5404ff048113e00a56880b21e547555b7aac5117be45794e3cf8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-4667ae3ed3d5404ff048113e00a56880b21e547555b7aac5117be45794e3cf8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1583/08-2432.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1583/08-2432.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18729561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhonghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Yvonne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwipatayi, Bibombe P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence-Brown, Michael M.D.</creatorcontrib><title>Multislice CT Angiography in the Follow-up of Fenestrated Endovascular Grafts: Effect of Slice Thickness on 2D and 3D Visualization of the Fenestration Stents</title><title>Journal of endovascular therapy</title><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><description>Purpose: To investigate the effect of multislice computed tomography (CT) protocols on the visualization of target vessel stents in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with fenestrated endovascular grafts. Methods: Twenty-one patients (19 men; mean age 75 years, range 63–86) undergoing fenestrated endovascular repair of AAA were retrospectively studied. Multislice CT angiography was performed with several protocols, and the section thicknesses used in each were compared to identify any relationship between slice thickness and target vessel stents visualized on 2-dimensional (2D) axial, multiplanar reformatted (MPR), and 3-dimensional (3D) virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) images. Image quality was assessed based on the degree of artifacts and their effect on the ability to visualize the configuration, intra-aortic location, and intraluminal appearance of the target vessel stents and measure their protrusion into the aortic lumen. Results: There were 7 different multislice CT scanning protocols employed in the 21 patients (25 datasets, with 2 sets of follow-up images in 4 patients). The slice thicknesses and numbers (n) of studies included were 0.5 (n=3), 0.625 (n=6), 1.0 (n=1), 1.25 (n=9), 2.5 (n=3), 3.0 (n=1), and 5.0 mm (n=2). Of these CT protocols, images (especially 2D/3D reconstructions) acquired at 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm were significantly compromised by interference from artifacts. Images acquired with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm were scored equal to or lower than those acquired with a submillimeter section thickness (0.5 or 0.625 mm), with minor degrees of artifacts resulting in acceptable image quality. Conclusion: Visualization of the target vessel stents depends on the appropriate selection of multislice CT scanning protocols. Our results showed that studies performed with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm produced similar image quality to those with a thickness of 0.5 or 0.625 mm. Submillimeter slices are not recommended in imaging patients treated with fenestrated stent-grafts, as they did not add additional information to the visualization.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - therapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>1526-6028</issn><issn>1545-1550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNplkc1uEzEURi0EoqWw4AWQxQKJxRRf_4wn7Ko0KUhFLBrYWs7MncRlYgfbAyoPw7PiaYMiwcrW1fG5n_wR8hLYOahGvGNNxaXg5_CInIKSqgKl2OPpzuuqZrw5Ic9SumWMAwd4Sk6g0Xymajglvz-NQ3ZpcC3S-Ype-I0Lm2j32zvqPM1bpMswDOFnNe5p6OkSPaYcbcaOLnwXftjUjoON9CraPqf3dNH32OYJvbl3rrau_VbeJBo85ZfU-o6KS_rVpdEO7pfNrswLfb_pr3ya3WT0OT0nT3o7JHxxOM_Il-ViNf9QXX---ji_uK5aISFXsq61RYGd6JRksu-ZbAAEMmZV3TRszQGV1Eqptba2VQB6jVLpmUTR9o0VZ-TNg3cfw_expDA7l1ocBusxjMnUM6m1ZrKAr_8Bb8MYfclmyteCUErzAr19gNoYUorYm310OxvvDDAzNWZYY6bGDBT21UE4rnfYHclDRcdoyW7wuO1_0x-iDpv9</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Sun, Zhonghua</creator><creator>Allen, Yvonne B.</creator><creator>Mwipatayi, Bibombe P.</creator><creator>Hartley, David E.</creator><creator>Lawrence-Brown, Michael M.D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Allen Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Multislice CT Angiography in the Follow-up of Fenestrated Endovascular Grafts: Effect of Slice Thickness on 2D and 3D Visualization of the Fenestration Stents</title><author>Sun, Zhonghua ; Allen, Yvonne B. ; Mwipatayi, Bibombe P. ; Hartley, David E. ; Lawrence-Brown, Michael M.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-4667ae3ed3d5404ff048113e00a56880b21e547555b7aac5117be45794e3cf8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - therapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhonghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Yvonne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mwipatayi, Bibombe P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence-Brown, Michael M.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Zhonghua</au><au>Allen, Yvonne B.</au><au>Mwipatayi, Bibombe P.</au><au>Hartley, David E.</au><au>Lawrence-Brown, Michael M.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multislice CT Angiography in the Follow-up of Fenestrated Endovascular Grafts: Effect of Slice Thickness on 2D and 3D Visualization of the Fenestration Stents</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endovascular therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Endovasc Ther</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>417-426</pages><issn>1526-6028</issn><eissn>1545-1550</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To investigate the effect of multislice computed tomography (CT) protocols on the visualization of target vessel stents in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with fenestrated endovascular grafts. Methods: Twenty-one patients (19 men; mean age 75 years, range 63–86) undergoing fenestrated endovascular repair of AAA were retrospectively studied. Multislice CT angiography was performed with several protocols, and the section thicknesses used in each were compared to identify any relationship between slice thickness and target vessel stents visualized on 2-dimensional (2D) axial, multiplanar reformatted (MPR), and 3-dimensional (3D) virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) images. Image quality was assessed based on the degree of artifacts and their effect on the ability to visualize the configuration, intra-aortic location, and intraluminal appearance of the target vessel stents and measure their protrusion into the aortic lumen. Results: There were 7 different multislice CT scanning protocols employed in the 21 patients (25 datasets, with 2 sets of follow-up images in 4 patients). The slice thicknesses and numbers (n) of studies included were 0.5 (n=3), 0.625 (n=6), 1.0 (n=1), 1.25 (n=9), 2.5 (n=3), 3.0 (n=1), and 5.0 mm (n=2). Of these CT protocols, images (especially 2D/3D reconstructions) acquired at 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm were significantly compromised by interference from artifacts. Images acquired with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm were scored equal to or lower than those acquired with a submillimeter section thickness (0.5 or 0.625 mm), with minor degrees of artifacts resulting in acceptable image quality. Conclusion: Visualization of the target vessel stents depends on the appropriate selection of multislice CT scanning protocols. Our results showed that studies performed with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm produced similar image quality to those with a thickness of 0.5 or 0.625 mm. Submillimeter slices are not recommended in imaging patients treated with fenestrated stent-grafts, as they did not add additional information to the visualization.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18729561</pmid><doi>10.1583/08-2432.1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-6028
ispartof Journal of endovascular therapy, 2008-08, Vol.15 (4), p.417-426
issn 1526-6028
1545-1550
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69477704
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiography - methods
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - therapy
Clinical outcomes
Digital imaging
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Linear Models
Male
Medical imaging
Middle Aged
Patients
Protocol
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Retrospective Studies
Stents
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Veins & arteries
title Multislice CT Angiography in the Follow-up of Fenestrated Endovascular Grafts: Effect of Slice Thickness on 2D and 3D Visualization of the Fenestration Stents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A14%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multislice%20CT%20Angiography%20in%20the%20Follow-up%20of%20Fenestrated%20Endovascular%20Grafts:%20Effect%20of%20Slice%20Thickness%20on%202D%20and%203D%20Visualization%20of%20the%20Fenestration%20Stents&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endovascular%20therapy&rft.au=Sun,%20Zhonghua&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=417-426&rft.issn=1526-6028&rft.eissn=1545-1550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1583/08-2432.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69477704%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211135572&rft_id=info:pmid/18729561&rft_sage_id=10.1583_08-2432.1&rfr_iscdi=true