Facilitation between the luminance and red–green detection mechanisms: enhancing contrast differences across edges

Previous studies have shown that detection of a red–green test pattern, such as a spot or grating, may be facilitated two to three times by a suprathreshold luminance pedestal of the same shape. We measured facilitation between the red–green (RG) and luminance (LUM) detection mechanisms using sine a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vision research (Oxford) 1999-12, Vol.39 (24), p.4098-4112
Hauptverfasser: Gowdy, P.D., Stromeyer, C.F., Kronauer, R.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4112
container_issue 24
container_start_page 4098
container_title Vision research (Oxford)
container_volume 39
creator Gowdy, P.D.
Stromeyer, C.F.
Kronauer, R.E.
description Previous studies have shown that detection of a red–green test pattern, such as a spot or grating, may be facilitated two to three times by a suprathreshold luminance pedestal of the same shape. We measured facilitation between the red–green (RG) and luminance (LUM) detection mechanisms using sine and square-wave gratings. Facilitation of RG by luminance pedestals was 3-fold for in phase sine-wave gratings of 0.8 cpd and a remarkable 7-fold for square-wave gratings. The latter facilitation was greatly reduced at intermediate relative phases and was generally reduced at higher spatial frequencies. We show that on a uniform field, the red or green regions of low spatial frequency test patterns are detected approximately independently, but in the presence of the LUM pedestal RG becomes sensitive to the red–green difference across the luminance edges. Under optimal conditions (with the low-frequency, square-wave luminance pedestal) this increased red–green sensitivity corresponds to a wavelength discrimination threshold as small as ∼0.04 nm. This conversion of RG into an ‘edge detector’ may explain why facilitation is twice as large for square-wave gratings (bipolar patterns) than spots (unipolar patterns). The reverse facilitation, that of LUM by the red–green pedestal, is weaker and the results suggest that this is because LUM is initially sensitive to the light–dark difference across luminance edges even in the absence of the red–green pedestal.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00115-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69463344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0042698999001157</els_id><sourcerecordid>69463344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-885ab293f58e73dac9fff9272c7609f599bd558d2f30f64385e3492d15f7650e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9u1DAQhy0EotvCI4B8QKgcAk7if9MLqqoWkCpxAM6W1x5vjRKn2N4ibrxD35AnIdldATdOM9J8M_PTR8izlr1uWSvffGKMd40EDacArxhrW9GoB2TVaqUbIbl8SFZ_kCNyXMpXxpgSHTwmRy1TXAPvVqReWReHWG2NU6JrrN8RE603SIftGJNNDqlNnmb0v37eb_Iy9VjR7fgR3Y1NsYzljGKaWxfThrop1WxLpT6GgBnnG4Val6dSKPoNlifkUbBDwaeHekK-XF1-vnjfXH989-Hi_LpxPbDaaC3suoM-CI2q99ZBCAE61TklGQQBsPZCaN-FngXJey2w59D5VgQlBcP-hLzc373N07ctlmrGWBwOg004bYuRwGXfcz6DYg_uQmYM5jbH0eYfpmVm0W12us3i0gCYnW6j5r3nhwfb9Yj-n6293xl4cQBscXYIeVFU_nLAQcKCvd1jONu4i5hNcXHx5mOeVRs_xf8k-Q1yOZ78</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69463344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facilitation between the luminance and red–green detection mechanisms: enhancing contrast differences across edges</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Gowdy, P.D. ; Stromeyer, C.F. ; Kronauer, R.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gowdy, P.D. ; Stromeyer, C.F. ; Kronauer, R.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have shown that detection of a red–green test pattern, such as a spot or grating, may be facilitated two to three times by a suprathreshold luminance pedestal of the same shape. We measured facilitation between the red–green (RG) and luminance (LUM) detection mechanisms using sine and square-wave gratings. Facilitation of RG by luminance pedestals was 3-fold for in phase sine-wave gratings of 0.8 cpd and a remarkable 7-fold for square-wave gratings. The latter facilitation was greatly reduced at intermediate relative phases and was generally reduced at higher spatial frequencies. We show that on a uniform field, the red or green regions of low spatial frequency test patterns are detected approximately independently, but in the presence of the LUM pedestal RG becomes sensitive to the red–green difference across the luminance edges. Under optimal conditions (with the low-frequency, square-wave luminance pedestal) this increased red–green sensitivity corresponds to a wavelength discrimination threshold as small as ∼0.04 nm. This conversion of RG into an ‘edge detector’ may explain why facilitation is twice as large for square-wave gratings (bipolar patterns) than spots (unipolar patterns). The reverse facilitation, that of LUM by the red–green pedestal, is weaker and the results suggest that this is because LUM is initially sensitive to the light–dark difference across luminance edges even in the absence of the red–green pedestal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00115-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10748942</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VISRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Color Perception - physiology ; Contrast Sensitivity - physiology ; Facilitation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Lighting ; Luminance mechanism ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Red–green mechanism ; Sensory Thresholds ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 1999-12, Vol.39 (24), p.4098-4112</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-885ab293f58e73dac9fff9272c7609f599bd558d2f30f64385e3492d15f7650e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-885ab293f58e73dac9fff9272c7609f599bd558d2f30f64385e3492d15f7650e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698999001157$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1949692$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10748942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gowdy, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stromeyer, C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronauer, R.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Facilitation between the luminance and red–green detection mechanisms: enhancing contrast differences across edges</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>Previous studies have shown that detection of a red–green test pattern, such as a spot or grating, may be facilitated two to three times by a suprathreshold luminance pedestal of the same shape. We measured facilitation between the red–green (RG) and luminance (LUM) detection mechanisms using sine and square-wave gratings. Facilitation of RG by luminance pedestals was 3-fold for in phase sine-wave gratings of 0.8 cpd and a remarkable 7-fold for square-wave gratings. The latter facilitation was greatly reduced at intermediate relative phases and was generally reduced at higher spatial frequencies. We show that on a uniform field, the red or green regions of low spatial frequency test patterns are detected approximately independently, but in the presence of the LUM pedestal RG becomes sensitive to the red–green difference across the luminance edges. Under optimal conditions (with the low-frequency, square-wave luminance pedestal) this increased red–green sensitivity corresponds to a wavelength discrimination threshold as small as ∼0.04 nm. This conversion of RG into an ‘edge detector’ may explain why facilitation is twice as large for square-wave gratings (bipolar patterns) than spots (unipolar patterns). The reverse facilitation, that of LUM by the red–green pedestal, is weaker and the results suggest that this is because LUM is initially sensitive to the light–dark difference across luminance edges even in the absence of the red–green pedestal.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Color Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</subject><subject>Facilitation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>Luminance mechanism</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Red–green mechanism</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9u1DAQhy0EotvCI4B8QKgcAk7if9MLqqoWkCpxAM6W1x5vjRKn2N4ibrxD35AnIdldATdOM9J8M_PTR8izlr1uWSvffGKMd40EDacArxhrW9GoB2TVaqUbIbl8SFZ_kCNyXMpXxpgSHTwmRy1TXAPvVqReWReHWG2NU6JrrN8RE603SIftGJNNDqlNnmb0v37eb_Iy9VjR7fgR3Y1NsYzljGKaWxfThrop1WxLpT6GgBnnG4Val6dSKPoNlifkUbBDwaeHekK-XF1-vnjfXH989-Hi_LpxPbDaaC3suoM-CI2q99ZBCAE61TklGQQBsPZCaN-FngXJey2w59D5VgQlBcP-hLzc373N07ctlmrGWBwOg004bYuRwGXfcz6DYg_uQmYM5jbH0eYfpmVm0W12us3i0gCYnW6j5r3nhwfb9Yj-n6293xl4cQBscXYIeVFU_nLAQcKCvd1jONu4i5hNcXHx5mOeVRs_xf8k-Q1yOZ78</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>Gowdy, P.D.</creator><creator>Stromeyer, C.F.</creator><creator>Kronauer, R.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>Facilitation between the luminance and red–green detection mechanisms: enhancing contrast differences across edges</title><author>Gowdy, P.D. ; Stromeyer, C.F. ; Kronauer, R.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-885ab293f58e73dac9fff9272c7609f599bd558d2f30f64385e3492d15f7650e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Color Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Contrast Sensitivity - physiology</topic><topic>Facilitation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>Luminance mechanism</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Red–green mechanism</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gowdy, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stromeyer, C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronauer, R.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gowdy, P.D.</au><au>Stromeyer, C.F.</au><au>Kronauer, R.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Facilitation between the luminance and red–green detection mechanisms: enhancing contrast differences across edges</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>4098</spage><epage>4112</epage><pages>4098-4112</pages><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><coden>VISRAM</coden><abstract>Previous studies have shown that detection of a red–green test pattern, such as a spot or grating, may be facilitated two to three times by a suprathreshold luminance pedestal of the same shape. We measured facilitation between the red–green (RG) and luminance (LUM) detection mechanisms using sine and square-wave gratings. Facilitation of RG by luminance pedestals was 3-fold for in phase sine-wave gratings of 0.8 cpd and a remarkable 7-fold for square-wave gratings. The latter facilitation was greatly reduced at intermediate relative phases and was generally reduced at higher spatial frequencies. We show that on a uniform field, the red or green regions of low spatial frequency test patterns are detected approximately independently, but in the presence of the LUM pedestal RG becomes sensitive to the red–green difference across the luminance edges. Under optimal conditions (with the low-frequency, square-wave luminance pedestal) this increased red–green sensitivity corresponds to a wavelength discrimination threshold as small as ∼0.04 nm. This conversion of RG into an ‘edge detector’ may explain why facilitation is twice as large for square-wave gratings (bipolar patterns) than spots (unipolar patterns). The reverse facilitation, that of LUM by the red–green pedestal, is weaker and the results suggest that this is because LUM is initially sensitive to the light–dark difference across luminance edges even in the absence of the red–green pedestal.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10748942</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00115-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-6989
ispartof Vision research (Oxford), 1999-12, Vol.39 (24), p.4098-4112
issn 0042-6989
1878-5646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69463344
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Color Perception - physiology
Contrast Sensitivity - physiology
Facilitation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Lighting
Luminance mechanism
Perception
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Red–green mechanism
Sensory Thresholds
Vision
title Facilitation between the luminance and red–green detection mechanisms: enhancing contrast differences across edges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A40%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facilitation%20between%20the%20luminance%20and%20red%E2%80%93green%20detection%20mechanisms:%20enhancing%20contrast%20differences%20across%20edges&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Gowdy,%20P.D.&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=4098&rft.epage=4112&rft.pages=4098-4112&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft.coden=VISRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00115-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69463344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69463344&rft_id=info:pmid/10748942&rft_els_id=S0042698999001157&rfr_iscdi=true