The COA360: a tool for assessing the cultural competency of healthcare organizations

The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by 2050, non-Hispanic whites will be in the numerical minority. This rapid diversification requires healthcare organizations to pay closer attention to cross-cultural issues if they are to meet the healthcare needs of the nation and continue to maintain a high st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of healthcare management 2008-07, Vol.53 (4), p.257-266
Hauptverfasser: LaVeist, Thomas A, Relosa, Rachel, Sawaya, Nadia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 266
container_issue 4
container_start_page 257
container_title Journal of healthcare management
container_volume 53
creator LaVeist, Thomas A
Relosa, Rachel
Sawaya, Nadia
description The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by 2050, non-Hispanic whites will be in the numerical minority. This rapid diversification requires healthcare organizations to pay closer attention to cross-cultural issues if they are to meet the healthcare needs of the nation and continue to maintain a high standard of care. Although scorecards and benchmarking are widely used to gauge healthcare organizations' performance in various areas, these tools have been underused in relation to cultural preparedness or initiatives. The likely reason for this is the lack of a validated tool specifically designed to examine cultural competency. Existing validated cultural competency instruments evaluate individuals, not organizations. In this article, we discuss a study to validate the Cultural Competency Organizational Assessment--360 or the COA360, an instrument designed to appraise a healthcare organization's cultural competence. The Office of Minority Health and the Joint Commission have each developed standards for measuring the cultural competency of organizations. The COA360 is designed to assess adherence to both of these sets of standards. For this validation study, we enlisted a panel of national experts. The panel rated each dimension of the COA360, and the combination of items for each of the scale's 14 dimensions was rated above 4.13 (on 5-point scale). Our conclusion points to the validity of the COA360. As such, it is a valuable tool not only for assessing a healthcare organization's cultural readiness but also for benchmarking its progress in addressing cultural and diversity issues.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00115514-200807000-00008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69460531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A182976470</galeid><sourcerecordid>A182976470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-2e79965fa8c3d5f32b4232b9e185c1c10a9b282bd19421b8857f0a1f9ea25acd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl-LEzEUxQdR3HX1K0jwQfBh1pvMnyS-laKrUOhLfQ6ZzM10lsykJhlw99ObtVWplHCTEH7nkns4RUEo3FKQ_CMApU1D65IBCOAAUOYC8ay4prKuS17J9nm-g2xLCZRdFa9ivM9EI0T7sriigjNoBb8udrs9kvV2VbXwiWiSvHfE-kB0jBjjOA8kZcAsLi1BO2L8dMCEs3kg3pI9apf2RgckPgx6Hh91Gv0cXxcvrHYR35zOm-L7l8-79ddys737tl5tSlMLmUqGXMq2sVqYqm9sxbqa5U0iFY2hhoKWHROs6_NMjHZCNNyCplaiZo02fXVTvD_2PQT_Y8GY1DRGg87pGf0SVSvrFpqKZvDdf-C9X8Kc_6ayD7x6qgyVR2jQDtU4W5-CNgPOmCf3M9oxP6-oYJK3NYfM317g8-pxGs1FwYczQWYS_kyDXmJU4m5zzpaXWOOdwwFVtnG9PefFkTfBxxjQqkMYJx0eFAX1lBn1JzPqb2bU78xk6duTOUs3Yf9PeApJ9QsSTbgP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206730673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The COA360: a tool for assessing the cultural competency of healthcare organizations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCO Business Source Complete</source><creator>LaVeist, Thomas A ; Relosa, Rachel ; Sawaya, Nadia</creator><creatorcontrib>LaVeist, Thomas A ; Relosa, Rachel ; Sawaya, Nadia</creatorcontrib><description>The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by 2050, non-Hispanic whites will be in the numerical minority. This rapid diversification requires healthcare organizations to pay closer attention to cross-cultural issues if they are to meet the healthcare needs of the nation and continue to maintain a high standard of care. Although scorecards and benchmarking are widely used to gauge healthcare organizations' performance in various areas, these tools have been underused in relation to cultural preparedness or initiatives. The likely reason for this is the lack of a validated tool specifically designed to examine cultural competency. Existing validated cultural competency instruments evaluate individuals, not organizations. In this article, we discuss a study to validate the Cultural Competency Organizational Assessment--360 or the COA360, an instrument designed to appraise a healthcare organization's cultural competence. The Office of Minority Health and the Joint Commission have each developed standards for measuring the cultural competency of organizations. The COA360 is designed to assess adherence to both of these sets of standards. For this validation study, we enlisted a panel of national experts. The panel rated each dimension of the COA360, and the combination of items for each of the scale's 14 dimensions was rated above 4.13 (on 5-point scale). Our conclusion points to the validity of the COA360. As such, it is a valuable tool not only for assessing a healthcare organization's cultural readiness but also for benchmarking its progress in addressing cultural and diversity issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-9012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7396</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00115514-200807000-00008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18720687</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHMAFB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, WK Health</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Corporate culture ; Cultural competence ; Cultural Competency ; Cultural Diversity ; Evaluation ; Executives ; Health administration ; Health care industry ; Health care policy ; Health disparities ; Health Facility Administration ; Health maintenance organizations ; Hispanic Americans ; Humans ; Medical care ; Medical care (Private) ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Patient satisfaction ; Professionals ; Public health ; Quality standards ; Questionnaires ; Statistics ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; Validation studies ; Workplace diversity</subject><ispartof>Journal of healthcare management, 2008-07, Vol.53 (4), p.257-266</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, WK Health</rights><rights>Copyright Health Administration Press Jul/Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-2e79965fa8c3d5f32b4232b9e185c1c10a9b282bd19421b8857f0a1f9ea25acd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18720687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LaVeist, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Relosa, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawaya, Nadia</creatorcontrib><title>The COA360: a tool for assessing the cultural competency of healthcare organizations</title><title>Journal of healthcare management</title><addtitle>J Healthc Manag</addtitle><description>The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by 2050, non-Hispanic whites will be in the numerical minority. This rapid diversification requires healthcare organizations to pay closer attention to cross-cultural issues if they are to meet the healthcare needs of the nation and continue to maintain a high standard of care. Although scorecards and benchmarking are widely used to gauge healthcare organizations' performance in various areas, these tools have been underused in relation to cultural preparedness or initiatives. The likely reason for this is the lack of a validated tool specifically designed to examine cultural competency. Existing validated cultural competency instruments evaluate individuals, not organizations. In this article, we discuss a study to validate the Cultural Competency Organizational Assessment--360 or the COA360, an instrument designed to appraise a healthcare organization's cultural competence. The Office of Minority Health and the Joint Commission have each developed standards for measuring the cultural competency of organizations. The COA360 is designed to assess adherence to both of these sets of standards. For this validation study, we enlisted a panel of national experts. The panel rated each dimension of the COA360, and the combination of items for each of the scale's 14 dimensions was rated above 4.13 (on 5-point scale). Our conclusion points to the validity of the COA360. As such, it is a valuable tool not only for assessing a healthcare organization's cultural readiness but also for benchmarking its progress in addressing cultural and diversity issues.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Cultural competence</subject><subject>Cultural Competency</subject><subject>Cultural Diversity</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health Facility Administration</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical care (Private)</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Workplace diversity</subject><issn>1096-9012</issn><issn>1944-7396</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl-LEzEUxQdR3HX1K0jwQfBh1pvMnyS-laKrUOhLfQ6ZzM10lsykJhlw99ObtVWplHCTEH7nkns4RUEo3FKQ_CMApU1D65IBCOAAUOYC8ay4prKuS17J9nm-g2xLCZRdFa9ivM9EI0T7sriigjNoBb8udrs9kvV2VbXwiWiSvHfE-kB0jBjjOA8kZcAsLi1BO2L8dMCEs3kg3pI9apf2RgckPgx6Hh91Gv0cXxcvrHYR35zOm-L7l8-79ddys737tl5tSlMLmUqGXMq2sVqYqm9sxbqa5U0iFY2hhoKWHROs6_NMjHZCNNyCplaiZo02fXVTvD_2PQT_Y8GY1DRGg87pGf0SVSvrFpqKZvDdf-C9X8Kc_6ayD7x6qgyVR2jQDtU4W5-CNgPOmCf3M9oxP6-oYJK3NYfM317g8-pxGs1FwYczQWYS_kyDXmJU4m5zzpaXWOOdwwFVtnG9PefFkTfBxxjQqkMYJx0eFAX1lBn1JzPqb2bU78xk6duTOUs3Yf9PeApJ9QsSTbgP</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>LaVeist, Thomas A</creator><creator>Relosa, Rachel</creator><creator>Sawaya, Nadia</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, WK Health</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>The COA360: a tool for assessing the cultural competency of healthcare organizations</title><author>LaVeist, Thomas A ; Relosa, Rachel ; Sawaya, Nadia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-2e79965fa8c3d5f32b4232b9e185c1c10a9b282bd19421b8857f0a1f9ea25acd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Cultural competence</topic><topic>Cultural Competency</topic><topic>Cultural Diversity</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health Facility Administration</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical care (Private)</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Workplace diversity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LaVeist, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Relosa, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawaya, Nadia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of healthcare management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LaVeist, Thomas A</au><au>Relosa, Rachel</au><au>Sawaya, Nadia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The COA360: a tool for assessing the cultural competency of healthcare organizations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of healthcare management</jtitle><addtitle>J Healthc Manag</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>257-266</pages><issn>1096-9012</issn><eissn>1944-7396</eissn><coden>JHMAFB</coden><abstract>The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by 2050, non-Hispanic whites will be in the numerical minority. This rapid diversification requires healthcare organizations to pay closer attention to cross-cultural issues if they are to meet the healthcare needs of the nation and continue to maintain a high standard of care. Although scorecards and benchmarking are widely used to gauge healthcare organizations' performance in various areas, these tools have been underused in relation to cultural preparedness or initiatives. The likely reason for this is the lack of a validated tool specifically designed to examine cultural competency. Existing validated cultural competency instruments evaluate individuals, not organizations. In this article, we discuss a study to validate the Cultural Competency Organizational Assessment--360 or the COA360, an instrument designed to appraise a healthcare organization's cultural competence. The Office of Minority Health and the Joint Commission have each developed standards for measuring the cultural competency of organizations. The COA360 is designed to assess adherence to both of these sets of standards. For this validation study, we enlisted a panel of national experts. The panel rated each dimension of the COA360, and the combination of items for each of the scale's 14 dimensions was rated above 4.13 (on 5-point scale). Our conclusion points to the validity of the COA360. As such, it is a valuable tool not only for assessing a healthcare organization's cultural readiness but also for benchmarking its progress in addressing cultural and diversity issues.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, WK Health</pub><pmid>18720687</pmid><doi>10.1097/00115514-200807000-00008</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1096-9012
ispartof Journal of healthcare management, 2008-07, Vol.53 (4), p.257-266
issn 1096-9012
1944-7396
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69460531
source MEDLINE; EBSCO Business Source Complete
subjects Clinical outcomes
Corporate culture
Cultural competence
Cultural Competency
Cultural Diversity
Evaluation
Executives
Health administration
Health care industry
Health care policy
Health disparities
Health Facility Administration
Health maintenance organizations
Hispanic Americans
Humans
Medical care
Medical care (Private)
Minority & ethnic groups
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Patient satisfaction
Professionals
Public health
Quality standards
Questionnaires
Statistics
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Validation studies
Workplace diversity
title The COA360: a tool for assessing the cultural competency of healthcare organizations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T00%3A48%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20COA360:%20a%20tool%20for%20assessing%20the%20cultural%20competency%20of%20healthcare%20organizations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20healthcare%20management&rft.au=LaVeist,%20Thomas%20A&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=257-266&rft.issn=1096-9012&rft.eissn=1944-7396&rft.coden=JHMAFB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00115514-200807000-00008&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA182976470%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206730673&rft_id=info:pmid/18720687&rft_galeid=A182976470&rfr_iscdi=true