USE OF SURGICAL HEMOCLIPS IN RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING

The goal of this prospective study was to determine the effect of hemoclip use on the size of radiation treatment fields based on a 3-cm margin around a surgical incision alone (field setup 1) vs. a 3-cm margin around the surgical incision plus hemoclips (field setup 2). Forty-seven dogs that underw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary radiology & ultrasound 2008-07, Vol.49 (4), p.395-399
Hauptverfasser: McENTEE, MARGARET C, STEFFEY, MICHELE, DYKES, NATHAN L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 399
container_issue 4
container_start_page 395
container_title Veterinary radiology & ultrasound
container_volume 49
creator McENTEE, MARGARET C
STEFFEY, MICHELE
DYKES, NATHAN L
description The goal of this prospective study was to determine the effect of hemoclip use on the size of radiation treatment fields based on a 3-cm margin around a surgical incision alone (field setup 1) vs. a 3-cm margin around the surgical incision plus hemoclips (field setup 2). Forty-seven dogs that underwent surgical resection of a total of 55 soft tissue masses had surgical hemoclips placed at the time of surgery and orthogonal radiographs made immediately postoperatively. Radiation treatment field simulation was done and field areas measured. Additional determinations included number of hemoclips outside of the radiation treatment field based on a margin around the incision alone, hemoclip distance from the incision, and association between incision length and greatest distance of hemoclips from the incision. There was a significant difference in radiation treatment field size using information regarding the location of hemoclips in conjunction with the surgical scar compared with the surgical scar alone for truncal (P=0.0003) vs. extremity tumors (P=0.087). In simulating radiation treatment fields hemoclips were located outside of field setup 1 for the majority of tumors (79%) resected from the trunk but only in a minority of tumors (10.7%) resected from extremity sites. The findings from this study suggest that surgical hemoclips have potential utility in simulation of radiation treatment fields in the postoperative setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00388.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69459799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69459799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4308-fc484bd1d9af5ecc2f0958de881e3024b22c8e39bb548da0753abaf5018e22d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1r2zAUQEXZ6Nf2FzY_7c3ulWRF0kvBpG5iSJyS2Bvs5SLbcnGaNKnV0PTf14lD9zq96ILOPYJDiEchoN25WQZUhuArNqABA1ABAFcq2J-Ry8-HL90MQvmKKn5BrpxbAjAhmTwnF1RJBlKKS6LzRezN7r1FPh8lw2jijePpbDhJHhZeknrz6C6JsmSWetk8jrJpnGbewyRK0yQdfSNfa7Ny9vvpvib5fZwNx_5kdjT5ZchB-XUZqrCoaKVNLWxZshq0UJVViloOLCwYK5XluihEqCoDUnBTdChQZRmrQn5NfvXebbt52Vn3iuvGlXa1Ms92s3M40KHQUusOVD1YthvnWlvjtm3Wpn1HCnjIhks81MFDHTxkw2M23HerP05_7Iq1rf4tnjp1wG0PvDUr-_7fYvw9z49jJ_B7QeNe7f5TYNonHEguBf5JR_hXD_lIjjOcdvzPnq_NBs1j2zjMFwwoB9B0AILzD-39jdk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69459799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>USE OF SURGICAL HEMOCLIPS IN RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>McENTEE, MARGARET C ; STEFFEY, MICHELE ; DYKES, NATHAN L</creator><creatorcontrib>McENTEE, MARGARET C ; STEFFEY, MICHELE ; DYKES, NATHAN L</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this prospective study was to determine the effect of hemoclip use on the size of radiation treatment fields based on a 3-cm margin around a surgical incision alone (field setup 1) vs. a 3-cm margin around the surgical incision plus hemoclips (field setup 2). Forty-seven dogs that underwent surgical resection of a total of 55 soft tissue masses had surgical hemoclips placed at the time of surgery and orthogonal radiographs made immediately postoperatively. Radiation treatment field simulation was done and field areas measured. Additional determinations included number of hemoclips outside of the radiation treatment field based on a margin around the incision alone, hemoclip distance from the incision, and association between incision length and greatest distance of hemoclips from the incision. There was a significant difference in radiation treatment field size using information regarding the location of hemoclips in conjunction with the surgical scar compared with the surgical scar alone for truncal (P=0.0003) vs. extremity tumors (P=0.087). In simulating radiation treatment fields hemoclips were located outside of field setup 1 for the majority of tumors (79%) resected from the trunk but only in a minority of tumors (10.7%) resected from extremity sites. The findings from this study suggest that surgical hemoclips have potential utility in simulation of radiation treatment fields in the postoperative setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-8183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-8261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00388.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18720775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; dog diseases ; Dog Diseases - radiotherapy ; Dog Diseases - surgery ; Dogs ; hemoclip ; neoplasms ; Planning Techniques ; radiation treatment planning ; radiotherapy ; simulation ; Soft Tissue Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Soft Tissue Neoplasms - surgery ; Soft Tissue Neoplasms - veterinary ; surgery ; surgical equipment ; Surgical Instruments - utilization ; Surgical Instruments - veterinary ; veterinary equipment</subject><ispartof>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound, 2008-07, Vol.49 (4), p.395-399</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 by the American College of Veterinary Radiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4308-fc484bd1d9af5ecc2f0958de881e3024b22c8e39bb548da0753abaf5018e22d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4308-fc484bd1d9af5ecc2f0958de881e3024b22c8e39bb548da0753abaf5018e22d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1740-8261.2008.00388.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1740-8261.2008.00388.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18720775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McENTEE, MARGARET C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEFFEY, MICHELE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DYKES, NATHAN L</creatorcontrib><title>USE OF SURGICAL HEMOCLIPS IN RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING</title><title>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound</title><addtitle>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</addtitle><description>The goal of this prospective study was to determine the effect of hemoclip use on the size of radiation treatment fields based on a 3-cm margin around a surgical incision alone (field setup 1) vs. a 3-cm margin around the surgical incision plus hemoclips (field setup 2). Forty-seven dogs that underwent surgical resection of a total of 55 soft tissue masses had surgical hemoclips placed at the time of surgery and orthogonal radiographs made immediately postoperatively. Radiation treatment field simulation was done and field areas measured. Additional determinations included number of hemoclips outside of the radiation treatment field based on a margin around the incision alone, hemoclip distance from the incision, and association between incision length and greatest distance of hemoclips from the incision. There was a significant difference in radiation treatment field size using information regarding the location of hemoclips in conjunction with the surgical scar compared with the surgical scar alone for truncal (P=0.0003) vs. extremity tumors (P=0.087). In simulating radiation treatment fields hemoclips were located outside of field setup 1 for the majority of tumors (79%) resected from the trunk but only in a minority of tumors (10.7%) resected from extremity sites. The findings from this study suggest that surgical hemoclips have potential utility in simulation of radiation treatment fields in the postoperative setting.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>dog diseases</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>hemoclip</subject><subject>neoplasms</subject><subject>Planning Techniques</subject><subject>radiation treatment planning</subject><subject>radiotherapy</subject><subject>simulation</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - veterinary</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>surgical equipment</subject><subject>Surgical Instruments - utilization</subject><subject>Surgical Instruments - veterinary</subject><subject>veterinary equipment</subject><issn>1058-8183</issn><issn>1740-8261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1r2zAUQEXZ6Nf2FzY_7c3ulWRF0kvBpG5iSJyS2Bvs5SLbcnGaNKnV0PTf14lD9zq96ILOPYJDiEchoN25WQZUhuArNqABA1ABAFcq2J-Ry8-HL90MQvmKKn5BrpxbAjAhmTwnF1RJBlKKS6LzRezN7r1FPh8lw2jijePpbDhJHhZeknrz6C6JsmSWetk8jrJpnGbewyRK0yQdfSNfa7Ny9vvpvib5fZwNx_5kdjT5ZchB-XUZqrCoaKVNLWxZshq0UJVViloOLCwYK5XluihEqCoDUnBTdChQZRmrQn5NfvXebbt52Vn3iuvGlXa1Ms92s3M40KHQUusOVD1YthvnWlvjtm3Wpn1HCnjIhks81MFDHTxkw2M23HerP05_7Iq1rf4tnjp1wG0PvDUr-_7fYvw9z49jJ_B7QeNe7f5TYNonHEguBf5JR_hXD_lIjjOcdvzPnq_NBs1j2zjMFwwoB9B0AILzD-39jdk</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>McENTEE, MARGARET C</creator><creator>STEFFEY, MICHELE</creator><creator>DYKES, NATHAN L</creator><general>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>USE OF SURGICAL HEMOCLIPS IN RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING</title><author>McENTEE, MARGARET C ; STEFFEY, MICHELE ; DYKES, NATHAN L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4308-fc484bd1d9af5ecc2f0958de881e3024b22c8e39bb548da0753abaf5018e22d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>dog diseases</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>hemoclip</topic><topic>neoplasms</topic><topic>Planning Techniques</topic><topic>radiation treatment planning</topic><topic>radiotherapy</topic><topic>simulation</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Neoplasms - veterinary</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>surgical equipment</topic><topic>Surgical Instruments - utilization</topic><topic>Surgical Instruments - veterinary</topic><topic>veterinary equipment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McENTEE, MARGARET C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEFFEY, MICHELE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DYKES, NATHAN L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McENTEE, MARGARET C</au><au>STEFFEY, MICHELE</au><au>DYKES, NATHAN L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>USE OF SURGICAL HEMOCLIPS IN RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</addtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>395-399</pages><issn>1058-8183</issn><eissn>1740-8261</eissn><abstract>The goal of this prospective study was to determine the effect of hemoclip use on the size of radiation treatment fields based on a 3-cm margin around a surgical incision alone (field setup 1) vs. a 3-cm margin around the surgical incision plus hemoclips (field setup 2). Forty-seven dogs that underwent surgical resection of a total of 55 soft tissue masses had surgical hemoclips placed at the time of surgery and orthogonal radiographs made immediately postoperatively. Radiation treatment field simulation was done and field areas measured. Additional determinations included number of hemoclips outside of the radiation treatment field based on a margin around the incision alone, hemoclip distance from the incision, and association between incision length and greatest distance of hemoclips from the incision. There was a significant difference in radiation treatment field size using information regarding the location of hemoclips in conjunction with the surgical scar compared with the surgical scar alone for truncal (P=0.0003) vs. extremity tumors (P=0.087). In simulating radiation treatment fields hemoclips were located outside of field setup 1 for the majority of tumors (79%) resected from the trunk but only in a minority of tumors (10.7%) resected from extremity sites. The findings from this study suggest that surgical hemoclips have potential utility in simulation of radiation treatment fields in the postoperative setting.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>18720775</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00388.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-8183
ispartof Veterinary radiology & ultrasound, 2008-07, Vol.49 (4), p.395-399
issn 1058-8183
1740-8261
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69459799
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Animals
dog diseases
Dog Diseases - radiotherapy
Dog Diseases - surgery
Dogs
hemoclip
neoplasms
Planning Techniques
radiation treatment planning
radiotherapy
simulation
Soft Tissue Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Soft Tissue Neoplasms - surgery
Soft Tissue Neoplasms - veterinary
surgery
surgical equipment
Surgical Instruments - utilization
Surgical Instruments - veterinary
veterinary equipment
title USE OF SURGICAL HEMOCLIPS IN RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T19%3A36%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=USE%20OF%20SURGICAL%20HEMOCLIPS%20IN%20RADIATION%20TREATMENT%20PLANNING&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20radiology%20&%20ultrasound&rft.au=McENTEE,%20MARGARET%20C&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=395-399&rft.issn=1058-8183&rft.eissn=1740-8261&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00388.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69459799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69459799&rft_id=info:pmid/18720775&rfr_iscdi=true