Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain
Background:Detection and treatment of undiagnosed refractive error (RE), with its attendant functional consequences, is a priority of VISION 2020, the global initiative against avoidable visual disability. The authors investigated the frequency of visual impairment due to undiagnosed RE and its asso...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2008-09, Vol.92 (9), p.1190-1194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1190 |
container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Rahi, J S Peckham, C S Cumberland, P M |
description | Background:Detection and treatment of undiagnosed refractive error (RE), with its attendant functional consequences, is a priority of VISION 2020, the global initiative against avoidable visual disability. The authors investigated the frequency of visual impairment due to undiagnosed RE and its associations with vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), general health and social circumstances in a contemporary and nationally representative population of British working-age adults.Methods:9271 members of the 1958 British birth cohort had visual acuity and VRQOL assessed at 44/45 years. The authors compared those with undiagnosed RE with those with diagnosed RE, defining undiagnosed RE as ⩾0.2 logMAR units/2 lines acuity improvement in both eyes with pinhole in individuals without current or prior optical treatment or ophthalmic history.Results:144/9271 (1.6%) individuals had undiagnosed and 3513/9271 (37.9%) diagnosed RE. 18% (24/144) of those with undiagnosed RE were classifiable as visually impaired. Individuals with undiagnosed RE were more likely to have a manual (vs non-manual) occupation and to be separated, divorced or widowed, and less likely to be in social or professional organisations. There is also some evidence that they are more likely to express concern, embarrassment and frustration about their eyesight and worry about coping with life.Conclusion:A significant proportion of working age adults in Britain appear to have undiagnosed but visually significant RE. Improvements in existing opportunities for detecting RE in adults could benefit these individuals during their working lives and avoid the serious adverse consequences associated with vision impairment in later life. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjo.2007.133454 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69454126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69454126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-93cadfaa6fe3e984209ff2e345642e46979bea787b65face05446e7ba6387ad03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMuP0zAQhy0EYrsLZ27IEmIPSOn6FTs-QsVTVZFY6NWaJJPK3TyKnfD473GUapG4cLLG881ofh8hzzhbcy71TXkc1oIxs-ZSqlw9ICuudJEJZuxDsmKpk3Gu-QW5jPGYSqG5eUwueGGENEqsyH7v4wQt9d0JfOiwH2k9IR0HOvW1h0M_RKxpwCZANfofSDGEIVDf059DuPP9gcIBKdRTO8b5903wI_j-CXnUQBvx6fm9It_evf26-ZBtP7__uHm9zUol9JhZWUHdAOgGJdpCCWabRmCKopVApa2xJYIpTKnzBipkuVIaTQlaFgZqJq_I9bL3FIbvE8bRdT5W2LbQ4zBFp22ywoVO4It_wOMwhT7d5rgxhRWWK56om4WqwhBjSu1OwXcQfjvO3CzcJeFuFu4W4Wni-XnvVHZY_-XPhhPw8gxArKBNHvvKx3tOsNxazuck2cL5OOKv-z6EO6eNNLnb7Tfuy-7Tztxub90c6NXCl93xv1f-AVIOpOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778929141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rahi, J S ; Peckham, C S ; Cumberland, P M</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahi, J S ; Peckham, C S ; Cumberland, P M</creatorcontrib><description>Background:Detection and treatment of undiagnosed refractive error (RE), with its attendant functional consequences, is a priority of VISION 2020, the global initiative against avoidable visual disability. The authors investigated the frequency of visual impairment due to undiagnosed RE and its associations with vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), general health and social circumstances in a contemporary and nationally representative population of British working-age adults.Methods:9271 members of the 1958 British birth cohort had visual acuity and VRQOL assessed at 44/45 years. The authors compared those with undiagnosed RE with those with diagnosed RE, defining undiagnosed RE as ⩾0.2 logMAR units/2 lines acuity improvement in both eyes with pinhole in individuals without current or prior optical treatment or ophthalmic history.Results:144/9271 (1.6%) individuals had undiagnosed and 3513/9271 (37.9%) diagnosed RE. 18% (24/144) of those with undiagnosed RE were classifiable as visually impaired. Individuals with undiagnosed RE were more likely to have a manual (vs non-manual) occupation and to be separated, divorced or widowed, and less likely to be in social or professional organisations. There is also some evidence that they are more likely to express concern, embarrassment and frustration about their eyesight and worry about coping with life.Conclusion:A significant proportion of working age adults in Britain appear to have undiagnosed but visually significant RE. Improvements in existing opportunities for detecting RE in adults could benefit these individuals during their working lives and avoid the serious adverse consequences associated with vision impairment in later life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.133454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18723742</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Age ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blindness - prevention & control ; Cohort Studies ; Employment ; Female ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; National Health Programs ; Older people ; Ophthalmology ; Population ; Quality of life ; Refractive Errors - complications ; Refractive Errors - epidemiology ; Refractive Errors - psychology ; Sickness Impact Profile ; Social classes ; Studies ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; Vision disorders ; Vision Screening - standards ; Vision, Low - epidemiology ; Vision, Low - etiology ; Vision, Low - psychology ; Visual impairment ; Visually Impaired Persons - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2008-09, Vol.92 (9), p.1190-1194</ispartof><rights>2008 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2008 2008 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-93cadfaa6fe3e984209ff2e345642e46979bea787b65face05446e7ba6387ad03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/92/9/1190.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/92/9/1190.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23552,27903,27904,77345,77376</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20599110$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18723742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahi, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peckham, C S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumberland, P M</creatorcontrib><title>Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background:Detection and treatment of undiagnosed refractive error (RE), with its attendant functional consequences, is a priority of VISION 2020, the global initiative against avoidable visual disability. The authors investigated the frequency of visual impairment due to undiagnosed RE and its associations with vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), general health and social circumstances in a contemporary and nationally representative population of British working-age adults.Methods:9271 members of the 1958 British birth cohort had visual acuity and VRQOL assessed at 44/45 years. The authors compared those with undiagnosed RE with those with diagnosed RE, defining undiagnosed RE as ⩾0.2 logMAR units/2 lines acuity improvement in both eyes with pinhole in individuals without current or prior optical treatment or ophthalmic history.Results:144/9271 (1.6%) individuals had undiagnosed and 3513/9271 (37.9%) diagnosed RE. 18% (24/144) of those with undiagnosed RE were classifiable as visually impaired. Individuals with undiagnosed RE were more likely to have a manual (vs non-manual) occupation and to be separated, divorced or widowed, and less likely to be in social or professional organisations. There is also some evidence that they are more likely to express concern, embarrassment and frustration about their eyesight and worry about coping with life.Conclusion:A significant proportion of working age adults in Britain appear to have undiagnosed but visually significant RE. Improvements in existing opportunities for detecting RE in adults could benefit these individuals during their working lives and avoid the serious adverse consequences associated with vision impairment in later life.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blindness - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>National Health Programs</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Refractive Errors - complications</subject><subject>Refractive Errors - epidemiology</subject><subject>Refractive Errors - psychology</subject><subject>Sickness Impact Profile</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>Vision disorders</subject><subject>Vision Screening - standards</subject><subject>Vision, Low - epidemiology</subject><subject>Vision, Low - etiology</subject><subject>Vision, Low - psychology</subject><subject>Visual impairment</subject><subject>Visually Impaired Persons - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMuP0zAQhy0EYrsLZ27IEmIPSOn6FTs-QsVTVZFY6NWaJJPK3TyKnfD473GUapG4cLLG881ofh8hzzhbcy71TXkc1oIxs-ZSqlw9ICuudJEJZuxDsmKpk3Gu-QW5jPGYSqG5eUwueGGENEqsyH7v4wQt9d0JfOiwH2k9IR0HOvW1h0M_RKxpwCZANfofSDGEIVDf059DuPP9gcIBKdRTO8b5903wI_j-CXnUQBvx6fm9It_evf26-ZBtP7__uHm9zUol9JhZWUHdAOgGJdpCCWabRmCKopVApa2xJYIpTKnzBipkuVIaTQlaFgZqJq_I9bL3FIbvE8bRdT5W2LbQ4zBFp22ywoVO4It_wOMwhT7d5rgxhRWWK56om4WqwhBjSu1OwXcQfjvO3CzcJeFuFu4W4Wni-XnvVHZY_-XPhhPw8gxArKBNHvvKx3tOsNxazuck2cL5OOKv-z6EO6eNNLnb7Tfuy-7Tztxub90c6NXCl93xv1f-AVIOpOo</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Rahi, J S</creator><creator>Peckham, C S</creator><creator>Cumberland, P M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain</title><author>Rahi, J S ; Peckham, C S ; Cumberland, P M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-93cadfaa6fe3e984209ff2e345642e46979bea787b65face05446e7ba6387ad03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blindness - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>National Health Programs</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Refractive Errors - complications</topic><topic>Refractive Errors - epidemiology</topic><topic>Refractive Errors - psychology</topic><topic>Sickness Impact Profile</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>Vision disorders</topic><topic>Vision Screening - standards</topic><topic>Vision, Low - epidemiology</topic><topic>Vision, Low - etiology</topic><topic>Vision, Low - psychology</topic><topic>Visual impairment</topic><topic>Visually Impaired Persons - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahi, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peckham, C S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumberland, P M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahi, J S</au><au>Peckham, C S</au><au>Cumberland, P M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1190</spage><epage>1194</epage><pages>1190-1194</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>Background:Detection and treatment of undiagnosed refractive error (RE), with its attendant functional consequences, is a priority of VISION 2020, the global initiative against avoidable visual disability. The authors investigated the frequency of visual impairment due to undiagnosed RE and its associations with vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), general health and social circumstances in a contemporary and nationally representative population of British working-age adults.Methods:9271 members of the 1958 British birth cohort had visual acuity and VRQOL assessed at 44/45 years. The authors compared those with undiagnosed RE with those with diagnosed RE, defining undiagnosed RE as ⩾0.2 logMAR units/2 lines acuity improvement in both eyes with pinhole in individuals without current or prior optical treatment or ophthalmic history.Results:144/9271 (1.6%) individuals had undiagnosed and 3513/9271 (37.9%) diagnosed RE. 18% (24/144) of those with undiagnosed RE were classifiable as visually impaired. Individuals with undiagnosed RE were more likely to have a manual (vs non-manual) occupation and to be separated, divorced or widowed, and less likely to be in social or professional organisations. There is also some evidence that they are more likely to express concern, embarrassment and frustration about their eyesight and worry about coping with life.Conclusion:A significant proportion of working age adults in Britain appear to have undiagnosed but visually significant RE. Improvements in existing opportunities for detecting RE in adults could benefit these individuals during their working lives and avoid the serious adverse consequences associated with vision impairment in later life.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>18723742</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.2007.133454</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 2008-09, Vol.92 (9), p.1190-1194 |
issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69454126 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Adults Age Biological and medical sciences Blindness - prevention & control Cohort Studies Employment Female Health risk assessment Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous National Health Programs Older people Ophthalmology Population Quality of life Refractive Errors - complications Refractive Errors - epidemiology Refractive Errors - psychology Sickness Impact Profile Social classes Studies United Kingdom - epidemiology Vision disorders Vision Screening - standards Vision, Low - epidemiology Vision, Low - etiology Vision, Low - psychology Visual impairment Visually Impaired Persons - statistics & numerical data |
title | Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A43%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20impairment%20due%20to%20undiagnosed%20refractive%20error%20in%20working%20age%20adults%20in%20Britain&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Rahi,%20J%20S&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1190&rft.epage=1194&rft.pages=1190-1194&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.2007.133454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69454126%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778929141&rft_id=info:pmid/18723742&rfr_iscdi=true |