Plant-pathogen interactions: what is proteomics telling us
Over the years, several studies have been performed to analyse plant-pathogen interactions. Recently, functional genomic strategies, including proteomics and transcriptomics, have contributed to the effort of defining gene and protein function and expression profiles. Using these 'omic' ap...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The FEBS journal 2008-08, Vol.275 (15), p.3731-3746 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3746 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 15 |
| container_start_page | 3731 |
| container_title | The FEBS journal |
| container_volume | 275 |
| creator | Mehta, Angela Brasileiro, Ana C.M Souza, Djair S.L Romano, Eduardo Campos, Magnólia A Grossi-de-Sá, Maria F Silva, Marília S Franco, Octávio L Fragoso, Rodrigo R Bevitori, Rosangela Rocha, Thales L |
| description | Over the years, several studies have been performed to analyse plant-pathogen interactions. Recently, functional genomic strategies, including proteomics and transcriptomics, have contributed to the effort of defining gene and protein function and expression profiles. Using these 'omic' approaches, pathogenicity- and defence-related genes and proteins expressed during phytopathogen infections have been identified and enormous datasets have been accumulated. However, the understanding of molecular plant-pathogen interactions is still an intriguing area of investigation. Proteomics has dramatically evolved in the pursuit of large-scale functional assignment of candidate proteins and, by using this approach, several proteins expressed during phytopathogenic interactions have been identified. In this review, we highlight the proteins expressed during plant-virus, plant-bacterium, plant-fungus and plant-nematode interactions reported in proteomic studies, and discuss these findings considering the advantages and limitations of current proteomic tools. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06528.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69433629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19606667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5008-4b3d9d5502280b4056c927fc3363284e2be9e8c64cbb2c5451888537233a67c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOj7-ghYX7lpvnk1mIejgCwQFFdyFNJMZM3TasWlx_PemzqDgRrPJhXz3cHIOQgmGDMdzOstwzkjKBJcZAZAZCE5kttxAg--Hze-Zveyg3RBmAJQzpbbRDpYCCybkAA0fSlO16cK0r_XUVYmvWtcY2_q6CsPk_dW0iQ_JoqlbV8-9DUnrytJX06QL-2hrYsrgDtb3Hnq-unwa3aR399e3o_O71PJoLWUFHasx50CIhIIBF1aRfGIpFZRI5kjhlJNWMFsUxHLGsZSS05xQakRuge6hk5VudPHWudDquQ822jCVq7ughWJRi6g_QawECCHyCB7_Amd111TxE5oAw0AFFxGSK8g2dQiNm-hF4-em-dAYdN-Cnuk-YN2HrfsW9FcLehlXD9f6XTF345_FdewROFsB7750H_8W1leXF4_9GAWOVgITU2szbXzQz48EMAVQmOac0U-KU5zG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204103656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant-pathogen interactions: what is proteomics telling us</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IngentaConnect Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mehta, Angela ; Brasileiro, Ana C.M ; Souza, Djair S.L ; Romano, Eduardo ; Campos, Magnólia A ; Grossi-de-Sá, Maria F ; Silva, Marília S ; Franco, Octávio L ; Fragoso, Rodrigo R ; Bevitori, Rosangela ; Rocha, Thales L</creator><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Angela ; Brasileiro, Ana C.M ; Souza, Djair S.L ; Romano, Eduardo ; Campos, Magnólia A ; Grossi-de-Sá, Maria F ; Silva, Marília S ; Franco, Octávio L ; Fragoso, Rodrigo R ; Bevitori, Rosangela ; Rocha, Thales L</creatorcontrib><description>Over the years, several studies have been performed to analyse plant-pathogen interactions. Recently, functional genomic strategies, including proteomics and transcriptomics, have contributed to the effort of defining gene and protein function and expression profiles. Using these 'omic' approaches, pathogenicity- and defence-related genes and proteins expressed during phytopathogen infections have been identified and enormous datasets have been accumulated. However, the understanding of molecular plant-pathogen interactions is still an intriguing area of investigation. Proteomics has dramatically evolved in the pursuit of large-scale functional assignment of candidate proteins and, by using this approach, several proteins expressed during phytopathogenic interactions have been identified. In this review, we highlight the proteins expressed during plant-virus, plant-bacterium, plant-fungus and plant-nematode interactions reported in proteomic studies, and discuss these findings considering the advantages and limitations of current proteomic tools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06528.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18616468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; bacteria ; Biochemistry ; Botany ; defence proteins ; functional genomics ; fungi ; mass spectrometry ; Molecular biology ; Nematoda - physiology ; nematode ; pathogenicity proteins ; Plant Proteins - genetics ; Plant Proteins - metabolism ; Plant Proteins - physiology ; Plants - microbiology ; Plants - parasitology ; Plants - virology ; Proteomics ; Research methodology ; two‐dimensional electrophoresis ; virus</subject><ispartof>The FEBS journal, 2008-08, Vol.275 (15), p.3731-3746</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 FEBS</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2008 Federation of European Biochemical Societies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5008-4b3d9d5502280b4056c927fc3363284e2be9e8c64cbb2c5451888537233a67c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5008-4b3d9d5502280b4056c927fc3363284e2be9e8c64cbb2c5451888537233a67c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1742-4658.2008.06528.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1742-4658.2008.06528.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18616468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasileiro, Ana C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Djair S.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Magnólia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossi-de-Sá, Maria F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Marília S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Octávio L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragoso, Rodrigo R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevitori, Rosangela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Thales L</creatorcontrib><title>Plant-pathogen interactions: what is proteomics telling us</title><title>The FEBS journal</title><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><description>Over the years, several studies have been performed to analyse plant-pathogen interactions. Recently, functional genomic strategies, including proteomics and transcriptomics, have contributed to the effort of defining gene and protein function and expression profiles. Using these 'omic' approaches, pathogenicity- and defence-related genes and proteins expressed during phytopathogen infections have been identified and enormous datasets have been accumulated. However, the understanding of molecular plant-pathogen interactions is still an intriguing area of investigation. Proteomics has dramatically evolved in the pursuit of large-scale functional assignment of candidate proteins and, by using this approach, several proteins expressed during phytopathogenic interactions have been identified. In this review, we highlight the proteins expressed during plant-virus, plant-bacterium, plant-fungus and plant-nematode interactions reported in proteomic studies, and discuss these findings considering the advantages and limitations of current proteomic tools.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>defence proteins</subject><subject>functional genomics</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Nematoda - physiology</subject><subject>nematode</subject><subject>pathogenicity proteins</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - physiology</subject><subject>Plants - microbiology</subject><subject>Plants - parasitology</subject><subject>Plants - virology</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>two‐dimensional electrophoresis</subject><subject>virus</subject><issn>1742-464X</issn><issn>1742-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOj7-ghYX7lpvnk1mIejgCwQFFdyFNJMZM3TasWlx_PemzqDgRrPJhXz3cHIOQgmGDMdzOstwzkjKBJcZAZAZCE5kttxAg--Hze-Zveyg3RBmAJQzpbbRDpYCCybkAA0fSlO16cK0r_XUVYmvWtcY2_q6CsPk_dW0iQ_JoqlbV8-9DUnrytJX06QL-2hrYsrgDtb3Hnq-unwa3aR399e3o_O71PJoLWUFHasx50CIhIIBF1aRfGIpFZRI5kjhlJNWMFsUxHLGsZSS05xQakRuge6hk5VudPHWudDquQ822jCVq7ughWJRi6g_QawECCHyCB7_Amd111TxE5oAw0AFFxGSK8g2dQiNm-hF4-em-dAYdN-Cnuk-YN2HrfsW9FcLehlXD9f6XTF345_FdewROFsB7750H_8W1leXF4_9GAWOVgITU2szbXzQz48EMAVQmOac0U-KU5zG</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Mehta, Angela</creator><creator>Brasileiro, Ana C.M</creator><creator>Souza, Djair S.L</creator><creator>Romano, Eduardo</creator><creator>Campos, Magnólia A</creator><creator>Grossi-de-Sá, Maria F</creator><creator>Silva, Marília S</creator><creator>Franco, Octávio L</creator><creator>Fragoso, Rodrigo R</creator><creator>Bevitori, Rosangela</creator><creator>Rocha, Thales L</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Plant-pathogen interactions: what is proteomics telling us</title><author>Mehta, Angela ; Brasileiro, Ana C.M ; Souza, Djair S.L ; Romano, Eduardo ; Campos, Magnólia A ; Grossi-de-Sá, Maria F ; Silva, Marília S ; Franco, Octávio L ; Fragoso, Rodrigo R ; Bevitori, Rosangela ; Rocha, Thales L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5008-4b3d9d5502280b4056c927fc3363284e2be9e8c64cbb2c5451888537233a67c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>defence proteins</topic><topic>functional genomics</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Nematoda - physiology</topic><topic>nematode</topic><topic>pathogenicity proteins</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - physiology</topic><topic>Plants - microbiology</topic><topic>Plants - parasitology</topic><topic>Plants - virology</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>two‐dimensional electrophoresis</topic><topic>virus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasileiro, Ana C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Djair S.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Magnólia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossi-de-Sá, Maria F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Marília S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Octávio L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragoso, Rodrigo R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevitori, Rosangela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Thales L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mehta, Angela</au><au>Brasileiro, Ana C.M</au><au>Souza, Djair S.L</au><au>Romano, Eduardo</au><au>Campos, Magnólia A</au><au>Grossi-de-Sá, Maria F</au><au>Silva, Marília S</au><au>Franco, Octávio L</au><au>Fragoso, Rodrigo R</au><au>Bevitori, Rosangela</au><au>Rocha, Thales L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant-pathogen interactions: what is proteomics telling us</atitle><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>275</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>3731</spage><epage>3746</epage><pages>3731-3746</pages><issn>1742-464X</issn><eissn>1742-4658</eissn><abstract>Over the years, several studies have been performed to analyse plant-pathogen interactions. Recently, functional genomic strategies, including proteomics and transcriptomics, have contributed to the effort of defining gene and protein function and expression profiles. Using these 'omic' approaches, pathogenicity- and defence-related genes and proteins expressed during phytopathogen infections have been identified and enormous datasets have been accumulated. However, the understanding of molecular plant-pathogen interactions is still an intriguing area of investigation. Proteomics has dramatically evolved in the pursuit of large-scale functional assignment of candidate proteins and, by using this approach, several proteins expressed during phytopathogenic interactions have been identified. In this review, we highlight the proteins expressed during plant-virus, plant-bacterium, plant-fungus and plant-nematode interactions reported in proteomic studies, and discuss these findings considering the advantages and limitations of current proteomic tools.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18616468</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06528.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1742-464X |
| ispartof | The FEBS journal, 2008-08, Vol.275 (15), p.3731-3746 |
| issn | 1742-464X 1742-4658 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69433629 |
| source | MEDLINE; IngentaConnect Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Animals bacteria Biochemistry Botany defence proteins functional genomics fungi mass spectrometry Molecular biology Nematoda - physiology nematode pathogenicity proteins Plant Proteins - genetics Plant Proteins - metabolism Plant Proteins - physiology Plants - microbiology Plants - parasitology Plants - virology Proteomics Research methodology two‐dimensional electrophoresis virus |
| title | Plant-pathogen interactions: what is proteomics telling us |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A06%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant-pathogen%20interactions:%20what%20is%20proteomics%20telling%20us&rft.jtitle=The%20FEBS%20journal&rft.au=Mehta,%20Angela&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=275&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=3731&rft.epage=3746&rft.pages=3731-3746&rft.issn=1742-464X&rft.eissn=1742-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06528.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19606667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204103656&rft_id=info:pmid/18616468&rfr_iscdi=true |