Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors investigated by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging

Summary This study was designed to assess the clinical usefulness of imaging for predicting the prognosis of patients with combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CC). Between 1999 and 2004, 30 patients with histopathologically proven cHCC‐CC underwent computed tomography (CT) or magnetic r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical practice (Esher) 2008-08, Vol.62 (8), p.1199-1205
Hauptverfasser: Lin, G., Toh, C.-H., Wu, R.-C., Ko, S.-F., Ng, S.-H., Chou, W.-C., Tseng, J.-H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1205
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1199
container_title International journal of clinical practice (Esher)
container_volume 62
creator Lin, G.
Toh, C.-H.
Wu, R.-C.
Ko, S.-F.
Ng, S.-H.
Chou, W.-C.
Tseng, J.-H.
description Summary This study was designed to assess the clinical usefulness of imaging for predicting the prognosis of patients with combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CC). Between 1999 and 2004, 30 patients with histopathologically proven cHCC‐CC underwent computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The imaging data and survival were analysed. Univariate log‐rank analysis of imaging findings revealed that tumour necrosis, bile duct invasion, major vascular branch invasion, multiplicity, bilobar distribution, regional lymph node involvement, regional organ invasion, distant metastasis and ascites had adverse influences on overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that major vascular branch invasion, regional organ invasion, nodal and distant metastases were independent prognostic factors that adversely affected overall survival rates. Overall cumulative survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 53%, 26% and 12%, respectively. Analysing the survival of our patients by using clinical stages of the newly updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification for liver neoplasm based on the imaging findings, we found significant differences between stages I/II and III (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01291.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69433186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69433186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5611-37b6892d8c070aa943e019be61bfcd9527f175e982f57f2bc76fafd348e3b3953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwF1CEBLek_oi_OCChBZaiqvQA6tFyHCfrJbFTO4HdA_8dh10WiQu-eDR-_GremcmyHIISpnO5LSGrUAFRBUsEACsBRAKWuwfZ-enhYYox5QUBGJ5lT2LcAoAI4eBxdgYZwQwKdJ79XPmhts40-caMavLa9P3cq5Drje-V66zXKmjr_KBe52PwnfNxsjpvlZ58iLl1301KdGpKEvU-134Y5yWe_OC7oMbN_nJQnTPLp2Cid8ppk9uUs657mj1qVR_Ns-N9kX398P7L6mNx_Xl9tXp7XWhCISwwqykXqOEaMKCUqLABUNSGwrrVjSCItcmRERy1hLWo1oy2qm1wxQ2usSD4Int10E0O7udUsBxsXKwqZ_wcJU2SGHL6XxCKiiPMqwS--Afc-jm4ZEIiJERFcMUS9PwIzfVgGjmG5Dvs5Z_2J-DlEVBRq74NqTk2njgECBSEgsS9OXA_bG_2f3WAXNZBbuUydblMXS7rIH-vg9zJq0-r2yVMAsVBwMbJ7E4CKnyTlGFG5N3NWhJ-9-5mDbG8xb8ACae5lA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229945347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors investigated by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Lin, G. ; Toh, C.-H. ; Wu, R.-C. ; Ko, S.-F. ; Ng, S.-H. ; Chou, W.-C. ; Tseng, J.-H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, G. ; Toh, C.-H. ; Wu, R.-C. ; Ko, S.-F. ; Ng, S.-H. ; Chou, W.-C. ; Tseng, J.-H.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary This study was designed to assess the clinical usefulness of imaging for predicting the prognosis of patients with combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CC). Between 1999 and 2004, 30 patients with histopathologically proven cHCC‐CC underwent computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The imaging data and survival were analysed. Univariate log‐rank analysis of imaging findings revealed that tumour necrosis, bile duct invasion, major vascular branch invasion, multiplicity, bilobar distribution, regional lymph node involvement, regional organ invasion, distant metastasis and ascites had adverse influences on overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that major vascular branch invasion, regional organ invasion, nodal and distant metastases were independent prognostic factors that adversely affected overall survival rates. Overall cumulative survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 53%, 26% and 12%, respectively. Analysing the survival of our patients by using clinical stages of the newly updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification for liver neoplasm based on the imaging findings, we found significant differences between stages I/II and III (p &lt; 0.001) and between stages III and IV (p = 0.040). We conclude CT or MRI can be used to identify the prognostic factors and to estimate the outcomes of patients with cHCC‐CC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-5031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01291.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17537192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - mortality ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology ; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic - pathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology ; Cholangiocarcinoma - mortality ; Cholangiocarcinoma - pathology ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; General aspects ; Humans ; Liver diseases ; Liver Neoplasms - mortality ; Liver Neoplasms - pathology ; Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - mortality ; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - pathology ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Prognosis ; Survival Analysis ; Survival Rate ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical practice (Esher), 2008-08, Vol.62 (8), p.1199-1205</ispartof><rights>2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5611-37b6892d8c070aa943e019be61bfcd9527f175e982f57f2bc76fafd348e3b3953</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1742-1241.2007.01291.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1742-1241.2007.01291.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20519560$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17537192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, C.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, R.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, S.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, S.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, W.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, J.-H.</creatorcontrib><title>Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors investigated by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</title><addtitle>Int J Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Summary This study was designed to assess the clinical usefulness of imaging for predicting the prognosis of patients with combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CC). Between 1999 and 2004, 30 patients with histopathologically proven cHCC‐CC underwent computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The imaging data and survival were analysed. Univariate log‐rank analysis of imaging findings revealed that tumour necrosis, bile duct invasion, major vascular branch invasion, multiplicity, bilobar distribution, regional lymph node involvement, regional organ invasion, distant metastasis and ascites had adverse influences on overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that major vascular branch invasion, regional organ invasion, nodal and distant metastases were independent prognostic factors that adversely affected overall survival rates. Overall cumulative survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 53%, 26% and 12%, respectively. Analysing the survival of our patients by using clinical stages of the newly updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification for liver neoplasm based on the imaging findings, we found significant differences between stages I/II and III (p &lt; 0.001) and between stages III and IV (p = 0.040). We conclude CT or MRI can be used to identify the prognostic factors and to estimate the outcomes of patients with cHCC‐CC.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic - pathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - pathology</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1368-5031</issn><issn>1742-1241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwF1CEBLek_oi_OCChBZaiqvQA6tFyHCfrJbFTO4HdA_8dh10WiQu-eDR-_GremcmyHIISpnO5LSGrUAFRBUsEACsBRAKWuwfZ-enhYYox5QUBGJ5lT2LcAoAI4eBxdgYZwQwKdJ79XPmhts40-caMavLa9P3cq5Drje-V66zXKmjr_KBe52PwnfNxsjpvlZ58iLl1301KdGpKEvU-134Y5yWe_OC7oMbN_nJQnTPLp2Cid8ppk9uUs657mj1qVR_Ns-N9kX398P7L6mNx_Xl9tXp7XWhCISwwqykXqOEaMKCUqLABUNSGwrrVjSCItcmRERy1hLWo1oy2qm1wxQ2usSD4Int10E0O7udUsBxsXKwqZ_wcJU2SGHL6XxCKiiPMqwS--Afc-jm4ZEIiJERFcMUS9PwIzfVgGjmG5Dvs5Z_2J-DlEVBRq74NqTk2njgECBSEgsS9OXA_bG_2f3WAXNZBbuUydblMXS7rIH-vg9zJq0-r2yVMAsVBwMbJ7E4CKnyTlGFG5N3NWhJ-9-5mDbG8xb8ACae5lA</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Lin, G.</creator><creator>Toh, C.-H.</creator><creator>Wu, R.-C.</creator><creator>Ko, S.-F.</creator><creator>Ng, S.-H.</creator><creator>Chou, W.-C.</creator><creator>Tseng, J.-H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors investigated by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Lin, G. ; Toh, C.-H. ; Wu, R.-C. ; Ko, S.-F. ; Ng, S.-H. ; Chou, W.-C. ; Tseng, J.-H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5611-37b6892d8c070aa943e019be61bfcd9527f175e982f57f2bc76fafd348e3b3953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic - pathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - pathology</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, C.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, R.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, S.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, S.-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, W.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, J.-H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, G.</au><au>Toh, C.-H.</au><au>Wu, R.-C.</au><au>Ko, S.-F.</au><au>Ng, S.-H.</au><au>Chou, W.-C.</au><au>Tseng, J.-H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors investigated by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1199</spage><epage>1205</epage><pages>1199-1205</pages><issn>1368-5031</issn><eissn>1742-1241</eissn><abstract>Summary This study was designed to assess the clinical usefulness of imaging for predicting the prognosis of patients with combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CC). Between 1999 and 2004, 30 patients with histopathologically proven cHCC‐CC underwent computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The imaging data and survival were analysed. Univariate log‐rank analysis of imaging findings revealed that tumour necrosis, bile duct invasion, major vascular branch invasion, multiplicity, bilobar distribution, regional lymph node involvement, regional organ invasion, distant metastasis and ascites had adverse influences on overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that major vascular branch invasion, regional organ invasion, nodal and distant metastases were independent prognostic factors that adversely affected overall survival rates. Overall cumulative survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 53%, 26% and 12%, respectively. Analysing the survival of our patients by using clinical stages of the newly updated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification for liver neoplasm based on the imaging findings, we found significant differences between stages I/II and III (p &lt; 0.001) and between stages III and IV (p = 0.040). We conclude CT or MRI can be used to identify the prognostic factors and to estimate the outcomes of patients with cHCC‐CC.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17537192</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01291.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-5031
ispartof International journal of clinical practice (Esher), 2008-08, Vol.62 (8), p.1199-1205
issn 1368-5031
1742-1241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69433186
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bile Duct Neoplasms - mortality
Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic - pathology
Biological and medical sciences
Cancer
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology
Cholangiocarcinoma - mortality
Cholangiocarcinoma - pathology
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
General aspects
Humans
Liver diseases
Liver Neoplasms - mortality
Liver Neoplasms - pathology
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Lymphatic Metastasis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards
Male
Medical prognosis
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - mortality
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - pathology
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Prognosis
Survival Analysis
Survival Rate
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards
Tumors
title Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors investigated by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A16%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20hepatocellular%20cholangiocarcinoma:%20prognostic%20factors%20investigated%20by%20computed%20tomography/magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20practice%20(Esher)&rft.au=Lin,%20G.&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1199&rft.epage=1205&rft.pages=1199-1205&rft.issn=1368-5031&rft.eissn=1742-1241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01291.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69433186%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229945347&rft_id=info:pmid/17537192&rfr_iscdi=true