Incentives and Other Factors Associated With Employee Participation in Health Risk Assessments
Objectives: Investigate factors associated with employee participatio rates in health risk assessments. Methods: This cross-sectional study using multiple regression analyzed data from 124 employers with 882,275 eligible employees who completed 344,825 health and productivity assessments (HPAs). Res...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2008-08, Vol.50 (8), p.863-872 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 872 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 863 |
| container_title | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Taitel, Michael S. Haufle, Vincent Heck, Debi Loeppke, Ronald Fetterolf, Donald |
| description | Objectives: Investigate factors associated with employee participatio rates in health risk assessments. Methods: This cross-sectional study using multiple regression analyzed data from 124 employers with 882,275 eligible employees who completed 344,825 health and productivity assessments (HPAs). Results: Incentive value and Communications and Organizational Commitment Level (Com/Org Level) were the strongest predictors of HPA completion rates. Employer size and a Gateway Model were also significant predictors. In addition, a correlation of variables showed other important relationships. To achieve a 50% HPA completion rate, employers with a low Com/Org Level will need an incentive value of approximately $120 whereas employers wit a high Com/Org Level only need approximately $40—a difference of $80 dollars. Conclusion: This applied study offers empirical evidence to help employers increase their employees' participation in health risk assessments. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181845fe2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69417375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44997627</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44997627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4601-d0d7de202e730fe765fed10ca3b830b7230f31ba202114e881d0e5fdb07ccece3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMotq7-A5VBqHdTT74mM5eltLbSskUU7wyZzBk22_lYc2Za-u_NuksLvZFwSDg875tzeBl7z-GYQ2W-fFteH0MNXKLkJS-VblG8YIdcyyLXlSpfpjeYIhdGiwP2hmgNwDUH_Zod8LKotFLFIft9OXgcpnCHlLmhyZbTCmN27vw0RspOiEYf3IRN9itMq-ys33TjA2J24-IUfNi4KYxDFobsAl2XgO-BbrcqJOqTLb1lr1rXEb7b3wv28_zsx-lFfrX8enl6cpV7VQDPG2hMgwIEGgktmiIt03DwTtalhNqI1JW8dongXGFZ8gZQt00Nxnv0KBfs8853E8c_M9Jk-0Aeu84NOM5ki0pxI43-LyggTVBVW_DTM3A9znFIS1jBhQGlSkiQ2kE-jkQRW7uJoXfxwXKw25RsSsk-TynJPu6957rH5km0jyUBR3vAkXddG93gAz1yAnTFhdZP_9-P3YSRbrv5HqNd_QvDAoCSplC5ACjTAchTpVkW7MNOtqYU86OtUlVlCmHkX0_RtI4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212704480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incentives and Other Factors Associated With Employee Participation in Health Risk Assessments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Taitel, Michael S. ; Haufle, Vincent ; Heck, Debi ; Loeppke, Ronald ; Fetterolf, Donald</creator><creatorcontrib>Taitel, Michael S. ; Haufle, Vincent ; Heck, Debi ; Loeppke, Ronald ; Fetterolf, Donald</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Investigate factors associated with employee participatio rates in health risk assessments. Methods: This cross-sectional study using multiple regression analyzed data from 124 employers with 882,275 eligible employees who completed 344,825 health and productivity assessments (HPAs). Results: Incentive value and Communications and Organizational Commitment Level (Com/Org Level) were the strongest predictors of HPA completion rates. Employer size and a Gateway Model were also significant predictors. In addition, a correlation of variables showed other important relationships. To achieve a 50% HPA completion rate, employers with a low Com/Org Level will need an incentive value of approximately $120 whereas employers wit a high Com/Org Level only need approximately $40—a difference of $80 dollars. Conclusion: This applied study offers empirical evidence to help employers increase their employees' participation in health risk assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-2752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181845fe2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18695446</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOEMFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Employee Incentive Plans - economics ; Employees ; FAST TRACK ARTICLE ; Female ; Health Promotion - economics ; Health Promotion - methods ; Health risk assessment ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Incentives ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Occupational Health ; Occupational medicine ; Participation ; Productivity measurement ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Regression analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2008-08, Vol.50 (8), p.863-872</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>2008The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4601-d0d7de202e730fe765fed10ca3b830b7230f31ba202114e881d0e5fdb07ccece3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4601-d0d7de202e730fe765fed10ca3b830b7230f31ba202114e881d0e5fdb07ccece3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44997627$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44997627$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20591255$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18695446$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taitel, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haufle, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heck, Debi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeppke, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetterolf, Donald</creatorcontrib><title>Incentives and Other Factors Associated With Employee Participation in Health Risk Assessments</title><title>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</title><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>Objectives: Investigate factors associated with employee participatio rates in health risk assessments. Methods: This cross-sectional study using multiple regression analyzed data from 124 employers with 882,275 eligible employees who completed 344,825 health and productivity assessments (HPAs). Results: Incentive value and Communications and Organizational Commitment Level (Com/Org Level) were the strongest predictors of HPA completion rates. Employer size and a Gateway Model were also significant predictors. In addition, a correlation of variables showed other important relationships. To achieve a 50% HPA completion rate, employers with a low Com/Org Level will need an incentive value of approximately $120 whereas employers wit a high Com/Org Level only need approximately $40—a difference of $80 dollars. Conclusion: This applied study offers empirical evidence to help employers increase their employees' participation in health risk assessments.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Employee Incentive Plans - economics</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>FAST TRACK ARTICLE</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Promotion - economics</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Occupational medicine</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Productivity measurement</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1076-2752</issn><issn>1536-5948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMotq7-A5VBqHdTT74mM5eltLbSskUU7wyZzBk22_lYc2Za-u_NuksLvZFwSDg875tzeBl7z-GYQ2W-fFteH0MNXKLkJS-VblG8YIdcyyLXlSpfpjeYIhdGiwP2hmgNwDUH_Zod8LKotFLFIft9OXgcpnCHlLmhyZbTCmN27vw0RspOiEYf3IRN9itMq-ys33TjA2J24-IUfNi4KYxDFobsAl2XgO-BbrcqJOqTLb1lr1rXEb7b3wv28_zsx-lFfrX8enl6cpV7VQDPG2hMgwIEGgktmiIt03DwTtalhNqI1JW8dongXGFZ8gZQt00Nxnv0KBfs8853E8c_M9Jk-0Aeu84NOM5ki0pxI43-LyggTVBVW_DTM3A9znFIS1jBhQGlSkiQ2kE-jkQRW7uJoXfxwXKw25RsSsk-TynJPu6957rH5km0jyUBR3vAkXddG93gAz1yAnTFhdZP_9-P3YSRbrv5HqNd_QvDAoCSplC5ACjTAchTpVkW7MNOtqYU86OtUlVlCmHkX0_RtI4</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Taitel, Michael S.</creator><creator>Haufle, Vincent</creator><creator>Heck, Debi</creator><creator>Loeppke, Ronald</creator><creator>Fetterolf, Donald</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>Incentives and Other Factors Associated With Employee Participation in Health Risk Assessments</title><author>Taitel, Michael S. ; Haufle, Vincent ; Heck, Debi ; Loeppke, Ronald ; Fetterolf, Donald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4601-d0d7de202e730fe765fed10ca3b830b7230f31ba202114e881d0e5fdb07ccece3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Employee Incentive Plans - economics</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>FAST TRACK ARTICLE</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Promotion - economics</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Occupational medicine</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Productivity measurement</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taitel, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haufle, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heck, Debi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeppke, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetterolf, Donald</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taitel, Michael S.</au><au>Haufle, Vincent</au><au>Heck, Debi</au><au>Loeppke, Ronald</au><au>Fetterolf, Donald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incentives and Other Factors Associated With Employee Participation in Health Risk Assessments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>863</spage><epage>872</epage><pages>863-872</pages><issn>1076-2752</issn><eissn>1536-5948</eissn><coden>JOEMFM</coden><abstract>Objectives: Investigate factors associated with employee participatio rates in health risk assessments. Methods: This cross-sectional study using multiple regression analyzed data from 124 employers with 882,275 eligible employees who completed 344,825 health and productivity assessments (HPAs). Results: Incentive value and Communications and Organizational Commitment Level (Com/Org Level) were the strongest predictors of HPA completion rates. Employer size and a Gateway Model were also significant predictors. In addition, a correlation of variables showed other important relationships. To achieve a 50% HPA completion rate, employers with a low Com/Org Level will need an incentive value of approximately $120 whereas employers wit a high Com/Org Level only need approximately $40—a difference of $80 dollars. Conclusion: This applied study offers empirical evidence to help employers increase their employees' participation in health risk assessments.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>18695446</pmid><doi>10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181845fe2</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1076-2752 |
| ispartof | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2008-08, Vol.50 (8), p.863-872 |
| issn | 1076-2752 1536-5948 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69417375 |
| source | MEDLINE; JSTOR; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cross-Sectional Studies Employee Incentive Plans - economics Employees FAST TRACK ARTICLE Female Health Promotion - economics Health Promotion - methods Health risk assessment Health Status Indicators Humans Incentives Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Occupational Health Occupational medicine Participation Productivity measurement Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Regression analysis Studies |
| title | Incentives and Other Factors Associated With Employee Participation in Health Risk Assessments |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A45%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incentives%20and%20Other%20Factors%20Associated%20With%20Employee%20Participation%20in%20Health%20Risk%20Assessments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine&rft.au=Taitel,%20Michael%20S.&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=863&rft.epage=872&rft.pages=863-872&rft.issn=1076-2752&rft.eissn=1536-5948&rft.coden=JOEMFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181845fe2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44997627%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212704480&rft_id=info:pmid/18695446&rft_jstor_id=44997627&rfr_iscdi=true |