Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair in Young Children: A Comparative Study of Four-Strand Versus Two-Strand Repair
This study compares the active ranges of finger motion and rupture rates of two-strand and four-strand repairs in zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in young children. A total of 29 patients (under the age of 4 years) with 32 flexor tendon lacerations in zone 2 were evaluated. The injured tendons were...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hand surgery, European volume European volume, 2008-08, Vol.33 (4), p.424-429 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 429 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 424 |
| container_title | The Journal of hand surgery, European volume |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | NAVALI, A. M. ROUHANI, A. |
| description | This study compares the active ranges of finger motion and rupture rates of
two-strand and four-strand repairs in zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in young
children. A total of 29 patients (under the age of 4 years) with 32 flexor
tendon lacerations in zone 2 were evaluated. The injured tendons were randomly
repaired with either two-strand or four-strand modified Strickland techniques.
At a mean follow-up period of 11 months, the mean total active motion of
interphalangeal joints was 156° in the two-strand and
158° in the four-strand group. According to the Strickland original
method, this means an average of 89% (range
57–100%) of normal function in the two-strand and
90% (range 60–100%) in the four-strand
group. There were no ruptures of the four-strand repairs, but one two-strand
repair failed within 3 weeks of the repair. Statistically, we were not able to
show any significant difference in the active ranges of finger motion achieved
with two-strand and four-strand repairs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1753193408090761 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69402625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1753193408090761</sage_id><sourcerecordid>69402625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-8287156cebf1b0a82127f5247b67925da00d02f157c8626968ca5ea5efd227a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7vniQXvVWTtPlRb1KcCgPBTUEvJW3T2dEmM2nV_fdmtCoIQuBB3ud9k_cB4Bijc4w5v8CchjgOIyRQjDjDO2BMUBQGjIh4F4y37WDbH4ED51YIURFjtg9GWDDBBRFjsHoxWkECp7X6NBYulC6Mhg9qLSsLKw2fTaeXMHmt6sIqfQmvYGKatbSyrd4VnLddsYGmhFPT2WDeWqkL-KSs6xxcfJjvmz7uEOyVsnbqaKgT8Di9XiS3wez-5i65mgV5yGgb-G9xTFmushJnSAqCCS8piXjGeExoIREqECkx5blghMVM5JIqf8qCEC5xOAFnfe7amrdOuTZtKperupZamc6lLI4QYYR6EPVgbo1zVpXp2laNtJsUo3TrN_3r14-cDNld1qjid2AQ6oHTAZAul3Xp988r98MRRGnIQuS5oOecXKp05fVp7-T_h78AVzuNyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69402625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair in Young Children: A Comparative Study of Four-Strand Versus Two-Strand Repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>NAVALI, A. M. ; ROUHANI, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>NAVALI, A. M. ; ROUHANI, A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares the active ranges of finger motion and rupture rates of
two-strand and four-strand repairs in zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in young
children. A total of 29 patients (under the age of 4 years) with 32 flexor
tendon lacerations in zone 2 were evaluated. The injured tendons were randomly
repaired with either two-strand or four-strand modified Strickland techniques.
At a mean follow-up period of 11 months, the mean total active motion of
interphalangeal joints was 156° in the two-strand and
158° in the four-strand group. According to the Strickland original
method, this means an average of 89% (range
57–100%) of normal function in the two-strand and
90% (range 60–100%) in the four-strand
group. There were no ruptures of the four-strand repairs, but one two-strand
repair failed within 3 weeks of the repair. Statistically, we were not able to
show any significant difference in the active ranges of finger motion achieved
with two-strand and four-strand repairs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-1934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-6289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1753193408090761</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18687828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child, Preschool ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Finger Injuries - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Prospective Studies ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Recovery of Function ; Rupture - surgery ; Suture Techniques ; Tendon Injuries - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume, 2008-08, Vol.33 (4), p.424-429</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-8287156cebf1b0a82127f5247b67925da00d02f157c8626968ca5ea5efd227a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-8287156cebf1b0a82127f5247b67925da00d02f157c8626968ca5ea5efd227a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1753193408090761$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1753193408090761$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20553630$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18687828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NAVALI, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUHANI, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair in Young Children: A Comparative Study of Four-Strand Versus Two-Strand Repair</title><title>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume</title><addtitle>J Hand Surg Eur Vol</addtitle><description>This study compares the active ranges of finger motion and rupture rates of
two-strand and four-strand repairs in zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in young
children. A total of 29 patients (under the age of 4 years) with 32 flexor
tendon lacerations in zone 2 were evaluated. The injured tendons were randomly
repaired with either two-strand or four-strand modified Strickland techniques.
At a mean follow-up period of 11 months, the mean total active motion of
interphalangeal joints was 156° in the two-strand and
158° in the four-strand group. According to the Strickland original
method, this means an average of 89% (range
57–100%) of normal function in the two-strand and
90% (range 60–100%) in the four-strand
group. There were no ruptures of the four-strand repairs, but one two-strand
repair failed within 3 weeks of the repair. Statistically, we were not able to
show any significant difference in the active ranges of finger motion achieved
with two-strand and four-strand repairs.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rupture - surgery</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1753-1934</issn><issn>2043-6289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7vniQXvVWTtPlRb1KcCgPBTUEvJW3T2dEmM2nV_fdmtCoIQuBB3ud9k_cB4Bijc4w5v8CchjgOIyRQjDjDO2BMUBQGjIh4F4y37WDbH4ED51YIURFjtg9GWDDBBRFjsHoxWkECp7X6NBYulC6Mhg9qLSsLKw2fTaeXMHmt6sIqfQmvYGKatbSyrd4VnLddsYGmhFPT2WDeWqkL-KSs6xxcfJjvmz7uEOyVsnbqaKgT8Di9XiS3wez-5i65mgV5yGgb-G9xTFmushJnSAqCCS8piXjGeExoIREqECkx5blghMVM5JIqf8qCEC5xOAFnfe7amrdOuTZtKperupZamc6lLI4QYYR6EPVgbo1zVpXp2laNtJsUo3TrN_3r14-cDNld1qjid2AQ6oHTAZAul3Xp988r98MRRGnIQuS5oOecXKp05fVp7-T_h78AVzuNyg</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>NAVALI, A. M.</creator><creator>ROUHANI, A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair in Young Children: A Comparative Study of Four-Strand Versus Two-Strand Repair</title><author>NAVALI, A. M. ; ROUHANI, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-8287156cebf1b0a82127f5247b67925da00d02f157c8626968ca5ea5efd227a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rupture - surgery</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NAVALI, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUHANI, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NAVALI, A. M.</au><au>ROUHANI, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair in Young Children: A Comparative Study of Four-Strand Versus Two-Strand Repair</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Surg Eur Vol</addtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>424</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>424-429</pages><issn>1753-1934</issn><eissn>2043-6289</eissn><abstract>This study compares the active ranges of finger motion and rupture rates of
two-strand and four-strand repairs in zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in young
children. A total of 29 patients (under the age of 4 years) with 32 flexor
tendon lacerations in zone 2 were evaluated. The injured tendons were randomly
repaired with either two-strand or four-strand modified Strickland techniques.
At a mean follow-up period of 11 months, the mean total active motion of
interphalangeal joints was 156° in the two-strand and
158° in the four-strand group. According to the Strickland original
method, this means an average of 89% (range
57–100%) of normal function in the two-strand and
90% (range 60–100%) in the four-strand
group. There were no ruptures of the four-strand repairs, but one two-strand
repair failed within 3 weeks of the repair. Statistically, we were not able to
show any significant difference in the active ranges of finger motion achieved
with two-strand and four-strand repairs.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18687828</pmid><doi>10.1177/1753193408090761</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1753-1934 |
| ispartof | The Journal of hand surgery, European volume, 2008-08, Vol.33 (4), p.424-429 |
| issn | 1753-1934 2043-6289 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69402625 |
| source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Child, Preschool Diseases of the osteoarticular system Female Finger Injuries - surgery Follow-Up Studies Humans Infant Male Medical sciences Prospective Studies Range of Motion, Articular Recovery of Function Rupture - surgery Suture Techniques Tendon Injuries - surgery Treatment Outcome |
| title | Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair in Young Children: A Comparative Study of Four-Strand Versus Two-Strand Repair |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T12%3A43%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zone%202%20Flexor%20Tendon%20Repair%20in%20Young%20Children:%20A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20Four-Strand%20Versus%20Two-Strand%20Repair&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hand%20surgery,%20European%20volume&rft.au=NAVALI,%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=424&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=424-429&rft.issn=1753-1934&rft.eissn=2043-6289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1753193408090761&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69402625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69402625&rft_id=info:pmid/18687828&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1753193408090761&rfr_iscdi=true |