Human Footprint In The West: A Large-Scale Analysis Of Anthropogenic Impacts
Anthropogenic features such as urbanization, roads, and power lines, are increasing in western United States landscapes in response to rapidly growing human populations. However, their spatial effects have not been evaluated. Our goal was to model the human footprint across the western United States...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2008-07, Vol.18 (5), p.1119-1139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1139 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1119 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Leu, Matthias Hanser, Steven E Knick, Steven T |
description | Anthropogenic features such as urbanization, roads, and power lines, are increasing in western United States landscapes in response to rapidly growing human populations. However, their spatial effects have not been evaluated. Our goal was to model the human footprint across the western United States. We first delineated the actual area occupied by anthropogenic features, the physical effect area. Next, we developed the human footprint model based on the ecological effect area, the zone influenced by features beyond their physical presence, by combining seven input models: three models quantified top-down anthropogenic influences of synanthropic predators (avian predators, domestic dog and cat presence risk), and four models quantified bottom-up anthropogenic influences on habitat (invasion of exotic plants, human-caused fires, energy extraction, and anthropogenic wildland fragmentation). Using independent bird population data, we found bird abundance of four synanthropic species to correlate positively with human footprint intensity and negatively for three of the six species influenced by habitat fragmentation. We then evaluated the extent of the human footprint in relation to terrestrial (ecoregions) and aquatic systems (major rivers and lakes), regional management and conservation status, physical environment, and temporal changes in human actions. The physical effect area of anthropogenic features covered 13% of the western United States with agricultural land (9.8%) being most dominant. High-intensity human footprint areas (class 8-10) overlapped highly productive low-elevation private landholdings and covered 7% of the western United States compared to 48% for low-intensity areas (class 1-3), which were confined to low-productivity high-elevation federal landholdings. Areas within 1 km of rivers were more affected by the human footprint compared to lakes. Percentage human population growth was higher in low-intensity human footprint areas. The disproportional regional effects of the human footprint on landscapes in the western United States create a challenge to management of ecosystems and wildlife populations. Using footprint models, managers can plan land use actions, develop restoration scenarios, and identify areas of high conservation value at local landscapes within a regional context. Moreover, human footprint models serve as a tool to stratify landscapes for studies investigating floral and faunal response to human disturbance intensity grad |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/07-0480.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69402161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40062217</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40062217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-4b0e06a8b296cc0a200f60eade36ebd46f3af131a7026fe9a490367e8415b3313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpycc2h_yApDoVenAzI8n66G0J-VhYSCAJPQrZK28cbGsjeSn776vFS3sq1WVmmGdeZl4Rco7wHbWBK1AFCJ2LD-QEDTdFWWr2MedQYgFK4jE5TekN8mOMHZFj1FLLUskTsrzf9m6gtyGMm9gOI10M9PnV058-jT_onC5dXPviqXadp_PBdbvUJvrQ5Hx8jWET1n5oa7roN64e02fyqXFd8meHOCMvtzfP1_fF8uFucT1fFrUAaQpRgQfpdMWMrGtwDKCR4N3Kc-mrlZANdw1ydAqYbLxxwgCXymuBZcU58hn5OuluYnjf5k1t36bad50bfNgmK40AhvL_IAMjBWiVwW8TWMeQUvSNzW70Lu4sgt17bEHZvcd2L3p5EN1WvV_9JQ-mZqCcgF9t53f_VrI388d8u0ZdIuZ_m5GLae4tjSH-mRMAkjHcL_ll6jcuWLeObbIvTwyQA8p8iFL8Nx8blfo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20964087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human Footprint In The West: A Large-Scale Analysis Of Anthropogenic Impacts</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Leu, Matthias ; Hanser, Steven E ; Knick, Steven T</creator><creatorcontrib>Leu, Matthias ; Hanser, Steven E ; Knick, Steven T</creatorcontrib><description>Anthropogenic features such as urbanization, roads, and power lines, are increasing in western United States landscapes in response to rapidly growing human populations. However, their spatial effects have not been evaluated. Our goal was to model the human footprint across the western United States. We first delineated the actual area occupied by anthropogenic features, the physical effect area. Next, we developed the human footprint model based on the ecological effect area, the zone influenced by features beyond their physical presence, by combining seven input models: three models quantified top-down anthropogenic influences of synanthropic predators (avian predators, domestic dog and cat presence risk), and four models quantified bottom-up anthropogenic influences on habitat (invasion of exotic plants, human-caused fires, energy extraction, and anthropogenic wildland fragmentation). Using independent bird population data, we found bird abundance of four synanthropic species to correlate positively with human footprint intensity and negatively for three of the six species influenced by habitat fragmentation. We then evaluated the extent of the human footprint in relation to terrestrial (ecoregions) and aquatic systems (major rivers and lakes), regional management and conservation status, physical environment, and temporal changes in human actions. The physical effect area of anthropogenic features covered 13% of the western United States with agricultural land (9.8%) being most dominant. High-intensity human footprint areas (class 8-10) overlapped highly productive low-elevation private landholdings and covered 7% of the western United States compared to 48% for low-intensity areas (class 1-3), which were confined to low-productivity high-elevation federal landholdings. Areas within 1 km of rivers were more affected by the human footprint compared to lakes. Percentage human population growth was higher in low-intensity human footprint areas. The disproportional regional effects of the human footprint on landscapes in the western United States create a challenge to management of ecosystems and wildlife populations. Using footprint models, managers can plan land use actions, develop restoration scenarios, and identify areas of high conservation value at local landscapes within a regional context. Moreover, human footprint models serve as a tool to stratify landscapes for studies investigating floral and faunal response to human disturbance intensity gradients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/07-0480.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18686576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>abiotic interaction ; altitude ; Animals ; anthropogenic activities ; anthropogenic disturbance ; Conservation biology ; Ecological footprint ; ecological human footprint ; ecological invasion ; Ecological modeling ; ecological restoration ; Ecology ; Ecoregions ; Ecosystems ; fires ; Habitat conservation ; habitat fragmentation ; habitats ; human footprint ; human population growth ; Humans ; lakes ; Land management ; land stewardship ; landscape management ; physical human footprint ; population growth ; predators ; productivity ; rivers ; roads ; United States ; Urban ecology ; Urbanization ; western United States ; Wildlife ecology</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2008-07, Vol.18 (5), p.1119-1139</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2008 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-4b0e06a8b296cc0a200f60eade36ebd46f3af131a7026fe9a490367e8415b3313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-4b0e06a8b296cc0a200f60eade36ebd46f3af131a7026fe9a490367e8415b3313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40062217$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40062217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18686576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leu, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanser, Steven E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knick, Steven T</creatorcontrib><title>Human Footprint In The West: A Large-Scale Analysis Of Anthropogenic Impacts</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Anthropogenic features such as urbanization, roads, and power lines, are increasing in western United States landscapes in response to rapidly growing human populations. However, their spatial effects have not been evaluated. Our goal was to model the human footprint across the western United States. We first delineated the actual area occupied by anthropogenic features, the physical effect area. Next, we developed the human footprint model based on the ecological effect area, the zone influenced by features beyond their physical presence, by combining seven input models: three models quantified top-down anthropogenic influences of synanthropic predators (avian predators, domestic dog and cat presence risk), and four models quantified bottom-up anthropogenic influences on habitat (invasion of exotic plants, human-caused fires, energy extraction, and anthropogenic wildland fragmentation). Using independent bird population data, we found bird abundance of four synanthropic species to correlate positively with human footprint intensity and negatively for three of the six species influenced by habitat fragmentation. We then evaluated the extent of the human footprint in relation to terrestrial (ecoregions) and aquatic systems (major rivers and lakes), regional management and conservation status, physical environment, and temporal changes in human actions. The physical effect area of anthropogenic features covered 13% of the western United States with agricultural land (9.8%) being most dominant. High-intensity human footprint areas (class 8-10) overlapped highly productive low-elevation private landholdings and covered 7% of the western United States compared to 48% for low-intensity areas (class 1-3), which were confined to low-productivity high-elevation federal landholdings. Areas within 1 km of rivers were more affected by the human footprint compared to lakes. Percentage human population growth was higher in low-intensity human footprint areas. The disproportional regional effects of the human footprint on landscapes in the western United States create a challenge to management of ecosystems and wildlife populations. Using footprint models, managers can plan land use actions, develop restoration scenarios, and identify areas of high conservation value at local landscapes within a regional context. Moreover, human footprint models serve as a tool to stratify landscapes for studies investigating floral and faunal response to human disturbance intensity gradients.</description><subject>abiotic interaction</subject><subject>altitude</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>anthropogenic activities</subject><subject>anthropogenic disturbance</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Ecological footprint</subject><subject>ecological human footprint</subject><subject>ecological invasion</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>ecological restoration</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecoregions</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>fires</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>human footprint</subject><subject>human population growth</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>lakes</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>land stewardship</subject><subject>landscape management</subject><subject>physical human footprint</subject><subject>population growth</subject><subject>predators</subject><subject>productivity</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>roads</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban ecology</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>western United States</subject><subject>Wildlife ecology</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpycc2h_yApDoVenAzI8n66G0J-VhYSCAJPQrZK28cbGsjeSn776vFS3sq1WVmmGdeZl4Rco7wHbWBK1AFCJ2LD-QEDTdFWWr2MedQYgFK4jE5TekN8mOMHZFj1FLLUskTsrzf9m6gtyGMm9gOI10M9PnV058-jT_onC5dXPviqXadp_PBdbvUJvrQ5Hx8jWET1n5oa7roN64e02fyqXFd8meHOCMvtzfP1_fF8uFucT1fFrUAaQpRgQfpdMWMrGtwDKCR4N3Kc-mrlZANdw1ydAqYbLxxwgCXymuBZcU58hn5OuluYnjf5k1t36bad50bfNgmK40AhvL_IAMjBWiVwW8TWMeQUvSNzW70Lu4sgt17bEHZvcd2L3p5EN1WvV_9JQ-mZqCcgF9t53f_VrI388d8u0ZdIuZ_m5GLae4tjSH-mRMAkjHcL_ll6jcuWLeObbIvTwyQA8p8iFL8Nx8blfo</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>Leu, Matthias</creator><creator>Hanser, Steven E</creator><creator>Knick, Steven T</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>Human Footprint In The West: A Large-Scale Analysis Of Anthropogenic Impacts</title><author>Leu, Matthias ; Hanser, Steven E ; Knick, Steven T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-4b0e06a8b296cc0a200f60eade36ebd46f3af131a7026fe9a490367e8415b3313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>abiotic interaction</topic><topic>altitude</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>anthropogenic activities</topic><topic>anthropogenic disturbance</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Ecological footprint</topic><topic>ecological human footprint</topic><topic>ecological invasion</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>ecological restoration</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecoregions</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>fires</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>human footprint</topic><topic>human population growth</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>lakes</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>land stewardship</topic><topic>landscape management</topic><topic>physical human footprint</topic><topic>population growth</topic><topic>predators</topic><topic>productivity</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>roads</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban ecology</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>western United States</topic><topic>Wildlife ecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leu, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanser, Steven E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knick, Steven T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leu, Matthias</au><au>Hanser, Steven E</au><au>Knick, Steven T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human Footprint In The West: A Large-Scale Analysis Of Anthropogenic Impacts</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1119</spage><epage>1139</epage><pages>1119-1139</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Anthropogenic features such as urbanization, roads, and power lines, are increasing in western United States landscapes in response to rapidly growing human populations. However, their spatial effects have not been evaluated. Our goal was to model the human footprint across the western United States. We first delineated the actual area occupied by anthropogenic features, the physical effect area. Next, we developed the human footprint model based on the ecological effect area, the zone influenced by features beyond their physical presence, by combining seven input models: three models quantified top-down anthropogenic influences of synanthropic predators (avian predators, domestic dog and cat presence risk), and four models quantified bottom-up anthropogenic influences on habitat (invasion of exotic plants, human-caused fires, energy extraction, and anthropogenic wildland fragmentation). Using independent bird population data, we found bird abundance of four synanthropic species to correlate positively with human footprint intensity and negatively for three of the six species influenced by habitat fragmentation. We then evaluated the extent of the human footprint in relation to terrestrial (ecoregions) and aquatic systems (major rivers and lakes), regional management and conservation status, physical environment, and temporal changes in human actions. The physical effect area of anthropogenic features covered 13% of the western United States with agricultural land (9.8%) being most dominant. High-intensity human footprint areas (class 8-10) overlapped highly productive low-elevation private landholdings and covered 7% of the western United States compared to 48% for low-intensity areas (class 1-3), which were confined to low-productivity high-elevation federal landholdings. Areas within 1 km of rivers were more affected by the human footprint compared to lakes. Percentage human population growth was higher in low-intensity human footprint areas. The disproportional regional effects of the human footprint on landscapes in the western United States create a challenge to management of ecosystems and wildlife populations. Using footprint models, managers can plan land use actions, develop restoration scenarios, and identify areas of high conservation value at local landscapes within a regional context. Moreover, human footprint models serve as a tool to stratify landscapes for studies investigating floral and faunal response to human disturbance intensity gradients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>18686576</pmid><doi>10.1890/07-0480.1</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2008-07, Vol.18 (5), p.1119-1139 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69402161 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; JSTOR |
subjects | abiotic interaction altitude Animals anthropogenic activities anthropogenic disturbance Conservation biology Ecological footprint ecological human footprint ecological invasion Ecological modeling ecological restoration Ecology Ecoregions Ecosystems fires Habitat conservation habitat fragmentation habitats human footprint human population growth Humans lakes Land management land stewardship landscape management physical human footprint population growth predators productivity rivers roads United States Urban ecology Urbanization western United States Wildlife ecology |
title | Human Footprint In The West: A Large-Scale Analysis Of Anthropogenic Impacts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T15%3A13%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20Footprint%20In%20The%20West:%20A%20Large-Scale%20Analysis%20Of%20Anthropogenic%20Impacts&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Leu,%20Matthias&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1119&rft.epage=1139&rft.pages=1119-1139&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/07-0480.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40062217%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20964087&rft_id=info:pmid/18686576&rft_jstor_id=40062217&rfr_iscdi=true |