Clinimetrics of freezing of gait
The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Movement disorders 2008, Vol.23 (S2), p.S468-S474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S474 |
---|---|
container_issue | S2 |
container_start_page | S468 |
container_title | Movement disorders |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Snijders, Anke H. Nijkrake, Maarten J. Bakker, Maaike Munneke, Marten Wind, Carina Bloem, Bastiaan R. |
description | The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some practical recommendations for a standardized clinical approach. During history taking, presence of FOG is best ascertained by asking about the characteristic feeling of “being glued to the floor.” Detection of FOG is greatly facilitated by demonstrating what FOG actually looks like, not only to the patient but also to the spouse or other carer. History taking further focuses on the specific circumstances that provoke FOG and on its severity, preferably using standardized questionnaires. Physical examination should be done both during the ON and OFF state, to judge the influence of treatment. Evaluation includes a dedicated “gait trajectory” that features specific triggers to elicit FOG (gait initiation; a narrow passage; dual tasking; and rapid 360° axial turns in both directions). Evaluating the response to external cues has diagnostic importance, and helps to determine possible therapeutic interventions. Because of the tight interplay between FOG and mental functions, the evaluation must include cognitive testing (mainly frontal executive functions) and judgment of mood. Neuroimaging is required for most patients in order to detect underlying pathology, in particular lesions of the frontal lobe or their connections to the basal ganglia. Various quantitative gait assessments have been proposed, but these methods have not proven value for clinical practice. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mds.22144 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69393391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69393391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-5c8a9712948d37d7e0332eced481e3fe745daa72cf3d5e96e70ba3d8c72b77783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EoqUw8AdQJySGtD47jp0RtbSACgwUwWa58aUyJE2JU0H59aSkwISY7ob3veERcgy0B5Syfm59jzEIwx3SBsEhUEzIXdKmSomAgxItcuD9M6UAAqJ90gIVRSpiqk26g8wtXI5V6RLfLdJuWiJ-uMV888-Nqw7JXmoyj0fb2yEPo4vp4DKY3I2vBueTIOExCwORKBNLYHGoLJdWIuWcYYI2VIA8RRkKa4xkScqtwDhCSWeGW5VINpNSKt4hp413WRavK_SVzp1PMMvMAouV11HMY85j-BdkAFJEStbgWQMmZeF9ialeli435VoD1Ztuuu6mv7rV7MlWuprlaH_Jbaga6DfAm8tw_bdJ3wzvv5VBs3C-wvefhSlfdCS5FPrxdqyHT3A9GU2knvJP11eEOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21175687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinimetrics of freezing of gait</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Snijders, Anke H. ; Nijkrake, Maarten J. ; Bakker, Maaike ; Munneke, Marten ; Wind, Carina ; Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Snijders, Anke H. ; Nijkrake, Maarten J. ; Bakker, Maaike ; Munneke, Marten ; Wind, Carina ; Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some practical recommendations for a standardized clinical approach. During history taking, presence of FOG is best ascertained by asking about the characteristic feeling of “being glued to the floor.” Detection of FOG is greatly facilitated by demonstrating what FOG actually looks like, not only to the patient but also to the spouse or other carer. History taking further focuses on the specific circumstances that provoke FOG and on its severity, preferably using standardized questionnaires. Physical examination should be done both during the ON and OFF state, to judge the influence of treatment. Evaluation includes a dedicated “gait trajectory” that features specific triggers to elicit FOG (gait initiation; a narrow passage; dual tasking; and rapid 360° axial turns in both directions). Evaluating the response to external cues has diagnostic importance, and helps to determine possible therapeutic interventions. Because of the tight interplay between FOG and mental functions, the evaluation must include cognitive testing (mainly frontal executive functions) and judgment of mood. Neuroimaging is required for most patients in order to detect underlying pathology, in particular lesions of the frontal lobe or their connections to the basal ganglia. Various quantitative gait assessments have been proposed, but these methods have not proven value for clinical practice. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-8257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mds.22144</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18668628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>clinimetry ; Diagnostic Imaging ; freezing of gait ; Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic - physiology ; Gait ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - complications ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis ; Humans ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Parkinson Disease - complications ; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis ; Parkinson's disease ; Physical Examination ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Movement disorders, 2008, Vol.23 (S2), p.S468-S474</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Movement Disorder Society</rights><rights>(c) 2008 Movement Disorder Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-5c8a9712948d37d7e0332eced481e3fe745daa72cf3d5e96e70ba3d8c72b77783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-5c8a9712948d37d7e0332eced481e3fe745daa72cf3d5e96e70ba3d8c72b77783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmds.22144$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmds.22144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4023,27922,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18668628$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snijders, Anke H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijkrake, Maarten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakker, Maaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munneke, Marten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wind, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinimetrics of freezing of gait</title><title>Movement disorders</title><addtitle>Mov. Disord</addtitle><description>The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some practical recommendations for a standardized clinical approach. During history taking, presence of FOG is best ascertained by asking about the characteristic feeling of “being glued to the floor.” Detection of FOG is greatly facilitated by demonstrating what FOG actually looks like, not only to the patient but also to the spouse or other carer. History taking further focuses on the specific circumstances that provoke FOG and on its severity, preferably using standardized questionnaires. Physical examination should be done both during the ON and OFF state, to judge the influence of treatment. Evaluation includes a dedicated “gait trajectory” that features specific triggers to elicit FOG (gait initiation; a narrow passage; dual tasking; and rapid 360° axial turns in both directions). Evaluating the response to external cues has diagnostic importance, and helps to determine possible therapeutic interventions. Because of the tight interplay between FOG and mental functions, the evaluation must include cognitive testing (mainly frontal executive functions) and judgment of mood. Neuroimaging is required for most patients in order to detect underlying pathology, in particular lesions of the frontal lobe or their connections to the basal ganglia. Various quantitative gait assessments have been proposed, but these methods have not proven value for clinical practice. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society</description><subject>clinimetry</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging</subject><subject>freezing of gait</subject><subject>Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic - physiology</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - complications</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - complications</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Physical Examination</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0885-3185</issn><issn>1531-8257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EoqUw8AdQJySGtD47jp0RtbSACgwUwWa58aUyJE2JU0H59aSkwISY7ob3veERcgy0B5Syfm59jzEIwx3SBsEhUEzIXdKmSomAgxItcuD9M6UAAqJ90gIVRSpiqk26g8wtXI5V6RLfLdJuWiJ-uMV888-Nqw7JXmoyj0fb2yEPo4vp4DKY3I2vBueTIOExCwORKBNLYHGoLJdWIuWcYYI2VIA8RRkKa4xkScqtwDhCSWeGW5VINpNSKt4hp413WRavK_SVzp1PMMvMAouV11HMY85j-BdkAFJEStbgWQMmZeF9ialeli435VoD1Ztuuu6mv7rV7MlWuprlaH_Jbaga6DfAm8tw_bdJ3wzvv5VBs3C-wvefhSlfdCS5FPrxdqyHT3A9GU2knvJP11eEOQ</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Snijders, Anke H.</creator><creator>Nijkrake, Maarten J.</creator><creator>Bakker, Maaike</creator><creator>Munneke, Marten</creator><creator>Wind, Carina</creator><creator>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Clinimetrics of freezing of gait</title><author>Snijders, Anke H. ; Nijkrake, Maarten J. ; Bakker, Maaike ; Munneke, Marten ; Wind, Carina ; Bloem, Bastiaan R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-5c8a9712948d37d7e0332eced481e3fe745daa72cf3d5e96e70ba3d8c72b77783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>clinimetry</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging</topic><topic>freezing of gait</topic><topic>Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic - physiology</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - complications</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - complications</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Physical Examination</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snijders, Anke H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijkrake, Maarten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakker, Maaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munneke, Marten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wind, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snijders, Anke H.</au><au>Nijkrake, Maarten J.</au><au>Bakker, Maaike</au><au>Munneke, Marten</au><au>Wind, Carina</au><au>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinimetrics of freezing of gait</atitle><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Mov. Disord</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>S468</spage><epage>S474</epage><pages>S468-S474</pages><issn>0885-3185</issn><eissn>1531-8257</eissn><abstract>The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some practical recommendations for a standardized clinical approach. During history taking, presence of FOG is best ascertained by asking about the characteristic feeling of “being glued to the floor.” Detection of FOG is greatly facilitated by demonstrating what FOG actually looks like, not only to the patient but also to the spouse or other carer. History taking further focuses on the specific circumstances that provoke FOG and on its severity, preferably using standardized questionnaires. Physical examination should be done both during the ON and OFF state, to judge the influence of treatment. Evaluation includes a dedicated “gait trajectory” that features specific triggers to elicit FOG (gait initiation; a narrow passage; dual tasking; and rapid 360° axial turns in both directions). Evaluating the response to external cues has diagnostic importance, and helps to determine possible therapeutic interventions. Because of the tight interplay between FOG and mental functions, the evaluation must include cognitive testing (mainly frontal executive functions) and judgment of mood. Neuroimaging is required for most patients in order to detect underlying pathology, in particular lesions of the frontal lobe or their connections to the basal ganglia. Various quantitative gait assessments have been proposed, but these methods have not proven value for clinical practice. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18668628</pmid><doi>10.1002/mds.22144</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-3185 |
ispartof | Movement disorders, 2008, Vol.23 (S2), p.S468-S474 |
issn | 0885-3185 1531-8257 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69393391 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | clinimetry Diagnostic Imaging freezing of gait Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic - physiology Gait Gait Disorders, Neurologic - complications Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis Humans Neuropsychological Tests Parkinson Disease - complications Parkinson Disease - diagnosis Parkinson's disease Physical Examination Severity of Illness Index Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Clinimetrics of freezing of gait |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinimetrics%20of%20freezing%20of%20gait&rft.jtitle=Movement%20disorders&rft.au=Snijders,%20Anke%20H.&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=S468&rft.epage=S474&rft.pages=S468-S474&rft.issn=0885-3185&rft.eissn=1531-8257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mds.22144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69393391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21175687&rft_id=info:pmid/18668628&rfr_iscdi=true |