Clinimetrics of freezing of gait

The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Movement disorders 2008, Vol.23 (S2), p.S468-S474
Hauptverfasser: Snijders, Anke H., Nijkrake, Maarten J., Bakker, Maaike, Munneke, Marten, Wind, Carina, Bloem, Bastiaan R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S474
container_issue S2
container_start_page S468
container_title Movement disorders
container_volume 23
creator Snijders, Anke H.
Nijkrake, Maarten J.
Bakker, Maaike
Munneke, Marten
Wind, Carina
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
description The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some practical recommendations for a standardized clinical approach. During history taking, presence of FOG is best ascertained by asking about the characteristic feeling of “being glued to the floor.” Detection of FOG is greatly facilitated by demonstrating what FOG actually looks like, not only to the patient but also to the spouse or other carer. History taking further focuses on the specific circumstances that provoke FOG and on its severity, preferably using standardized questionnaires. Physical examination should be done both during the ON and OFF state, to judge the influence of treatment. Evaluation includes a dedicated “gait trajectory” that features specific triggers to elicit FOG (gait initiation; a narrow passage; dual tasking; and rapid 360° axial turns in both directions). Evaluating the response to external cues has diagnostic importance, and helps to determine possible therapeutic interventions. Because of the tight interplay between FOG and mental functions, the evaluation must include cognitive testing (mainly frontal executive functions) and judgment of mood. Neuroimaging is required for most patients in order to detect underlying pathology, in particular lesions of the frontal lobe or their connections to the basal ganglia. Various quantitative gait assessments have been proposed, but these methods have not proven value for clinical practice. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mds.22144
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69393391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69393391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-5c8a9712948d37d7e0332eced481e3fe745daa72cf3d5e96e70ba3d8c72b77783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EoqUw8AdQJySGtD47jp0RtbSACgwUwWa58aUyJE2JU0H59aSkwISY7ob3veERcgy0B5Syfm59jzEIwx3SBsEhUEzIXdKmSomAgxItcuD9M6UAAqJ90gIVRSpiqk26g8wtXI5V6RLfLdJuWiJ-uMV888-Nqw7JXmoyj0fb2yEPo4vp4DKY3I2vBueTIOExCwORKBNLYHGoLJdWIuWcYYI2VIA8RRkKa4xkScqtwDhCSWeGW5VINpNSKt4hp413WRavK_SVzp1PMMvMAouV11HMY85j-BdkAFJEStbgWQMmZeF9ialeli435VoD1Ztuuu6mv7rV7MlWuprlaH_Jbaga6DfAm8tw_bdJ3wzvv5VBs3C-wvefhSlfdCS5FPrxdqyHT3A9GU2knvJP11eEOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21175687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinimetrics of freezing of gait</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Snijders, Anke H. ; Nijkrake, Maarten J. ; Bakker, Maaike ; Munneke, Marten ; Wind, Carina ; Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Snijders, Anke H. ; Nijkrake, Maarten J. ; Bakker, Maaike ; Munneke, Marten ; Wind, Carina ; Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some practical recommendations for a standardized clinical approach. During history taking, presence of FOG is best ascertained by asking about the characteristic feeling of “being glued to the floor.” Detection of FOG is greatly facilitated by demonstrating what FOG actually looks like, not only to the patient but also to the spouse or other carer. History taking further focuses on the specific circumstances that provoke FOG and on its severity, preferably using standardized questionnaires. Physical examination should be done both during the ON and OFF state, to judge the influence of treatment. Evaluation includes a dedicated “gait trajectory” that features specific triggers to elicit FOG (gait initiation; a narrow passage; dual tasking; and rapid 360° axial turns in both directions). Evaluating the response to external cues has diagnostic importance, and helps to determine possible therapeutic interventions. Because of the tight interplay between FOG and mental functions, the evaluation must include cognitive testing (mainly frontal executive functions) and judgment of mood. Neuroimaging is required for most patients in order to detect underlying pathology, in particular lesions of the frontal lobe or their connections to the basal ganglia. Various quantitative gait assessments have been proposed, but these methods have not proven value for clinical practice. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-8257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mds.22144</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18668628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>clinimetry ; Diagnostic Imaging ; freezing of gait ; Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic - physiology ; Gait ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - complications ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis ; Humans ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Parkinson Disease - complications ; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis ; Parkinson's disease ; Physical Examination ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Movement disorders, 2008, Vol.23 (S2), p.S468-S474</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Movement Disorder Society</rights><rights>(c) 2008 Movement Disorder Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-5c8a9712948d37d7e0332eced481e3fe745daa72cf3d5e96e70ba3d8c72b77783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-5c8a9712948d37d7e0332eced481e3fe745daa72cf3d5e96e70ba3d8c72b77783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmds.22144$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmds.22144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4023,27922,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18668628$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snijders, Anke H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijkrake, Maarten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakker, Maaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munneke, Marten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wind, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinimetrics of freezing of gait</title><title>Movement disorders</title><addtitle>Mov. Disord</addtitle><description>The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some practical recommendations for a standardized clinical approach. During history taking, presence of FOG is best ascertained by asking about the characteristic feeling of “being glued to the floor.” Detection of FOG is greatly facilitated by demonstrating what FOG actually looks like, not only to the patient but also to the spouse or other carer. History taking further focuses on the specific circumstances that provoke FOG and on its severity, preferably using standardized questionnaires. Physical examination should be done both during the ON and OFF state, to judge the influence of treatment. Evaluation includes a dedicated “gait trajectory” that features specific triggers to elicit FOG (gait initiation; a narrow passage; dual tasking; and rapid 360° axial turns in both directions). Evaluating the response to external cues has diagnostic importance, and helps to determine possible therapeutic interventions. Because of the tight interplay between FOG and mental functions, the evaluation must include cognitive testing (mainly frontal executive functions) and judgment of mood. Neuroimaging is required for most patients in order to detect underlying pathology, in particular lesions of the frontal lobe or their connections to the basal ganglia. Various quantitative gait assessments have been proposed, but these methods have not proven value for clinical practice. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society</description><subject>clinimetry</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging</subject><subject>freezing of gait</subject><subject>Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic - physiology</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - complications</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - complications</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Physical Examination</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0885-3185</issn><issn>1531-8257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EoqUw8AdQJySGtD47jp0RtbSACgwUwWa58aUyJE2JU0H59aSkwISY7ob3veERcgy0B5Syfm59jzEIwx3SBsEhUEzIXdKmSomAgxItcuD9M6UAAqJ90gIVRSpiqk26g8wtXI5V6RLfLdJuWiJ-uMV888-Nqw7JXmoyj0fb2yEPo4vp4DKY3I2vBueTIOExCwORKBNLYHGoLJdWIuWcYYI2VIA8RRkKa4xkScqtwDhCSWeGW5VINpNSKt4hp413WRavK_SVzp1PMMvMAouV11HMY85j-BdkAFJEStbgWQMmZeF9ialeli435VoD1Ztuuu6mv7rV7MlWuprlaH_Jbaga6DfAm8tw_bdJ3wzvv5VBs3C-wvefhSlfdCS5FPrxdqyHT3A9GU2knvJP11eEOQ</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Snijders, Anke H.</creator><creator>Nijkrake, Maarten J.</creator><creator>Bakker, Maaike</creator><creator>Munneke, Marten</creator><creator>Wind, Carina</creator><creator>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Clinimetrics of freezing of gait</title><author>Snijders, Anke H. ; Nijkrake, Maarten J. ; Bakker, Maaike ; Munneke, Marten ; Wind, Carina ; Bloem, Bastiaan R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-5c8a9712948d37d7e0332eced481e3fe745daa72cf3d5e96e70ba3d8c72b77783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>clinimetry</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging</topic><topic>freezing of gait</topic><topic>Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic - physiology</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - complications</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - complications</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Physical Examination</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snijders, Anke H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijkrake, Maarten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakker, Maaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munneke, Marten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wind, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snijders, Anke H.</au><au>Nijkrake, Maarten J.</au><au>Bakker, Maaike</au><au>Munneke, Marten</au><au>Wind, Carina</au><au>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinimetrics of freezing of gait</atitle><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Mov. Disord</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>S468</spage><epage>S474</epage><pages>S468-S474</pages><issn>0885-3185</issn><eissn>1531-8257</eissn><abstract>The clinical assessment of freezing of gait (FOG) provides great challenges. Patients often do not realize what FOG really is. Assessing FOG is further complicated by the episodic, unpredictable, and variable presentation, as well as the complex relationship with medication. Here, we provide some practical recommendations for a standardized clinical approach. During history taking, presence of FOG is best ascertained by asking about the characteristic feeling of “being glued to the floor.” Detection of FOG is greatly facilitated by demonstrating what FOG actually looks like, not only to the patient but also to the spouse or other carer. History taking further focuses on the specific circumstances that provoke FOG and on its severity, preferably using standardized questionnaires. Physical examination should be done both during the ON and OFF state, to judge the influence of treatment. Evaluation includes a dedicated “gait trajectory” that features specific triggers to elicit FOG (gait initiation; a narrow passage; dual tasking; and rapid 360° axial turns in both directions). Evaluating the response to external cues has diagnostic importance, and helps to determine possible therapeutic interventions. Because of the tight interplay between FOG and mental functions, the evaluation must include cognitive testing (mainly frontal executive functions) and judgment of mood. Neuroimaging is required for most patients in order to detect underlying pathology, in particular lesions of the frontal lobe or their connections to the basal ganglia. Various quantitative gait assessments have been proposed, but these methods have not proven value for clinical practice. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18668628</pmid><doi>10.1002/mds.22144</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-3185
ispartof Movement disorders, 2008, Vol.23 (S2), p.S468-S474
issn 0885-3185
1531-8257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69393391
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects clinimetry
Diagnostic Imaging
freezing of gait
Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic - physiology
Gait
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - complications
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - diagnosis
Humans
Neuropsychological Tests
Parkinson Disease - complications
Parkinson Disease - diagnosis
Parkinson's disease
Physical Examination
Severity of Illness Index
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Clinimetrics of freezing of gait
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinimetrics%20of%20freezing%20of%20gait&rft.jtitle=Movement%20disorders&rft.au=Snijders,%20Anke%20H.&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=S468&rft.epage=S474&rft.pages=S468-S474&rft.issn=0885-3185&rft.eissn=1531-8257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mds.22144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69393391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21175687&rft_id=info:pmid/18668628&rfr_iscdi=true