How physician communication influences recognition of depression in primary care

The relationship between physician communication patterns and the successful recognition of depression is poorly understood. We used unannounced visits by actors playing standardized patients to evaluate verbal communication between primary care physicians and a patient presenting with a minor depre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of family practice 1999-12, Vol.48 (12), p.958-964
Hauptverfasser: Carney, P A, Eliassen, M S, Wolford, G L, Owen, M, Badger, L W, Dietrich, A J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 964
container_issue 12
container_start_page 958
container_title The Journal of family practice
container_volume 48
creator Carney, P A
Eliassen, M S
Wolford, G L
Owen, M
Badger, L W
Dietrich, A J
description The relationship between physician communication patterns and the successful recognition of depression is poorly understood. We used unannounced visits by actors playing standardized patients to evaluate verbal communication between primary care physicians and a patient presenting with a minor depression scenario. Participants (n = 77) were assigned to receive 2 visits from a man or woman portraying a 26-year-old patient with chronic headaches who meets the criteria for minor depression. The standardized patients carried hidden audiotape recorders and high-fidelity microphones to document the encounters. The audiotapes were coded at 2-second intervals. These data were linked to information gathered from standardized patient checklists, medical records, and debriefing telephone calls with participants. We obtained complete data on 59 (77%) of the physician-patient encounters; of those, 43 (73%) of the physicians recognized depression. Physicians who recognized depression asked twice as many questions about feelings and affect compared with those who did not (for feelings: 1.9% of total physician activity vs. 0.9%, P = .017; for affect: composite score of 2.7% of total physician activity vs 1.3%, P = .003). We found no differences in the proportion or timing of broad to narrow questioning between those who did and did not recognize depression. Physicians who successfully recognized depression later in the interview showed an increase in questions about feelings in the quartile just before recognition occurred. Physicians who recognized depression differed significantly in the percentage of questions about feeling and affect, and an increase in questions about feelings may precede a diagnosis of depression, though more research is needed to establish this as an important finding.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69392477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A59407978</galeid><sourcerecordid>A59407978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g312t-6aaef47318ae0c6ea850d0bdb794d9c01b96983ed750bcd5d2f0d0d22be50cc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0VFLwzAQAOA8KG5O_4LkRZ8spE3TNI9jqBMG-qDPJU2uXSRNatIi-_d2boLCyMPB3ceRuztDc0JEnlBGxAxdxvhBSEp5ml-gWUqKrGS8mKPXtf_C_XYXjTLSYeW7bnRGycF4h41r7AhOQcQBlG-d-Un7BmvoA8R4QLgPppNhh5UMcIXOG2kjXB_jAr0_Pryt1snm5el5tdwkLU2zISmkhCbnNC0lEFWALBnRpNY1F7kWiqS1KERJQXNGaqWZzpqprrOsBkaU4nSB7g59--A_R4hD1ZmowFrpwI-xKgQVWc738P4AW2mhmkbyQ5CqBQdBWu-gMVN6yUROuODlxJMTfHoaOqNO-ds_fgvSDtvo7bjfVPznbo7_HesOdHXcWfV7CvoNNZGE_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69392477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How physician communication influences recognition of depression in primary care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Carney, P A ; Eliassen, M S ; Wolford, G L ; Owen, M ; Badger, L W ; Dietrich, A J</creator><creatorcontrib>Carney, P A ; Eliassen, M S ; Wolford, G L ; Owen, M ; Badger, L W ; Dietrich, A J</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between physician communication patterns and the successful recognition of depression is poorly understood. We used unannounced visits by actors playing standardized patients to evaluate verbal communication between primary care physicians and a patient presenting with a minor depression scenario. Participants (n = 77) were assigned to receive 2 visits from a man or woman portraying a 26-year-old patient with chronic headaches who meets the criteria for minor depression. The standardized patients carried hidden audiotape recorders and high-fidelity microphones to document the encounters. The audiotapes were coded at 2-second intervals. These data were linked to information gathered from standardized patient checklists, medical records, and debriefing telephone calls with participants. We obtained complete data on 59 (77%) of the physician-patient encounters; of those, 43 (73%) of the physicians recognized depression. Physicians who recognized depression asked twice as many questions about feelings and affect compared with those who did not (for feelings: 1.9% of total physician activity vs. 0.9%, P = .017; for affect: composite score of 2.7% of total physician activity vs 1.3%, P = .003). We found no differences in the proportion or timing of broad to narrow questioning between those who did and did not recognize depression. Physicians who successfully recognized depression later in the interview showed an increase in questions about feelings in the quartile just before recognition occurred. Physicians who recognized depression differed significantly in the percentage of questions about feeling and affect, and an increase in questions about feelings may precede a diagnosis of depression, though more research is needed to establish this as an important finding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-3509</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10628576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Jobson Medical Information LLC</publisher><subject>Adult ; Affect ; Alabama ; Communication ; Communication in medicine ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - psychology ; Depression, Mental ; Diagnosis ; Evaluation ; Family Practice ; Female ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; New England ; Physician and patient ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians - psychology ; Social aspects ; Washington</subject><ispartof>The Journal of family practice, 1999-12, Vol.48 (12), p.958-964</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Jobson Medical Information LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10628576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carney, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliassen, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolford, G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badger, L W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, A J</creatorcontrib><title>How physician communication influences recognition of depression in primary care</title><title>The Journal of family practice</title><addtitle>J Fam Pract</addtitle><description>The relationship between physician communication patterns and the successful recognition of depression is poorly understood. We used unannounced visits by actors playing standardized patients to evaluate verbal communication between primary care physicians and a patient presenting with a minor depression scenario. Participants (n = 77) were assigned to receive 2 visits from a man or woman portraying a 26-year-old patient with chronic headaches who meets the criteria for minor depression. The standardized patients carried hidden audiotape recorders and high-fidelity microphones to document the encounters. The audiotapes were coded at 2-second intervals. These data were linked to information gathered from standardized patient checklists, medical records, and debriefing telephone calls with participants. We obtained complete data on 59 (77%) of the physician-patient encounters; of those, 43 (73%) of the physicians recognized depression. Physicians who recognized depression asked twice as many questions about feelings and affect compared with those who did not (for feelings: 1.9% of total physician activity vs. 0.9%, P = .017; for affect: composite score of 2.7% of total physician activity vs 1.3%, P = .003). We found no differences in the proportion or timing of broad to narrow questioning between those who did and did not recognize depression. Physicians who successfully recognized depression later in the interview showed an increase in questions about feelings in the quartile just before recognition occurred. Physicians who recognized depression differed significantly in the percentage of questions about feeling and affect, and an increase in questions about feelings may precede a diagnosis of depression, though more research is needed to establish this as an important finding.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Alabama</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication in medicine</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Depression, Mental</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>New England</subject><subject>Physician and patient</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>0094-3509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0VFLwzAQAOA8KG5O_4LkRZ8spE3TNI9jqBMG-qDPJU2uXSRNatIi-_d2boLCyMPB3ceRuztDc0JEnlBGxAxdxvhBSEp5ml-gWUqKrGS8mKPXtf_C_XYXjTLSYeW7bnRGycF4h41r7AhOQcQBlG-d-Un7BmvoA8R4QLgPppNhh5UMcIXOG2kjXB_jAr0_Pryt1snm5el5tdwkLU2zISmkhCbnNC0lEFWALBnRpNY1F7kWiqS1KERJQXNGaqWZzpqprrOsBkaU4nSB7g59--A_R4hD1ZmowFrpwI-xKgQVWc738P4AW2mhmkbyQ5CqBQdBWu-gMVN6yUROuODlxJMTfHoaOqNO-ds_fgvSDtvo7bjfVPznbo7_HesOdHXcWfV7CvoNNZGE_A</recordid><startdate>199912</startdate><enddate>199912</enddate><creator>Carney, P A</creator><creator>Eliassen, M S</creator><creator>Wolford, G L</creator><creator>Owen, M</creator><creator>Badger, L W</creator><creator>Dietrich, A J</creator><general>Jobson Medical Information LLC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199912</creationdate><title>How physician communication influences recognition of depression in primary care</title><author>Carney, P A ; Eliassen, M S ; Wolford, G L ; Owen, M ; Badger, L W ; Dietrich, A J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g312t-6aaef47318ae0c6ea850d0bdb794d9c01b96983ed750bcd5d2f0d0d22be50cc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Alabama</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication in medicine</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Depression, Mental</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>New England</topic><topic>Physician and patient</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carney, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliassen, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolford, G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badger, L W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, A J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of family practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carney, P A</au><au>Eliassen, M S</au><au>Wolford, G L</au><au>Owen, M</au><au>Badger, L W</au><au>Dietrich, A J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How physician communication influences recognition of depression in primary care</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of family practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Fam Pract</addtitle><date>1999-12</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>958</spage><epage>964</epage><pages>958-964</pages><issn>0094-3509</issn><abstract>The relationship between physician communication patterns and the successful recognition of depression is poorly understood. We used unannounced visits by actors playing standardized patients to evaluate verbal communication between primary care physicians and a patient presenting with a minor depression scenario. Participants (n = 77) were assigned to receive 2 visits from a man or woman portraying a 26-year-old patient with chronic headaches who meets the criteria for minor depression. The standardized patients carried hidden audiotape recorders and high-fidelity microphones to document the encounters. The audiotapes were coded at 2-second intervals. These data were linked to information gathered from standardized patient checklists, medical records, and debriefing telephone calls with participants. We obtained complete data on 59 (77%) of the physician-patient encounters; of those, 43 (73%) of the physicians recognized depression. Physicians who recognized depression asked twice as many questions about feelings and affect compared with those who did not (for feelings: 1.9% of total physician activity vs. 0.9%, P = .017; for affect: composite score of 2.7% of total physician activity vs 1.3%, P = .003). We found no differences in the proportion or timing of broad to narrow questioning between those who did and did not recognize depression. Physicians who successfully recognized depression later in the interview showed an increase in questions about feelings in the quartile just before recognition occurred. Physicians who recognized depression differed significantly in the percentage of questions about feeling and affect, and an increase in questions about feelings may precede a diagnosis of depression, though more research is needed to establish this as an important finding.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Jobson Medical Information LLC</pub><pmid>10628576</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-3509
ispartof The Journal of family practice, 1999-12, Vol.48 (12), p.958-964
issn 0094-3509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69392477
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Affect
Alabama
Communication
Communication in medicine
Depression - diagnosis
Depression - psychology
Depression, Mental
Diagnosis
Evaluation
Family Practice
Female
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
New England
Physician and patient
Physician-Patient Relations
Physicians - psychology
Social aspects
Washington
title How physician communication influences recognition of depression in primary care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T10%3A23%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20physician%20communication%20influences%20recognition%20of%20depression%20in%20primary%20care&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20family%20practice&rft.au=Carney,%20P%20A&rft.date=1999-12&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=958&rft.epage=964&rft.pages=958-964&rft.issn=0094-3509&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA59407978%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69392477&rft_id=info:pmid/10628576&rft_galeid=A59407978&rfr_iscdi=true