Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Germs Resistant to Antibiotics Commonly Used After Renal Transplantation

Abstract Background The inadequate utilization of antibiotics is responsible for the development of urinary tract infections (UTI) after renal transplantation (RT), through the induction of resistance to the antibiotics themselves. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of resistanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2008-07, Vol.40 (6), p.1881-1884
Hauptverfasser: Di Cocco, P, Orlando, G, Mazzotta, C, Rizza, V, D'Angelo, M, Clemente, K, Greco, S, Famulari, A, Pisani, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1884
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1881
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 40
creator Di Cocco, P
Orlando, G
Mazzotta, C
Rizza, V
D'Angelo, M
Clemente, K
Greco, S
Famulari, A
Pisani, F
description Abstract Background The inadequate utilization of antibiotics is responsible for the development of urinary tract infections (UTI) after renal transplantation (RT), through the induction of resistance to the antibiotics themselves. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of resistance to cefotaxime (CEF) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), routinely used for surgical perioperative prophylaxis and prevention of Pneumocystis carinii , respectively. Materials and Methods We enrolled all adult patients having received an RT from 2001 to 2006 and having a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Urine cultures (UC) were routinely performed at every outpatient clinic control and whenever required by the onset of significant clinical signs/symptoms. UTI was diagnosed by the presence of a positive UC. The endpoint of the study was the emergence of bacterial strains resistant to either CEF or TMP/SMX. Results We recorded 169 UTI in 76 patients (38 men/38 women, 33%) over a mean follow-up of 779.9 ± 523.3 days. Thirty-nine patients (51%) developed more than 1 UTI episode. When gram-negative bacteria were considered, 102/144 (70.8%) tests showed resistance to TMP/SMX, while data were available in about only 7 gram-positive infections (5/7, 71%). CEF was tested less frequently with 21/43 (49%) germs resistant to this molecule. Conclusions The onset of bacterial resistance to either TMP/SMX or CEF is frequent after RT. A wiser stricter utilization of antibiotics is mandatory. Standard antibiotic protocols should be revised.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69386968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134508005976</els_id><sourcerecordid>69386968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1989e35dd73636fc48580024b4e726a5d6e1f93a3ee83edccd6eb63f911432e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktGK1DAUhoMo7rj6ChIEvWtNmjZNvRCGUdeBBUF3rkOankLGNlmTVHbe3lNmWMQrr0KS7_w5fCeEvOGs5IzL98cyR-PTfQwWYCgrxlTJmpLx-gnZcNWKopKVeEo2jNW84KJursiLlI4M91UtnpMrrmTbsFZtyMPeWzeAt0DDSA_ReRNP9C4am-nej2CzCz7RnVkSDLQ_0RuIc6LfIbmUjc80B7r12fUuZGcRDPMc_HSih5Xfjhkiwt5Mayb2PGGNWTNfkmejmRK8uqzX5PDl893ua3H77Wa_294WtpYiF7xTHYhmGFohhRxtrRrFWFX3NbSVNM0ggY-dMAJACRisxYNeirHjvBYV1OKavDvnoq5fC6SsZ5csTNgIhCVp2QklO6kQ_HAGbQwpRRj1fXQz2tCc6dW7Puq_vevVu2aNRu9Y_PryytLPePdYehGNwNsLYJI104hB1qVHrmKSNaxrkft05gCd_HYQdbJuHc_gIg5DD8H9Xz8f_4mxk_MOX_4JJ0jHsEScSdJcp0oz_WP9KetHYSi36Vop_gBRr756</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69386968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Germs Resistant to Antibiotics Commonly Used After Renal Transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Di Cocco, P ; Orlando, G ; Mazzotta, C ; Rizza, V ; D'Angelo, M ; Clemente, K ; Greco, S ; Famulari, A ; Pisani, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Cocco, P ; Orlando, G ; Mazzotta, C ; Rizza, V ; D'Angelo, M ; Clemente, K ; Greco, S ; Famulari, A ; Pisani, F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The inadequate utilization of antibiotics is responsible for the development of urinary tract infections (UTI) after renal transplantation (RT), through the induction of resistance to the antibiotics themselves. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of resistance to cefotaxime (CEF) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), routinely used for surgical perioperative prophylaxis and prevention of Pneumocystis carinii , respectively. Materials and Methods We enrolled all adult patients having received an RT from 2001 to 2006 and having a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Urine cultures (UC) were routinely performed at every outpatient clinic control and whenever required by the onset of significant clinical signs/symptoms. UTI was diagnosed by the presence of a positive UC. The endpoint of the study was the emergence of bacterial strains resistant to either CEF or TMP/SMX. Results We recorded 169 UTI in 76 patients (38 men/38 women, 33%) over a mean follow-up of 779.9 ± 523.3 days. Thirty-nine patients (51%) developed more than 1 UTI episode. When gram-negative bacteria were considered, 102/144 (70.8%) tests showed resistance to TMP/SMX, while data were available in about only 7 gram-positive infections (5/7, 71%). CEF was tested less frequently with 21/43 (49%) germs resistant to this molecule. Conclusions The onset of bacterial resistance to either TMP/SMX or CEF is frequent after RT. A wiser stricter utilization of antibiotics is mandatory. Standard antibiotic protocols should be revised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18675078</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPPA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Biological and medical sciences ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fundamental immunology ; General aspects ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the urinary system ; Tissue, organ and graft immunology ; Urinary Tract Infections - epidemiology ; Urinary Tract Infections - etiology ; Urine - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2008-07, Vol.40 (6), p.1881-1884</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1989e35dd73636fc48580024b4e726a5d6e1f93a3ee83edccd6eb63f911432e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1989e35dd73636fc48580024b4e726a5d6e1f93a3ee83edccd6eb63f911432e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134508005976$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20605097$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18675078$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Cocco, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlando, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzotta, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizza, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Angelo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Famulari, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisani, F</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Germs Resistant to Antibiotics Commonly Used After Renal Transplantation</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The inadequate utilization of antibiotics is responsible for the development of urinary tract infections (UTI) after renal transplantation (RT), through the induction of resistance to the antibiotics themselves. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of resistance to cefotaxime (CEF) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), routinely used for surgical perioperative prophylaxis and prevention of Pneumocystis carinii , respectively. Materials and Methods We enrolled all adult patients having received an RT from 2001 to 2006 and having a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Urine cultures (UC) were routinely performed at every outpatient clinic control and whenever required by the onset of significant clinical signs/symptoms. UTI was diagnosed by the presence of a positive UC. The endpoint of the study was the emergence of bacterial strains resistant to either CEF or TMP/SMX. Results We recorded 169 UTI in 76 patients (38 men/38 women, 33%) over a mean follow-up of 779.9 ± 523.3 days. Thirty-nine patients (51%) developed more than 1 UTI episode. When gram-negative bacteria were considered, 102/144 (70.8%) tests showed resistance to TMP/SMX, while data were available in about only 7 gram-positive infections (5/7, 71%). CEF was tested less frequently with 21/43 (49%) germs resistant to this molecule. Conclusions The onset of bacterial resistance to either TMP/SMX or CEF is frequent after RT. A wiser stricter utilization of antibiotics is mandatory. Standard antibiotic protocols should be revised.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental immunology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the urinary system</subject><subject>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Urine - microbiology</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktGK1DAUhoMo7rj6ChIEvWtNmjZNvRCGUdeBBUF3rkOankLGNlmTVHbe3lNmWMQrr0KS7_w5fCeEvOGs5IzL98cyR-PTfQwWYCgrxlTJmpLx-gnZcNWKopKVeEo2jNW84KJursiLlI4M91UtnpMrrmTbsFZtyMPeWzeAt0DDSA_ReRNP9C4am-nej2CzCz7RnVkSDLQ_0RuIc6LfIbmUjc80B7r12fUuZGcRDPMc_HSih5Xfjhkiwt5Mayb2PGGNWTNfkmejmRK8uqzX5PDl893ua3H77Wa_294WtpYiF7xTHYhmGFohhRxtrRrFWFX3NbSVNM0ggY-dMAJACRisxYNeirHjvBYV1OKavDvnoq5fC6SsZ5csTNgIhCVp2QklO6kQ_HAGbQwpRRj1fXQz2tCc6dW7Puq_vevVu2aNRu9Y_PryytLPePdYehGNwNsLYJI104hB1qVHrmKSNaxrkft05gCd_HYQdbJuHc_gIg5DD8H9Xz8f_4mxk_MOX_4JJ0jHsEScSdJcp0oz_WP9KetHYSi36Vop_gBRr756</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Di Cocco, P</creator><creator>Orlando, G</creator><creator>Mazzotta, C</creator><creator>Rizza, V</creator><creator>D'Angelo, M</creator><creator>Clemente, K</creator><creator>Greco, S</creator><creator>Famulari, A</creator><creator>Pisani, F</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Germs Resistant to Antibiotics Commonly Used After Renal Transplantation</title><author>Di Cocco, P ; Orlando, G ; Mazzotta, C ; Rizza, V ; D'Angelo, M ; Clemente, K ; Greco, S ; Famulari, A ; Pisani, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1989e35dd73636fc48580024b4e726a5d6e1f93a3ee83edccd6eb63f911432e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental immunology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the urinary system</topic><topic>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Urine - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Cocco, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlando, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzotta, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizza, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Angelo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Famulari, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisani, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Cocco, P</au><au>Orlando, G</au><au>Mazzotta, C</au><au>Rizza, V</au><au>D'Angelo, M</au><au>Clemente, K</au><au>Greco, S</au><au>Famulari, A</au><au>Pisani, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Germs Resistant to Antibiotics Commonly Used After Renal Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1881</spage><epage>1884</epage><pages>1881-1884</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><coden>TRPPA8</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The inadequate utilization of antibiotics is responsible for the development of urinary tract infections (UTI) after renal transplantation (RT), through the induction of resistance to the antibiotics themselves. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of resistance to cefotaxime (CEF) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), routinely used for surgical perioperative prophylaxis and prevention of Pneumocystis carinii , respectively. Materials and Methods We enrolled all adult patients having received an RT from 2001 to 2006 and having a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Urine cultures (UC) were routinely performed at every outpatient clinic control and whenever required by the onset of significant clinical signs/symptoms. UTI was diagnosed by the presence of a positive UC. The endpoint of the study was the emergence of bacterial strains resistant to either CEF or TMP/SMX. Results We recorded 169 UTI in 76 patients (38 men/38 women, 33%) over a mean follow-up of 779.9 ± 523.3 days. Thirty-nine patients (51%) developed more than 1 UTI episode. When gram-negative bacteria were considered, 102/144 (70.8%) tests showed resistance to TMP/SMX, while data were available in about only 7 gram-positive infections (5/7, 71%). CEF was tested less frequently with 21/43 (49%) germs resistant to this molecule. Conclusions The onset of bacterial resistance to either TMP/SMX or CEF is frequent after RT. A wiser stricter utilization of antibiotics is mandatory. Standard antibiotic protocols should be revised.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18675078</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.014</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2008-07, Vol.40 (6), p.1881-1884
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69386968
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Bacteria - drug effects
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Biological and medical sciences
Drug Resistance, Microbial
Epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fundamental immunology
General aspects
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - epidemiology
Humans
Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the urinary system
Tissue, organ and graft immunology
Urinary Tract Infections - epidemiology
Urinary Tract Infections - etiology
Urine - microbiology
title Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Germs Resistant to Antibiotics Commonly Used After Renal Transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20of%20Urinary%20Tract%20Infections%20Caused%20by%20Germs%20Resistant%20to%20Antibiotics%20Commonly%20Used%20After%20Renal%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Di%20Cocco,%20P&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1881&rft.epage=1884&rft.pages=1881-1884&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft.coden=TRPPA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69386968%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69386968&rft_id=info:pmid/18675078&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0041134508005976&rfr_iscdi=true