Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking
Abstract Human walking is characterized by pronounced arm movement, yet computer simulation models of walking usually lump the mass of the arms with the head and torso. The implications of this simplification have not been thoroughly documented in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2008-08, Vol.41 (11), p.2575-2580 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2580 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2575 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Umberger, Brian R |
description | Abstract Human walking is characterized by pronounced arm movement, yet computer simulation models of walking usually lump the mass of the arms with the head and torso. The implications of this simplification have not been thoroughly documented in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study was to establish the dependence of several biomechanical and energetic variables on suppressing arm swing (AS) in walking. Eight healthy adult subjects walked with and without normal AS, with speed and stride frequency/length matched between trials. Metabolic data were collected during walking on a treadmill, while kinematic and kinetic data were collected during overground walking. Gross and net energy expenditure were significantly higher during walking without AS, with the mean differences being less than 10%. Joint angles, angular velocities, and ground reaction forces were nearly identical for walking with and without AS. Most joint moments and powers were also similar between AS conditions; however, some kinetic variables (e.g., knee joint power) exhibited larger differences, primarily during the stance phase. The variable that differed most between walking with and without AS was the free vertical moment between the foot and ground. In summary, most variables differed by less than 10% and were highly correlated ( r ⩾0.90) between walking with and without normal AS. Thus, researchers may be justified in using walking models without articulated arms. However, a few variables exhibited larger differences, which might be of relevance based on the specific research question being addressed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69384870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929008002716</els_id><sourcerecordid>69384870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-612742607eb1d127200e3d7d99f60b78a5eedc5cbac88e2c4ddaf726de3ef6aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhi0EotvCK1SRkDiRMLYT27kgqqoUpEocgAMny7EnW4fEWewNVd8ep7uoUi-c_Fv6Zuz5bELOKVQUqHg_VEPn5wntbcUAVAVNBax-RjZUSV4yruA52QAwWrashRNymtIAALKW7UtyQpVglEuxIT-v-h7tPhVzX6Rlt4uYkg_bwsSpSHdrmkPxyweczN7b9O4hH5IJrsCAcfuwXxvcLpMJxZ0ZM7R9RV70Zkz4-riekR-frr5ffi5vvl5_uby4KW1Dm30pKJM1EyCxoy7nPA1yJ13b9gI6qUyD6GxjO2OVQmZr50wvmXDIsRfG8DPy9tB3F-ffC6a9nnyyOI4m4LwkLVquaiUhg2-egMO8xJDvpinwOnvioDIlDpSNc0oRe72LfjLxPkN6Va8H_U-9XtVraHRWnwvPj-2XbkL3WHZ0nYGPBwCzjT8eo07WY7DofMxPoN3s_3_Ghyct7OiDt9k43mN6nEcnpkF_Wz_A-v6gcpJU8L9qJa2d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034929308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Umberger, Brian R</creator><creatorcontrib>Umberger, Brian R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Human walking is characterized by pronounced arm movement, yet computer simulation models of walking usually lump the mass of the arms with the head and torso. The implications of this simplification have not been thoroughly documented in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study was to establish the dependence of several biomechanical and energetic variables on suppressing arm swing (AS) in walking. Eight healthy adult subjects walked with and without normal AS, with speed and stride frequency/length matched between trials. Metabolic data were collected during walking on a treadmill, while kinematic and kinetic data were collected during overground walking. Gross and net energy expenditure were significantly higher during walking without AS, with the mean differences being less than 10%. Joint angles, angular velocities, and ground reaction forces were nearly identical for walking with and without AS. Most joint moments and powers were also similar between AS conditions; however, some kinetic variables (e.g., knee joint power) exhibited larger differences, primarily during the stance phase. The variable that differed most between walking with and without AS was the free vertical moment between the foot and ground. In summary, most variables differed by less than 10% and were highly correlated ( r ⩾0.90) between walking with and without normal AS. Thus, researchers may be justified in using walking models without articulated arms. However, a few variables exhibited larger differences, which might be of relevance based on the specific research question being addressed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18621376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm - physiology ; Arm swing ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Computer simulation ; Female ; Fitness equipment ; Gait ; Hip joint ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Kinetics ; Locomotion ; Male ; Metabolic cost ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Studies ; Variables ; Walking ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2008-08, Vol.41 (11), p.2575-2580</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-612742607eb1d127200e3d7d99f60b78a5eedc5cbac88e2c4ddaf726de3ef6aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-612742607eb1d127200e3d7d99f60b78a5eedc5cbac88e2c4ddaf726de3ef6aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929008002716$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18621376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Umberger, Brian R</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Abstract Human walking is characterized by pronounced arm movement, yet computer simulation models of walking usually lump the mass of the arms with the head and torso. The implications of this simplification have not been thoroughly documented in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study was to establish the dependence of several biomechanical and energetic variables on suppressing arm swing (AS) in walking. Eight healthy adult subjects walked with and without normal AS, with speed and stride frequency/length matched between trials. Metabolic data were collected during walking on a treadmill, while kinematic and kinetic data were collected during overground walking. Gross and net energy expenditure were significantly higher during walking without AS, with the mean differences being less than 10%. Joint angles, angular velocities, and ground reaction forces were nearly identical for walking with and without AS. Most joint moments and powers were also similar between AS conditions; however, some kinetic variables (e.g., knee joint power) exhibited larger differences, primarily during the stance phase. The variable that differed most between walking with and without AS was the free vertical moment between the foot and ground. In summary, most variables differed by less than 10% and were highly correlated ( r ⩾0.90) between walking with and without normal AS. Thus, researchers may be justified in using walking models without articulated arms. However, a few variables exhibited larger differences, which might be of relevance based on the specific research question being addressed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>Arm swing</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fitness equipment</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Hip joint</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Locomotion</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolic cost</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhi0EotvCK1SRkDiRMLYT27kgqqoUpEocgAMny7EnW4fEWewNVd8ep7uoUi-c_Fv6Zuz5bELOKVQUqHg_VEPn5wntbcUAVAVNBax-RjZUSV4yruA52QAwWrashRNymtIAALKW7UtyQpVglEuxIT-v-h7tPhVzX6Rlt4uYkg_bwsSpSHdrmkPxyweczN7b9O4hH5IJrsCAcfuwXxvcLpMJxZ0ZM7R9RV70Zkz4-riekR-frr5ffi5vvl5_uby4KW1Dm30pKJM1EyCxoy7nPA1yJ13b9gI6qUyD6GxjO2OVQmZr50wvmXDIsRfG8DPy9tB3F-ffC6a9nnyyOI4m4LwkLVquaiUhg2-egMO8xJDvpinwOnvioDIlDpSNc0oRe72LfjLxPkN6Va8H_U-9XtVraHRWnwvPj-2XbkL3WHZ0nYGPBwCzjT8eo07WY7DofMxPoN3s_3_Ghyct7OiDt9k43mN6nEcnpkF_Wz_A-v6gcpJU8L9qJa2d</recordid><startdate>20080807</startdate><enddate>20080807</enddate><creator>Umberger, Brian R</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080807</creationdate><title>Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking</title><author>Umberger, Brian R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-612742607eb1d127200e3d7d99f60b78a5eedc5cbac88e2c4ddaf726de3ef6aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>Arm swing</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fitness equipment</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Hip joint</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Locomotion</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolic cost</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Umberger, Brian R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Umberger, Brian R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2008-08-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2575</spage><epage>2580</epage><pages>2575-2580</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Abstract Human walking is characterized by pronounced arm movement, yet computer simulation models of walking usually lump the mass of the arms with the head and torso. The implications of this simplification have not been thoroughly documented in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study was to establish the dependence of several biomechanical and energetic variables on suppressing arm swing (AS) in walking. Eight healthy adult subjects walked with and without normal AS, with speed and stride frequency/length matched between trials. Metabolic data were collected during walking on a treadmill, while kinematic and kinetic data were collected during overground walking. Gross and net energy expenditure were significantly higher during walking without AS, with the mean differences being less than 10%. Joint angles, angular velocities, and ground reaction forces were nearly identical for walking with and without AS. Most joint moments and powers were also similar between AS conditions; however, some kinetic variables (e.g., knee joint power) exhibited larger differences, primarily during the stance phase. The variable that differed most between walking with and without AS was the free vertical moment between the foot and ground. In summary, most variables differed by less than 10% and were highly correlated ( r ⩾0.90) between walking with and without normal AS. Thus, researchers may be justified in using walking models without articulated arms. However, a few variables exhibited larger differences, which might be of relevance based on the specific research question being addressed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18621376</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.024</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2008-08, Vol.41 (11), p.2575-2580 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69384870 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Arm - physiology Arm swing Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Computer simulation Female Fitness equipment Gait Hip joint Humans Kinematics Kinetics Locomotion Male Metabolic cost Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Studies Variables Walking Walking - physiology |
title | Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A42%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20suppressing%20arm%20swing%20on%20kinematics,%20kinetics,%20and%20energetics%20of%20human%20walking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Umberger,%20Brian%20R&rft.date=2008-08-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2575&rft.epage=2580&rft.pages=2575-2580&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69384870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034929308&rft_id=info:pmid/18621376&rft_els_id=S0021929008002716&rfr_iscdi=true |