Recent developments in fish vaccinology

During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary immunology and immunopathology 1999-12, Vol.72 (1), p.203-212
Hauptverfasser: Gudding, R., Lillehaug, A., Evensen, Ø.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 212
container_issue 1
container_start_page 203
container_title Veterinary immunology and immunopathology
container_volume 72
creator Gudding, R.
Lillehaug, A.
Evensen, Ø.
description During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp., and Yersinia sp. have been effectively controlled by vaccination. With furunculosis, the success is attributed to the use of injectable vaccines containing adjuvants. Vaccines against virus infections, including infectious pancreatic necrosis, have also been used in commercial fish farming. Vaccines against several other bacterial and viral infections have been studied and found to be technically feasible. Pasteurellosis, streptococcosis (lactococcosis) and infections with iridoviruses are candidate diseases for control by immunoprophylaxis in the near future. The overall positive effect of vaccination in farmed fish is reduced mortality. However, for the future of the fish farming industry it is also important that vaccination contributes to a sustainable biological production with negligible consumption of antibiotics. A potential side-effect associated with injectable vaccines is local reactions in the peritoneal cavity. The paper presents recent developments in immunoprophylaxis of fish and some problems that should be addressed by the research community in the years to come.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69382971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165242799001336</els_id><sourcerecordid>69382971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a1461da9370ff1a671c189a29c4045830b8474a1376f601dea84c7145777eabc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EomV5hKKeWA4Bj-14OSFUsUkVSCxny3UmxShNSpxW6tuTNhXiVh9sS_PNzK-PkAHQa6Agb97bK02YYOrSmCtKgfNE7pE-aMUTlnKxT_p_SI8cxfhNKU2N1oekB1SCSIH2ycUbeiybYYZLLKr5rP3HYSiHeYhfw6XzPpRVUU1XJ-Qgd0XE0-17TD4f7j9GT8n49fF5dDdOvADRJA6EhMwZrmieg5MKPGjjmPGCilRzOtFCCQdcyVxSyNBp4VWbRSmFbuL5MTnv5s7r6meBsbGzED0WhSuxWkQrDdfMKNgJghIMGFMtmHagr6sYa8ztvA4zV68sULtWaTcq7dqTNcZuVFrZ9p1tFywmM8z-dXXuWmDQAbmrrJvWIdqXMaPrA1Kbtn7b1bH1tQxY2-gDlh6zUKNvbFaFHRF-AeKKiVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17421227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recent developments in fish vaccinology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gudding, R. ; Lillehaug, A. ; Evensen, Ø.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gudding, R. ; Lillehaug, A. ; Evensen, Ø.</creatorcontrib><description>During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp., and Yersinia sp. have been effectively controlled by vaccination. With furunculosis, the success is attributed to the use of injectable vaccines containing adjuvants. Vaccines against virus infections, including infectious pancreatic necrosis, have also been used in commercial fish farming. Vaccines against several other bacterial and viral infections have been studied and found to be technically feasible. Pasteurellosis, streptococcosis (lactococcosis) and infections with iridoviruses are candidate diseases for control by immunoprophylaxis in the near future. The overall positive effect of vaccination in farmed fish is reduced mortality. However, for the future of the fish farming industry it is also important that vaccination contributes to a sustainable biological production with negligible consumption of antibiotics. A potential side-effect associated with injectable vaccines is local reactions in the peritoneal cavity. The paper presents recent developments in immunoprophylaxis of fish and some problems that should be addressed by the research community in the years to come.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-2427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10614510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aeromonas ; Animals ; Aquaculture ; Brackish ; Fish ; Fish Diseases - immunology ; Fish Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; FISHES ; Freshwater ; IMMUNITE ; IMMUNITY ; INMUNIDAD ; Marine ; PECES ; POISSON (ANIMAL) ; Protective immunity ; Salmon ; Salmonidae ; VACCINATION ; Vaccination - veterinary ; Vaccine ; Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Vaccines - immunology ; VACUNACION ; Vibrio ; Yersinia</subject><ispartof>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 1999-12, Vol.72 (1), p.203-212</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a1461da9370ff1a671c189a29c4045830b8474a1376f601dea84c7145777eabc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a1461da9370ff1a671c189a29c4045830b8474a1376f601dea84c7145777eabc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10614510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gudding, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillehaug, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evensen, Ø.</creatorcontrib><title>Recent developments in fish vaccinology</title><title>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology</title><addtitle>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</addtitle><description>During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp., and Yersinia sp. have been effectively controlled by vaccination. With furunculosis, the success is attributed to the use of injectable vaccines containing adjuvants. Vaccines against virus infections, including infectious pancreatic necrosis, have also been used in commercial fish farming. Vaccines against several other bacterial and viral infections have been studied and found to be technically feasible. Pasteurellosis, streptococcosis (lactococcosis) and infections with iridoviruses are candidate diseases for control by immunoprophylaxis in the near future. The overall positive effect of vaccination in farmed fish is reduced mortality. However, for the future of the fish farming industry it is also important that vaccination contributes to a sustainable biological production with negligible consumption of antibiotics. A potential side-effect associated with injectable vaccines is local reactions in the peritoneal cavity. The paper presents recent developments in immunoprophylaxis of fish and some problems that should be addressed by the research community in the years to come.</description><subject>Aeromonas</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Fish Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>FISHES</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>IMMUNITE</subject><subject>IMMUNITY</subject><subject>INMUNIDAD</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>PECES</subject><subject>POISSON (ANIMAL)</subject><subject>Protective immunity</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Salmonidae</subject><subject>VACCINATION</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>VACUNACION</subject><subject>Vibrio</subject><subject>Yersinia</subject><issn>0165-2427</issn><issn>1873-2534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EomV5hKKeWA4Bj-14OSFUsUkVSCxny3UmxShNSpxW6tuTNhXiVh9sS_PNzK-PkAHQa6Agb97bK02YYOrSmCtKgfNE7pE-aMUTlnKxT_p_SI8cxfhNKU2N1oekB1SCSIH2ycUbeiybYYZLLKr5rP3HYSiHeYhfw6XzPpRVUU1XJ-Qgd0XE0-17TD4f7j9GT8n49fF5dDdOvADRJA6EhMwZrmieg5MKPGjjmPGCilRzOtFCCQdcyVxSyNBp4VWbRSmFbuL5MTnv5s7r6meBsbGzED0WhSuxWkQrDdfMKNgJghIMGFMtmHagr6sYa8ztvA4zV68sULtWaTcq7dqTNcZuVFrZ9p1tFywmM8z-dXXuWmDQAbmrrJvWIdqXMaPrA1Kbtn7b1bH1tQxY2-gDlh6zUKNvbFaFHRF-AeKKiVc</recordid><startdate>19991215</startdate><enddate>19991215</enddate><creator>Gudding, R.</creator><creator>Lillehaug, A.</creator><creator>Evensen, Ø.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991215</creationdate><title>Recent developments in fish vaccinology</title><author>Gudding, R. ; Lillehaug, A. ; Evensen, Ø.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a1461da9370ff1a671c189a29c4045830b8474a1376f601dea84c7145777eabc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Aeromonas</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Fish Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>FISHES</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>IMMUNITE</topic><topic>IMMUNITY</topic><topic>INMUNIDAD</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>PECES</topic><topic>POISSON (ANIMAL)</topic><topic>Protective immunity</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Salmonidae</topic><topic>VACCINATION</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>VACUNACION</topic><topic>Vibrio</topic><topic>Yersinia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gudding, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillehaug, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evensen, Ø.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gudding, R.</au><au>Lillehaug, A.</au><au>Evensen, Ø.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recent developments in fish vaccinology</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</addtitle><date>1999-12-15</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>203-212</pages><issn>0165-2427</issn><eissn>1873-2534</eissn><abstract>During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp., and Yersinia sp. have been effectively controlled by vaccination. With furunculosis, the success is attributed to the use of injectable vaccines containing adjuvants. Vaccines against virus infections, including infectious pancreatic necrosis, have also been used in commercial fish farming. Vaccines against several other bacterial and viral infections have been studied and found to be technically feasible. Pasteurellosis, streptococcosis (lactococcosis) and infections with iridoviruses are candidate diseases for control by immunoprophylaxis in the near future. The overall positive effect of vaccination in farmed fish is reduced mortality. However, for the future of the fish farming industry it is also important that vaccination contributes to a sustainable biological production with negligible consumption of antibiotics. A potential side-effect associated with injectable vaccines is local reactions in the peritoneal cavity. The paper presents recent developments in immunoprophylaxis of fish and some problems that should be addressed by the research community in the years to come.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10614510</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-2427
ispartof Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 1999-12, Vol.72 (1), p.203-212
issn 0165-2427
1873-2534
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69382971
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aeromonas
Animals
Aquaculture
Brackish
Fish
Fish Diseases - immunology
Fish Diseases - prevention & control
FISHES
Freshwater
IMMUNITE
IMMUNITY
INMUNIDAD
Marine
PECES
POISSON (ANIMAL)
Protective immunity
Salmon
Salmonidae
VACCINATION
Vaccination - veterinary
Vaccine
Vaccines - administration & dosage
Vaccines - immunology
VACUNACION
Vibrio
Yersinia
title Recent developments in fish vaccinology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T12%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recent%20developments%20in%20fish%20vaccinology&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20immunology%20and%20immunopathology&rft.au=Gudding,%20R.&rft.date=1999-12-15&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=203-212&rft.issn=0165-2427&rft.eissn=1873-2534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69382971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17421227&rft_id=info:pmid/10614510&rft_els_id=S0165242799001336&rfr_iscdi=true