Recent developments in fish vaccinology
During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary immunology and immunopathology 1999-12, Vol.72 (1), p.203-212 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 212 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | Veterinary immunology and immunopathology |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Gudding, R. Lillehaug, A. Evensen, Ø. |
description | During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as
Vibrio sp.,
Aeromonas sp., and
Yersinia sp. have been effectively controlled by vaccination. With furunculosis, the success is attributed to the use of injectable vaccines containing adjuvants. Vaccines against virus infections, including infectious pancreatic necrosis, have also been used in commercial fish farming. Vaccines against several other bacterial and viral infections have been studied and found to be technically feasible. Pasteurellosis, streptococcosis (lactococcosis) and infections with iridoviruses are candidate diseases for control by immunoprophylaxis in the near future.
The overall positive effect of vaccination in farmed fish is reduced mortality. However, for the future of the fish farming industry it is also important that vaccination contributes to a sustainable biological production with negligible consumption of antibiotics. A potential side-effect associated with injectable vaccines is local reactions in the peritoneal cavity.
The paper presents recent developments in immunoprophylaxis of fish and some problems that should be addressed by the research community in the years to come. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69382971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165242799001336</els_id><sourcerecordid>69382971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a1461da9370ff1a671c189a29c4045830b8474a1376f601dea84c7145777eabc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EomV5hKKeWA4Bj-14OSFUsUkVSCxny3UmxShNSpxW6tuTNhXiVh9sS_PNzK-PkAHQa6Agb97bK02YYOrSmCtKgfNE7pE-aMUTlnKxT_p_SI8cxfhNKU2N1oekB1SCSIH2ycUbeiybYYZLLKr5rP3HYSiHeYhfw6XzPpRVUU1XJ-Qgd0XE0-17TD4f7j9GT8n49fF5dDdOvADRJA6EhMwZrmieg5MKPGjjmPGCilRzOtFCCQdcyVxSyNBp4VWbRSmFbuL5MTnv5s7r6meBsbGzED0WhSuxWkQrDdfMKNgJghIMGFMtmHagr6sYa8ztvA4zV68sULtWaTcq7dqTNcZuVFrZ9p1tFywmM8z-dXXuWmDQAbmrrJvWIdqXMaPrA1Kbtn7b1bH1tQxY2-gDlh6zUKNvbFaFHRF-AeKKiVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17421227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recent developments in fish vaccinology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gudding, R. ; Lillehaug, A. ; Evensen, Ø.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gudding, R. ; Lillehaug, A. ; Evensen, Ø.</creatorcontrib><description>During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as
Vibrio sp.,
Aeromonas sp., and
Yersinia sp. have been effectively controlled by vaccination. With furunculosis, the success is attributed to the use of injectable vaccines containing adjuvants. Vaccines against virus infections, including infectious pancreatic necrosis, have also been used in commercial fish farming. Vaccines against several other bacterial and viral infections have been studied and found to be technically feasible. Pasteurellosis, streptococcosis (lactococcosis) and infections with iridoviruses are candidate diseases for control by immunoprophylaxis in the near future.
The overall positive effect of vaccination in farmed fish is reduced mortality. However, for the future of the fish farming industry it is also important that vaccination contributes to a sustainable biological production with negligible consumption of antibiotics. A potential side-effect associated with injectable vaccines is local reactions in the peritoneal cavity.
The paper presents recent developments in immunoprophylaxis of fish and some problems that should be addressed by the research community in the years to come.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-2427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10614510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aeromonas ; Animals ; Aquaculture ; Brackish ; Fish ; Fish Diseases - immunology ; Fish Diseases - prevention & control ; FISHES ; Freshwater ; IMMUNITE ; IMMUNITY ; INMUNIDAD ; Marine ; PECES ; POISSON (ANIMAL) ; Protective immunity ; Salmon ; Salmonidae ; VACCINATION ; Vaccination - veterinary ; Vaccine ; Vaccines - administration & dosage ; Vaccines - immunology ; VACUNACION ; Vibrio ; Yersinia</subject><ispartof>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 1999-12, Vol.72 (1), p.203-212</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a1461da9370ff1a671c189a29c4045830b8474a1376f601dea84c7145777eabc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a1461da9370ff1a671c189a29c4045830b8474a1376f601dea84c7145777eabc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10614510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gudding, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillehaug, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evensen, Ø.</creatorcontrib><title>Recent developments in fish vaccinology</title><title>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology</title><addtitle>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</addtitle><description>During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as
Vibrio sp.,
Aeromonas sp., and
Yersinia sp. have been effectively controlled by vaccination. With furunculosis, the success is attributed to the use of injectable vaccines containing adjuvants. Vaccines against virus infections, including infectious pancreatic necrosis, have also been used in commercial fish farming. Vaccines against several other bacterial and viral infections have been studied and found to be technically feasible. Pasteurellosis, streptococcosis (lactococcosis) and infections with iridoviruses are candidate diseases for control by immunoprophylaxis in the near future.
The overall positive effect of vaccination in farmed fish is reduced mortality. However, for the future of the fish farming industry it is also important that vaccination contributes to a sustainable biological production with negligible consumption of antibiotics. A potential side-effect associated with injectable vaccines is local reactions in the peritoneal cavity.
The paper presents recent developments in immunoprophylaxis of fish and some problems that should be addressed by the research community in the years to come.</description><subject>Aeromonas</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Fish Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>FISHES</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>IMMUNITE</subject><subject>IMMUNITY</subject><subject>INMUNIDAD</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>PECES</subject><subject>POISSON (ANIMAL)</subject><subject>Protective immunity</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Salmonidae</subject><subject>VACCINATION</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>VACUNACION</subject><subject>Vibrio</subject><subject>Yersinia</subject><issn>0165-2427</issn><issn>1873-2534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EomV5hKKeWA4Bj-14OSFUsUkVSCxny3UmxShNSpxW6tuTNhXiVh9sS_PNzK-PkAHQa6Agb97bK02YYOrSmCtKgfNE7pE-aMUTlnKxT_p_SI8cxfhNKU2N1oekB1SCSIH2ycUbeiybYYZLLKr5rP3HYSiHeYhfw6XzPpRVUU1XJ-Qgd0XE0-17TD4f7j9GT8n49fF5dDdOvADRJA6EhMwZrmieg5MKPGjjmPGCilRzOtFCCQdcyVxSyNBp4VWbRSmFbuL5MTnv5s7r6meBsbGzED0WhSuxWkQrDdfMKNgJghIMGFMtmHagr6sYa8ztvA4zV68sULtWaTcq7dqTNcZuVFrZ9p1tFywmM8z-dXXuWmDQAbmrrJvWIdqXMaPrA1Kbtn7b1bH1tQxY2-gDlh6zUKNvbFaFHRF-AeKKiVc</recordid><startdate>19991215</startdate><enddate>19991215</enddate><creator>Gudding, R.</creator><creator>Lillehaug, A.</creator><creator>Evensen, Ø.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991215</creationdate><title>Recent developments in fish vaccinology</title><author>Gudding, R. ; Lillehaug, A. ; Evensen, Ø.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a1461da9370ff1a671c189a29c4045830b8474a1376f601dea84c7145777eabc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Aeromonas</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Fish Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>FISHES</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>IMMUNITE</topic><topic>IMMUNITY</topic><topic>INMUNIDAD</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>PECES</topic><topic>POISSON (ANIMAL)</topic><topic>Protective immunity</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Salmonidae</topic><topic>VACCINATION</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>VACUNACION</topic><topic>Vibrio</topic><topic>Yersinia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gudding, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillehaug, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evensen, Ø.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gudding, R.</au><au>Lillehaug, A.</au><au>Evensen, Ø.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recent developments in fish vaccinology</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</addtitle><date>1999-12-15</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>203-212</pages><issn>0165-2427</issn><eissn>1873-2534</eissn><abstract>During the last 10 to 20 years vaccination has become established as an important method for prevention of infectious diseases in farmed fish, mainly salmonid species. So far, most commercial vaccines have been inactivated vaccines administered by injection or immersion. Bacterial infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as
Vibrio sp.,
Aeromonas sp., and
Yersinia sp. have been effectively controlled by vaccination. With furunculosis, the success is attributed to the use of injectable vaccines containing adjuvants. Vaccines against virus infections, including infectious pancreatic necrosis, have also been used in commercial fish farming. Vaccines against several other bacterial and viral infections have been studied and found to be technically feasible. Pasteurellosis, streptococcosis (lactococcosis) and infections with iridoviruses are candidate diseases for control by immunoprophylaxis in the near future.
The overall positive effect of vaccination in farmed fish is reduced mortality. However, for the future of the fish farming industry it is also important that vaccination contributes to a sustainable biological production with negligible consumption of antibiotics. A potential side-effect associated with injectable vaccines is local reactions in the peritoneal cavity.
The paper presents recent developments in immunoprophylaxis of fish and some problems that should be addressed by the research community in the years to come.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10614510</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-2427 |
ispartof | Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 1999-12, Vol.72 (1), p.203-212 |
issn | 0165-2427 1873-2534 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69382971 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aeromonas Animals Aquaculture Brackish Fish Fish Diseases - immunology Fish Diseases - prevention & control FISHES Freshwater IMMUNITE IMMUNITY INMUNIDAD Marine PECES POISSON (ANIMAL) Protective immunity Salmon Salmonidae VACCINATION Vaccination - veterinary Vaccine Vaccines - administration & dosage Vaccines - immunology VACUNACION Vibrio Yersinia |
title | Recent developments in fish vaccinology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T12%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recent%20developments%20in%20fish%20vaccinology&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20immunology%20and%20immunopathology&rft.au=Gudding,%20R.&rft.date=1999-12-15&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=203-212&rft.issn=0165-2427&rft.eissn=1873-2534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0165-2427(99)00133-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69382971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17421227&rft_id=info:pmid/10614510&rft_els_id=S0165242799001336&rfr_iscdi=true |