Instrumented Measurement of Anteroposterior and Inversion-Eversion Laxity of the Normal Ankle Joint Complex

Manual examination is the most common method for the evaluation of ankle anteroposterior (AP) and inversion-eversion (I-E) laxity. Objective assessment data of normal ankle laxity must be provided before comparison with an injured ankle can be made. The purpose of this study was to compare AP transl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot & ankle international 1999-12, Vol.20 (12), p.808-814
Hauptverfasser: Kovaleski, John E., Gurchiek, Larry R., Heitman, Robert J., Hollis, J. Marcus, Pearsall, Albert W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 814
container_issue 12
container_start_page 808
container_title Foot & ankle international
container_volume 20
creator Kovaleski, John E.
Gurchiek, Larry R.
Heitman, Robert J.
Hollis, J. Marcus
Pearsall, Albert W.
description Manual examination is the most common method for the evaluation of ankle anteroposterior (AP) and inversion-eversion (I-E) laxity. Objective assessment data of normal ankle laxity must be provided before comparison with an injured ankle can be made. The purpose of this study was to compare AP translation and I-E rotation at three force loads between dominant and nondominant ankles and to assess the test-retest reliability of a portable arthrometer in obtaining these measurements. The arthrometer consists of a frame that is fixed to the foot, a pad that is attached to the tibia, and a load-measuring handle that is attached to the foot plate through which the load is applied. A six-degrees-of-freedom spatial kinematic linkage system is connected between the tibial pad and the foot frame to measure motion. Instrumented measurement testing of total AP displacement and I-E rotation of both ankles was performed in 41 subjects (21 men and 20 women; mean age, 23.8 ± 4.4 years). Subjects had no history of ankle injury. Subjects were tested in the supine position while lying on a table with the knee secured in extension and the foot positioned at 0° of flexion. Laxity was measured from total AP displacement (millimeters) during loading to 125 N of AP force and from total I-E rotation (degrees of range of motion) during loading to 4000 N-mm. Reliability was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) at 75 N, 100 N, and 125 N of AP force and at 2000, 3000, and 4000 N-mm torque loads. Mean differences for displacement and rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at each of the force and torque loads were analyzed by dependent t-tests. For both the dominant and nondominant ankles, respectively, the reliability coefficients at each of the force loads for AP displacement (range, 0.82–0.89) and I-E rotation (range, 0.86–0.97) were high. The t-test analyses showed no significant differences (P ≥ 0.05) for total AP displacement or I-E rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at any of the force loads. The results are clinically useful in providing information about the reliability of measures at different AP and I-E force loads using a portable ankle ligament arthrometer.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/107110079902001210
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69372077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_107110079902001210</sage_id><sourcerecordid>69372077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-65e214877b8282674032aac2fc907f327a87565afdb17bf24201750eda0acd573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Pg0AQhjdGY2v1D3gwnLxhZ5ePgWPTVK2petEzWWBQWmBxF0z7711CDyYmnmZ28zxvMi9j1xzuOEecc0DOATCOQQBwweGETXns-y5GGJ7a3QLuQEzYhTFby6DH43M24RBCbOUp260b0-m-pqaj3HkmaXpNw8tRhbOwn1q1ythRKu3IJnfWzTdpU6rGXR0XZyP3ZXcYhO6TnBela1lZd1eR86RKG7VUdVvR_pKdFbIydHWcM_Z-v3pbPrqb14f1crFxMx-Czg0DEtyPENNIRCJEHzwhZSaKLAYsPIEywiAMZJGnHNNC-MLeFQDlEmSWB-jN2O2Y22r11ZPpkro0GVWVbEj1JgljDwXgAIoRzLQyRlORtLqspT4kHJKh4uRvxVa6Oab3aU35L2Xs1ALzETDyg5Kt6nVjr_0v8gevAYRD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69372077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Instrumented Measurement of Anteroposterior and Inversion-Eversion Laxity of the Normal Ankle Joint Complex</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Kovaleski, John E. ; Gurchiek, Larry R. ; Heitman, Robert J. ; Hollis, J. Marcus ; Pearsall, Albert W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kovaleski, John E. ; Gurchiek, Larry R. ; Heitman, Robert J. ; Hollis, J. Marcus ; Pearsall, Albert W.</creatorcontrib><description>Manual examination is the most common method for the evaluation of ankle anteroposterior (AP) and inversion-eversion (I-E) laxity. Objective assessment data of normal ankle laxity must be provided before comparison with an injured ankle can be made. The purpose of this study was to compare AP translation and I-E rotation at three force loads between dominant and nondominant ankles and to assess the test-retest reliability of a portable arthrometer in obtaining these measurements. The arthrometer consists of a frame that is fixed to the foot, a pad that is attached to the tibia, and a load-measuring handle that is attached to the foot plate through which the load is applied. A six-degrees-of-freedom spatial kinematic linkage system is connected between the tibial pad and the foot frame to measure motion. Instrumented measurement testing of total AP displacement and I-E rotation of both ankles was performed in 41 subjects (21 men and 20 women; mean age, 23.8 ± 4.4 years). Subjects had no history of ankle injury. Subjects were tested in the supine position while lying on a table with the knee secured in extension and the foot positioned at 0° of flexion. Laxity was measured from total AP displacement (millimeters) during loading to 125 N of AP force and from total I-E rotation (degrees of range of motion) during loading to 4000 N-mm. Reliability was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) at 75 N, 100 N, and 125 N of AP force and at 2000, 3000, and 4000 N-mm torque loads. Mean differences for displacement and rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at each of the force and torque loads were analyzed by dependent t-tests. For both the dominant and nondominant ankles, respectively, the reliability coefficients at each of the force loads for AP displacement (range, 0.82–0.89) and I-E rotation (range, 0.86–0.97) were high. The t-test analyses showed no significant differences (P ≥ 0.05) for total AP displacement or I-E rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at any of the force loads. The results are clinically useful in providing information about the reliability of measures at different AP and I-E force loads using a portable ankle ligament arthrometer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/107110079902001210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10609711</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ankle Injuries - diagnosis ; Ankle Joint - physiology ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Female ; Humans ; Joint Instability - diagnosis ; Ligaments, Articular - physiology ; Male ; Orthopedics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design - standards ; Rotation</subject><ispartof>Foot &amp; ankle international, 1999-12, Vol.20 (12), p.808-814</ispartof><rights>1999 American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-65e214877b8282674032aac2fc907f327a87565afdb17bf24201750eda0acd573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-65e214877b8282674032aac2fc907f327a87565afdb17bf24201750eda0acd573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/107110079902001210$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/107110079902001210$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10609711$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kovaleski, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurchiek, Larry R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitman, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollis, J. Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearsall, Albert W.</creatorcontrib><title>Instrumented Measurement of Anteroposterior and Inversion-Eversion Laxity of the Normal Ankle Joint Complex</title><title>Foot &amp; ankle international</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><description>Manual examination is the most common method for the evaluation of ankle anteroposterior (AP) and inversion-eversion (I-E) laxity. Objective assessment data of normal ankle laxity must be provided before comparison with an injured ankle can be made. The purpose of this study was to compare AP translation and I-E rotation at three force loads between dominant and nondominant ankles and to assess the test-retest reliability of a portable arthrometer in obtaining these measurements. The arthrometer consists of a frame that is fixed to the foot, a pad that is attached to the tibia, and a load-measuring handle that is attached to the foot plate through which the load is applied. A six-degrees-of-freedom spatial kinematic linkage system is connected between the tibial pad and the foot frame to measure motion. Instrumented measurement testing of total AP displacement and I-E rotation of both ankles was performed in 41 subjects (21 men and 20 women; mean age, 23.8 ± 4.4 years). Subjects had no history of ankle injury. Subjects were tested in the supine position while lying on a table with the knee secured in extension and the foot positioned at 0° of flexion. Laxity was measured from total AP displacement (millimeters) during loading to 125 N of AP force and from total I-E rotation (degrees of range of motion) during loading to 4000 N-mm. Reliability was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) at 75 N, 100 N, and 125 N of AP force and at 2000, 3000, and 4000 N-mm torque loads. Mean differences for displacement and rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at each of the force and torque loads were analyzed by dependent t-tests. For both the dominant and nondominant ankles, respectively, the reliability coefficients at each of the force loads for AP displacement (range, 0.82–0.89) and I-E rotation (range, 0.86–0.97) were high. The t-test analyses showed no significant differences (P ≥ 0.05) for total AP displacement or I-E rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at any of the force loads. The results are clinically useful in providing information about the reliability of measures at different AP and I-E force loads using a portable ankle ligament arthrometer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ankle Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ligaments, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Design - standards</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><issn>1071-1007</issn><issn>1944-7876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Pg0AQhjdGY2v1D3gwnLxhZ5ePgWPTVK2petEzWWBQWmBxF0z7711CDyYmnmZ28zxvMi9j1xzuOEecc0DOATCOQQBwweGETXns-y5GGJ7a3QLuQEzYhTFby6DH43M24RBCbOUp260b0-m-pqaj3HkmaXpNw8tRhbOwn1q1ythRKu3IJnfWzTdpU6rGXR0XZyP3ZXcYhO6TnBela1lZd1eR86RKG7VUdVvR_pKdFbIydHWcM_Z-v3pbPrqb14f1crFxMx-Czg0DEtyPENNIRCJEHzwhZSaKLAYsPIEywiAMZJGnHNNC-MLeFQDlEmSWB-jN2O2Y22r11ZPpkro0GVWVbEj1JgljDwXgAIoRzLQyRlORtLqspT4kHJKh4uRvxVa6Oab3aU35L2Xs1ALzETDyg5Kt6nVjr_0v8gevAYRD</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>Kovaleski, John E.</creator><creator>Gurchiek, Larry R.</creator><creator>Heitman, Robert J.</creator><creator>Hollis, J. Marcus</creator><creator>Pearsall, Albert W.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>Instrumented Measurement of Anteroposterior and Inversion-Eversion Laxity of the Normal Ankle Joint Complex</title><author>Kovaleski, John E. ; Gurchiek, Larry R. ; Heitman, Robert J. ; Hollis, J. Marcus ; Pearsall, Albert W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-65e214877b8282674032aac2fc907f327a87565afdb17bf24201750eda0acd573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ankle Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ligaments, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Design - standards</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kovaleski, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurchiek, Larry R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitman, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollis, J. Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearsall, Albert W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kovaleski, John E.</au><au>Gurchiek, Larry R.</au><au>Heitman, Robert J.</au><au>Hollis, J. Marcus</au><au>Pearsall, Albert W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Instrumented Measurement of Anteroposterior and Inversion-Eversion Laxity of the Normal Ankle Joint Complex</atitle><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle international</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>808</spage><epage>814</epage><pages>808-814</pages><issn>1071-1007</issn><eissn>1944-7876</eissn><abstract>Manual examination is the most common method for the evaluation of ankle anteroposterior (AP) and inversion-eversion (I-E) laxity. Objective assessment data of normal ankle laxity must be provided before comparison with an injured ankle can be made. The purpose of this study was to compare AP translation and I-E rotation at three force loads between dominant and nondominant ankles and to assess the test-retest reliability of a portable arthrometer in obtaining these measurements. The arthrometer consists of a frame that is fixed to the foot, a pad that is attached to the tibia, and a load-measuring handle that is attached to the foot plate through which the load is applied. A six-degrees-of-freedom spatial kinematic linkage system is connected between the tibial pad and the foot frame to measure motion. Instrumented measurement testing of total AP displacement and I-E rotation of both ankles was performed in 41 subjects (21 men and 20 women; mean age, 23.8 ± 4.4 years). Subjects had no history of ankle injury. Subjects were tested in the supine position while lying on a table with the knee secured in extension and the foot positioned at 0° of flexion. Laxity was measured from total AP displacement (millimeters) during loading to 125 N of AP force and from total I-E rotation (degrees of range of motion) during loading to 4000 N-mm. Reliability was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) at 75 N, 100 N, and 125 N of AP force and at 2000, 3000, and 4000 N-mm torque loads. Mean differences for displacement and rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at each of the force and torque loads were analyzed by dependent t-tests. For both the dominant and nondominant ankles, respectively, the reliability coefficients at each of the force loads for AP displacement (range, 0.82–0.89) and I-E rotation (range, 0.86–0.97) were high. The t-test analyses showed no significant differences (P ≥ 0.05) for total AP displacement or I-E rotation between the dominant and nondominant ankles at any of the force loads. The results are clinically useful in providing information about the reliability of measures at different AP and I-E force loads using a portable ankle ligament arthrometer.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>10609711</pmid><doi>10.1177/107110079902001210</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-1007
ispartof Foot & ankle international, 1999-12, Vol.20 (12), p.808-814
issn 1071-1007
1944-7876
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69372077
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Ankle Injuries - diagnosis
Ankle Joint - physiology
Biomechanical Phenomena
Female
Humans
Joint Instability - diagnosis
Ligaments, Articular - physiology
Male
Orthopedics
Reproducibility of Results
Research Design - standards
Rotation
title Instrumented Measurement of Anteroposterior and Inversion-Eversion Laxity of the Normal Ankle Joint Complex
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T23%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Instrumented%20Measurement%20of%20Anteroposterior%20and%20Inversion-Eversion%20Laxity%20of%20the%20Normal%20Ankle%20Joint%20Complex&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20ankle%20international&rft.au=Kovaleski,%20John%20E.&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=808&rft.epage=814&rft.pages=808-814&rft.issn=1071-1007&rft.eissn=1944-7876&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/107110079902001210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69372077%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69372077&rft_id=info:pmid/10609711&rft_sage_id=10.1177_107110079902001210&rfr_iscdi=true