Can we improve our results in hemodialysis? Setting quality objectives, feedback, and benchmarking
To diminish inter centres variability in applied medical treatments, as well as in the results obtained with them, is one of the main challenges that Nephrology faces now a days. The systematic and planned use of Clinical Performance Measures (CPMs), Feedback and Benchmarking are tools that can help...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nefrología 2008, Vol.28 (4), p.397-406 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | spa |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 406 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 397 |
| container_title | Nefrología |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Arenas, M D Alvarez-Ude, F Moledous, A Malek, T Gil, M T Soriano, A Núñez, C |
| description | To diminish inter centres variability in applied medical treatments, as well as in the results obtained with them, is one of the main challenges that Nephrology faces now a days. The systematic and planned use of Clinical Performance Measures (CPMs), Feedback and Benchmarking are tools that can help clinicians to reach such an objective. In this study we evaluate the consequences of applying those techniques in the results obtained in three haemodialysis units.
we analyzed the results obtained in 311 patients dialyzed in the three units during the period 2006-2007. Established and evaluated objectives were as follows: 1.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum calcium below 9,5 mg/dl over 70%; 2.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum phosphorus under 5,5 mg/dl over 80%; 3.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum PTH in between 150-300 pg/ml over 40%; 4.- To diminish the percentage of patients with a serum ferritine below 100 ng/ml under 10%, in one of the units that at the beginning of the study was not accomplishing that objective. Every three months each unit received their own results as well as the results of the two other units.
the percentage of patients with serum calcium below 9,5 mg/dl increased significantly in the three units (54,6%, 56,1% and 55,6% at the beginning; 87,7%, 82.9% and 75,1% at the end of the study, respectively; p |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69367732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69367732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-16b16db8dbc5da65f79295be1e43abf23bc74c1564690c96e1b3c10d38de42793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kDtPwzAYRT2AaCn8BeSJqZFiO7HjCaGIl1SJAZgjP75Qt46Txk5R_z2RKNNdjq7OvRdomVNCMi5luUDXMe7ynJdUiiu0IBXnlBRiiXStAv4B7Lph7I-A-2nEI8TJp4hdwFvoeuuUP0UXH_AHpOTCNz5Myrt0wr3egUnuCHGNWwCrldmvsQoWawhm26lxP-M36LJVPsLtOVfo6_nps37NNu8vb_XjJhsIkykjXBNudWW1Ka3iZSsklaUGAgVTuqVMG1EYUvKCy9xIDkQzQ3LLKgsFFZKt0P1f77zkMEFMTeeiAe9VgH6KDZeMC8HoDN6dwUl3YJthdLPqqfl_hf0ClbRejQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69367732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can we improve our results in hemodialysis? Setting quality objectives, feedback, and benchmarking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Arenas, M D ; Alvarez-Ude, F ; Moledous, A ; Malek, T ; Gil, M T ; Soriano, A ; Núñez, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Arenas, M D ; Alvarez-Ude, F ; Moledous, A ; Malek, T ; Gil, M T ; Soriano, A ; Núñez, C</creatorcontrib><description>To diminish inter centres variability in applied medical treatments, as well as in the results obtained with them, is one of the main challenges that Nephrology faces now a days. The systematic and planned use of Clinical Performance Measures (CPMs), Feedback and Benchmarking are tools that can help clinicians to reach such an objective. In this study we evaluate the consequences of applying those techniques in the results obtained in three haemodialysis units.
we analyzed the results obtained in 311 patients dialyzed in the three units during the period 2006-2007. Established and evaluated objectives were as follows: 1.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum calcium below 9,5 mg/dl over 70%; 2.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum phosphorus under 5,5 mg/dl over 80%; 3.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum PTH in between 150-300 pg/ml over 40%; 4.- To diminish the percentage of patients with a serum ferritine below 100 ng/ml under 10%, in one of the units that at the beginning of the study was not accomplishing that objective. Every three months each unit received their own results as well as the results of the two other units.
the percentage of patients with serum calcium below 9,5 mg/dl increased significantly in the three units (54,6%, 56,1% and 55,6% at the beginning; 87,7%, 82.9% and 75,1% at the end of the study, respectively; p<0,001). The same was observed for the percentage of patients with a serum phosphorus below 5,5 mg/dl (77,9%, 73,6% and 66,0% at the beginning; 81,7%, 78,0% and 85.9% at the end, respectively; p: not significant), and for the percentage of patients with PTH between 150-300 pg/ml (32,9%, 43,1% and 26,4% versus 47,5%, 41,4% and 39.5%, respectively; p: not significant). The percentage of patients with a serum ferritin below 100 ng/ml in unit B diminished from 30% to 5,3% (p<0,001), reaching results similar the the two other units. Mean erythropoietin (EPO) consumption during the year 2005 was 145,5+/-13,2 U/kg/week in unit A; 226,2+/-39,8 U/kg/week in unit B, and 175,5+/-13,9 U/kg/week in unit C. At the end of year 2007, mean EPO consumption was significantly lower in unit B (144,2+/-15 U/kg/week), and similar to the other two units (140+/-14,2 in unit A and 135,1+/-13,8 in unit C).
The results of this study permit to conclude that the use of QPM's and quality targets, combined with feedback and benchmarking, allows for the improvement of clinical results. Each centre should establish their own objectives, independently of the defined quality standards, so as to reach such standards or even to improve them. In this study, the three units showed a general improvement in their results, tending towards similar outcomes for the same clinical processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0211-6995</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18662147</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Aged ; Benchmarking ; Feedback ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Renal Dialysis - standards</subject><ispartof>Nefrología, 2008, Vol.28 (4), p.397-406</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18662147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arenas, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez-Ude, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moledous, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, M T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soriano, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez, C</creatorcontrib><title>Can we improve our results in hemodialysis? Setting quality objectives, feedback, and benchmarking</title><title>Nefrología</title><addtitle>Nefrologia</addtitle><description>To diminish inter centres variability in applied medical treatments, as well as in the results obtained with them, is one of the main challenges that Nephrology faces now a days. The systematic and planned use of Clinical Performance Measures (CPMs), Feedback and Benchmarking are tools that can help clinicians to reach such an objective. In this study we evaluate the consequences of applying those techniques in the results obtained in three haemodialysis units.
we analyzed the results obtained in 311 patients dialyzed in the three units during the period 2006-2007. Established and evaluated objectives were as follows: 1.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum calcium below 9,5 mg/dl over 70%; 2.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum phosphorus under 5,5 mg/dl over 80%; 3.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum PTH in between 150-300 pg/ml over 40%; 4.- To diminish the percentage of patients with a serum ferritine below 100 ng/ml under 10%, in one of the units that at the beginning of the study was not accomplishing that objective. Every three months each unit received their own results as well as the results of the two other units.
the percentage of patients with serum calcium below 9,5 mg/dl increased significantly in the three units (54,6%, 56,1% and 55,6% at the beginning; 87,7%, 82.9% and 75,1% at the end of the study, respectively; p<0,001). The same was observed for the percentage of patients with a serum phosphorus below 5,5 mg/dl (77,9%, 73,6% and 66,0% at the beginning; 81,7%, 78,0% and 85.9% at the end, respectively; p: not significant), and for the percentage of patients with PTH between 150-300 pg/ml (32,9%, 43,1% and 26,4% versus 47,5%, 41,4% and 39.5%, respectively; p: not significant). The percentage of patients with a serum ferritin below 100 ng/ml in unit B diminished from 30% to 5,3% (p<0,001), reaching results similar the the two other units. Mean erythropoietin (EPO) consumption during the year 2005 was 145,5+/-13,2 U/kg/week in unit A; 226,2+/-39,8 U/kg/week in unit B, and 175,5+/-13,9 U/kg/week in unit C. At the end of year 2007, mean EPO consumption was significantly lower in unit B (144,2+/-15 U/kg/week), and similar to the other two units (140+/-14,2 in unit A and 135,1+/-13,8 in unit C).
The results of this study permit to conclude that the use of QPM's and quality targets, combined with feedback and benchmarking, allows for the improvement of clinical results. Each centre should establish their own objectives, independently of the defined quality standards, so as to reach such standards or even to improve them. In this study, the three units showed a general improvement in their results, tending towards similar outcomes for the same clinical processes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - standards</subject><issn>0211-6995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kDtPwzAYRT2AaCn8BeSJqZFiO7HjCaGIl1SJAZgjP75Qt46Txk5R_z2RKNNdjq7OvRdomVNCMi5luUDXMe7ynJdUiiu0IBXnlBRiiXStAv4B7Lph7I-A-2nEI8TJp4hdwFvoeuuUP0UXH_AHpOTCNz5Myrt0wr3egUnuCHGNWwCrldmvsQoWawhm26lxP-M36LJVPsLtOVfo6_nps37NNu8vb_XjJhsIkykjXBNudWW1Ka3iZSsklaUGAgVTuqVMG1EYUvKCy9xIDkQzQ3LLKgsFFZKt0P1f77zkMEFMTeeiAe9VgH6KDZeMC8HoDN6dwUl3YJthdLPqqfl_hf0ClbRejQ</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Arenas, M D</creator><creator>Alvarez-Ude, F</creator><creator>Moledous, A</creator><creator>Malek, T</creator><creator>Gil, M T</creator><creator>Soriano, A</creator><creator>Núñez, C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Can we improve our results in hemodialysis? Setting quality objectives, feedback, and benchmarking</title><author>Arenas, M D ; Alvarez-Ude, F ; Moledous, A ; Malek, T ; Gil, M T ; Soriano, A ; Núñez, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-16b16db8dbc5da65f79295be1e43abf23bc74c1564690c96e1b3c10d38de42793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arenas, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez-Ude, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moledous, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, M T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soriano, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nefrología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arenas, M D</au><au>Alvarez-Ude, F</au><au>Moledous, A</au><au>Malek, T</au><au>Gil, M T</au><au>Soriano, A</au><au>Núñez, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can we improve our results in hemodialysis? Setting quality objectives, feedback, and benchmarking</atitle><jtitle>Nefrología</jtitle><addtitle>Nefrologia</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>397-406</pages><issn>0211-6995</issn><abstract>To diminish inter centres variability in applied medical treatments, as well as in the results obtained with them, is one of the main challenges that Nephrology faces now a days. The systematic and planned use of Clinical Performance Measures (CPMs), Feedback and Benchmarking are tools that can help clinicians to reach such an objective. In this study we evaluate the consequences of applying those techniques in the results obtained in three haemodialysis units.
we analyzed the results obtained in 311 patients dialyzed in the three units during the period 2006-2007. Established and evaluated objectives were as follows: 1.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum calcium below 9,5 mg/dl over 70%; 2.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum phosphorus under 5,5 mg/dl over 80%; 3.- To increase the percentage of patients with a serum PTH in between 150-300 pg/ml over 40%; 4.- To diminish the percentage of patients with a serum ferritine below 100 ng/ml under 10%, in one of the units that at the beginning of the study was not accomplishing that objective. Every three months each unit received their own results as well as the results of the two other units.
the percentage of patients with serum calcium below 9,5 mg/dl increased significantly in the three units (54,6%, 56,1% and 55,6% at the beginning; 87,7%, 82.9% and 75,1% at the end of the study, respectively; p<0,001). The same was observed for the percentage of patients with a serum phosphorus below 5,5 mg/dl (77,9%, 73,6% and 66,0% at the beginning; 81,7%, 78,0% and 85.9% at the end, respectively; p: not significant), and for the percentage of patients with PTH between 150-300 pg/ml (32,9%, 43,1% and 26,4% versus 47,5%, 41,4% and 39.5%, respectively; p: not significant). The percentage of patients with a serum ferritin below 100 ng/ml in unit B diminished from 30% to 5,3% (p<0,001), reaching results similar the the two other units. Mean erythropoietin (EPO) consumption during the year 2005 was 145,5+/-13,2 U/kg/week in unit A; 226,2+/-39,8 U/kg/week in unit B, and 175,5+/-13,9 U/kg/week in unit C. At the end of year 2007, mean EPO consumption was significantly lower in unit B (144,2+/-15 U/kg/week), and similar to the other two units (140+/-14,2 in unit A and 135,1+/-13,8 in unit C).
The results of this study permit to conclude that the use of QPM's and quality targets, combined with feedback and benchmarking, allows for the improvement of clinical results. Each centre should establish their own objectives, independently of the defined quality standards, so as to reach such standards or even to improve them. In this study, the three units showed a general improvement in their results, tending towards similar outcomes for the same clinical processes.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>18662147</pmid><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0211-6995 |
| ispartof | Nefrología, 2008, Vol.28 (4), p.397-406 |
| issn | 0211-6995 |
| language | spa |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69367732 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Aged Benchmarking Feedback Humans Middle Aged Renal Dialysis - standards |
| title | Can we improve our results in hemodialysis? Setting quality objectives, feedback, and benchmarking |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A49%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20we%20improve%20our%20results%20in%20hemodialysis?%20Setting%20quality%20objectives,%20feedback,%20and%20benchmarking&rft.jtitle=Nefrolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=Arenas,%20M%20D&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=397-406&rft.issn=0211-6995&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69367732%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69367732&rft_id=info:pmid/18662147&rfr_iscdi=true |