Clinical image quality criteria for full field digital mammography: a first practical application

In order to quantify the clinical quality of full-field digital mammography, a set of image quality parameters is developed. The set consisted of 12 image quality criteria and 8 physical characteristics of the image. The first set interrogates the visibility of anatomical structures and typical char...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2008, Vol.129 (1-3), p.265-270
Hauptverfasser: Van Ongeval, Chantal, Van Steen, André, Geniets, Catherine, Dekeyzer, Frederik, Bosmans, Hilde, Marchal, Guy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 270
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 265
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 129
creator Van Ongeval, Chantal
Van Steen, André
Geniets, Catherine
Dekeyzer, Frederik
Bosmans, Hilde
Marchal, Guy
description In order to quantify the clinical quality of full-field digital mammography, a set of image quality parameters is developed. The set consisted of 12 image quality criteria and 8 physical characteristics of the image. The first set interrogates the visibility of anatomical structures and typical characteristics of a digital image, such as noise and saturation of dark and white areas. The second set of criteria evaluates contrast, sharpness and confidence with the representation of masses, microcalcifications and the image. The use of these criteria is reported in a retrospective study, in which the impact of dose on the radiological quality of digital mammograms is evaluated. Fifty patients acquired in a low-dose mode were retrieved and compared with 50 patients acquired in a dose mode that was set 41% higher. The dose affects, more than expected, contrast and sharpness of the image, whereas the visibility of the anatomical structures remains unchanged. With these parameters, quantification of the image quality is possible; however, because of subjectivity of the parameters, only intra-observer comparison and evaluation of the individual parameters rather than the overall results are advised. Together with physical tests of image quality, critical radiological evaluation of the quality should be included in the acceptance process of digital mammography.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rpd/ncn029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69366080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/rpd/ncn029</oup_id><sourcerecordid>69366080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e47f1fef0b44d7de5446ca23ed15e76cc3b3943e0ad9dd7b2ae89bfba8912d193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E9vFCEYx3FibOxavfQFGC56MBkLAzMM3symdY2b9mKr6YUw8LCizJ8Ck3TfvVNno7f2xEPyye_wReiUkg-USHYWR3vWm56U8hlaUcHLgnFSP0crQjkvGl6SY_QypV-ElEJW_AU6pg2jcv6skF4H33ujA_ad3gG-m3TweY9N9Bmi19gNEbspBOw8BIut3_k860533bCLevy5_4hn5WPKeIza5L9jehzDfGQ_9K_QkdMhwevDe4KuL86_rTfF9urzl_WnbWFYw3MBXDjqwJGWcyssVJzXRpcMLK1A1MawlknOgGgrrRVtqaGRrWt1I2lpqWQn6N2yO8bhboKUVeeTgRB0D8OUVC1ZXZOGPAlL0oiG8gf4foEmDilFcGqMc6W4V5Soh_JqLq-W8jN-c1id2g7sf3pIPYO3Cxim8fGhYnE-Zbj_J3X8rWrBRKU2P27VJdl-3dTfK3XD_gAPo52Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20878140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical image quality criteria for full field digital mammography: a first practical application</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Van Ongeval, Chantal ; Van Steen, André ; Geniets, Catherine ; Dekeyzer, Frederik ; Bosmans, Hilde ; Marchal, Guy</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Ongeval, Chantal ; Van Steen, André ; Geniets, Catherine ; Dekeyzer, Frederik ; Bosmans, Hilde ; Marchal, Guy</creatorcontrib><description>In order to quantify the clinical quality of full-field digital mammography, a set of image quality parameters is developed. The set consisted of 12 image quality criteria and 8 physical characteristics of the image. The first set interrogates the visibility of anatomical structures and typical characteristics of a digital image, such as noise and saturation of dark and white areas. The second set of criteria evaluates contrast, sharpness and confidence with the representation of masses, microcalcifications and the image. The use of these criteria is reported in a retrospective study, in which the impact of dose on the radiological quality of digital mammograms is evaluated. Fifty patients acquired in a low-dose mode were retrieved and compared with 50 patients acquired in a dose mode that was set 41% higher. The dose affects, more than expected, contrast and sharpness of the image, whereas the visibility of the anatomical structures remains unchanged. With these parameters, quantification of the image quality is possible; however, because of subjectivity of the parameters, only intra-observer comparison and evaluation of the individual parameters rather than the overall results are advised. Together with physical tests of image quality, critical radiological evaluation of the quality should be included in the acceptance process of digital mammography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncn029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18319279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Diseases - pathology ; Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography - methods ; Mammography - standards ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2008, Vol.129 (1-3), p.265-270</ispartof><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e47f1fef0b44d7de5446ca23ed15e76cc3b3943e0ad9dd7b2ae89bfba8912d193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e47f1fef0b44d7de5446ca23ed15e76cc3b3943e0ad9dd7b2ae89bfba8912d193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18319279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Ongeval, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Steen, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geniets, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekeyzer, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosmans, Hilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchal, Guy</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical image quality criteria for full field digital mammography: a first practical application</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>In order to quantify the clinical quality of full-field digital mammography, a set of image quality parameters is developed. The set consisted of 12 image quality criteria and 8 physical characteristics of the image. The first set interrogates the visibility of anatomical structures and typical characteristics of a digital image, such as noise and saturation of dark and white areas. The second set of criteria evaluates contrast, sharpness and confidence with the representation of masses, microcalcifications and the image. The use of these criteria is reported in a retrospective study, in which the impact of dose on the radiological quality of digital mammograms is evaluated. Fifty patients acquired in a low-dose mode were retrieved and compared with 50 patients acquired in a dose mode that was set 41% higher. The dose affects, more than expected, contrast and sharpness of the image, whereas the visibility of the anatomical structures remains unchanged. With these parameters, quantification of the image quality is possible; however, because of subjectivity of the parameters, only intra-observer comparison and evaluation of the individual parameters rather than the overall results are advised. Together with physical tests of image quality, critical radiological evaluation of the quality should be included in the acceptance process of digital mammography.</description><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mammography - standards</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E9vFCEYx3FibOxavfQFGC56MBkLAzMM3symdY2b9mKr6YUw8LCizJ8Ck3TfvVNno7f2xEPyye_wReiUkg-USHYWR3vWm56U8hlaUcHLgnFSP0crQjkvGl6SY_QypV-ElEJW_AU6pg2jcv6skF4H33ujA_ad3gG-m3TweY9N9Bmi19gNEbspBOw8BIut3_k860533bCLevy5_4hn5WPKeIza5L9jehzDfGQ_9K_QkdMhwevDe4KuL86_rTfF9urzl_WnbWFYw3MBXDjqwJGWcyssVJzXRpcMLK1A1MawlknOgGgrrRVtqaGRrWt1I2lpqWQn6N2yO8bhboKUVeeTgRB0D8OUVC1ZXZOGPAlL0oiG8gf4foEmDilFcGqMc6W4V5Soh_JqLq-W8jN-c1id2g7sf3pIPYO3Cxim8fGhYnE-Zbj_J3X8rWrBRKU2P27VJdl-3dTfK3XD_gAPo52Q</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Van Ongeval, Chantal</creator><creator>Van Steen, André</creator><creator>Geniets, Catherine</creator><creator>Dekeyzer, Frederik</creator><creator>Bosmans, Hilde</creator><creator>Marchal, Guy</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Clinical image quality criteria for full field digital mammography: a first practical application</title><author>Van Ongeval, Chantal ; Van Steen, André ; Geniets, Catherine ; Dekeyzer, Frederik ; Bosmans, Hilde ; Marchal, Guy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e47f1fef0b44d7de5446ca23ed15e76cc3b3943e0ad9dd7b2ae89bfba8912d193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mammography - standards</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Ongeval, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Steen, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geniets, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekeyzer, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosmans, Hilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchal, Guy</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Ongeval, Chantal</au><au>Van Steen, André</au><au>Geniets, Catherine</au><au>Dekeyzer, Frederik</au><au>Bosmans, Hilde</au><au>Marchal, Guy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical image quality criteria for full field digital mammography: a first practical application</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>265-270</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>In order to quantify the clinical quality of full-field digital mammography, a set of image quality parameters is developed. The set consisted of 12 image quality criteria and 8 physical characteristics of the image. The first set interrogates the visibility of anatomical structures and typical characteristics of a digital image, such as noise and saturation of dark and white areas. The second set of criteria evaluates contrast, sharpness and confidence with the representation of masses, microcalcifications and the image. The use of these criteria is reported in a retrospective study, in which the impact of dose on the radiological quality of digital mammograms is evaluated. Fifty patients acquired in a low-dose mode were retrieved and compared with 50 patients acquired in a dose mode that was set 41% higher. The dose affects, more than expected, contrast and sharpness of the image, whereas the visibility of the anatomical structures remains unchanged. With these parameters, quantification of the image quality is possible; however, because of subjectivity of the parameters, only intra-observer comparison and evaluation of the individual parameters rather than the overall results are advised. Together with physical tests of image quality, critical radiological evaluation of the quality should be included in the acceptance process of digital mammography.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18319279</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncn029</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2008, Vol.129 (1-3), p.265-270
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69366080
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Breast Diseases - pathology
Calcinosis - diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Mammography - methods
Mammography - standards
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - standards
title Clinical image quality criteria for full field digital mammography: a first practical application
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A28%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20image%20quality%20criteria%20for%20full%20field%20digital%20mammography:%20a%20first%20practical%20application&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Van%20Ongeval,%20Chantal&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=265-270&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncn029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69366080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20878140&rft_id=info:pmid/18319279&rft_oup_id=10.1093/rpd/ncn029&rfr_iscdi=true