The evolution of parathyroidectomy failures

Background: Reported operative failure rates for primary hyperparathyroidism range from 5% to 10%. Failure has been due to multiglandular disease, ectopic parathyroid glands, errors in frozen section, and missed diagnoses. Recently, our operative approach has changed from bilateral cervical explorat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 1999, Vol.126 (6), p.998-1003
Hauptverfasser: Boggs, Jodeen E., Irvin, George L., Carneiro, Denise M., Molinari, Alberto S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1003
container_issue 6
container_start_page 998
container_title Surgery
container_volume 126
creator Boggs, Jodeen E.
Irvin, George L.
Carneiro, Denise M.
Molinari, Alberto S.
description Background: Reported operative failure rates for primary hyperparathyroidism range from 5% to 10%. Failure has been due to multiglandular disease, ectopic parathyroid glands, errors in frozen section, and missed diagnoses. Recently, our operative approach has changed from bilateral cervical exploration to direction by preoperative localization and intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone assay. The purpose of this study is to examine the causes and rates of failure in this evolving approach to parathyroidectomy. Methods: Among 447 consecutive cases of primary hyperparathyroidectomy, 20 operative failures were examined. Three different operative approaches were compared with respect to causes and rates of failure. Results: From 1969 to 1989, with bilateral neck exploration, failure was due to missed diagnoses, ectopic glands, multiglandular disease, and unknown causes, with a failure rate of 5%. From 1990 to 1993, with bilateral neck exploration and quick parathyroid hormone assay, failure was due to ectopic mediastinal glands, misinterpretation of frozen section, and operative judgment, with a failure rate of 10%. From 1993 to 1998, with preoperative localization and quick parathyroid hormone assay, the two operative failures (1.5%) were due to operative judgment and misinterpretation of the quick parathyroid hormone assay. Conclusions: The new surgical approach combining preoperative localization studies and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring has eliminated the most common causes of parathyroidectomy failure and has significantly decreased the operative failure rate. (Surgery 1999;126:998-1003.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70053-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69356208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S003960609970053X</els_id><sourcerecordid>69356208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418x-4aec472f0766c215d3cf50ae7084fd01436fa22167a4f94a0629aedcdde225d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMotj5-gtKVKDJ6k5nJTFYixRcUXFihuxCTGxqZaWoyU-y_d9op4s7V3XznHO5HyBmFGwqU374BpCLhwOFSiKsCIE-T2R4Z0jxlSZFyuk-Gv8iAHMX4CQAio-UhGVDIRUkLMSTX0zmOcOWrtnF-MfJ2tFRBNfN18M6gbny9HlnlqjZgPCEHVlURT3f3mLw_PkzHz8nk9ellfD9JdNf-nWQKdVYwCwXnmtHcpNrmoLCAMrMGaJZyqxijvFCZFZkCzoRCo41Bxjo6PSYXfe8y-K8WYyNrFzVWlVqgb6PkIs05g7ID8x7UwccY0MplcLUKa0lBbizJrSW5USCFkFtLctblzncD7UeN5k-q19IBdz2A3Zsrh0FG7XCh0bjQSZHGu38mfgAU13bO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69356208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The evolution of parathyroidectomy failures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Boggs, Jodeen E. ; Irvin, George L. ; Carneiro, Denise M. ; Molinari, Alberto S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Jodeen E. ; Irvin, George L. ; Carneiro, Denise M. ; Molinari, Alberto S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Reported operative failure rates for primary hyperparathyroidism range from 5% to 10%. Failure has been due to multiglandular disease, ectopic parathyroid glands, errors in frozen section, and missed diagnoses. Recently, our operative approach has changed from bilateral cervical exploration to direction by preoperative localization and intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone assay. The purpose of this study is to examine the causes and rates of failure in this evolving approach to parathyroidectomy. Methods: Among 447 consecutive cases of primary hyperparathyroidectomy, 20 operative failures were examined. Three different operative approaches were compared with respect to causes and rates of failure. Results: From 1969 to 1989, with bilateral neck exploration, failure was due to missed diagnoses, ectopic glands, multiglandular disease, and unknown causes, with a failure rate of 5%. From 1990 to 1993, with bilateral neck exploration and quick parathyroid hormone assay, failure was due to ectopic mediastinal glands, misinterpretation of frozen section, and operative judgment, with a failure rate of 10%. From 1993 to 1998, with preoperative localization and quick parathyroid hormone assay, the two operative failures (1.5%) were due to operative judgment and misinterpretation of the quick parathyroid hormone assay. Conclusions: The new surgical approach combining preoperative localization studies and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring has eliminated the most common causes of parathyroidectomy failure and has significantly decreased the operative failure rate. (Surgery 1999;126:998-1003.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70053-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10598179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging ; Hyperparathyroidism - epidemiology ; Hyperparathyroidism - surgery ; Intraoperative Period ; Luminescent Measurements ; Neck - surgery ; Parathyroid Hormone - analysis ; Parathyroidectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 1999, Vol.126 (6), p.998-1003</ispartof><rights>1999 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418x-4aec472f0766c215d3cf50ae7084fd01436fa22167a4f94a0629aedcdde225d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418x-4aec472f0766c215d3cf50ae7084fd01436fa22167a4f94a0629aedcdde225d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70053-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10598179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Jodeen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irvin, George L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molinari, Alberto S.</creatorcontrib><title>The evolution of parathyroidectomy failures</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Background: Reported operative failure rates for primary hyperparathyroidism range from 5% to 10%. Failure has been due to multiglandular disease, ectopic parathyroid glands, errors in frozen section, and missed diagnoses. Recently, our operative approach has changed from bilateral cervical exploration to direction by preoperative localization and intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone assay. The purpose of this study is to examine the causes and rates of failure in this evolving approach to parathyroidectomy. Methods: Among 447 consecutive cases of primary hyperparathyroidectomy, 20 operative failures were examined. Three different operative approaches were compared with respect to causes and rates of failure. Results: From 1969 to 1989, with bilateral neck exploration, failure was due to missed diagnoses, ectopic glands, multiglandular disease, and unknown causes, with a failure rate of 5%. From 1990 to 1993, with bilateral neck exploration and quick parathyroid hormone assay, failure was due to ectopic mediastinal glands, misinterpretation of frozen section, and operative judgment, with a failure rate of 10%. From 1993 to 1998, with preoperative localization and quick parathyroid hormone assay, the two operative failures (1.5%) were due to operative judgment and misinterpretation of the quick parathyroid hormone assay. Conclusions: The new surgical approach combining preoperative localization studies and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring has eliminated the most common causes of parathyroidectomy failure and has significantly decreased the operative failure rate. (Surgery 1999;126:998-1003.)</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hyperparathyroidism - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hyperparathyroidism - surgery</subject><subject>Intraoperative Period</subject><subject>Luminescent Measurements</subject><subject>Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - analysis</subject><subject>Parathyroidectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMotj5-gtKVKDJ6k5nJTFYixRcUXFihuxCTGxqZaWoyU-y_d9op4s7V3XznHO5HyBmFGwqU374BpCLhwOFSiKsCIE-T2R4Z0jxlSZFyuk-Gv8iAHMX4CQAio-UhGVDIRUkLMSTX0zmOcOWrtnF-MfJ2tFRBNfN18M6gbny9HlnlqjZgPCEHVlURT3f3mLw_PkzHz8nk9ellfD9JdNf-nWQKdVYwCwXnmtHcpNrmoLCAMrMGaJZyqxijvFCZFZkCzoRCo41Bxjo6PSYXfe8y-K8WYyNrFzVWlVqgb6PkIs05g7ID8x7UwccY0MplcLUKa0lBbizJrSW5USCFkFtLctblzncD7UeN5k-q19IBdz2A3Zsrh0FG7XCh0bjQSZHGu38mfgAU13bO</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Boggs, Jodeen E.</creator><creator>Irvin, George L.</creator><creator>Carneiro, Denise M.</creator><creator>Molinari, Alberto S.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>The evolution of parathyroidectomy failures</title><author>Boggs, Jodeen E. ; Irvin, George L. ; Carneiro, Denise M. ; Molinari, Alberto S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418x-4aec472f0766c215d3cf50ae7084fd01436fa22167a4f94a0629aedcdde225d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hyperparathyroidism - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hyperparathyroidism - surgery</topic><topic>Intraoperative Period</topic><topic>Luminescent Measurements</topic><topic>Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - analysis</topic><topic>Parathyroidectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Jodeen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irvin, George L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molinari, Alberto S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boggs, Jodeen E.</au><au>Irvin, George L.</au><au>Carneiro, Denise M.</au><au>Molinari, Alberto S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The evolution of parathyroidectomy failures</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>998</spage><epage>1003</epage><pages>998-1003</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>Background: Reported operative failure rates for primary hyperparathyroidism range from 5% to 10%. Failure has been due to multiglandular disease, ectopic parathyroid glands, errors in frozen section, and missed diagnoses. Recently, our operative approach has changed from bilateral cervical exploration to direction by preoperative localization and intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone assay. The purpose of this study is to examine the causes and rates of failure in this evolving approach to parathyroidectomy. Methods: Among 447 consecutive cases of primary hyperparathyroidectomy, 20 operative failures were examined. Three different operative approaches were compared with respect to causes and rates of failure. Results: From 1969 to 1989, with bilateral neck exploration, failure was due to missed diagnoses, ectopic glands, multiglandular disease, and unknown causes, with a failure rate of 5%. From 1990 to 1993, with bilateral neck exploration and quick parathyroid hormone assay, failure was due to ectopic mediastinal glands, misinterpretation of frozen section, and operative judgment, with a failure rate of 10%. From 1993 to 1998, with preoperative localization and quick parathyroid hormone assay, the two operative failures (1.5%) were due to operative judgment and misinterpretation of the quick parathyroid hormone assay. Conclusions: The new surgical approach combining preoperative localization studies and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring has eliminated the most common causes of parathyroidectomy failure and has significantly decreased the operative failure rate. (Surgery 1999;126:998-1003.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>10598179</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70053-X</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 1999, Vol.126 (6), p.998-1003
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69356208
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Humans
Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging
Hyperparathyroidism - epidemiology
Hyperparathyroidism - surgery
Intraoperative Period
Luminescent Measurements
Neck - surgery
Parathyroid Hormone - analysis
Parathyroidectomy - statistics & numerical data
Radionuclide Imaging
Retrospective Studies
Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi
Treatment Failure
title The evolution of parathyroidectomy failures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A52%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20evolution%20of%20parathyroidectomy%20failures&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Boggs,%20Jodeen%20E.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=998&rft.epage=1003&rft.pages=998-1003&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70053-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69356208%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69356208&rft_id=info:pmid/10598179&rft_els_id=S003960609970053X&rfr_iscdi=true