Fetal Movement Assessment
Maternal perception of fetal movements is the oldest and most commonly used method to assess fetal well-being. While almost all pregnant women adhere to it, organized screening by fetal movements has seen variable popularity among health professionals. Early results of screening were promising and f...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Seminars in perinatology 2008-08, Vol.32 (4), p.243-246 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 246 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 243 |
| container_title | Seminars in perinatology |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Frøen, J. Frederik, MD, PhD Heazell, Alexander E.P., MBChB(Hons) Tveit, Julie Victoria Holm, MD Saastad, Eli, RN, Rm, MSc Fretts, Ruth C., MD, MPH Flenady, Vicki, RN, Rm, MMedSc |
| description | Maternal perception of fetal movements is the oldest and most commonly used method to assess fetal well-being. While almost all pregnant women adhere to it, organized screening by fetal movements has seen variable popularity among health professionals. Early results of screening were promising and fetal movement counting is the only antepartum testing method that has shown effect in reducing mortality in a randomized controlled trial comparing testing versus no testing. Although awareness of fetal movements is associated with improved perinatal outcomes, the quest to define a quantitative “alarm limit” to define decreased fetal movements has so far been unsuccessful, and the use of most such limits developed for fetal movement counting should be discouraged. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69346689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0146000508000475</els_id><sourcerecordid>69346689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-71bb81e938a06de77f38270fd32dc49cdfc81920ff3d951fba7fedd1afba2acb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7vrxAzwoe_LWOmmSNr0oy-KqoHhQwVtIkwlk7ceadAX_vS27IHjxMjOHd96XeYaQcwopBcGuVmnEZo3BpxmATIGnAHyPTKkQMoFCvO-TKVCeJwAgJuQoxhUA4yWFQzKhMhdZmdEpOVtir-vZU_eFDbb9bB4jxjiOJ-TA6Tri6a4fk7fl7eviPnl8vntYzB8Tw6nsk4JWlaRYMqkht1gUjsmsAGdZZg0vjXVG0jID55gtBXWVLhxaS_UwZdpU7Jhcbn3XofvcYOxV46PButYtdpuo8pLxPJflIBRboQldjAGdWgff6PCtKKiRiVqpHRM1MlHA1cBk2LvYBWyqBu3v1g7CILjZCnA488tjUNF4bA1aH9D0ynb-34jrPw6m9q03uv7Ab4yrbhPagaGiKmYK1Mv4mPEvIIfKC8F-AGqLidw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69346689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fetal Movement Assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Frøen, J. Frederik, MD, PhD ; Heazell, Alexander E.P., MBChB(Hons) ; Tveit, Julie Victoria Holm, MD ; Saastad, Eli, RN, Rm, MSc ; Fretts, Ruth C., MD, MPH ; Flenady, Vicki, RN, Rm, MMedSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Frøen, J. Frederik, MD, PhD ; Heazell, Alexander E.P., MBChB(Hons) ; Tveit, Julie Victoria Holm, MD ; Saastad, Eli, RN, Rm, MSc ; Fretts, Ruth C., MD, MPH ; Flenady, Vicki, RN, Rm, MMedSc</creatorcontrib><description>Maternal perception of fetal movements is the oldest and most commonly used method to assess fetal well-being. While almost all pregnant women adhere to it, organized screening by fetal movements has seen variable popularity among health professionals. Early results of screening were promising and fetal movement counting is the only antepartum testing method that has shown effect in reducing mortality in a randomized controlled trial comparing testing versus no testing. Although awareness of fetal movements is associated with improved perinatal outcomes, the quest to define a quantitative “alarm limit” to define decreased fetal movements has so far been unsuccessful, and the use of most such limits developed for fetal movement counting should be discouraged.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-0005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-075X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18652921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Female ; Fetal Death - diagnosis ; Fetal Death - prevention & control ; fetal monitoring ; Fetal Movement ; Humans ; methods ; Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine ; Pregnancy ; Stillbirth</subject><ispartof>Seminars in perinatology, 2008-08, Vol.32 (4), p.243-246</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-71bb81e938a06de77f38270fd32dc49cdfc81920ff3d951fba7fedd1afba2acb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-71bb81e938a06de77f38270fd32dc49cdfc81920ff3d951fba7fedd1afba2acb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18652921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frøen, J. Frederik, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heazell, Alexander E.P., MBChB(Hons)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tveit, Julie Victoria Holm, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saastad, Eli, RN, Rm, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fretts, Ruth C., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flenady, Vicki, RN, Rm, MMedSc</creatorcontrib><title>Fetal Movement Assessment</title><title>Seminars in perinatology</title><addtitle>Semin Perinatol</addtitle><description>Maternal perception of fetal movements is the oldest and most commonly used method to assess fetal well-being. While almost all pregnant women adhere to it, organized screening by fetal movements has seen variable popularity among health professionals. Early results of screening were promising and fetal movement counting is the only antepartum testing method that has shown effect in reducing mortality in a randomized controlled trial comparing testing versus no testing. Although awareness of fetal movements is associated with improved perinatal outcomes, the quest to define a quantitative “alarm limit” to define decreased fetal movements has so far been unsuccessful, and the use of most such limits developed for fetal movement counting should be discouraged.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Death - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fetal Death - prevention & control</subject><subject>fetal monitoring</subject><subject>Fetal Movement</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Stillbirth</subject><issn>0146-0005</issn><issn>1558-075X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7vrxAzwoe_LWOmmSNr0oy-KqoHhQwVtIkwlk7ceadAX_vS27IHjxMjOHd96XeYaQcwopBcGuVmnEZo3BpxmATIGnAHyPTKkQMoFCvO-TKVCeJwAgJuQoxhUA4yWFQzKhMhdZmdEpOVtir-vZU_eFDbb9bB4jxjiOJ-TA6Tri6a4fk7fl7eviPnl8vntYzB8Tw6nsk4JWlaRYMqkht1gUjsmsAGdZZg0vjXVG0jID55gtBXWVLhxaS_UwZdpU7Jhcbn3XofvcYOxV46PButYtdpuo8pLxPJflIBRboQldjAGdWgff6PCtKKiRiVqpHRM1MlHA1cBk2LvYBWyqBu3v1g7CILjZCnA488tjUNF4bA1aH9D0ynb-34jrPw6m9q03uv7Ab4yrbhPagaGiKmYK1Mv4mPEvIIfKC8F-AGqLidw</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Frøen, J. Frederik, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Heazell, Alexander E.P., MBChB(Hons)</creator><creator>Tveit, Julie Victoria Holm, MD</creator><creator>Saastad, Eli, RN, Rm, MSc</creator><creator>Fretts, Ruth C., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Flenady, Vicki, RN, Rm, MMedSc</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>Fetal Movement Assessment</title><author>Frøen, J. Frederik, MD, PhD ; Heazell, Alexander E.P., MBChB(Hons) ; Tveit, Julie Victoria Holm, MD ; Saastad, Eli, RN, Rm, MSc ; Fretts, Ruth C., MD, MPH ; Flenady, Vicki, RN, Rm, MMedSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-71bb81e938a06de77f38270fd32dc49cdfc81920ff3d951fba7fedd1afba2acb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Death - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fetal Death - prevention & control</topic><topic>fetal monitoring</topic><topic>Fetal Movement</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Stillbirth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frøen, J. Frederik, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heazell, Alexander E.P., MBChB(Hons)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tveit, Julie Victoria Holm, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saastad, Eli, RN, Rm, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fretts, Ruth C., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flenady, Vicki, RN, Rm, MMedSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frøen, J. Frederik, MD, PhD</au><au>Heazell, Alexander E.P., MBChB(Hons)</au><au>Tveit, Julie Victoria Holm, MD</au><au>Saastad, Eli, RN, Rm, MSc</au><au>Fretts, Ruth C., MD, MPH</au><au>Flenady, Vicki, RN, Rm, MMedSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fetal Movement Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in perinatology</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Perinatol</addtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>243-246</pages><issn>0146-0005</issn><eissn>1558-075X</eissn><abstract>Maternal perception of fetal movements is the oldest and most commonly used method to assess fetal well-being. While almost all pregnant women adhere to it, organized screening by fetal movements has seen variable popularity among health professionals. Early results of screening were promising and fetal movement counting is the only antepartum testing method that has shown effect in reducing mortality in a randomized controlled trial comparing testing versus no testing. Although awareness of fetal movements is associated with improved perinatal outcomes, the quest to define a quantitative “alarm limit” to define decreased fetal movements has so far been unsuccessful, and the use of most such limits developed for fetal movement counting should be discouraged.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18652921</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.004</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0146-0005 |
| ispartof | Seminars in perinatology, 2008-08, Vol.32 (4), p.243-246 |
| issn | 0146-0005 1558-075X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69346689 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Female Fetal Death - diagnosis Fetal Death - prevention & control fetal monitoring Fetal Movement Humans methods Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine Pregnancy Stillbirth |
| title | Fetal Movement Assessment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T16%3A49%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fetal%20Movement%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20perinatology&rft.au=Fr%C3%B8en,%20J.%20Frederik,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=243-246&rft.issn=0146-0005&rft.eissn=1558-075X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69346689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69346689&rft_id=info:pmid/18652921&rft_els_id=S0146000508000475&rfr_iscdi=true |