Relationship between apparent (single-pool) and true (double-pool) urea distribution volume

The volume of urea distribution (V) is usually derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetics. A theoretical analysis has shown that modeled single-pool V (Vsp) is overestimated when the urea reduction ratio (URR) is greater than 65 to 70% and is underestimated when the URR is less than 65%....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kidney international 1999-11, Vol.56 (5), p.1928-1933
Hauptverfasser: Daugirdas, John T., Greene, Tom, Depner, Thomas A., Gotch, Frank A., Star, Robert A., the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1933
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1928
container_title Kidney international
container_volume 56
creator Daugirdas, John T.
Greene, Tom
Depner, Thomas A.
Gotch, Frank A.
Star, Robert A.
the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group
description The volume of urea distribution (V) is usually derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetics. A theoretical analysis has shown that modeled single-pool V (Vsp) is overestimated when the urea reduction ratio (URR) is greater than 65 to 70% and is underestimated when the URR is less than 65%. The “true” volume derived from double-pool kinetics (Vdp) does not exhibit this effect. An equation has been derived to adjust Vsp to the expected Vdp. To validate these theoretical predictions, we examined data from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study to assess the performance of Vdp as estimated from Vsp using the previously published prediction equation. For increased precision, both Vsp and Vdp were factored by anthropometric volume (Va). Patients were first dialyzed with a target equilibrated dialysis dose (eKt/V) of 1.45 during a baseline period and were then randomly assigned to eKt/V targets of either 1.05 (a URR of approximately 67%) or 1.45 (a URR of approximately 75%). A blood sample was obtained one hour after starting dialysis during one dialysis in each patient. Vsp/Va was (mean ± SD) 1.014 ± 0.127 in 795 patients during the baseline period when the URR was approximately 1.45. During the first modeled dialysis after randomization, the Vsp/Va fell to 0.961 ± 0.138 in the group with an eKt/V target of 1.05, but did not change significantly under the high eKt/V goal. The correction of Vsp to Vdp using the prediction equation resulted in a Vdp/Va ratio of 0.96 to 0.98 in all three circumstances without significant differences. When a blood sample was drawn one hour after starting dialysis, the apparent Vsp/Va ratio at one hour was much lower at 0.708 ± 0.139. However, the mean Vdp/Va ratio, computed using the correction equation, was 0.968 ± 0.322, which was similar to the Vdp/Va ratio calculated from the postdialysis blood urea nitrogen. These data suggest that the previously derived formula for adjusted Vsp is valid experimentally. The Vsp/Vdp correction should be useful for prescribing hemodialysis with either a very low Kt/V (for example, daily and early incremental dialysis) or a very high Kt/V.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00726.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69303642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0085253815465147</els_id><sourcerecordid>69303642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-2515de80496ea5ce7b13d45d64c185e4aecd90b0b9c4ff01c88938ab059983233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PxCAQhonR6Lr6FwwHY9ZDK7SlC0c1fiUmJkZPHgiFqbLplgqtH_9e6m7UmycCPDPzzoMQpiSlpChPFillWZ7QOWMpFUKkhMyzMv3YQJOfj000IYSzJGM530G7ISxIvIucbKMdSticclJM0NM9NKq3rg0vtsMV9O8ALVZdpzy0PZ4F2z43kHTONcdYtQb3fgA8M26ofp4HDwobG3pvq2Hshd9cMyxhD23Vqgmwvz6n6PHy4uH8Orm9u7o5P71NNKOsjwEpMxDTiBIU0zCvaG4KZspCU86gUKCNIBWphC7qmlDN4xZcVYQJwfMsz6foaNW38-51gNDLpQ0amka14IYgy7h0XhZZBPkK1N6F4KGWnbdL5T8lJXIUKxdy9CdHf3IUK7_Fyo9YerCeMVRLMH8KVyYjcLgGVNCqqb1qtQ2_HOVZFuNO0dkKgyjkzYKXQVtoNRjrQffSOPt_mC_S5ZdH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69303642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship between apparent (single-pool) and true (double-pool) urea distribution volume</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Daugirdas, John T. ; Greene, Tom ; Depner, Thomas A. ; Gotch, Frank A. ; Star, Robert A. ; the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group</creator><creatorcontrib>Daugirdas, John T. ; Greene, Tom ; Depner, Thomas A. ; Gotch, Frank A. ; Star, Robert A. ; the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>The volume of urea distribution (V) is usually derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetics. A theoretical analysis has shown that modeled single-pool V (Vsp) is overestimated when the urea reduction ratio (URR) is greater than 65 to 70% and is underestimated when the URR is less than 65%. The “true” volume derived from double-pool kinetics (Vdp) does not exhibit this effect. An equation has been derived to adjust Vsp to the expected Vdp. To validate these theoretical predictions, we examined data from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study to assess the performance of Vdp as estimated from Vsp using the previously published prediction equation. For increased precision, both Vsp and Vdp were factored by anthropometric volume (Va). Patients were first dialyzed with a target equilibrated dialysis dose (eKt/V) of 1.45 during a baseline period and were then randomly assigned to eKt/V targets of either 1.05 (a URR of approximately 67%) or 1.45 (a URR of approximately 75%). A blood sample was obtained one hour after starting dialysis during one dialysis in each patient. Vsp/Va was (mean ± SD) 1.014 ± 0.127 in 795 patients during the baseline period when the URR was approximately 1.45. During the first modeled dialysis after randomization, the Vsp/Va fell to 0.961 ± 0.138 in the group with an eKt/V target of 1.05, but did not change significantly under the high eKt/V goal. The correction of Vsp to Vdp using the prediction equation resulted in a Vdp/Va ratio of 0.96 to 0.98 in all three circumstances without significant differences. When a blood sample was drawn one hour after starting dialysis, the apparent Vsp/Va ratio at one hour was much lower at 0.708 ± 0.139. However, the mean Vdp/Va ratio, computed using the correction equation, was 0.968 ± 0.322, which was similar to the Vdp/Va ratio calculated from the postdialysis blood urea nitrogen. These data suggest that the previously derived formula for adjusted Vsp is valid experimentally. The Vsp/Vdp correction should be useful for prescribing hemodialysis with either a very low Kt/V (for example, daily and early incremental dialysis) or a very high Kt/V.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00726.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10571804</identifier><identifier>CODEN: KDYIA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; anthropometric volume ; Biological and medical sciences ; dialysis ; Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Models, Biological ; Renal Dialysis ; Urea - metabolism ; urea kinetic modeling ; volume of urea distribution</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 1999-11, Vol.56 (5), p.1928-1933</ispartof><rights>1999 International Society of Nephrology</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-2515de80496ea5ce7b13d45d64c185e4aecd90b0b9c4ff01c88938ab059983233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-2515de80496ea5ce7b13d45d64c185e4aecd90b0b9c4ff01c88938ab059983233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1182298$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10571804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daugirdas, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depner, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotch, Frank A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Star, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship between apparent (single-pool) and true (double-pool) urea distribution volume</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><description>The volume of urea distribution (V) is usually derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetics. A theoretical analysis has shown that modeled single-pool V (Vsp) is overestimated when the urea reduction ratio (URR) is greater than 65 to 70% and is underestimated when the URR is less than 65%. The “true” volume derived from double-pool kinetics (Vdp) does not exhibit this effect. An equation has been derived to adjust Vsp to the expected Vdp. To validate these theoretical predictions, we examined data from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study to assess the performance of Vdp as estimated from Vsp using the previously published prediction equation. For increased precision, both Vsp and Vdp were factored by anthropometric volume (Va). Patients were first dialyzed with a target equilibrated dialysis dose (eKt/V) of 1.45 during a baseline period and were then randomly assigned to eKt/V targets of either 1.05 (a URR of approximately 67%) or 1.45 (a URR of approximately 75%). A blood sample was obtained one hour after starting dialysis during one dialysis in each patient. Vsp/Va was (mean ± SD) 1.014 ± 0.127 in 795 patients during the baseline period when the URR was approximately 1.45. During the first modeled dialysis after randomization, the Vsp/Va fell to 0.961 ± 0.138 in the group with an eKt/V target of 1.05, but did not change significantly under the high eKt/V goal. The correction of Vsp to Vdp using the prediction equation resulted in a Vdp/Va ratio of 0.96 to 0.98 in all three circumstances without significant differences. When a blood sample was drawn one hour after starting dialysis, the apparent Vsp/Va ratio at one hour was much lower at 0.708 ± 0.139. However, the mean Vdp/Va ratio, computed using the correction equation, was 0.968 ± 0.322, which was similar to the Vdp/Va ratio calculated from the postdialysis blood urea nitrogen. These data suggest that the previously derived formula for adjusted Vsp is valid experimentally. The Vsp/Vdp correction should be useful for prescribing hemodialysis with either a very low Kt/V (for example, daily and early incremental dialysis) or a very high Kt/V.</description><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>anthropometric volume</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>dialysis</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Urea - metabolism</subject><subject>urea kinetic modeling</subject><subject>volume of urea distribution</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PxCAQhonR6Lr6FwwHY9ZDK7SlC0c1fiUmJkZPHgiFqbLplgqtH_9e6m7UmycCPDPzzoMQpiSlpChPFillWZ7QOWMpFUKkhMyzMv3YQJOfj000IYSzJGM530G7ISxIvIucbKMdSticclJM0NM9NKq3rg0vtsMV9O8ALVZdpzy0PZ4F2z43kHTONcdYtQb3fgA8M26ofp4HDwobG3pvq2Hshd9cMyxhD23Vqgmwvz6n6PHy4uH8Orm9u7o5P71NNKOsjwEpMxDTiBIU0zCvaG4KZspCU86gUKCNIBWphC7qmlDN4xZcVYQJwfMsz6foaNW38-51gNDLpQ0amka14IYgy7h0XhZZBPkK1N6F4KGWnbdL5T8lJXIUKxdy9CdHf3IUK7_Fyo9YerCeMVRLMH8KVyYjcLgGVNCqqb1qtQ2_HOVZFuNO0dkKgyjkzYKXQVtoNRjrQffSOPt_mC_S5ZdH</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>Daugirdas, John T.</creator><creator>Greene, Tom</creator><creator>Depner, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Gotch, Frank A.</creator><creator>Star, Robert A.</creator><creator>the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Nature Publishing</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>Relationship between apparent (single-pool) and true (double-pool) urea distribution volume</title><author>Daugirdas, John T. ; Greene, Tom ; Depner, Thomas A. ; Gotch, Frank A. ; Star, Robert A. ; the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-2515de80496ea5ce7b13d45d64c185e4aecd90b0b9c4ff01c88938ab059983233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>anthropometric volume</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>dialysis</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Urea - metabolism</topic><topic>urea kinetic modeling</topic><topic>volume of urea distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daugirdas, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depner, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotch, Frank A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Star, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daugirdas, John T.</au><au>Greene, Tom</au><au>Depner, Thomas A.</au><au>Gotch, Frank A.</au><au>Star, Robert A.</au><au>the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship between apparent (single-pool) and true (double-pool) urea distribution volume</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1928</spage><epage>1933</epage><pages>1928-1933</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><coden>KDYIA5</coden><abstract>The volume of urea distribution (V) is usually derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetics. A theoretical analysis has shown that modeled single-pool V (Vsp) is overestimated when the urea reduction ratio (URR) is greater than 65 to 70% and is underestimated when the URR is less than 65%. The “true” volume derived from double-pool kinetics (Vdp) does not exhibit this effect. An equation has been derived to adjust Vsp to the expected Vdp. To validate these theoretical predictions, we examined data from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study to assess the performance of Vdp as estimated from Vsp using the previously published prediction equation. For increased precision, both Vsp and Vdp were factored by anthropometric volume (Va). Patients were first dialyzed with a target equilibrated dialysis dose (eKt/V) of 1.45 during a baseline period and were then randomly assigned to eKt/V targets of either 1.05 (a URR of approximately 67%) or 1.45 (a URR of approximately 75%). A blood sample was obtained one hour after starting dialysis during one dialysis in each patient. Vsp/Va was (mean ± SD) 1.014 ± 0.127 in 795 patients during the baseline period when the URR was approximately 1.45. During the first modeled dialysis after randomization, the Vsp/Va fell to 0.961 ± 0.138 in the group with an eKt/V target of 1.05, but did not change significantly under the high eKt/V goal. The correction of Vsp to Vdp using the prediction equation resulted in a Vdp/Va ratio of 0.96 to 0.98 in all three circumstances without significant differences. When a blood sample was drawn one hour after starting dialysis, the apparent Vsp/Va ratio at one hour was much lower at 0.708 ± 0.139. However, the mean Vdp/Va ratio, computed using the correction equation, was 0.968 ± 0.322, which was similar to the Vdp/Va ratio calculated from the postdialysis blood urea nitrogen. These data suggest that the previously derived formula for adjusted Vsp is valid experimentally. The Vsp/Vdp correction should be useful for prescribing hemodialysis with either a very low Kt/V (for example, daily and early incremental dialysis) or a very high Kt/V.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10571804</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00726.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0085-2538
ispartof Kidney international, 1999-11, Vol.56 (5), p.1928-1933
issn 0085-2538
1523-1755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69303642
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
anthropometric volume
Biological and medical sciences
dialysis
Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Medical sciences
Models, Biological
Renal Dialysis
Urea - metabolism
urea kinetic modeling
volume of urea distribution
title Relationship between apparent (single-pool) and true (double-pool) urea distribution volume
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A26%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20between%20apparent%20(single-pool)%20and%20true%20(double-pool)%20urea%20distribution%20volume&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Daugirdas,%20John%20T.&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1928&rft.epage=1933&rft.pages=1928-1933&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft.coden=KDYIA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00726.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69303642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69303642&rft_id=info:pmid/10571804&rft_els_id=S0085253815465147&rfr_iscdi=true