Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care — A National Survey of Physicians
This national survey finds that only 4% of physicians use an extensive, fully functional system for electronic health records, and 13% use some form of basic electronic records. Those who use electronic records are generally satisfied with the systems and believe that they improve the quality of car...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2008-07, Vol.359 (1), p.50-60 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 60 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 50 |
| container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
| container_volume | 359 |
| creator | DesRoches, Catherine M Campbell, Eric G Rao, Sowmya R Donelan, Karen Ferris, Timothy G Jha, Ashish Kaushal, Rainu Levy, Douglas E Rosenbaum, Sara Shields, Alexandra E Blumenthal, David |
| description | This national survey finds that only 4% of physicians use an extensive, fully functional system for electronic health records, and 13% use some form of basic electronic records. Those who use electronic records are generally satisfied with the systems and believe that they improve the quality of care that patients receive.
Only 4% of physicians use an extensive, fully functional system for electronic health records, and 13% use some form of basic electronic records. Those who use electronic records believe that they improve the quality of care that patients receive.
Health-information technology, such as sophisticated electronic health records, has the potential to improve health care.
1
–
3
Nevertheless, electronic-records systems have been slow to become part of the practices of physicians in the United States.
4
,
5
To date, there have been no definitive national studies that provide reliable estimates of the adoption of electronic health records by U.S. physicians. Recent estimates of such adoption by physicians range from 9 to 29%.
4
,
5
These percentages were derived from studies that either had a small number of respondents or incompletely specified definitions of an electronic health record.
5
,
6
To provide clearer estimates of . . . |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69290351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1504831421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-59c15733afe95403105b918e756db3543549ee1741d76b29cc8e47d9c6118193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgio6XpVsJgu6quTdZDsN4w8ug7kuanmKHttGkFWbnQ_iEPokVBwcFw4Fsvpxz8iO0T8kJJVKd3k6vbqIlmjBC5BoaUcl5IgRR62hECNOJSA3fQtsxzslwqDCbaItqqaSWcoRm0xpcF3xbOXwBtu6e8D04H4qIqxaPm7yvbefDAk9sAPzx9o7H-NZ2lW9tjR_68AoL7Es8e1rEylW2jbtoo7R1hL3lvYMez6aPk4vk-u78cjK-TpyirEukcVSmnNsSjBSED3_JDdWQSlXkXIqhDABNBS1SlTPjnAaRFmZ4TTU1fAcdf7d9Dv6lh9hlTRUd1LVtwfcxU4YZwiUd4OEfOPd9GLaPGWPcMKH5F0q-kQs-xgBl9hyqxoZFRkn2FXP2K-bBHyyb9nkDxUovcx3A0RLY6GxdBtu6Kv44RoROFVUr1zQxa2He_DPwE6aPjnU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223924831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care — A National Survey of Physicians</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>DesRoches, Catherine M ; Campbell, Eric G ; Rao, Sowmya R ; Donelan, Karen ; Ferris, Timothy G ; Jha, Ashish ; Kaushal, Rainu ; Levy, Douglas E ; Rosenbaum, Sara ; Shields, Alexandra E ; Blumenthal, David</creator><creatorcontrib>DesRoches, Catherine M ; Campbell, Eric G ; Rao, Sowmya R ; Donelan, Karen ; Ferris, Timothy G ; Jha, Ashish ; Kaushal, Rainu ; Levy, Douglas E ; Rosenbaum, Sara ; Shields, Alexandra E ; Blumenthal, David</creatorcontrib><description>This national survey finds that only 4% of physicians use an extensive, fully functional system for electronic health records, and 13% use some form of basic electronic records. Those who use electronic records are generally satisfied with the systems and believe that they improve the quality of care that patients receive.
Only 4% of physicians use an extensive, fully functional system for electronic health records, and 13% use some form of basic electronic records. Those who use electronic records believe that they improve the quality of care that patients receive.
Health-information technology, such as sophisticated electronic health records, has the potential to improve health care.
1
–
3
Nevertheless, electronic-records systems have been slow to become part of the practices of physicians in the United States.
4
,
5
To date, there have been no definitive national studies that provide reliable estimates of the adoption of electronic health records by U.S. physicians. Recent estimates of such adoption by physicians range from 9 to 29%.
4
,
5
These percentages were derived from studies that either had a small number of respondents or incompletely specified definitions of an electronic health record.
5
,
6
To provide clearer estimates of . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18565855</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEJMAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Algorithms ; Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Computerized physician order entry ; Consumer Behavior ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Electronic health records ; Female ; General aspects ; Group Practice - statistics & numerical data ; Health care policy ; Health Care Surveys ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized - statistics & numerical data ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Multivariate Analysis ; Physicians - psychology ; Physicians - statistics & numerical data ; Practice Management, Medical - organization & administration ; Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Quality of Health Care ; United States]]></subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2008-07, Vol.359 (1), p.50-60</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2008 Massachusetts Medical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-59c15733afe95403105b918e756db3543549ee1741d76b29cc8e47d9c6118193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-59c15733afe95403105b918e756db3543549ee1741d76b29cc8e47d9c6118193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMsa0802005$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa0802005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2746,2747,26080,27901,27902,52357,54039</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20487616$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18565855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DesRoches, Catherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Eric G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Sowmya R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donelan, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Timothy G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, Rainu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Douglas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Alexandra E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumenthal, David</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care — A National Survey of Physicians</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>This national survey finds that only 4% of physicians use an extensive, fully functional system for electronic health records, and 13% use some form of basic electronic records. Those who use electronic records are generally satisfied with the systems and believe that they improve the quality of care that patients receive.
Only 4% of physicians use an extensive, fully functional system for electronic health records, and 13% use some form of basic electronic records. Those who use electronic records believe that they improve the quality of care that patients receive.
Health-information technology, such as sophisticated electronic health records, has the potential to improve health care.
1
–
3
Nevertheless, electronic-records systems have been slow to become part of the practices of physicians in the United States.
4
,
5
To date, there have been no definitive national studies that provide reliable estimates of the adoption of electronic health records by U.S. physicians. Recent estimates of such adoption by physicians range from 9 to 29%.
4
,
5
These percentages were derived from studies that either had a small number of respondents or incompletely specified definitions of an electronic health record.
5
,
6
To provide clearer estimates of . . .</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Computerized physician order entry</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Group Practice - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Management, Medical - organization & administration</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgio6XpVsJgu6quTdZDsN4w8ug7kuanmKHttGkFWbnQ_iEPokVBwcFw4Fsvpxz8iO0T8kJJVKd3k6vbqIlmjBC5BoaUcl5IgRR62hECNOJSA3fQtsxzslwqDCbaItqqaSWcoRm0xpcF3xbOXwBtu6e8D04H4qIqxaPm7yvbefDAk9sAPzx9o7H-NZ2lW9tjR_68AoL7Es8e1rEylW2jbtoo7R1hL3lvYMez6aPk4vk-u78cjK-TpyirEukcVSmnNsSjBSED3_JDdWQSlXkXIqhDABNBS1SlTPjnAaRFmZ4TTU1fAcdf7d9Dv6lh9hlTRUd1LVtwfcxU4YZwiUd4OEfOPd9GLaPGWPcMKH5F0q-kQs-xgBl9hyqxoZFRkn2FXP2K-bBHyyb9nkDxUovcx3A0RLY6GxdBtu6Kv44RoROFVUr1zQxa2He_DPwE6aPjnU</recordid><startdate>20080703</startdate><enddate>20080703</enddate><creator>DesRoches, Catherine M</creator><creator>Campbell, Eric G</creator><creator>Rao, Sowmya R</creator><creator>Donelan, Karen</creator><creator>Ferris, Timothy G</creator><creator>Jha, Ashish</creator><creator>Kaushal, Rainu</creator><creator>Levy, Douglas E</creator><creator>Rosenbaum, Sara</creator><creator>Shields, Alexandra E</creator><creator>Blumenthal, David</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080703</creationdate><title>Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care — A National Survey of Physicians</title><author>DesRoches, Catherine M ; Campbell, Eric G ; Rao, Sowmya R ; Donelan, Karen ; Ferris, Timothy G ; Jha, Ashish ; Kaushal, Rainu ; Levy, Douglas E ; Rosenbaum, Sara ; Shields, Alexandra E ; Blumenthal, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-59c15733afe95403105b918e756db3543549ee1741d76b29cc8e47d9c6118193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Computerized physician order entry</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Group Practice - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Management, Medical - organization & administration</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DesRoches, Catherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Eric G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Sowmya R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donelan, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Timothy G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, Rainu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Douglas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Alexandra E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumenthal, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DesRoches, Catherine M</au><au>Campbell, Eric G</au><au>Rao, Sowmya R</au><au>Donelan, Karen</au><au>Ferris, Timothy G</au><au>Jha, Ashish</au><au>Kaushal, Rainu</au><au>Levy, Douglas E</au><au>Rosenbaum, Sara</au><au>Shields, Alexandra E</au><au>Blumenthal, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care — A National Survey of Physicians</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2008-07-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>359</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>50-60</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><coden>NEJMAG</coden><abstract>This national survey finds that only 4% of physicians use an extensive, fully functional system for electronic health records, and 13% use some form of basic electronic records. Those who use electronic records are generally satisfied with the systems and believe that they improve the quality of care that patients receive.
Only 4% of physicians use an extensive, fully functional system for electronic health records, and 13% use some form of basic electronic records. Those who use electronic records believe that they improve the quality of care that patients receive.
Health-information technology, such as sophisticated electronic health records, has the potential to improve health care.
1
–
3
Nevertheless, electronic-records systems have been slow to become part of the practices of physicians in the United States.
4
,
5
To date, there have been no definitive national studies that provide reliable estimates of the adoption of electronic health records by U.S. physicians. Recent estimates of such adoption by physicians range from 9 to 29%.
4
,
5
These percentages were derived from studies that either had a small number of respondents or incompletely specified definitions of an electronic health record.
5
,
6
To provide clearer estimates of . . .</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>18565855</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMsa0802005</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
| ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 2008-07, Vol.359 (1), p.50-60 |
| issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69290351 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; New England Journal of Medicine |
| subjects | Algorithms Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data Attitude of Health Personnel Biological and medical sciences Chi-Square Distribution Computerized physician order entry Consumer Behavior Diffusion of Innovation Electronic health records Female General aspects Group Practice - statistics & numerical data Health care policy Health Care Surveys Hospitals Humans Male Medical Records Systems, Computerized - statistics & numerical data Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization Medical sciences Miscellaneous Multivariate Analysis Physicians - psychology Physicians - statistics & numerical data Practice Management, Medical - organization & administration Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Quality of Health Care United States |
| title | Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care — A National Survey of Physicians |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T08%3A17%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20Health%20Records%20in%20Ambulatory%20Care%20%E2%80%94%20A%20National%20Survey%20of%20Physicians&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=DesRoches,%20Catherine%20M&rft.date=2008-07-03&rft.volume=359&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=50-60&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft.coden=NEJMAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMsa0802005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1504831421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223924831&rft_id=info:pmid/18565855&rfr_iscdi=true |