Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve Compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant

Objective To compare the efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant in the treatment of adult glaucoma. Design Comparative case series. Participants Fifty-nine eyes of 59 patients who received the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve and 133 eyes of 133 patients who recei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2008-07, Vol.115 (7), p.1141-1147
Hauptverfasser: Goulet, Robert J., MD, Phan, Anh-Danh T., MD, Cantor, Louis B., MD, WuDunn, Darrell, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1147
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1141
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
container_volume 115
creator Goulet, Robert J., MD
Phan, Anh-Danh T., MD
Cantor, Louis B., MD
WuDunn, Darrell, MD, PhD
description Objective To compare the efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant in the treatment of adult glaucoma. Design Comparative case series. Participants Fifty-nine eyes of 59 patients who received the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve and 133 eyes of 133 patients who received the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant by the Indiana University Glaucoma Service from 1996 to 2003. Methods Eyes that had previous drainage implant procedures were excluded from both groups. If both eyes of a single patient received an implant, the second eye to undergo implantation was excluded from the study. Main Outcome Measures Kaplan–Meier survival with success defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 5 mmHg and < 22 mmHg and at least 20% reduction from preoperative IOP (with or without antiglaucoma medications) and without loss of light perception. Secondary outcome measures included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications, and surgical complications. Results The 2 groups were similar with regards to age, gender, race, neovascular glaucoma diagnosis, number of prior ocular surgeries, preoperative IOP, and number of preoperative glaucoma medications. Mean durations of follow-up were 20.0 months for Ahmed eyes and 22.9 months for Baerveldt eyes. Cumulative successes in the Ahmed group were 0.73 at 1 year and 0.62 at 2 years, whereas cumulative successes in the Baerveldt group were 0.92 at 1 year and 0.85 at 2 years (Kaplan–Meier survival functions: P = 0.03, log rank test). Male gender, African descent, neovascular glaucoma, and Ahmed implantation were found to be significant predictors of failure. At last follow-up visit, eyes in the Ahmed group had a significantly higher mean IOP (19.8±9.5 vs. 15.8±7.9 mmHg, P = 0.003, t test) and more antiglaucoma medications (1.4±1.2 vs. 0.9±1.1 medications, P = 0.008, Mann–Whitney test) than eyes in the Baerveldt group. Two methods for avoiding hypotony after Baerveldt 250-mm2 implantation had similar outcomes. Conclusions Our study suggests that the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve may be less effective at lowering IOP than the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69289605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0161642007011906</els_id><sourcerecordid>69289605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-3de6070a9ba39dd491002371c5d7e457a6c8629fcfb217da739d44ab891d04613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1r3DAQhkVoSTZp_0EIvrQ3b0cflqxLIFnSNBDoIW1PBTEry9gbee1I9pb995WzS9rTwMzzDsMzhFxSWFKg8stm2Q_N2OCSAajUWgIXJ2RBC6FzoSh_RxYJo7kUDM7IeYwbAJCSi1NyRksqBchyQX7f1XVr0e6zvs7GxmU3Teeq7Ill9x4n23eY_UK_c9mq7wYMafSnHZtX8hZd2DlfjRkrIO-6_yIP3eBxO34g72v00X081gvy8-vdj9W3_PH7_cPq5jG3jBdlzisnQQHqNXJdVUJTAMYVtUWlnCgUSltKpmtbrxlVFapECYHrUtMKhKT8gnw-7B1C_zK5OJqujdb5dIPrp2ikZqWWUCRQHEAb-hiDq80Q2g7D3lAws1WzMQerZrY6d5PVFLs67p_Wyc6_0FFjAj4dAYwWfR1wa9v4xjEQCoTQibs-cC7Z2LUuGOvbbfLvn93exU0_hW0SZaiJzIB5mh84_y_ZoVSD5H8BCRGUUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69289605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve Compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Goulet, Robert J., MD ; Phan, Anh-Danh T., MD ; Cantor, Louis B., MD ; WuDunn, Darrell, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Goulet, Robert J., MD ; Phan, Anh-Danh T., MD ; Cantor, Louis B., MD ; WuDunn, Darrell, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare the efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant in the treatment of adult glaucoma. Design Comparative case series. Participants Fifty-nine eyes of 59 patients who received the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve and 133 eyes of 133 patients who received the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant by the Indiana University Glaucoma Service from 1996 to 2003. Methods Eyes that had previous drainage implant procedures were excluded from both groups. If both eyes of a single patient received an implant, the second eye to undergo implantation was excluded from the study. Main Outcome Measures Kaplan–Meier survival with success defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) &gt; 5 mmHg and &lt; 22 mmHg and at least 20% reduction from preoperative IOP (with or without antiglaucoma medications) and without loss of light perception. Secondary outcome measures included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications, and surgical complications. Results The 2 groups were similar with regards to age, gender, race, neovascular glaucoma diagnosis, number of prior ocular surgeries, preoperative IOP, and number of preoperative glaucoma medications. Mean durations of follow-up were 20.0 months for Ahmed eyes and 22.9 months for Baerveldt eyes. Cumulative successes in the Ahmed group were 0.73 at 1 year and 0.62 at 2 years, whereas cumulative successes in the Baerveldt group were 0.92 at 1 year and 0.85 at 2 years (Kaplan–Meier survival functions: P = 0.03, log rank test). Male gender, African descent, neovascular glaucoma, and Ahmed implantation were found to be significant predictors of failure. At last follow-up visit, eyes in the Ahmed group had a significantly higher mean IOP (19.8±9.5 vs. 15.8±7.9 mmHg, P = 0.003, t test) and more antiglaucoma medications (1.4±1.2 vs. 0.9±1.1 medications, P = 0.008, Mann–Whitney test) than eyes in the Baerveldt group. Two methods for avoiding hypotony after Baerveldt 250-mm2 implantation had similar outcomes. Conclusions Our study suggests that the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve may be less effective at lowering IOP than the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18164068</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antihypertensive Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cataract Extraction ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glaucoma - physiopathology ; Glaucoma - surgery ; Glaucoma and intraocular pressure ; Glaucoma Drainage Implants ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Intraoperative Complications ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Retrospective Studies ; Tonometry, Ocular ; Trabeculectomy ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2008-07, Vol.115 (7), p.1141-1147</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-3de6070a9ba39dd491002371c5d7e457a6c8629fcfb217da739d44ab891d04613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-3de6070a9ba39dd491002371c5d7e457a6c8629fcfb217da739d44ab891d04613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20470449$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18164068$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goulet, Robert J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, Anh-Danh T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantor, Louis B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WuDunn, Darrell, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve Compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>Objective To compare the efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant in the treatment of adult glaucoma. Design Comparative case series. Participants Fifty-nine eyes of 59 patients who received the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve and 133 eyes of 133 patients who received the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant by the Indiana University Glaucoma Service from 1996 to 2003. Methods Eyes that had previous drainage implant procedures were excluded from both groups. If both eyes of a single patient received an implant, the second eye to undergo implantation was excluded from the study. Main Outcome Measures Kaplan–Meier survival with success defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) &gt; 5 mmHg and &lt; 22 mmHg and at least 20% reduction from preoperative IOP (with or without antiglaucoma medications) and without loss of light perception. Secondary outcome measures included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications, and surgical complications. Results The 2 groups were similar with regards to age, gender, race, neovascular glaucoma diagnosis, number of prior ocular surgeries, preoperative IOP, and number of preoperative glaucoma medications. Mean durations of follow-up were 20.0 months for Ahmed eyes and 22.9 months for Baerveldt eyes. Cumulative successes in the Ahmed group were 0.73 at 1 year and 0.62 at 2 years, whereas cumulative successes in the Baerveldt group were 0.92 at 1 year and 0.85 at 2 years (Kaplan–Meier survival functions: P = 0.03, log rank test). Male gender, African descent, neovascular glaucoma, and Ahmed implantation were found to be significant predictors of failure. At last follow-up visit, eyes in the Ahmed group had a significantly higher mean IOP (19.8±9.5 vs. 15.8±7.9 mmHg, P = 0.003, t test) and more antiglaucoma medications (1.4±1.2 vs. 0.9±1.1 medications, P = 0.008, Mann–Whitney test) than eyes in the Baerveldt group. Two methods for avoiding hypotony after Baerveldt 250-mm2 implantation had similar outcomes. Conclusions Our study suggests that the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve may be less effective at lowering IOP than the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glaucoma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma - surgery</subject><subject>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Glaucoma Drainage Implants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular</subject><subject>Trabeculectomy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1r3DAQhkVoSTZp_0EIvrQ3b0cflqxLIFnSNBDoIW1PBTEry9gbee1I9pb995WzS9rTwMzzDsMzhFxSWFKg8stm2Q_N2OCSAajUWgIXJ2RBC6FzoSh_RxYJo7kUDM7IeYwbAJCSi1NyRksqBchyQX7f1XVr0e6zvs7GxmU3Teeq7Ill9x4n23eY_UK_c9mq7wYMafSnHZtX8hZd2DlfjRkrIO-6_yIP3eBxO34g72v00X081gvy8-vdj9W3_PH7_cPq5jG3jBdlzisnQQHqNXJdVUJTAMYVtUWlnCgUSltKpmtbrxlVFapECYHrUtMKhKT8gnw-7B1C_zK5OJqujdb5dIPrp2ikZqWWUCRQHEAb-hiDq80Q2g7D3lAws1WzMQerZrY6d5PVFLs67p_Wyc6_0FFjAj4dAYwWfR1wa9v4xjEQCoTQibs-cC7Z2LUuGOvbbfLvn93exU0_hW0SZaiJzIB5mh84_y_ZoVSD5H8BCRGUUA</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>Goulet, Robert J., MD</creator><creator>Phan, Anh-Danh T., MD</creator><creator>Cantor, Louis B., MD</creator><creator>WuDunn, Darrell, MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve Compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant</title><author>Goulet, Robert J., MD ; Phan, Anh-Danh T., MD ; Cantor, Louis B., MD ; WuDunn, Darrell, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-3de6070a9ba39dd491002371c5d7e457a6c8629fcfb217da739d44ab891d04613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glaucoma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma - surgery</topic><topic>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Glaucoma Drainage Implants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular</topic><topic>Trabeculectomy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goulet, Robert J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, Anh-Danh T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantor, Louis B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WuDunn, Darrell, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goulet, Robert J., MD</au><au>Phan, Anh-Danh T., MD</au><au>Cantor, Louis B., MD</au><au>WuDunn, Darrell, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve Compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1141</spage><epage>1147</epage><pages>1141-1147</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>Objective To compare the efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant in the treatment of adult glaucoma. Design Comparative case series. Participants Fifty-nine eyes of 59 patients who received the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve and 133 eyes of 133 patients who received the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant by the Indiana University Glaucoma Service from 1996 to 2003. Methods Eyes that had previous drainage implant procedures were excluded from both groups. If both eyes of a single patient received an implant, the second eye to undergo implantation was excluded from the study. Main Outcome Measures Kaplan–Meier survival with success defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) &gt; 5 mmHg and &lt; 22 mmHg and at least 20% reduction from preoperative IOP (with or without antiglaucoma medications) and without loss of light perception. Secondary outcome measures included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications, and surgical complications. Results The 2 groups were similar with regards to age, gender, race, neovascular glaucoma diagnosis, number of prior ocular surgeries, preoperative IOP, and number of preoperative glaucoma medications. Mean durations of follow-up were 20.0 months for Ahmed eyes and 22.9 months for Baerveldt eyes. Cumulative successes in the Ahmed group were 0.73 at 1 year and 0.62 at 2 years, whereas cumulative successes in the Baerveldt group were 0.92 at 1 year and 0.85 at 2 years (Kaplan–Meier survival functions: P = 0.03, log rank test). Male gender, African descent, neovascular glaucoma, and Ahmed implantation were found to be significant predictors of failure. At last follow-up visit, eyes in the Ahmed group had a significantly higher mean IOP (19.8±9.5 vs. 15.8±7.9 mmHg, P = 0.003, t test) and more antiglaucoma medications (1.4±1.2 vs. 0.9±1.1 medications, P = 0.008, Mann–Whitney test) than eyes in the Baerveldt group. Two methods for avoiding hypotony after Baerveldt 250-mm2 implantation had similar outcomes. Conclusions Our study suggests that the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve may be less effective at lowering IOP than the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>18164068</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.034</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-6420
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2008-07, Vol.115 (7), p.1141-1147
issn 0161-6420
1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69289605
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antihypertensive Agents - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Cataract Extraction
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma - physiopathology
Glaucoma - surgery
Glaucoma and intraocular pressure
Glaucoma Drainage Implants
Humans
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Intraoperative Complications
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Ophthalmology
Prosthesis Implantation
Retrospective Studies
Tonometry, Ocular
Trabeculectomy
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity - physiology
title Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 Glaucoma Valve Compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 Glaucoma Implant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20the%20Ahmed%20S2%20Glaucoma%20Valve%20Compared%20with%20the%20Baerveldt%20250-mm2%20Glaucoma%20Implant&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Goulet,%20Robert%20J.,%20MD&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1141&rft.epage=1147&rft.pages=1141-1147&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69289605%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69289605&rft_id=info:pmid/18164068&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0161642007011906&rfr_iscdi=true