Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria
A procedure for measuring total purine content of mixed ruminal bacteria was adapted for use in the determination of purines in pure cultures of ruminal bacteria. Recovery of adenine and guanine, alone or in mixture, was quite variable. The problem was traced to solubility of the silver salt of aden...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 1999-11, Vol.77 (11), p.3084-3095 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3095 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3084 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Obispo, N.E Dehority, B.A |
description | A procedure for measuring total purine content of mixed ruminal bacteria was adapted for use in the determination of purines in pure cultures of ruminal bacteria. Recovery of adenine and guanine, alone or in mixture, was quite variable. The problem was traced to solubility of the silver salt of adenine in the acid wash solution. When the precipitating solution was used as the wash, recovery of the purines was over 97%. Recovery of a 1:1 mixture of adenine and guanine added to yeast RNA was 100.6 +/- 3.2%. Purine, protein, and bacterial concentrations were determined for 10 pure cultures of ruminal bacteria: Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, D16f, H10b, and H17c; Fibrobacter succinogenes B21a; Lachnospira multiparus D25e; Lactobacillus lactis ARD26e; Prevotella ruminicola H15a; Ruminococcus albus 7; Ruminococcus flavefaciens B34b; and Streptococcus bovis ARD5d. The CV for the most-probable-number (MPN) assay (bacterial concentrations), purine analysis, and protein analysis were 55.86, 5.25 and 6.52%, respectively. Considerable variation was found among bacterial species and strains when purine and protein concentrations were compared as the amount per individual cell. More consistent values were obtained when these components were expressed on a dry matter basis. Purine:protein ratios for the 10 pure cultures ranged from .023 to .1299, with a mean value of .0883. For samples of mixed bacteria separated from ruminal fluid, this ratio was found to average .0306, which is approximately one-third of the value for the pure cultures. The value determined for the mixed bacterial sample is similar to previously reported values. Based on the ratio obtained with the pure cultures, the microbial protein flow out of the rumen has probably been overestimated in most previous reports. Limited studies suggest that the samples of mixed ruminal bacteria used as a standard are probably contaminated with feed particles containing protein, which results in lower purine:protein ratios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/1999.77113084x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69286062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69286062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-294651cd17592f2ca74499f6c6166fa27469d3b2103857575dc01faea66fd43d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9rFDEUB_Agit1Wrx51kKKnWfPyc3KUxapQ6KHtObzNJNus82NNZtD-980yi4okkEM--b6XR8gboGsmmf4Expi11gCcNuL3M7ICyWTNQfHnZEUpg7ppgJ2R85z3lAKTRr4kZ0ClakQDK7K58pjjNnZxeqzGUM05DrtqGifsqsOc4uBzhWVXPaYfPlVhTFWa-ziU-y26yaeIr8iLgF32r0_nBbm_-nK3-VZf33z9vvl8XTtB-VQzI5QE14KWhgXmUAthTFBOgVIBmRbKtHzLgPJG6rJaRyGgx3LbCt7yC_JhyT2k8efs82T7mJ3vOhz8OGerDGsUVazA9__B_Tin0nK2DBqgWoojWi_IpTHn5IM9pFh--WiB2uNs7XG29s9sy4O3p9R52_v2H74Ms4DLE8DssAsJBxfzX8cYp0IW9nFhD3H38Csmb3OPXVdSwe4x61IY7LFkke8WGXC0uEsl7P6W0dIPM1IppfkTtQmVBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218107542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Obispo, N.E ; Dehority, B.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Obispo, N.E ; Dehority, B.A</creatorcontrib><description>A procedure for measuring total purine content of mixed ruminal bacteria was adapted for use in the determination of purines in pure cultures of ruminal bacteria. Recovery of adenine and guanine, alone or in mixture, was quite variable. The problem was traced to solubility of the silver salt of adenine in the acid wash solution. When the precipitating solution was used as the wash, recovery of the purines was over 97%. Recovery of a 1:1 mixture of adenine and guanine added to yeast RNA was 100.6 +/- 3.2%. Purine, protein, and bacterial concentrations were determined for 10 pure cultures of ruminal bacteria: Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, D16f, H10b, and H17c; Fibrobacter succinogenes B21a; Lachnospira multiparus D25e; Lactobacillus lactis ARD26e; Prevotella ruminicola H15a; Ruminococcus albus 7; Ruminococcus flavefaciens B34b; and Streptococcus bovis ARD5d. The CV for the most-probable-number (MPN) assay (bacterial concentrations), purine analysis, and protein analysis were 55.86, 5.25 and 6.52%, respectively. Considerable variation was found among bacterial species and strains when purine and protein concentrations were compared as the amount per individual cell. More consistent values were obtained when these components were expressed on a dry matter basis. Purine:protein ratios for the 10 pure cultures ranged from .023 to .1299, with a mean value of .0883. For samples of mixed bacteria separated from ruminal fluid, this ratio was found to average .0306, which is approximately one-third of the value for the pure cultures. The value determined for the mixed bacterial sample is similar to previously reported values. Based on the ratio obtained with the pure cultures, the microbial protein flow out of the rumen has probably been overestimated in most previous reports. Limited studies suggest that the samples of mixed ruminal bacteria used as a standard are probably contaminated with feed particles containing protein, which results in lower purine:protein ratios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/1999.77113084x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10568481</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>adenine ; Animal productions ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Bacteria ; bacterial proteins ; bioassays ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers ; chemical composition ; Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary ; concentrates ; cultured cells ; forage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; guanine ; Microbial ecology ; Microorganisms ; Normal microflora of man and animals. Rumen ; precipitation ; protein composition ; Proteins ; purines ; Purines - analysis ; Rumen - microbiology ; rumen bacteria ; solubility ; species differences ; steers ; strain differences ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1999-11, Vol.77 (11), p.3084-3095</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Nov 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-294651cd17592f2ca74499f6c6166fa27469d3b2103857575dc01faea66fd43d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1223045$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10568481$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Obispo, N.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehority, B.A</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>A procedure for measuring total purine content of mixed ruminal bacteria was adapted for use in the determination of purines in pure cultures of ruminal bacteria. Recovery of adenine and guanine, alone or in mixture, was quite variable. The problem was traced to solubility of the silver salt of adenine in the acid wash solution. When the precipitating solution was used as the wash, recovery of the purines was over 97%. Recovery of a 1:1 mixture of adenine and guanine added to yeast RNA was 100.6 +/- 3.2%. Purine, protein, and bacterial concentrations were determined for 10 pure cultures of ruminal bacteria: Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, D16f, H10b, and H17c; Fibrobacter succinogenes B21a; Lachnospira multiparus D25e; Lactobacillus lactis ARD26e; Prevotella ruminicola H15a; Ruminococcus albus 7; Ruminococcus flavefaciens B34b; and Streptococcus bovis ARD5d. The CV for the most-probable-number (MPN) assay (bacterial concentrations), purine analysis, and protein analysis were 55.86, 5.25 and 6.52%, respectively. Considerable variation was found among bacterial species and strains when purine and protein concentrations were compared as the amount per individual cell. More consistent values were obtained when these components were expressed on a dry matter basis. Purine:protein ratios for the 10 pure cultures ranged from .023 to .1299, with a mean value of .0883. For samples of mixed bacteria separated from ruminal fluid, this ratio was found to average .0306, which is approximately one-third of the value for the pure cultures. The value determined for the mixed bacterial sample is similar to previously reported values. Based on the ratio obtained with the pure cultures, the microbial protein flow out of the rumen has probably been overestimated in most previous reports. Limited studies suggest that the samples of mixed ruminal bacteria used as a standard are probably contaminated with feed particles containing protein, which results in lower purine:protein ratios.</description><subject>adenine</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bacterial proteins</subject><subject>bioassays</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>chemical composition</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary</subject><subject>concentrates</subject><subject>cultured cells</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>guanine</subject><subject>Microbial ecology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Normal microflora of man and animals. Rumen</subject><subject>precipitation</subject><subject>protein composition</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>purines</subject><subject>Purines - analysis</subject><subject>Rumen - microbiology</subject><subject>rumen bacteria</subject><subject>solubility</subject><subject>species differences</subject><subject>steers</subject><subject>strain differences</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M9rFDEUB_Agit1Wrx51kKKnWfPyc3KUxapQ6KHtObzNJNus82NNZtD-980yi4okkEM--b6XR8gboGsmmf4Expi11gCcNuL3M7ICyWTNQfHnZEUpg7ppgJ2R85z3lAKTRr4kZ0ClakQDK7K58pjjNnZxeqzGUM05DrtqGifsqsOc4uBzhWVXPaYfPlVhTFWa-ziU-y26yaeIr8iLgF32r0_nBbm_-nK3-VZf33z9vvl8XTtB-VQzI5QE14KWhgXmUAthTFBOgVIBmRbKtHzLgPJG6rJaRyGgx3LbCt7yC_JhyT2k8efs82T7mJ3vOhz8OGerDGsUVazA9__B_Tin0nK2DBqgWoojWi_IpTHn5IM9pFh--WiB2uNs7XG29s9sy4O3p9R52_v2H74Ms4DLE8DssAsJBxfzX8cYp0IW9nFhD3H38Csmb3OPXVdSwe4x61IY7LFkke8WGXC0uEsl7P6W0dIPM1IppfkTtQmVBg</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>Obispo, N.E</creator><creator>Dehority, B.A</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria</title><author>Obispo, N.E ; Dehority, B.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-294651cd17592f2ca74499f6c6166fa27469d3b2103857575dc01faea66fd43d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>adenine</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bacterial proteins</topic><topic>bioassays</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>chemical composition</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary</topic><topic>concentrates</topic><topic>cultured cells</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>guanine</topic><topic>Microbial ecology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Normal microflora of man and animals. Rumen</topic><topic>precipitation</topic><topic>protein composition</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>purines</topic><topic>Purines - analysis</topic><topic>Rumen - microbiology</topic><topic>rumen bacteria</topic><topic>solubility</topic><topic>species differences</topic><topic>steers</topic><topic>strain differences</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Obispo, N.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehority, B.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Obispo, N.E</au><au>Dehority, B.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3084</spage><epage>3095</epage><pages>3084-3095</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><eissn>0021-8812</eissn><abstract>A procedure for measuring total purine content of mixed ruminal bacteria was adapted for use in the determination of purines in pure cultures of ruminal bacteria. Recovery of adenine and guanine, alone or in mixture, was quite variable. The problem was traced to solubility of the silver salt of adenine in the acid wash solution. When the precipitating solution was used as the wash, recovery of the purines was over 97%. Recovery of a 1:1 mixture of adenine and guanine added to yeast RNA was 100.6 +/- 3.2%. Purine, protein, and bacterial concentrations were determined for 10 pure cultures of ruminal bacteria: Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, D16f, H10b, and H17c; Fibrobacter succinogenes B21a; Lachnospira multiparus D25e; Lactobacillus lactis ARD26e; Prevotella ruminicola H15a; Ruminococcus albus 7; Ruminococcus flavefaciens B34b; and Streptococcus bovis ARD5d. The CV for the most-probable-number (MPN) assay (bacterial concentrations), purine analysis, and protein analysis were 55.86, 5.25 and 6.52%, respectively. Considerable variation was found among bacterial species and strains when purine and protein concentrations were compared as the amount per individual cell. More consistent values were obtained when these components were expressed on a dry matter basis. Purine:protein ratios for the 10 pure cultures ranged from .023 to .1299, with a mean value of .0883. For samples of mixed bacteria separated from ruminal fluid, this ratio was found to average .0306, which is approximately one-third of the value for the pure cultures. The value determined for the mixed bacterial sample is similar to previously reported values. Based on the ratio obtained with the pure cultures, the microbial protein flow out of the rumen has probably been overestimated in most previous reports. Limited studies suggest that the samples of mixed ruminal bacteria used as a standard are probably contaminated with feed particles containing protein, which results in lower purine:protein ratios.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>10568481</pmid><doi>10.2527/1999.77113084x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 1999-11, Vol.77 (11), p.3084-3095 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 0021-8812 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69286062 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | adenine Animal productions Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Bacteria bacterial proteins bioassays Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers chemical composition Colony Count, Microbial - veterinary concentrates cultured cells forage Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology guanine Microbial ecology Microorganisms Normal microflora of man and animals. Rumen precipitation protein composition Proteins purines Purines - analysis Rumen - microbiology rumen bacteria solubility species differences steers strain differences Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates |
title | Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A32%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20using%20total%20purines%20as%20a%20marker%20for%20ruminal%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Obispo,%20N.E&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3084&rft.epage=3095&rft.pages=3084-3095&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/1999.77113084x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69286062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218107542&rft_id=info:pmid/10568481&rfr_iscdi=true |