Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears
Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) 2008-05, Vol.33 (5), p.675-682 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 682 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 675 |
container_title | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Anderson, Meredith L., MD Larson, A. Noelle, MD Moran, Steven L., MD Cooney, William P., MD Amrami, Kimberly K., MD Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD |
description | Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 patients had repair of traumatic TFCC tears. Thirty-six patients had arthroscopic TFCC repair, and 39 patients had open repair. One patient was lost to follow-up. Evaluation included range of motion, grip strength, preoperative and postoperative Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and patient-reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and visual analog scale score. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests or 2-sample t -tests; significance was set at p < .05. Results Mean follow-up was 43 months ± 11. Mean MMWS improved 6.5 points ± 19.9 after surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients improved at least 1 level in the MMWS pain score. No statistical difference was found between open and arthroscopic repair in the improvement of MMWS or visual analog scale pain scores. There was increased postoperative nerve pain (ulnar nerve branch) in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients), but this was not found to be statistically significant. Reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability was performed in 17% of patients. No statistical association was observed between surgery type and the rate of reoperation for instability. Female gender was significantly associated with a higher rate of total reoperation. Conclusions There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair. Although not statistically significant, there was an increased rate of postoperative superficial ulnar nerve pain in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients). After TFCC repair, 13 out of 75 patients required reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability in this sample. A statistically significant association was found between reoperation rate and female gender. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69279570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0363502308000439</els_id><sourcerecordid>69279570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-a1030fd32ad54bb329e9a984d1ac47fd87f09a3b5fa2b27c64b4b51aa1bdd5f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQbnTXepI0_QARhoszCgMDenUbTtPTmdTepiatOP_edG5RcOEqm-c9nDzvYewlh4wDL972WX8XMBMAVQY8AwGP2I4rydNCFfljtgNZyFSBkGfsWQg9QExJ9ZSd8UrVUCnYMdwPdrQGh2TvjhN6G9yYuC658POdd8G4yZrkG_mwhORmojH5TBNavyIHb3G8XQb0yaVtvDPoZzvgLT2MGuhXciD04Tl70uEQ6MX2nrOvlx8O-4_p9c3Vp_3FdWpyWc8pcpDQtVJgq_KmkaKmGusqbzmavOzaquygRtmoDkUjSlPkTd4ojsibtlVdJc_Zm9PcybsfC4VZH20wNAw4kluCLmpR1qqECIoTaOIHg6dOT94e0d9rDnoVq3u9itWrWA1cR7Ex9GqbvjRHav9GNpMReL0BGKLOzuNobPjDCYg9qLyO3LsTR9HFT0teB2NpNNRaT2bWrbP_3-P9P3GzFfid7in0bvFjtKy5DkKD_rKewHoBUMX2o2j5G9Y7rKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69279570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Anderson, Meredith L., MD ; Larson, A. Noelle, MD ; Moran, Steven L., MD ; Cooney, William P., MD ; Amrami, Kimberly K., MD ; Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Meredith L., MD ; Larson, A. Noelle, MD ; Moran, Steven L., MD ; Cooney, William P., MD ; Amrami, Kimberly K., MD ; Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 patients had repair of traumatic TFCC tears. Thirty-six patients had arthroscopic TFCC repair, and 39 patients had open repair. One patient was lost to follow-up. Evaluation included range of motion, grip strength, preoperative and postoperative Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and patient-reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and visual analog scale score. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests or 2-sample t -tests; significance was set at p < .05. Results Mean follow-up was 43 months ± 11. Mean MMWS improved 6.5 points ± 19.9 after surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients improved at least 1 level in the MMWS pain score. No statistical difference was found between open and arthroscopic repair in the improvement of MMWS or visual analog scale pain scores. There was increased postoperative nerve pain (ulnar nerve branch) in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients), but this was not found to be statistically significant. Reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability was performed in 17% of patients. No statistical association was observed between surgery type and the rate of reoperation for instability. Female gender was significantly associated with a higher rate of total reoperation. Conclusions There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair. Although not statistically significant, there was an increased rate of postoperative superficial ulnar nerve pain in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients). After TFCC repair, 13 out of 75 patients required reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability in this sample. A statistically significant association was found between reoperation rate and female gender. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-6564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18590850</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHSUDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New york, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arthroscopy ; Arthroscopy - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hand Strength ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Linear Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedics ; Pain Measurement ; Postoperative Complications ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reoperation ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Treatment Outcome ; Triangular Fibrocartilage - injuries ; Triangular Fibrocartilage - surgery ; triangular fibrocartilage complex</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2008-05, Vol.33 (5), p.675-682</ispartof><rights>American Society for Surgery of the Hand</rights><rights>2008 American Society for Surgery of the Hand</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-a1030fd32ad54bb329e9a984d1ac47fd87f09a3b5fa2b27c64b4b51aa1bdd5f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-a1030fd32ad54bb329e9a984d1ac47fd87f09a3b5fa2b27c64b4b51aa1bdd5f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502308000439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20502549$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18590850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Meredith L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, A. Noelle, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Steven L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooney, William P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amrami, Kimberly K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears</title><title>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</title><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 patients had repair of traumatic TFCC tears. Thirty-six patients had arthroscopic TFCC repair, and 39 patients had open repair. One patient was lost to follow-up. Evaluation included range of motion, grip strength, preoperative and postoperative Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and patient-reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and visual analog scale score. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests or 2-sample t -tests; significance was set at p < .05. Results Mean follow-up was 43 months ± 11. Mean MMWS improved 6.5 points ± 19.9 after surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients improved at least 1 level in the MMWS pain score. No statistical difference was found between open and arthroscopic repair in the improvement of MMWS or visual analog scale pain scores. There was increased postoperative nerve pain (ulnar nerve branch) in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients), but this was not found to be statistically significant. Reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability was performed in 17% of patients. No statistical association was observed between surgery type and the rate of reoperation for instability. Female gender was significantly associated with a higher rate of total reoperation. Conclusions There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair. Although not statistically significant, there was an increased rate of postoperative superficial ulnar nerve pain in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients). After TFCC repair, 13 out of 75 patients required reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability in this sample. A statistically significant association was found between reoperation rate and female gender. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arthroscopy</subject><subject>Arthroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hand Strength</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Triangular Fibrocartilage - injuries</subject><subject>Triangular Fibrocartilage - surgery</subject><subject>triangular fibrocartilage complex</subject><issn>0363-5023</issn><issn>1531-6564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQbnTXepI0_QARhoszCgMDenUbTtPTmdTepiatOP_edG5RcOEqm-c9nDzvYewlh4wDL972WX8XMBMAVQY8AwGP2I4rydNCFfljtgNZyFSBkGfsWQg9QExJ9ZSd8UrVUCnYMdwPdrQGh2TvjhN6G9yYuC658POdd8G4yZrkG_mwhORmojH5TBNavyIHb3G8XQb0yaVtvDPoZzvgLT2MGuhXciD04Tl70uEQ6MX2nrOvlx8O-4_p9c3Vp_3FdWpyWc8pcpDQtVJgq_KmkaKmGusqbzmavOzaquygRtmoDkUjSlPkTd4ojsibtlVdJc_Zm9PcybsfC4VZH20wNAw4kluCLmpR1qqECIoTaOIHg6dOT94e0d9rDnoVq3u9itWrWA1cR7Ex9GqbvjRHav9GNpMReL0BGKLOzuNobPjDCYg9qLyO3LsTR9HFT0teB2NpNNRaT2bWrbP_3-P9P3GzFfid7in0bvFjtKy5DkKD_rKewHoBUMX2o2j5G9Y7rKw</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Anderson, Meredith L., MD</creator><creator>Larson, A. Noelle, MD</creator><creator>Moran, Steven L., MD</creator><creator>Cooney, William P., MD</creator><creator>Amrami, Kimberly K., MD</creator><creator>Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears</title><author>Anderson, Meredith L., MD ; Larson, A. Noelle, MD ; Moran, Steven L., MD ; Cooney, William P., MD ; Amrami, Kimberly K., MD ; Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-a1030fd32ad54bb329e9a984d1ac47fd87f09a3b5fa2b27c64b4b51aa1bdd5f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arthroscopy</topic><topic>Arthroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hand Strength</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Triangular Fibrocartilage - injuries</topic><topic>Triangular Fibrocartilage - surgery</topic><topic>triangular fibrocartilage complex</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Meredith L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, A. Noelle, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Steven L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooney, William P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amrami, Kimberly K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Meredith L., MD</au><au>Larson, A. Noelle, MD</au><au>Moran, Steven L., MD</au><au>Cooney, William P., MD</au><au>Amrami, Kimberly K., MD</au><au>Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>675</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>675-682</pages><issn>0363-5023</issn><eissn>1531-6564</eissn><coden>JHSUDV</coden><abstract>Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 patients had repair of traumatic TFCC tears. Thirty-six patients had arthroscopic TFCC repair, and 39 patients had open repair. One patient was lost to follow-up. Evaluation included range of motion, grip strength, preoperative and postoperative Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and patient-reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and visual analog scale score. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests or 2-sample t -tests; significance was set at p < .05. Results Mean follow-up was 43 months ± 11. Mean MMWS improved 6.5 points ± 19.9 after surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients improved at least 1 level in the MMWS pain score. No statistical difference was found between open and arthroscopic repair in the improvement of MMWS or visual analog scale pain scores. There was increased postoperative nerve pain (ulnar nerve branch) in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients), but this was not found to be statistically significant. Reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability was performed in 17% of patients. No statistical association was observed between surgery type and the rate of reoperation for instability. Female gender was significantly associated with a higher rate of total reoperation. Conclusions There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair. Although not statistically significant, there was an increased rate of postoperative superficial ulnar nerve pain in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients). After TFCC repair, 13 out of 75 patients required reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability in this sample. A statistically significant association was found between reoperation rate and female gender. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.</abstract><cop>New york, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18590850</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-5023 |
ispartof | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2008-05, Vol.33 (5), p.675-682 |
issn | 0363-5023 1531-6564 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69279570 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Arthroscopy Arthroscopy - methods Biological and medical sciences Chi-Square Distribution Diseases of the osteoarticular system Endoscopy Female Follow-Up Studies Hand Strength Humans Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Linear Models Male Medical sciences Orthopedics Pain Measurement Postoperative Complications Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Reoperation Risk Factors Surveys and Questionnaires Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents Treatment Outcome Triangular Fibrocartilage - injuries Triangular Fibrocartilage - surgery triangular fibrocartilage complex |
title | Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Comparison%20of%20Arthroscopic%20Versus%20Open%20Repair%20of%20Triangular%20Fibrocartilage%20Complex%20Tears&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hand%20surgery%20(American%20ed.)&rft.au=Anderson,%20Meredith%20L.,%20MD&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=675&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=675-682&rft.issn=0363-5023&rft.eissn=1531-6564&rft.coden=JHSUDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69279570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69279570&rft_id=info:pmid/18590850&rft_els_id=S0363502308000439&rfr_iscdi=true |