Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears

Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) 2008-05, Vol.33 (5), p.675-682
Hauptverfasser: Anderson, Meredith L., MD, Larson, A. Noelle, MD, Moran, Steven L., MD, Cooney, William P., MD, Amrami, Kimberly K., MD, Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 682
container_issue 5
container_start_page 675
container_title The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)
container_volume 33
creator Anderson, Meredith L., MD
Larson, A. Noelle, MD
Moran, Steven L., MD
Cooney, William P., MD
Amrami, Kimberly K., MD
Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD
description Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 patients had repair of traumatic TFCC tears. Thirty-six patients had arthroscopic TFCC repair, and 39 patients had open repair. One patient was lost to follow-up. Evaluation included range of motion, grip strength, preoperative and postoperative Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and patient-reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and visual analog scale score. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests or 2-sample t -tests; significance was set at p < .05. Results Mean follow-up was 43 months ± 11. Mean MMWS improved 6.5 points ± 19.9 after surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients improved at least 1 level in the MMWS pain score. No statistical difference was found between open and arthroscopic repair in the improvement of MMWS or visual analog scale pain scores. There was increased postoperative nerve pain (ulnar nerve branch) in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients), but this was not found to be statistically significant. Reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability was performed in 17% of patients. No statistical association was observed between surgery type and the rate of reoperation for instability. Female gender was significantly associated with a higher rate of total reoperation. Conclusions There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair. Although not statistically significant, there was an increased rate of postoperative superficial ulnar nerve pain in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients). After TFCC repair, 13 out of 75 patients required reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability in this sample. A statistically significant association was found between reoperation rate and female gender. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69279570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0363502308000439</els_id><sourcerecordid>69279570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-a1030fd32ad54bb329e9a984d1ac47fd87f09a3b5fa2b27c64b4b51aa1bdd5f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQbnTXepI0_QARhoszCgMDenUbTtPTmdTepiatOP_edG5RcOEqm-c9nDzvYewlh4wDL972WX8XMBMAVQY8AwGP2I4rydNCFfljtgNZyFSBkGfsWQg9QExJ9ZSd8UrVUCnYMdwPdrQGh2TvjhN6G9yYuC658POdd8G4yZrkG_mwhORmojH5TBNavyIHb3G8XQb0yaVtvDPoZzvgLT2MGuhXciD04Tl70uEQ6MX2nrOvlx8O-4_p9c3Vp_3FdWpyWc8pcpDQtVJgq_KmkaKmGusqbzmavOzaquygRtmoDkUjSlPkTd4ojsibtlVdJc_Zm9PcybsfC4VZH20wNAw4kluCLmpR1qqECIoTaOIHg6dOT94e0d9rDnoVq3u9itWrWA1cR7Ex9GqbvjRHav9GNpMReL0BGKLOzuNobPjDCYg9qLyO3LsTR9HFT0teB2NpNNRaT2bWrbP_3-P9P3GzFfid7in0bvFjtKy5DkKD_rKewHoBUMX2o2j5G9Y7rKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69279570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Anderson, Meredith L., MD ; Larson, A. Noelle, MD ; Moran, Steven L., MD ; Cooney, William P., MD ; Amrami, Kimberly K., MD ; Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Meredith L., MD ; Larson, A. Noelle, MD ; Moran, Steven L., MD ; Cooney, William P., MD ; Amrami, Kimberly K., MD ; Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 patients had repair of traumatic TFCC tears. Thirty-six patients had arthroscopic TFCC repair, and 39 patients had open repair. One patient was lost to follow-up. Evaluation included range of motion, grip strength, preoperative and postoperative Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and patient-reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and visual analog scale score. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests or 2-sample t -tests; significance was set at p &lt; .05. Results Mean follow-up was 43 months ± 11. Mean MMWS improved 6.5 points ± 19.9 after surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients improved at least 1 level in the MMWS pain score. No statistical difference was found between open and arthroscopic repair in the improvement of MMWS or visual analog scale pain scores. There was increased postoperative nerve pain (ulnar nerve branch) in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients), but this was not found to be statistically significant. Reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability was performed in 17% of patients. No statistical association was observed between surgery type and the rate of reoperation for instability. Female gender was significantly associated with a higher rate of total reoperation. Conclusions There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair. Although not statistically significant, there was an increased rate of postoperative superficial ulnar nerve pain in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients). After TFCC repair, 13 out of 75 patients required reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability in this sample. A statistically significant association was found between reoperation rate and female gender. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-6564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18590850</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHSUDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New york, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arthroscopy ; Arthroscopy - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hand Strength ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Linear Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedics ; Pain Measurement ; Postoperative Complications ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reoperation ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Treatment Outcome ; Triangular Fibrocartilage - injuries ; Triangular Fibrocartilage - surgery ; triangular fibrocartilage complex</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2008-05, Vol.33 (5), p.675-682</ispartof><rights>American Society for Surgery of the Hand</rights><rights>2008 American Society for Surgery of the Hand</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-a1030fd32ad54bb329e9a984d1ac47fd87f09a3b5fa2b27c64b4b51aa1bdd5f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-a1030fd32ad54bb329e9a984d1ac47fd87f09a3b5fa2b27c64b4b51aa1bdd5f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502308000439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20502549$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18590850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Meredith L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, A. Noelle, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Steven L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooney, William P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amrami, Kimberly K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears</title><title>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</title><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 patients had repair of traumatic TFCC tears. Thirty-six patients had arthroscopic TFCC repair, and 39 patients had open repair. One patient was lost to follow-up. Evaluation included range of motion, grip strength, preoperative and postoperative Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and patient-reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and visual analog scale score. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests or 2-sample t -tests; significance was set at p &lt; .05. Results Mean follow-up was 43 months ± 11. Mean MMWS improved 6.5 points ± 19.9 after surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients improved at least 1 level in the MMWS pain score. No statistical difference was found between open and arthroscopic repair in the improvement of MMWS or visual analog scale pain scores. There was increased postoperative nerve pain (ulnar nerve branch) in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients), but this was not found to be statistically significant. Reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability was performed in 17% of patients. No statistical association was observed between surgery type and the rate of reoperation for instability. Female gender was significantly associated with a higher rate of total reoperation. Conclusions There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair. Although not statistically significant, there was an increased rate of postoperative superficial ulnar nerve pain in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients). After TFCC repair, 13 out of 75 patients required reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability in this sample. A statistically significant association was found between reoperation rate and female gender. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arthroscopy</subject><subject>Arthroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hand Strength</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Triangular Fibrocartilage - injuries</subject><subject>Triangular Fibrocartilage - surgery</subject><subject>triangular fibrocartilage complex</subject><issn>0363-5023</issn><issn>1531-6564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQbnTXepI0_QARhoszCgMDenUbTtPTmdTepiatOP_edG5RcOEqm-c9nDzvYewlh4wDL972WX8XMBMAVQY8AwGP2I4rydNCFfljtgNZyFSBkGfsWQg9QExJ9ZSd8UrVUCnYMdwPdrQGh2TvjhN6G9yYuC658POdd8G4yZrkG_mwhORmojH5TBNavyIHb3G8XQb0yaVtvDPoZzvgLT2MGuhXciD04Tl70uEQ6MX2nrOvlx8O-4_p9c3Vp_3FdWpyWc8pcpDQtVJgq_KmkaKmGusqbzmavOzaquygRtmoDkUjSlPkTd4ojsibtlVdJc_Zm9PcybsfC4VZH20wNAw4kluCLmpR1qqECIoTaOIHg6dOT94e0d9rDnoVq3u9itWrWA1cR7Ex9GqbvjRHav9GNpMReL0BGKLOzuNobPjDCYg9qLyO3LsTR9HFT0teB2NpNNRaT2bWrbP_3-P9P3GzFfid7in0bvFjtKy5DkKD_rKewHoBUMX2o2j5G9Y7rKw</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Anderson, Meredith L., MD</creator><creator>Larson, A. Noelle, MD</creator><creator>Moran, Steven L., MD</creator><creator>Cooney, William P., MD</creator><creator>Amrami, Kimberly K., MD</creator><creator>Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears</title><author>Anderson, Meredith L., MD ; Larson, A. Noelle, MD ; Moran, Steven L., MD ; Cooney, William P., MD ; Amrami, Kimberly K., MD ; Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-a1030fd32ad54bb329e9a984d1ac47fd87f09a3b5fa2b27c64b4b51aa1bdd5f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arthroscopy</topic><topic>Arthroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hand Strength</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Triangular Fibrocartilage - injuries</topic><topic>Triangular Fibrocartilage - surgery</topic><topic>triangular fibrocartilage complex</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Meredith L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, A. Noelle, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Steven L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooney, William P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amrami, Kimberly K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Meredith L., MD</au><au>Larson, A. Noelle, MD</au><au>Moran, Steven L., MD</au><au>Cooney, William P., MD</au><au>Amrami, Kimberly K., MD</au><au>Berger, Richard A., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>675</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>675-682</pages><issn>0363-5023</issn><eissn>1531-6564</eissn><coden>JHSUDV</coden><abstract>Purpose To determine whether traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears treated by arthroscopic repair have improved functional outcome scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief compared with those repaired using an open surgical technique. Methods From 1997 to 2006, 75 patients had repair of traumatic TFCC tears. Thirty-six patients had arthroscopic TFCC repair, and 39 patients had open repair. One patient was lost to follow-up. Evaluation included range of motion, grip strength, preoperative and postoperative Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and patient-reported Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and visual analog scale score. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests or 2-sample t -tests; significance was set at p &lt; .05. Results Mean follow-up was 43 months ± 11. Mean MMWS improved 6.5 points ± 19.9 after surgery. Fifty-seven percent of patients improved at least 1 level in the MMWS pain score. No statistical difference was found between open and arthroscopic repair in the improvement of MMWS or visual analog scale pain scores. There was increased postoperative nerve pain (ulnar nerve branch) in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients), but this was not found to be statistically significant. Reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability was performed in 17% of patients. No statistical association was observed between surgery type and the rate of reoperation for instability. Female gender was significantly associated with a higher rate of total reoperation. Conclusions There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair. Although not statistically significant, there was an increased rate of postoperative superficial ulnar nerve pain in the open group (14 out of 39 patients) compared with the arthroscopic group (8 out of 36 patients). After TFCC repair, 13 out of 75 patients required reoperation for distal radioulnar joint instability in this sample. A statistically significant association was found between reoperation rate and female gender. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.</abstract><cop>New york, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18590850</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5023
ispartof The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2008-05, Vol.33 (5), p.675-682
issn 0363-5023
1531-6564
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69279570
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Arthroscopy
Arthroscopy - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Chi-Square Distribution
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Endoscopy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hand Strength
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Linear Models
Male
Medical sciences
Orthopedics
Pain Measurement
Postoperative Complications
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Reoperation
Risk Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Treatment Outcome
Triangular Fibrocartilage - injuries
Triangular Fibrocartilage - surgery
triangular fibrocartilage complex
title Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Comparison%20of%20Arthroscopic%20Versus%20Open%20Repair%20of%20Triangular%20Fibrocartilage%20Complex%20Tears&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hand%20surgery%20(American%20ed.)&rft.au=Anderson,%20Meredith%20L.,%20MD&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=675&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=675-682&rft.issn=0363-5023&rft.eissn=1531-6564&rft.coden=JHSUDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69279570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69279570&rft_id=info:pmid/18590850&rft_els_id=S0363502308000439&rfr_iscdi=true