Prospective Study of Atrial Fibrillation Termination During Ablation Guided by Automated Detection of Fractionated Electrograms
Introduction: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) may identify critical sites for perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and provide useful targets for ablation. Current assessment of CFAE is subjective; automated detection algorithms may improve reproducibility, but their utility in g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2008-06, Vol.19 (6), p.613-620 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 620 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 613 |
container_title | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | PORTER, MICHAEL SPEAR, WILLIAM AKAR, JOSEPH G. HELMS, RAY BRYSIEWICZ, NEIL SANTUCCI, PETER WILBER, DAVID J. |
description | Introduction: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) may identify critical sites for perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and provide useful targets for ablation. Current assessment of CFAE is subjective; automated detection algorithms may improve reproducibility, but their utility in guiding ablation has not been tested.
Methods and Results: In 67 patients presenting for initial AF ablation (42 paroxysmal, 25 persistent), LA and CS mapping were performed during induced or spontaneous AF. CFAE were identified by an online automated computer algorithm and displayed on electroanatomical maps. A mean of 28 ± 18 sites/patient were identified (20 ± 13% of mapped sites), and were more frequent during persistent AF. CFAE occurred most commonly within the CS, on the atrial septum, and around the pulmonary veins. Ablation initially targeting CFAE terminated AF in 88% of paroxysmal AF, but only 20% of persistent AF (P < 0.001). Subsequently, additional ablation was performed in all patients (PV isolation for paroxysmal AF, PV isolation + mitral and roof lines for persistent AF). Minimum follow‐up was 1 year. One‐year freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single procedure was 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 68% for persistent AF.
Conclusions: Ablation guided by automated detection of CFAE proved feasible, and was associated with a high AF termination rate in paroxysmal, but not persistent AF. As an adjunct to conventional techniques, it was associated with excellent long‐term single procedure outcomes in both groups. Criteria for identifying optimal CFAE sites for ablation, and selection of patients most likely to benefit, require additional study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01189.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69263787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69263787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4719-8c332538a08bc37fbda7f7aa6fcadbfe24bf5327eeef397b40328cd3d70df2873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v0zAAhi0EYmPwF5BP3JL5I4mdA4eqazu28SFWBDfLju3JJWmK7UB74q_PaapxxRe_0fth5QEAYpTjdC43OS4LlHFcsZwgxHOEMa_z_TNw_mQ8TxoVZUY5o2fgVQgbhDCtUPkSnGFeVIQSdA7-fvF92Jkmut8G3sdBH2Bv4Sx6J1u4dMq7tpXR9Vu4Nr5z20lfDd5tH-BMnbzV4LTRUB3gbIh9J2P6uDJxnE1uGlx6edRHZ9Emw_cPXnbhNXhhZRvMm9N9Ab4tF-v5dXb3efVhPrvLmoLhOuMNpaSkXCKuGsqs0pJZJmVlG6mVNaRQtqSEGWMsrZkqECW80VQzpC1JBC7Au2l35_tfgwlRdC40Jv3c1vRDEFVNKsqOQT4FmwQmeGPFzrtO-oPASIzwxUaMjMXIWIzwxRG-2Kfq29Mbg-qM_lc80U6B91Pgj2vN4b-Hxc18MarUz6a-C9Hsn_rS_xQVo6wU3z-txP3tx6_L9e0PUdNHD5Glgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69263787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective Study of Atrial Fibrillation Termination During Ablation Guided by Automated Detection of Fractionated Electrograms</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>PORTER, MICHAEL ; SPEAR, WILLIAM ; AKAR, JOSEPH G. ; HELMS, RAY ; BRYSIEWICZ, NEIL ; SANTUCCI, PETER ; WILBER, DAVID J.</creator><creatorcontrib>PORTER, MICHAEL ; SPEAR, WILLIAM ; AKAR, JOSEPH G. ; HELMS, RAY ; BRYSIEWICZ, NEIL ; SANTUCCI, PETER ; WILBER, DAVID J.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) may identify critical sites for perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and provide useful targets for ablation. Current assessment of CFAE is subjective; automated detection algorithms may improve reproducibility, but their utility in guiding ablation has not been tested.
Methods and Results: In 67 patients presenting for initial AF ablation (42 paroxysmal, 25 persistent), LA and CS mapping were performed during induced or spontaneous AF. CFAE were identified by an online automated computer algorithm and displayed on electroanatomical maps. A mean of 28 ± 18 sites/patient were identified (20 ± 13% of mapped sites), and were more frequent during persistent AF. CFAE occurred most commonly within the CS, on the atrial septum, and around the pulmonary veins. Ablation initially targeting CFAE terminated AF in 88% of paroxysmal AF, but only 20% of persistent AF (P < 0.001). Subsequently, additional ablation was performed in all patients (PV isolation for paroxysmal AF, PV isolation + mitral and roof lines for persistent AF). Minimum follow‐up was 1 year. One‐year freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single procedure was 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 68% for persistent AF.
Conclusions: Ablation guided by automated detection of CFAE proved feasible, and was associated with a high AF termination rate in paroxysmal, but not persistent AF. As an adjunct to conventional techniques, it was associated with excellent long‐term single procedure outcomes in both groups. Criteria for identifying optimal CFAE sites for ablation, and selection of patients most likely to benefit, require additional study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01189.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18462320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>ablation ; atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery ; atrium ; Catheter Ablation - methods ; Electrocardiography - methods ; electrograms ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; mapping ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2008-06, Vol.19 (6), p.613-620</ispartof><rights>2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4719-8c332538a08bc37fbda7f7aa6fcadbfe24bf5327eeef397b40328cd3d70df2873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4719-8c332538a08bc37fbda7f7aa6fcadbfe24bf5327eeef397b40328cd3d70df2873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8167.2008.01189.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8167.2008.01189.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18462320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PORTER, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPEAR, WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKAR, JOSEPH G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELMS, RAY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRYSIEWICZ, NEIL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SANTUCCI, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILBER, DAVID J.</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective Study of Atrial Fibrillation Termination During Ablation Guided by Automated Detection of Fractionated Electrograms</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Introduction: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) may identify critical sites for perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and provide useful targets for ablation. Current assessment of CFAE is subjective; automated detection algorithms may improve reproducibility, but their utility in guiding ablation has not been tested.
Methods and Results: In 67 patients presenting for initial AF ablation (42 paroxysmal, 25 persistent), LA and CS mapping were performed during induced or spontaneous AF. CFAE were identified by an online automated computer algorithm and displayed on electroanatomical maps. A mean of 28 ± 18 sites/patient were identified (20 ± 13% of mapped sites), and were more frequent during persistent AF. CFAE occurred most commonly within the CS, on the atrial septum, and around the pulmonary veins. Ablation initially targeting CFAE terminated AF in 88% of paroxysmal AF, but only 20% of persistent AF (P < 0.001). Subsequently, additional ablation was performed in all patients (PV isolation for paroxysmal AF, PV isolation + mitral and roof lines for persistent AF). Minimum follow‐up was 1 year. One‐year freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single procedure was 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 68% for persistent AF.
Conclusions: Ablation guided by automated detection of CFAE proved feasible, and was associated with a high AF termination rate in paroxysmal, but not persistent AF. As an adjunct to conventional techniques, it was associated with excellent long‐term single procedure outcomes in both groups. Criteria for identifying optimal CFAE sites for ablation, and selection of patients most likely to benefit, require additional study.</description><subject>ablation</subject><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</subject><subject>atrium</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - methods</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - methods</subject><subject>electrograms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mapping</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1045-3873</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1v0zAAhi0EYmPwF5BP3JL5I4mdA4eqazu28SFWBDfLju3JJWmK7UB74q_PaapxxRe_0fth5QEAYpTjdC43OS4LlHFcsZwgxHOEMa_z_TNw_mQ8TxoVZUY5o2fgVQgbhDCtUPkSnGFeVIQSdA7-fvF92Jkmut8G3sdBH2Bv4Sx6J1u4dMq7tpXR9Vu4Nr5z20lfDd5tH-BMnbzV4LTRUB3gbIh9J2P6uDJxnE1uGlx6edRHZ9Emw_cPXnbhNXhhZRvMm9N9Ab4tF-v5dXb3efVhPrvLmoLhOuMNpaSkXCKuGsqs0pJZJmVlG6mVNaRQtqSEGWMsrZkqECW80VQzpC1JBC7Au2l35_tfgwlRdC40Jv3c1vRDEFVNKsqOQT4FmwQmeGPFzrtO-oPASIzwxUaMjMXIWIzwxRG-2Kfq29Mbg-qM_lc80U6B91Pgj2vN4b-Hxc18MarUz6a-C9Hsn_rS_xQVo6wU3z-txP3tx6_L9e0PUdNHD5Glgw</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>PORTER, MICHAEL</creator><creator>SPEAR, WILLIAM</creator><creator>AKAR, JOSEPH G.</creator><creator>HELMS, RAY</creator><creator>BRYSIEWICZ, NEIL</creator><creator>SANTUCCI, PETER</creator><creator>WILBER, DAVID J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>Prospective Study of Atrial Fibrillation Termination During Ablation Guided by Automated Detection of Fractionated Electrograms</title><author>PORTER, MICHAEL ; SPEAR, WILLIAM ; AKAR, JOSEPH G. ; HELMS, RAY ; BRYSIEWICZ, NEIL ; SANTUCCI, PETER ; WILBER, DAVID J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4719-8c332538a08bc37fbda7f7aa6fcadbfe24bf5327eeef397b40328cd3d70df2873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ablation</topic><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</topic><topic>atrium</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - methods</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - methods</topic><topic>electrograms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mapping</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PORTER, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPEAR, WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKAR, JOSEPH G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELMS, RAY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRYSIEWICZ, NEIL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SANTUCCI, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILBER, DAVID J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PORTER, MICHAEL</au><au>SPEAR, WILLIAM</au><au>AKAR, JOSEPH G.</au><au>HELMS, RAY</au><au>BRYSIEWICZ, NEIL</au><au>SANTUCCI, PETER</au><au>WILBER, DAVID J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective Study of Atrial Fibrillation Termination During Ablation Guided by Automated Detection of Fractionated Electrograms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>613-620</pages><issn>1045-3873</issn><eissn>1540-8167</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) may identify critical sites for perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and provide useful targets for ablation. Current assessment of CFAE is subjective; automated detection algorithms may improve reproducibility, but their utility in guiding ablation has not been tested.
Methods and Results: In 67 patients presenting for initial AF ablation (42 paroxysmal, 25 persistent), LA and CS mapping were performed during induced or spontaneous AF. CFAE were identified by an online automated computer algorithm and displayed on electroanatomical maps. A mean of 28 ± 18 sites/patient were identified (20 ± 13% of mapped sites), and were more frequent during persistent AF. CFAE occurred most commonly within the CS, on the atrial septum, and around the pulmonary veins. Ablation initially targeting CFAE terminated AF in 88% of paroxysmal AF, but only 20% of persistent AF (P < 0.001). Subsequently, additional ablation was performed in all patients (PV isolation for paroxysmal AF, PV isolation + mitral and roof lines for persistent AF). Minimum follow‐up was 1 year. One‐year freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single procedure was 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 68% for persistent AF.
Conclusions: Ablation guided by automated detection of CFAE proved feasible, and was associated with a high AF termination rate in paroxysmal, but not persistent AF. As an adjunct to conventional techniques, it was associated with excellent long‐term single procedure outcomes in both groups. Criteria for identifying optimal CFAE sites for ablation, and selection of patients most likely to benefit, require additional study.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>18462320</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01189.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-3873 |
ispartof | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2008-06, Vol.19 (6), p.613-620 |
issn | 1045-3873 1540-8167 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69263787 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | ablation atrial fibrillation Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology Atrial Fibrillation - surgery atrium Catheter Ablation - methods Electrocardiography - methods electrograms Female Follow-Up Studies Heart Rate - physiology Humans Male mapping Middle Aged Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods Prospective Studies Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Prospective Study of Atrial Fibrillation Termination During Ablation Guided by Automated Detection of Fractionated Electrograms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A05%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20Study%20of%20Atrial%20Fibrillation%20Termination%20During%20Ablation%20Guided%20by%20Automated%20Detection%20of%20Fractionated%20Electrograms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20electrophysiology&rft.au=PORTER,%20MICHAEL&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=613-620&rft.issn=1045-3873&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01189.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69263787%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69263787&rft_id=info:pmid/18462320&rfr_iscdi=true |