Retention of the capsule endoscope: a single-center experience of 1000 capsule endoscopy procedures

Background Retention of the video capsule is the most significant complication associated with capsule endoscopy (CE). There are limited data on incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of capsule retention. Objective We aimed to determine the incidence of capsule retention and to investigate the cause...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2008-07, Vol.68 (1), p.174-180
Hauptverfasser: Li, Feng, MD, Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD, De Petris, Giovanni, MD, Sharma, Virender K., MD, Shiff, Arthur D., MD, Heigh, Russell I., MD, Fleischer, David E., MD, Post, Janice, RN, Erickson, Paula, RN, Leighton, Jonathan A., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 180
container_issue 1
container_start_page 174
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 68
creator Li, Feng, MD
Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD
De Petris, Giovanni, MD
Sharma, Virender K., MD
Shiff, Arthur D., MD
Heigh, Russell I., MD
Fleischer, David E., MD
Post, Janice, RN
Erickson, Paula, RN
Leighton, Jonathan A., MD
description Background Retention of the video capsule is the most significant complication associated with capsule endoscopy (CE). There are limited data on incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of capsule retention. Objective We aimed to determine the incidence of capsule retention and to investigate the causes and clinical outcomes of capsule retention. Setting Single tertiary referral medical center. Patients All patients who underwent CE for suspected small bowel disease from June 2002 to March 2006. Methods Retrospective case series. Results Capsule retention occurred in 1.4% of our patients (14/1000). Eleven patients failed to pass the capsule because of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) enteropathy (diaphragm disease). One patient had capsule retention from an obstructing carcinoid tumor. Metastatic ovarian cancer with invasion of the ileum was the cause of retention in another patient. One patient who did not have surgical removal of the capsule because of loss of follow-up had retention caused by a small-bowel tumor suspicious for carcinoid tumor on CT enterography. All patients remained “asymptomatic” from the retained capsules. Thirteen patients underwent elective partial small-bowel resection and capsule removal. No deaths were associated with these surgeries. Eleven patients recovered promptly, whereas 2 patients had mild postoperative ileus. Limitation Retrospective study. Conclusion Retention of the capsule endoscope appears to be infrequent. The most common cause is diaphragm disease resulting from NSAIDs in this study population. In most cases, capsule retention is asymptomatic, and it usually leads to surgical removal, which appears safe and also identifies and treats the underlying small-bowel condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69251823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510708002691</els_id><sourcerecordid>69251823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-cda6a99f7e3c7cfff2a411998134e17eb5500a173a8aaa42c34fc33ecb64f2e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt-L1DAQgIN4eOvpH-CL9EXf2ptJ2qZVEORQTzgQ_PEcstPJmbXb1qQ93P_e1F0UFHzKy_fNhI8R4glCgYD15a649VxIgKYAWYDS98QGodV5rXV7X2wgQXmFoM_Fwxh3kECp8IE4x6ZCpaXaCPrIMw-zH4dsdNn8lTOyU1x6znjoxkjjxC8ym0U_3PacU0I5ZPxj4uB5IF4lTHP_sQ7ZFEbibgkcH4kzZ_vIj0_vhfjy9s3nq-v85sO791evb3KqQM45dba2bes0K9LknJO2RGzbBlXJqHlbVQAWtbKNtbaUpEpHSjFt69JJRnUhnh_nptXfF46z2ftI3Pd24HGJpm5lhalAAvEIUhhjDOzMFPzehoNBMGtZszOprFnLGpAmlU3O09PwZbvn7o9xSpmAZyfARrK9C3YgH39zEipIbJW4l0eOU4o7z8FE-tWy84FpNt3o__uNV3_Z1PvBp4Xf-MBxNy5hSI0NmpgE82k9gfUCoAGQdYvqJ_z8q3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69251823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retention of the capsule endoscope: a single-center experience of 1000 capsule endoscopy procedures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Li, Feng, MD ; Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD ; De Petris, Giovanni, MD ; Sharma, Virender K., MD ; Shiff, Arthur D., MD ; Heigh, Russell I., MD ; Fleischer, David E., MD ; Post, Janice, RN ; Erickson, Paula, RN ; Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Feng, MD ; Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD ; De Petris, Giovanni, MD ; Sharma, Virender K., MD ; Shiff, Arthur D., MD ; Heigh, Russell I., MD ; Fleischer, David E., MD ; Post, Janice, RN ; Erickson, Paula, RN ; Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Retention of the video capsule is the most significant complication associated with capsule endoscopy (CE). There are limited data on incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of capsule retention. Objective We aimed to determine the incidence of capsule retention and to investigate the causes and clinical outcomes of capsule retention. Setting Single tertiary referral medical center. Patients All patients who underwent CE for suspected small bowel disease from June 2002 to March 2006. Methods Retrospective case series. Results Capsule retention occurred in 1.4% of our patients (14/1000). Eleven patients failed to pass the capsule because of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) enteropathy (diaphragm disease). One patient had capsule retention from an obstructing carcinoid tumor. Metastatic ovarian cancer with invasion of the ileum was the cause of retention in another patient. One patient who did not have surgical removal of the capsule because of loss of follow-up had retention caused by a small-bowel tumor suspicious for carcinoid tumor on CT enterography. All patients remained “asymptomatic” from the retained capsules. Thirteen patients underwent elective partial small-bowel resection and capsule removal. No deaths were associated with these surgeries. Eleven patients recovered promptly, whereas 2 patients had mild postoperative ileus. Limitation Retrospective study. Conclusion Retention of the capsule endoscope appears to be infrequent. The most common cause is diaphragm disease resulting from NSAIDs in this study population. In most cases, capsule retention is asymptomatic, and it usually leads to surgical removal, which appears safe and also identifies and treats the underlying small-bowel condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18513723</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Capsule Endoscopes - adverse effects ; Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects ; Capsule Endoscopy - methods ; Cohort Studies ; Device Removal - methods ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intestinal Obstruction - epidemiology ; Intestinal Obstruction - etiology ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2008-07, Vol.68 (1), p.174-180</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2008 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-cda6a99f7e3c7cfff2a411998134e17eb5500a173a8aaa42c34fc33ecb64f2e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-cda6a99f7e3c7cfff2a411998134e17eb5500a173a8aaa42c34fc33ecb64f2e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510708002691$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20501855$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18513723$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Feng, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Petris, Giovanni, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Virender K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiff, Arthur D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heigh, Russell I., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischer, David E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Post, Janice, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Paula, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Retention of the capsule endoscope: a single-center experience of 1000 capsule endoscopy procedures</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Retention of the video capsule is the most significant complication associated with capsule endoscopy (CE). There are limited data on incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of capsule retention. Objective We aimed to determine the incidence of capsule retention and to investigate the causes and clinical outcomes of capsule retention. Setting Single tertiary referral medical center. Patients All patients who underwent CE for suspected small bowel disease from June 2002 to March 2006. Methods Retrospective case series. Results Capsule retention occurred in 1.4% of our patients (14/1000). Eleven patients failed to pass the capsule because of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) enteropathy (diaphragm disease). One patient had capsule retention from an obstructing carcinoid tumor. Metastatic ovarian cancer with invasion of the ileum was the cause of retention in another patient. One patient who did not have surgical removal of the capsule because of loss of follow-up had retention caused by a small-bowel tumor suspicious for carcinoid tumor on CT enterography. All patients remained “asymptomatic” from the retained capsules. Thirteen patients underwent elective partial small-bowel resection and capsule removal. No deaths were associated with these surgeries. Eleven patients recovered promptly, whereas 2 patients had mild postoperative ileus. Limitation Retrospective study. Conclusion Retention of the capsule endoscope appears to be infrequent. The most common cause is diaphragm disease resulting from NSAIDs in this study population. In most cases, capsule retention is asymptomatic, and it usually leads to surgical removal, which appears safe and also identifies and treats the underlying small-bowel condition.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Device Removal - methods</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intestinal Obstruction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intestinal Obstruction - etiology</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt-L1DAQgIN4eOvpH-CL9EXf2ptJ2qZVEORQTzgQ_PEcstPJmbXb1qQ93P_e1F0UFHzKy_fNhI8R4glCgYD15a649VxIgKYAWYDS98QGodV5rXV7X2wgQXmFoM_Fwxh3kECp8IE4x6ZCpaXaCPrIMw-zH4dsdNn8lTOyU1x6znjoxkjjxC8ym0U_3PacU0I5ZPxj4uB5IF4lTHP_sQ7ZFEbibgkcH4kzZ_vIj0_vhfjy9s3nq-v85sO791evb3KqQM45dba2bes0K9LknJO2RGzbBlXJqHlbVQAWtbKNtbaUpEpHSjFt69JJRnUhnh_nptXfF46z2ftI3Pd24HGJpm5lhalAAvEIUhhjDOzMFPzehoNBMGtZszOprFnLGpAmlU3O09PwZbvn7o9xSpmAZyfARrK9C3YgH39zEipIbJW4l0eOU4o7z8FE-tWy84FpNt3o__uNV3_Z1PvBp4Xf-MBxNy5hSI0NmpgE82k9gfUCoAGQdYvqJ_z8q3o</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Li, Feng, MD</creator><creator>Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD</creator><creator>De Petris, Giovanni, MD</creator><creator>Sharma, Virender K., MD</creator><creator>Shiff, Arthur D., MD</creator><creator>Heigh, Russell I., MD</creator><creator>Fleischer, David E., MD</creator><creator>Post, Janice, RN</creator><creator>Erickson, Paula, RN</creator><creator>Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Retention of the capsule endoscope: a single-center experience of 1000 capsule endoscopy procedures</title><author>Li, Feng, MD ; Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD ; De Petris, Giovanni, MD ; Sharma, Virender K., MD ; Shiff, Arthur D., MD ; Heigh, Russell I., MD ; Fleischer, David E., MD ; Post, Janice, RN ; Erickson, Paula, RN ; Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-cda6a99f7e3c7cfff2a411998134e17eb5500a173a8aaa42c34fc33ecb64f2e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Device Removal - methods</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intestinal Obstruction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intestinal Obstruction - etiology</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Feng, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Petris, Giovanni, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Virender K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiff, Arthur D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heigh, Russell I., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischer, David E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Post, Janice, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Paula, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Feng, MD</au><au>Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD</au><au>De Petris, Giovanni, MD</au><au>Sharma, Virender K., MD</au><au>Shiff, Arthur D., MD</au><au>Heigh, Russell I., MD</au><au>Fleischer, David E., MD</au><au>Post, Janice, RN</au><au>Erickson, Paula, RN</au><au>Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retention of the capsule endoscope: a single-center experience of 1000 capsule endoscopy procedures</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>174-180</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background Retention of the video capsule is the most significant complication associated with capsule endoscopy (CE). There are limited data on incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of capsule retention. Objective We aimed to determine the incidence of capsule retention and to investigate the causes and clinical outcomes of capsule retention. Setting Single tertiary referral medical center. Patients All patients who underwent CE for suspected small bowel disease from June 2002 to March 2006. Methods Retrospective case series. Results Capsule retention occurred in 1.4% of our patients (14/1000). Eleven patients failed to pass the capsule because of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) enteropathy (diaphragm disease). One patient had capsule retention from an obstructing carcinoid tumor. Metastatic ovarian cancer with invasion of the ileum was the cause of retention in another patient. One patient who did not have surgical removal of the capsule because of loss of follow-up had retention caused by a small-bowel tumor suspicious for carcinoid tumor on CT enterography. All patients remained “asymptomatic” from the retained capsules. Thirteen patients underwent elective partial small-bowel resection and capsule removal. No deaths were associated with these surgeries. Eleven patients recovered promptly, whereas 2 patients had mild postoperative ileus. Limitation Retrospective study. Conclusion Retention of the capsule endoscope appears to be infrequent. The most common cause is diaphragm disease resulting from NSAIDs in this study population. In most cases, capsule retention is asymptomatic, and it usually leads to surgical removal, which appears safe and also identifies and treats the underlying small-bowel condition.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18513723</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.037</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2008-07, Vol.68 (1), p.174-180
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69251823
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Capsule Endoscopes - adverse effects
Capsule Endoscopy - adverse effects
Capsule Endoscopy - methods
Cohort Studies
Device Removal - methods
Digestive system. Abdomen
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods
Equipment Failure
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Incidence
Intestinal Obstruction - epidemiology
Intestinal Obstruction - etiology
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
title Retention of the capsule endoscope: a single-center experience of 1000 capsule endoscopy procedures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A14%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retention%20of%20the%20capsule%20endoscope:%20a%20single-center%20experience%20of%201000%20capsule%20endoscopy%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Li,%20Feng,%20MD&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=174-180&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69251823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69251823&rft_id=info:pmid/18513723&rft_els_id=S0016510708002691&rfr_iscdi=true