Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of "impulsive choice" behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology

Impulsive choice refers to the selection of small immediate gains in preference to larger delayed gains, or the selection of large delayed penalties in preference to smaller immediate penalties. Current theoretical interpretations of impulsive choice are reviewed, and a synthesis of these ideas, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychopharmacology 1999-10, Vol.146 (4), p.362-372
Hauptverfasser: Ho, M Y, Mobini, S, Chiang, T J, Bradshaw, C M, Szabadi, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 372
container_issue 4
container_start_page 362
container_title Psychopharmacology
container_volume 146
creator Ho, M Y
Mobini, S
Chiang, T J
Bradshaw, C M
Szabadi, E
description Impulsive choice refers to the selection of small immediate gains in preference to larger delayed gains, or the selection of large delayed penalties in preference to smaller immediate penalties. Current theoretical interpretations of impulsive choice are reviewed, and a synthesis of these ideas, the "multiplicative hyperbolic model of choice", is presented. The model assumes that the value of a positive reinforcer increases as a hyperbolic function of its size, and decreases as a hyperbolic function of its delay and the odds against its occurrence. Each hyperbolic function contains a single discounting parameter which quantifies the organism's sensitivity to the variable in question. The hyperbolic discounting functions combine multiplicatively to determine the overall value of the reinforcer. Equivalent functions are postulated to govern the (negative) value of aversive events, the net value of an outcome reflecting the algebraic sum of the positive and negative values. The model gives rise to a quantitative methodology for studying impulsive choice, based on a family of linear indifference (null) equations, which describe performance under conditions of indifference, when the values of the reinforcers are assumed to be equal. This methodology may be used to identify individual differences in sensitivity to the magnitude, delay and probability of reinforcement. The methodology is also suitable for the quantitative evaluation of the effects of some pharmacological interventions on discounting parameters. Recent psychopharmacological studies of impulsive choice are reviewed, and the utility of indifference equations for extending this work, and developing a quantitative psychopharmacology of impulsive choice is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/PL00005482
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69242213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69242213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6a4a798e8a8a7bb11c99cd523212e414c288c22a53176add507f60aa12d98533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhoMoun5c_AESFDwI1Xw0TepNxC9Y0MN6LrNpaiNtU5N2of_elBUU5zLDzDMvzLwInVJyTQmRN29LEkOkiu2gBU05SxiRbBctCOE84VSoA3QYwudMpSrdRweUCBFLuUBhVRvnJwxdiVsz1K7EtsNDbfDXCN1gBxjsxsQxNFOwAbsKn9u2H5swt3XtrDbneG1q2Fg3-lsch43Vcct1AVfO4z5MEetr8C1o17iP6RjtVdAEc_KTj9D748Pq_jlZvj693N8tE80FG5IygxRkrowCBXK9plTnuS4F44wyk9JUM6U0YyA4lRmUpSCyyggAZWWuBOdH6HKr23v3NZowFK0N2jQNdMaNochyljJGZ_DiH_gZb4knh4JTKqXkKpupqy2lvQvBm6rovW3BTwUlxWxE8WtEhM9-JMd1a8o_6Pbz_BuaiYNf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3117773863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of "impulsive choice" behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ho, M Y ; Mobini, S ; Chiang, T J ; Bradshaw, C M ; Szabadi, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, M Y ; Mobini, S ; Chiang, T J ; Bradshaw, C M ; Szabadi, E</creatorcontrib><description>Impulsive choice refers to the selection of small immediate gains in preference to larger delayed gains, or the selection of large delayed penalties in preference to smaller immediate penalties. Current theoretical interpretations of impulsive choice are reviewed, and a synthesis of these ideas, the "multiplicative hyperbolic model of choice", is presented. The model assumes that the value of a positive reinforcer increases as a hyperbolic function of its size, and decreases as a hyperbolic function of its delay and the odds against its occurrence. Each hyperbolic function contains a single discounting parameter which quantifies the organism's sensitivity to the variable in question. The hyperbolic discounting functions combine multiplicatively to determine the overall value of the reinforcer. Equivalent functions are postulated to govern the (negative) value of aversive events, the net value of an outcome reflecting the algebraic sum of the positive and negative values. The model gives rise to a quantitative methodology for studying impulsive choice, based on a family of linear indifference (null) equations, which describe performance under conditions of indifference, when the values of the reinforcers are assumed to be equal. This methodology may be used to identify individual differences in sensitivity to the magnitude, delay and probability of reinforcement. The methodology is also suitable for the quantitative evaluation of the effects of some pharmacological interventions on discounting parameters. Recent psychopharmacological studies of impulsive choice are reviewed, and the utility of indifference equations for extending this work, and developing a quantitative psychopharmacology of impulsive choice is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/PL00005482</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10550487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Choice Behavior ; Fines &amp; penalties ; Humans ; Impulsive behavior ; Impulsive Behavior - diagnosis ; Models, Psychological ; Psychopharmacology ; Reinforcement ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Sensitivity analysis</subject><ispartof>Psychopharmacology, 1999-10, Vol.146 (4), p.362-372</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6a4a798e8a8a7bb11c99cd523212e414c288c22a53176add507f60aa12d98533</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10550487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, M Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mobini, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabadi, E</creatorcontrib><title>Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of "impulsive choice" behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology</title><title>Psychopharmacology</title><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><description>Impulsive choice refers to the selection of small immediate gains in preference to larger delayed gains, or the selection of large delayed penalties in preference to smaller immediate penalties. Current theoretical interpretations of impulsive choice are reviewed, and a synthesis of these ideas, the "multiplicative hyperbolic model of choice", is presented. The model assumes that the value of a positive reinforcer increases as a hyperbolic function of its size, and decreases as a hyperbolic function of its delay and the odds against its occurrence. Each hyperbolic function contains a single discounting parameter which quantifies the organism's sensitivity to the variable in question. The hyperbolic discounting functions combine multiplicatively to determine the overall value of the reinforcer. Equivalent functions are postulated to govern the (negative) value of aversive events, the net value of an outcome reflecting the algebraic sum of the positive and negative values. The model gives rise to a quantitative methodology for studying impulsive choice, based on a family of linear indifference (null) equations, which describe performance under conditions of indifference, when the values of the reinforcers are assumed to be equal. This methodology may be used to identify individual differences in sensitivity to the magnitude, delay and probability of reinforcement. The methodology is also suitable for the quantitative evaluation of the effects of some pharmacological interventions on discounting parameters. Recent psychopharmacological studies of impulsive choice are reviewed, and the utility of indifference equations for extending this work, and developing a quantitative psychopharmacology of impulsive choice is discussed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Fines &amp; penalties</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impulsive behavior</subject><subject>Impulsive Behavior - diagnosis</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Psychopharmacology</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><issn>0033-3158</issn><issn>1432-2072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhoMoun5c_AESFDwI1Xw0TepNxC9Y0MN6LrNpaiNtU5N2of_elBUU5zLDzDMvzLwInVJyTQmRN29LEkOkiu2gBU05SxiRbBctCOE84VSoA3QYwudMpSrdRweUCBFLuUBhVRvnJwxdiVsz1K7EtsNDbfDXCN1gBxjsxsQxNFOwAbsKn9u2H5swt3XtrDbneG1q2Fg3-lsch43Vcct1AVfO4z5MEetr8C1o17iP6RjtVdAEc_KTj9D748Pq_jlZvj693N8tE80FG5IygxRkrowCBXK9plTnuS4F44wyk9JUM6U0YyA4lRmUpSCyyggAZWWuBOdH6HKr23v3NZowFK0N2jQNdMaNochyljJGZ_DiH_gZb4knh4JTKqXkKpupqy2lvQvBm6rovW3BTwUlxWxE8WtEhM9-JMd1a8o_6Pbz_BuaiYNf</recordid><startdate>19991001</startdate><enddate>19991001</enddate><creator>Ho, M Y</creator><creator>Mobini, S</creator><creator>Chiang, T J</creator><creator>Bradshaw, C M</creator><creator>Szabadi, E</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991001</creationdate><title>Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of "impulsive choice" behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology</title><author>Ho, M Y ; Mobini, S ; Chiang, T J ; Bradshaw, C M ; Szabadi, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-d6a4a798e8a8a7bb11c99cd523212e414c288c22a53176add507f60aa12d98533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Fines &amp; penalties</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impulsive behavior</topic><topic>Impulsive Behavior - diagnosis</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Psychopharmacology</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, M Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mobini, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szabadi, E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, M Y</au><au>Mobini, S</au><au>Chiang, T J</au><au>Bradshaw, C M</au><au>Szabadi, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of "impulsive choice" behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology</atitle><jtitle>Psychopharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><date>1999-10-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>362-372</pages><issn>0033-3158</issn><eissn>1432-2072</eissn><abstract>Impulsive choice refers to the selection of small immediate gains in preference to larger delayed gains, or the selection of large delayed penalties in preference to smaller immediate penalties. Current theoretical interpretations of impulsive choice are reviewed, and a synthesis of these ideas, the "multiplicative hyperbolic model of choice", is presented. The model assumes that the value of a positive reinforcer increases as a hyperbolic function of its size, and decreases as a hyperbolic function of its delay and the odds against its occurrence. Each hyperbolic function contains a single discounting parameter which quantifies the organism's sensitivity to the variable in question. The hyperbolic discounting functions combine multiplicatively to determine the overall value of the reinforcer. Equivalent functions are postulated to govern the (negative) value of aversive events, the net value of an outcome reflecting the algebraic sum of the positive and negative values. The model gives rise to a quantitative methodology for studying impulsive choice, based on a family of linear indifference (null) equations, which describe performance under conditions of indifference, when the values of the reinforcers are assumed to be equal. This methodology may be used to identify individual differences in sensitivity to the magnitude, delay and probability of reinforcement. The methodology is also suitable for the quantitative evaluation of the effects of some pharmacological interventions on discounting parameters. Recent psychopharmacological studies of impulsive choice are reviewed, and the utility of indifference equations for extending this work, and developing a quantitative psychopharmacology of impulsive choice is discussed.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>10550487</pmid><doi>10.1007/PL00005482</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3158
ispartof Psychopharmacology, 1999-10, Vol.146 (4), p.362-372
issn 0033-3158
1432-2072
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69242213
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animals
Choice Behavior
Fines & penalties
Humans
Impulsive behavior
Impulsive Behavior - diagnosis
Models, Psychological
Psychopharmacology
Reinforcement
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Sensitivity analysis
title Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of "impulsive choice" behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A22%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theory%20and%20method%20in%20the%20quantitative%20analysis%20of%20%22impulsive%20choice%22%20behaviour:%20implications%20for%20psychopharmacology&rft.jtitle=Psychopharmacology&rft.au=Ho,%20M%20Y&rft.date=1999-10-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=362-372&rft.issn=0033-3158&rft.eissn=1432-2072&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/PL00005482&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69242213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3117773863&rft_id=info:pmid/10550487&rfr_iscdi=true