Use of the Microscope in Endodontics: Results of a Questionnaire

Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and characteristics of operating microscope (OM) utilization among endodontists in the United States. The study also investigated how OM use has changed since a similar study was published nearly a decade ago. A web-based survey reg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2008-07, Vol.34 (7), p.804-807
Hauptverfasser: Kersten, Daniel D., DDS, Mines, Pete, DDS, Sweet, Mark, DDS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 807
container_issue 7
container_start_page 804
container_title Journal of endodontics
container_volume 34
creator Kersten, Daniel D., DDS
Mines, Pete, DDS
Sweet, Mark, DDS
description Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and characteristics of operating microscope (OM) utilization among endodontists in the United States. The study also investigated how OM use has changed since a similar study was published nearly a decade ago. A web-based survey regarding OM usage was e-mailed to 2340 active members of the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) in the United States. Data from 1091 questionnaires indicated that 90% of the endodontists surveyed have access to and use the OM in their practice. The frequency of use as a function of years since completing endodontic training was as follows: 21 years, 78%. Previous studies found that shorter operators needed to adopt a strained position to view mandibular molars. Our results indicated with strong correlation ( r = 0.90) that shorter endodontists used the microscope more often than taller endodontists. The OM was used most frequently for root-end inspection, locating canal orifices, and root-end filling, respectively. Of the practitioners who used the OM, 59% used it without limitation, 86% used it equally between the maxillary and mandibular arch, and 84% used it as often as anticipated. The most common limitations to OM use were positional difficulty, limited field of view, and inconvenience, respectfully. The use of the OM by endodontists increased from 52% in 1999 to 90% in 2007.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69237470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0099239908003506</els_id><sourcerecordid>69237470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-851d8ae4cbc3b8200b1d2826fa2574ac343c18f8622e2d5cb763d35f06288e073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi0EKgvtH-CAcuKWMLbj2KmqqhXiSwIhCpwtx54Ip1l7GyeV-Pck2pUq9cBpLs_7auYZQk4oFBRodd4VXcRQMABVQFkAsD2yokqqnAtR7pMVQF3njNf1ITlKqQOgknP5iRxSJSTUiq_Ij5eEWWyz8RWze2-HmGzcYOZDdhlcdDGM3qav2S9MUz-mhTTZ44Rp9DEE4wf8TA5a0yf8spvH5OXq8vniJr97uL69-HmX21KKMVeCOmWwtI3ljZpXbqhjilWtYUKWxvKSW6paVTGGzAnbyIo7LlqomFIIkh-Ts23vZoh_lgX02ieLfW8CxinpqmZclhJmkG3B5Zg0YKs3g1-b4U1T0Is33enFm168aSj17G0One7ap2aN7l9kJ2oGvm0BnG_863HQyXoMFt3swI7aRf9x__f_4rb3wVvT_8Y3TF2chjDb01QnpkE_LZ9bHgcKgAuo-DsE0pI5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69237470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of the Microscope in Endodontics: Results of a Questionnaire</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kersten, Daniel D., DDS ; Mines, Pete, DDS ; Sweet, Mark, DDS</creator><creatorcontrib>Kersten, Daniel D., DDS ; Mines, Pete, DDS ; Sweet, Mark, DDS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and characteristics of operating microscope (OM) utilization among endodontists in the United States. The study also investigated how OM use has changed since a similar study was published nearly a decade ago. A web-based survey regarding OM usage was e-mailed to 2340 active members of the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) in the United States. Data from 1091 questionnaires indicated that 90% of the endodontists surveyed have access to and use the OM in their practice. The frequency of use as a function of years since completing endodontic training was as follows: &lt;10 years, 95%; 10–15 years, 90%; 16–20 years, 82%; &gt;21 years, 78%. Previous studies found that shorter operators needed to adopt a strained position to view mandibular molars. Our results indicated with strong correlation ( r = 0.90) that shorter endodontists used the microscope more often than taller endodontists. The OM was used most frequently for root-end inspection, locating canal orifices, and root-end filling, respectively. Of the practitioners who used the OM, 59% used it without limitation, 86% used it equally between the maxillary and mandibular arch, and 84% used it as often as anticipated. The most common limitations to OM use were positional difficulty, limited field of view, and inconvenience, respectfully. The use of the OM by endodontists increased from 52% in 1999 to 90% in 2007.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18570983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Body Height ; Dental Equipment ; Dentistry ; Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism ; endodontics ; Endodontics - instrumentation ; height ; Humans ; limitations ; Microscopy - instrumentation ; Microscopy - utilization ; Microsurgery - instrumentation ; Microsurgery - utilization ; Middle Aged ; operating microscope ; Practice Patterns, Dentists' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Regression Analysis ; Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; utilization ; web survey</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2008-07, Vol.34 (7), p.804-807</ispartof><rights>American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>2008 American Association of Endodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-851d8ae4cbc3b8200b1d2826fa2574ac343c18f8622e2d5cb763d35f06288e073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18570983$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kersten, Daniel D., DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mines, Pete, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweet, Mark, DDS</creatorcontrib><title>Use of the Microscope in Endodontics: Results of a Questionnaire</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and characteristics of operating microscope (OM) utilization among endodontists in the United States. The study also investigated how OM use has changed since a similar study was published nearly a decade ago. A web-based survey regarding OM usage was e-mailed to 2340 active members of the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) in the United States. Data from 1091 questionnaires indicated that 90% of the endodontists surveyed have access to and use the OM in their practice. The frequency of use as a function of years since completing endodontic training was as follows: &lt;10 years, 95%; 10–15 years, 90%; 16–20 years, 82%; &gt;21 years, 78%. Previous studies found that shorter operators needed to adopt a strained position to view mandibular molars. Our results indicated with strong correlation ( r = 0.90) that shorter endodontists used the microscope more often than taller endodontists. The OM was used most frequently for root-end inspection, locating canal orifices, and root-end filling, respectively. Of the practitioners who used the OM, 59% used it without limitation, 86% used it equally between the maxillary and mandibular arch, and 84% used it as often as anticipated. The most common limitations to OM use were positional difficulty, limited field of view, and inconvenience, respectfully. The use of the OM by endodontists increased from 52% in 1999 to 90% in 2007.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Dental Equipment</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</subject><subject>endodontics</subject><subject>Endodontics - instrumentation</subject><subject>height</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>limitations</subject><subject>Microscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Microscopy - utilization</subject><subject>Microsurgery - instrumentation</subject><subject>Microsurgery - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>operating microscope</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Dentists' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>utilization</subject><subject>web survey</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi0EKgvtH-CAcuKWMLbj2KmqqhXiSwIhCpwtx54Ip1l7GyeV-Pck2pUq9cBpLs_7auYZQk4oFBRodd4VXcRQMABVQFkAsD2yokqqnAtR7pMVQF3njNf1ITlKqQOgknP5iRxSJSTUiq_Ij5eEWWyz8RWze2-HmGzcYOZDdhlcdDGM3qav2S9MUz-mhTTZ44Rp9DEE4wf8TA5a0yf8spvH5OXq8vniJr97uL69-HmX21KKMVeCOmWwtI3ljZpXbqhjilWtYUKWxvKSW6paVTGGzAnbyIo7LlqomFIIkh-Ts23vZoh_lgX02ieLfW8CxinpqmZclhJmkG3B5Zg0YKs3g1-b4U1T0Is33enFm168aSj17G0One7ap2aN7l9kJ2oGvm0BnG_863HQyXoMFt3swI7aRf9x__f_4rb3wVvT_8Y3TF2chjDb01QnpkE_LZ9bHgcKgAuo-DsE0pI5</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Kersten, Daniel D., DDS</creator><creator>Mines, Pete, DDS</creator><creator>Sweet, Mark, DDS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Use of the Microscope in Endodontics: Results of a Questionnaire</title><author>Kersten, Daniel D., DDS ; Mines, Pete, DDS ; Sweet, Mark, DDS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-851d8ae4cbc3b8200b1d2826fa2574ac343c18f8622e2d5cb763d35f06288e073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Dental Equipment</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</topic><topic>endodontics</topic><topic>Endodontics - instrumentation</topic><topic>height</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>limitations</topic><topic>Microscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Microscopy - utilization</topic><topic>Microsurgery - instrumentation</topic><topic>Microsurgery - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>operating microscope</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Dentists' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>utilization</topic><topic>web survey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kersten, Daniel D., DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mines, Pete, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweet, Mark, DDS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kersten, Daniel D., DDS</au><au>Mines, Pete, DDS</au><au>Sweet, Mark, DDS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of the Microscope in Endodontics: Results of a Questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>804</spage><epage>807</epage><pages>804-807</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and characteristics of operating microscope (OM) utilization among endodontists in the United States. The study also investigated how OM use has changed since a similar study was published nearly a decade ago. A web-based survey regarding OM usage was e-mailed to 2340 active members of the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) in the United States. Data from 1091 questionnaires indicated that 90% of the endodontists surveyed have access to and use the OM in their practice. The frequency of use as a function of years since completing endodontic training was as follows: &lt;10 years, 95%; 10–15 years, 90%; 16–20 years, 82%; &gt;21 years, 78%. Previous studies found that shorter operators needed to adopt a strained position to view mandibular molars. Our results indicated with strong correlation ( r = 0.90) that shorter endodontists used the microscope more often than taller endodontists. The OM was used most frequently for root-end inspection, locating canal orifices, and root-end filling, respectively. Of the practitioners who used the OM, 59% used it without limitation, 86% used it equally between the maxillary and mandibular arch, and 84% used it as often as anticipated. The most common limitations to OM use were positional difficulty, limited field of view, and inconvenience, respectfully. The use of the OM by endodontists increased from 52% in 1999 to 90% in 2007.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18570983</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.002</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-2399
ispartof Journal of endodontics, 2008-07, Vol.34 (7), p.804-807
issn 0099-2399
1878-3554
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69237470
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Age
Aged
Body Height
Dental Equipment
Dentistry
Endocrinology & Metabolism
endodontics
Endodontics - instrumentation
height
Humans
limitations
Microscopy - instrumentation
Microscopy - utilization
Microsurgery - instrumentation
Microsurgery - utilization
Middle Aged
operating microscope
Practice Patterns, Dentists' - statistics & numerical data
Regression Analysis
Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
utilization
web survey
title Use of the Microscope in Endodontics: Results of a Questionnaire
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T06%3A23%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20the%20Microscope%20in%20Endodontics:%20Results%20of%20a%20Questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Kersten,%20Daniel%20D.,%20DDS&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=804&rft.epage=807&rft.pages=804-807&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69237470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69237470&rft_id=info:pmid/18570983&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0099239908003506&rfr_iscdi=true