Does lesion size affect the outcome in avascular necrosis?

The size of the necrotic lesion may be a significant factor in predicting outcome and determining treatment in hips with avascular necrosis. However, to date most reports on the treatment of this condition have not attempted to correlate outcome with lesion size. Seventy-three hips with avascular ne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1999-10, Vol.367 (367), p.262-271
Hauptverfasser: STEINBERG, M. E, BANDS, R. E, PARRY, S, HOFFMAN, E, CHAN, T, HARTMAN, K. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue 367
container_start_page 262
container_title Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume 367
creator STEINBERG, M. E
BANDS, R. E
PARRY, S
HOFFMAN, E
CHAN, T
HARTMAN, K. M
description The size of the necrotic lesion may be a significant factor in predicting outcome and determining treatment in hips with avascular necrosis. However, to date most reports on the treatment of this condition have not attempted to correlate outcome with lesion size. Seventy-three hips with avascular necrosis were evaluated, 11 in Stage I and 62 in Stage II. All were treated with core decompression and bone grafting. Patients were followed up 2 to 6 years (mean, 39 months). The results were determined by change in Harris hip score, degree of radiographic progression, and the need for total hip replacement. Outcome was correlated with the lesion size, stage, etiology, and other factors. In Stage I, the true three-dimensional size of the lesion was measured with a new technique of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. In Stage II, measurements were obtained from radiographs using a modular system for quantitative digital analysis. Hips were divided into three groups based on lesion size: Group A, less than 15% of femoral head involvement; Group B, 15% to 30%; and Group C, greater than 30%. There were no significant differences in outcome between Stages I and II and no relationship to etiology or other demographic factors. When correlated with lesion size, radiographs on a 21-point scale showed progression by 1.1, 4.2, and 4.3 points; the Harris hip score showed an improvement of 10.6 and 3.3 points and a loss of 3.6 points; and total hip replacement was required in 7%, 31%, and 33% of Group A, B, and C lesions, respectively. The difference in outcome between small lesions and large or medium lesions was statistically significant, but no significant differences were seen between medium and large lesions. These observations emphasize the importance of lesion size in predicting outcome after core decompression and grafting and possibly after other surgical and nonsurgical methods of managing hips with avascular necrosis. They also encourage the use of methods of evaluation and staging that include a determination of lesion size and stage.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003086-199910000-00033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69234124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69234124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-679129b22d8b4fd2d7370250b85ede5f119f6f943a4a0ef8f577d1bc89b62c843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLxDAQgIMo7rr6FyQH8VZNJmmaeBFZn7DgRcFbSNMJVvrQphX019u662MuwwzfPPgIoZydcGayUzaGYFol3BjDpyqZOmKLzHkKOuFcwDaZjz2TGOBPM7IX48uEyBR2yYyzVCoFck7OLluMtMJYtg2N5SdSFwL6nvbPSNuh922NtGyoe3fRD5XraIO-a2MZz_fJTnBVxINNXpDH66uH5W2yur-5W16sEi-Z6hOVGQ4mByh0LkMBRSYyBinLdYoFpoFzE1QwUjjpGAYd0iwreO61yRV4LcWCHK_3vnbt24Cxt3UZPVaVa7AdolUGhOQwgXoNTg_GDoN97cradR-WMzt5sz_e7K83--1tHD3c3BjyGot_g2tRI3C0AUYPrgqda3wZ_zhgOhMgvgBmDnPt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69234124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does lesion size affect the outcome in avascular necrosis?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>STEINBERG, M. E ; BANDS, R. E ; PARRY, S ; HOFFMAN, E ; CHAN, T ; HARTMAN, K. M</creator><creatorcontrib>STEINBERG, M. E ; BANDS, R. E ; PARRY, S ; HOFFMAN, E ; CHAN, T ; HARTMAN, K. M</creatorcontrib><description>The size of the necrotic lesion may be a significant factor in predicting outcome and determining treatment in hips with avascular necrosis. However, to date most reports on the treatment of this condition have not attempted to correlate outcome with lesion size. Seventy-three hips with avascular necrosis were evaluated, 11 in Stage I and 62 in Stage II. All were treated with core decompression and bone grafting. Patients were followed up 2 to 6 years (mean, 39 months). The results were determined by change in Harris hip score, degree of radiographic progression, and the need for total hip replacement. Outcome was correlated with the lesion size, stage, etiology, and other factors. In Stage I, the true three-dimensional size of the lesion was measured with a new technique of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. In Stage II, measurements were obtained from radiographs using a modular system for quantitative digital analysis. Hips were divided into three groups based on lesion size: Group A, less than 15% of femoral head involvement; Group B, 15% to 30%; and Group C, greater than 30%. There were no significant differences in outcome between Stages I and II and no relationship to etiology or other demographic factors. When correlated with lesion size, radiographs on a 21-point scale showed progression by 1.1, 4.2, and 4.3 points; the Harris hip score showed an improvement of 10.6 and 3.3 points and a loss of 3.6 points; and total hip replacement was required in 7%, 31%, and 33% of Group A, B, and C lesions, respectively. The difference in outcome between small lesions and large or medium lesions was statistically significant, but no significant differences were seen between medium and large lesions. These observations emphasize the importance of lesion size in predicting outcome after core decompression and grafting and possibly after other surgical and nonsurgical methods of managing hips with avascular necrosis. They also encourage the use of methods of evaluation and staging that include a determination of lesion size and stage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199910000-00033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10546624</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CORTBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Transplantation ; Decompression, Surgical ; Femur Head - diagnostic imaging ; Femur Head - pathology ; Femur Head Necrosis - diagnosis ; Femur Head Necrosis - pathology ; Femur Head Necrosis - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedic surgery ; Radiography ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1999-10, Vol.367 (367), p.262-271</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-679129b22d8b4fd2d7370250b85ede5f119f6f943a4a0ef8f577d1bc89b62c843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-679129b22d8b4fd2d7370250b85ede5f119f6f943a4a0ef8f577d1bc89b62c843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1208732$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10546624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STEINBERG, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BANDS, R. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARRY, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOFFMAN, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAN, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARTMAN, K. M</creatorcontrib><title>Does lesion size affect the outcome in avascular necrosis?</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>The size of the necrotic lesion may be a significant factor in predicting outcome and determining treatment in hips with avascular necrosis. However, to date most reports on the treatment of this condition have not attempted to correlate outcome with lesion size. Seventy-three hips with avascular necrosis were evaluated, 11 in Stage I and 62 in Stage II. All were treated with core decompression and bone grafting. Patients were followed up 2 to 6 years (mean, 39 months). The results were determined by change in Harris hip score, degree of radiographic progression, and the need for total hip replacement. Outcome was correlated with the lesion size, stage, etiology, and other factors. In Stage I, the true three-dimensional size of the lesion was measured with a new technique of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. In Stage II, measurements were obtained from radiographs using a modular system for quantitative digital analysis. Hips were divided into three groups based on lesion size: Group A, less than 15% of femoral head involvement; Group B, 15% to 30%; and Group C, greater than 30%. There were no significant differences in outcome between Stages I and II and no relationship to etiology or other demographic factors. When correlated with lesion size, radiographs on a 21-point scale showed progression by 1.1, 4.2, and 4.3 points; the Harris hip score showed an improvement of 10.6 and 3.3 points and a loss of 3.6 points; and total hip replacement was required in 7%, 31%, and 33% of Group A, B, and C lesions, respectively. The difference in outcome between small lesions and large or medium lesions was statistically significant, but no significant differences were seen between medium and large lesions. These observations emphasize the importance of lesion size in predicting outcome after core decompression and grafting and possibly after other surgical and nonsurgical methods of managing hips with avascular necrosis. They also encourage the use of methods of evaluation and staging that include a determination of lesion size and stage.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical</subject><subject>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur Head - pathology</subject><subject>Femur Head Necrosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Femur Head Necrosis - pathology</subject><subject>Femur Head Necrosis - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLxDAQgIMo7rr6FyQH8VZNJmmaeBFZn7DgRcFbSNMJVvrQphX019u662MuwwzfPPgIoZydcGayUzaGYFol3BjDpyqZOmKLzHkKOuFcwDaZjz2TGOBPM7IX48uEyBR2yYyzVCoFck7OLluMtMJYtg2N5SdSFwL6nvbPSNuh922NtGyoe3fRD5XraIO-a2MZz_fJTnBVxINNXpDH66uH5W2yur-5W16sEi-Z6hOVGQ4mByh0LkMBRSYyBinLdYoFpoFzE1QwUjjpGAYd0iwreO61yRV4LcWCHK_3vnbt24Cxt3UZPVaVa7AdolUGhOQwgXoNTg_GDoN97cradR-WMzt5sz_e7K83--1tHD3c3BjyGot_g2tRI3C0AUYPrgqda3wZ_zhgOhMgvgBmDnPt</recordid><startdate>19991001</startdate><enddate>19991001</enddate><creator>STEINBERG, M. E</creator><creator>BANDS, R. E</creator><creator>PARRY, S</creator><creator>HOFFMAN, E</creator><creator>CHAN, T</creator><creator>HARTMAN, K. M</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991001</creationdate><title>Does lesion size affect the outcome in avascular necrosis?</title><author>STEINBERG, M. E ; BANDS, R. E ; PARRY, S ; HOFFMAN, E ; CHAN, T ; HARTMAN, K. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-679129b22d8b4fd2d7370250b85ede5f119f6f943a4a0ef8f577d1bc89b62c843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical</topic><topic>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur Head - pathology</topic><topic>Femur Head Necrosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Femur Head Necrosis - pathology</topic><topic>Femur Head Necrosis - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STEINBERG, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BANDS, R. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARRY, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOFFMAN, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAN, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARTMAN, K. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STEINBERG, M. E</au><au>BANDS, R. E</au><au>PARRY, S</au><au>HOFFMAN, E</au><au>CHAN, T</au><au>HARTMAN, K. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does lesion size affect the outcome in avascular necrosis?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>1999-10-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>367</volume><issue>367</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>262-271</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><coden>CORTBR</coden><abstract>The size of the necrotic lesion may be a significant factor in predicting outcome and determining treatment in hips with avascular necrosis. However, to date most reports on the treatment of this condition have not attempted to correlate outcome with lesion size. Seventy-three hips with avascular necrosis were evaluated, 11 in Stage I and 62 in Stage II. All were treated with core decompression and bone grafting. Patients were followed up 2 to 6 years (mean, 39 months). The results were determined by change in Harris hip score, degree of radiographic progression, and the need for total hip replacement. Outcome was correlated with the lesion size, stage, etiology, and other factors. In Stage I, the true three-dimensional size of the lesion was measured with a new technique of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. In Stage II, measurements were obtained from radiographs using a modular system for quantitative digital analysis. Hips were divided into three groups based on lesion size: Group A, less than 15% of femoral head involvement; Group B, 15% to 30%; and Group C, greater than 30%. There were no significant differences in outcome between Stages I and II and no relationship to etiology or other demographic factors. When correlated with lesion size, radiographs on a 21-point scale showed progression by 1.1, 4.2, and 4.3 points; the Harris hip score showed an improvement of 10.6 and 3.3 points and a loss of 3.6 points; and total hip replacement was required in 7%, 31%, and 33% of Group A, B, and C lesions, respectively. The difference in outcome between small lesions and large or medium lesions was statistically significant, but no significant differences were seen between medium and large lesions. These observations emphasize the importance of lesion size in predicting outcome after core decompression and grafting and possibly after other surgical and nonsurgical methods of managing hips with avascular necrosis. They also encourage the use of methods of evaluation and staging that include a determination of lesion size and stage.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>10546624</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003086-199910000-00033</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1999-10, Vol.367 (367), p.262-271
issn 0009-921X
1528-1132
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69234124
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Transplantation
Decompression, Surgical
Femur Head - diagnostic imaging
Femur Head - pathology
Femur Head Necrosis - diagnosis
Femur Head Necrosis - pathology
Femur Head Necrosis - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical sciences
Orthopedic surgery
Radiography
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Treatment Outcome
title Does lesion size affect the outcome in avascular necrosis?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A01%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20lesion%20size%20affect%20the%20outcome%20in%20avascular%20necrosis?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=STEINBERG,%20M.%20E&rft.date=1999-10-01&rft.volume=367&rft.issue=367&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=262-271&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.coden=CORTBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003086-199910000-00033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69234124%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69234124&rft_id=info:pmid/10546624&rfr_iscdi=true