Reliability of Isometric Muscle Endurance Tests in Subjects With Postural Neck Pain
Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of 3 isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain. Methods Twenty-one subjects with chronic postural neck pain performed 3 submaximal muscle tests twice on the first occasion and once at the second...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2008-06, Vol.31 (5), p.348-354 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 354 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 348 |
container_title | Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Edmondston, Stephen J., PhD Wallumrød, Magnus E., MManipTher MacLéid, Fiachra, MManipTher Kvamme, Lars S., MManipTher Joebges, Sandra, MManipTher Brabham, Glen C., BSc |
description | Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of 3 isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain. Methods Twenty-one subjects with chronic postural neck pain performed 3 submaximal muscle tests twice on the first occasion and once at the second session 3 days later. The tests examined isometric neck flexion, neck extension, and scapular muscle endurance. Results Reliability was excellent for the neck flexor test (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0 93), moderate for the scapular test (ICC = 0.67), and good for the neck extensor test (ICC = 0 88). The standard error of measure for the tests was 6.4, 10.9, and 25.9 seconds, respectively. The minimum change required to represent real change in muscle endurance was 17.8 seconds for the neck flexor test, 30.1 seconds for the scapular test, and 71.3 seconds for the neck extensor test. Conclusion This study showed the reliability of 3 cervical spine and shoulder girdle submaximal muscle endurance tests in patients with postural neck pain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.04.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69224277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0161475408001140</els_id><sourcerecordid>69224277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-99a366055fc6d3708d2fa52058659b605719fdd55961df48360686ea49e7ea93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqH_AgOXnrtpJO0h0QQZZdd2HVxRnwGDJJNaa3P8akW5h_b5oZEDx4SkGeeql6ipA3DEoGTL3vym44zCUHaEoQJTB4RjZMVrxQslHPySZDrBC1FBfkMqUOAHSlm5fkgjVSNryuN2T7Hftg96EP85FOLb1P04BzDI5-WZLrkd6Mfol2dEh3mOZEw0i3y75Dl-sfYf5JH6c0Z6KnX9E90UcbxlfkRWv7hK_P7xXZ3d7sru-Kh2-f768_PRROgJ4LrW2lFEjZOuWrGhrPWys55Nml3uePmunWeym1Yr4VTaVANQqt0Fij1dUVeXeKPcTp15KHM0NIDvvejjgtySjNuchLZpCfQBenlCK25hDDYOPRMDCrSdOZ1aRZTRoQJpvMTW_P6ct-QP-35awuAx9OAOYVfweMJrmAWZQPMdsxfgr_z__4T7vrwxic7Z_wiKmbljhmeYaZxA2Y7XrL9ZTQADAmoPoDEF6Ykg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69224277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of Isometric Muscle Endurance Tests in Subjects With Postural Neck Pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Edmondston, Stephen J., PhD ; Wallumrød, Magnus E., MManipTher ; MacLéid, Fiachra, MManipTher ; Kvamme, Lars S., MManipTher ; Joebges, Sandra, MManipTher ; Brabham, Glen C., BSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Edmondston, Stephen J., PhD ; Wallumrød, Magnus E., MManipTher ; MacLéid, Fiachra, MManipTher ; Kvamme, Lars S., MManipTher ; Joebges, Sandra, MManipTher ; Brabham, Glen C., BSc</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of 3 isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain. Methods Twenty-one subjects with chronic postural neck pain performed 3 submaximal muscle tests twice on the first occasion and once at the second session 3 days later. The tests examined isometric neck flexion, neck extension, and scapular muscle endurance. Results Reliability was excellent for the neck flexor test (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0 93), moderate for the scapular test (ICC = 0.67), and good for the neck extensor test (ICC = 0 88). The standard error of measure for the tests was 6.4, 10.9, and 25.9 seconds, respectively. The minimum change required to represent real change in muscle endurance was 17.8 seconds for the neck flexor test, 30.1 seconds for the scapular test, and 71.3 seconds for the neck extensor test. Conclusion This study showed the reliability of 3 cervical spine and shoulder girdle submaximal muscle endurance tests in patients with postural neck pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-4754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.04.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18558277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Exercise Test - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction ; Isometric Contraction - physiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Fatigue ; Neck Muscles ; Neck Muscles - physiology ; Neck Pain - diagnosis ; Neck Pain - epidemiology ; Pain Measurement ; Physical Endurance - physiology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Postural Balance ; Posture ; Probability ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shoulder Pain - diagnosis ; Shoulder Pain - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2008-06, Vol.31 (5), p.348-354</ispartof><rights>National University of Health Sciences</rights><rights>2008 National University of Health Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-99a366055fc6d3708d2fa52058659b605719fdd55961df48360686ea49e7ea93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-99a366055fc6d3708d2fa52058659b605719fdd55961df48360686ea49e7ea93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.04.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18558277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edmondston, Stephen J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallumrød, Magnus E., MManipTher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLéid, Fiachra, MManipTher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvamme, Lars S., MManipTher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joebges, Sandra, MManipTher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brabham, Glen C., BSc</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of Isometric Muscle Endurance Tests in Subjects With Postural Neck Pain</title><title>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of 3 isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain. Methods Twenty-one subjects with chronic postural neck pain performed 3 submaximal muscle tests twice on the first occasion and once at the second session 3 days later. The tests examined isometric neck flexion, neck extension, and scapular muscle endurance. Results Reliability was excellent for the neck flexor test (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0 93), moderate for the scapular test (ICC = 0.67), and good for the neck extensor test (ICC = 0 88). The standard error of measure for the tests was 6.4, 10.9, and 25.9 seconds, respectively. The minimum change required to represent real change in muscle endurance was 17.8 seconds for the neck flexor test, 30.1 seconds for the scapular test, and 71.3 seconds for the neck extensor test. Conclusion This study showed the reliability of 3 cervical spine and shoulder girdle submaximal muscle endurance tests in patients with postural neck pain.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Fatigue</subject><subject>Neck Muscles</subject><subject>Neck Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Neck Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neck Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Physical Endurance - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shoulder Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Shoulder Pain - epidemiology</subject><issn>0161-4754</issn><issn>1532-6586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqH_AgOXnrtpJO0h0QQZZdd2HVxRnwGDJJNaa3P8akW5h_b5oZEDx4SkGeeql6ipA3DEoGTL3vym44zCUHaEoQJTB4RjZMVrxQslHPySZDrBC1FBfkMqUOAHSlm5fkgjVSNryuN2T7Hftg96EP85FOLb1P04BzDI5-WZLrkd6Mfol2dEh3mOZEw0i3y75Dl-sfYf5JH6c0Z6KnX9E90UcbxlfkRWv7hK_P7xXZ3d7sru-Kh2-f768_PRROgJ4LrW2lFEjZOuWrGhrPWys55Nml3uePmunWeym1Yr4VTaVANQqt0Fij1dUVeXeKPcTp15KHM0NIDvvejjgtySjNuchLZpCfQBenlCK25hDDYOPRMDCrSdOZ1aRZTRoQJpvMTW_P6ct-QP-35awuAx9OAOYVfweMJrmAWZQPMdsxfgr_z__4T7vrwxic7Z_wiKmbljhmeYaZxA2Y7XrL9ZTQADAmoPoDEF6Ykg</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Edmondston, Stephen J., PhD</creator><creator>Wallumrød, Magnus E., MManipTher</creator><creator>MacLéid, Fiachra, MManipTher</creator><creator>Kvamme, Lars S., MManipTher</creator><creator>Joebges, Sandra, MManipTher</creator><creator>Brabham, Glen C., BSc</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Reliability of Isometric Muscle Endurance Tests in Subjects With Postural Neck Pain</title><author>Edmondston, Stephen J., PhD ; Wallumrød, Magnus E., MManipTher ; MacLéid, Fiachra, MManipTher ; Kvamme, Lars S., MManipTher ; Joebges, Sandra, MManipTher ; Brabham, Glen C., BSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-99a366055fc6d3708d2fa52058659b605719fdd55961df48360686ea49e7ea93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Fatigue</topic><topic>Neck Muscles</topic><topic>Neck Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Neck Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neck Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Physical Endurance - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shoulder Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Shoulder Pain - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edmondston, Stephen J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallumrød, Magnus E., MManipTher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLéid, Fiachra, MManipTher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvamme, Lars S., MManipTher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joebges, Sandra, MManipTher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brabham, Glen C., BSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edmondston, Stephen J., PhD</au><au>Wallumrød, Magnus E., MManipTher</au><au>MacLéid, Fiachra, MManipTher</au><au>Kvamme, Lars S., MManipTher</au><au>Joebges, Sandra, MManipTher</au><au>Brabham, Glen C., BSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of Isometric Muscle Endurance Tests in Subjects With Postural Neck Pain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>348</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>348-354</pages><issn>0161-4754</issn><eissn>1532-6586</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of 3 isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain. Methods Twenty-one subjects with chronic postural neck pain performed 3 submaximal muscle tests twice on the first occasion and once at the second session 3 days later. The tests examined isometric neck flexion, neck extension, and scapular muscle endurance. Results Reliability was excellent for the neck flexor test (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0 93), moderate for the scapular test (ICC = 0.67), and good for the neck extensor test (ICC = 0 88). The standard error of measure for the tests was 6.4, 10.9, and 25.9 seconds, respectively. The minimum change required to represent real change in muscle endurance was 17.8 seconds for the neck flexor test, 30.1 seconds for the scapular test, and 71.3 seconds for the neck extensor test. Conclusion This study showed the reliability of 3 cervical spine and shoulder girdle submaximal muscle endurance tests in patients with postural neck pain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>18558277</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.04.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-4754 |
ispartof | Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2008-06, Vol.31 (5), p.348-354 |
issn | 0161-4754 1532-6586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69224277 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Cohort Studies Exercise Test - methods Female Humans Isometric Contraction Isometric Contraction - physiology Male Middle Aged Muscle Fatigue Neck Muscles Neck Muscles - physiology Neck Pain - diagnosis Neck Pain - epidemiology Pain Measurement Physical Endurance - physiology Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Postural Balance Posture Probability Reliability Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Severity of Illness Index Shoulder Pain - diagnosis Shoulder Pain - epidemiology |
title | Reliability of Isometric Muscle Endurance Tests in Subjects With Postural Neck Pain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A55%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20Isometric%20Muscle%20Endurance%20Tests%20in%20Subjects%20With%20Postural%20Neck%20Pain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manipulative%20and%20physiological%20therapeutics&rft.au=Edmondston,%20Stephen%20J.,%20PhD&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=348&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=348-354&rft.issn=0161-4754&rft.eissn=1532-6586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69224277%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69224277&rft_id=info:pmid/18558277&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0161475408001140&rfr_iscdi=true |