Criteria for Psychological Adaptation to High-Altitude Hypoxia

The purpose of this study was to test an ascent program for ideal psychological adaptation to high altitudes. A psychological approach was used to test a model describing a gradual step-by-step ascent. Seven subjects spent nine days between 3,500 m and 4,400 m altitude, followed by eight days climbi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perceptual and motor skills 1999-08, Vol.89 (1), p.3-18
Hauptverfasser: Bonnon, M., Noël-Jorand, M-C., Therme, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Perceptual and motor skills
container_volume 89
creator Bonnon, M.
Noël-Jorand, M-C.
Therme, P.
description The purpose of this study was to test an ascent program for ideal psychological adaptation to high altitudes. A psychological approach was used to test a model describing a gradual step-by-step ascent. Seven subjects spent nine days between 3,500 m and 4,400 m altitude, followed by eight days climbing 500 m each day from 3,500 m to 5,400 m. They performed a cognitive-motor task three times, once under normoxia, once under acute hypoxia, and once under chronic hypoxic conditions. Durations for these subjects were compared with those obtained by a control group tested under normoxia. Subjects' emotional state was assessed by analyzing their remarks during an interview conducted at 5,400 m and by calculating from the answers given to the three questions, a mood index for each subject. Analysis showed that the performances of both groups improved on the second and third administrations of the test. There was, however, no interaction between the group and the time of administration. Mood indexes indicated that the majority of the subjects had no trouble in adapting to the situation and few cognitive or emotional disturbances were observed. These findings may be attributed to the ascent being well designed and planned thereby preventing various possible forms of mountain sickness and other pathologies from developing in the subjects.
doi_str_mv 10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69223460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_pms.1999.89.1.3</sage_id><sourcerecordid>69223460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-a2456e1b14d5d300aa3f86be2353e4acea0628cfb1f6a879f9387a187c1c049d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUB_Agis7p2ZsUD55sl9f8aHIRxlAnDPSg4C1kabpFuqUmLbj_3o4NFEE8vcvnfUPeF6ELwFlOOR81q5iBlDITMoOMHKABMCZSLsTbIRpgTCBlkLMTdBrjO8aYA6XH6AQwo5RIMUC3k-BaG5xOKh-S57gxS1_7hTO6TsalblrdOr9OWp9M3WKZjuvWtV1pk-mm8Z9On6GjStfRnu_nEL3e371Mpuns6eFxMp6lhmDSpjqnjFuYAy1ZSTDWmlSCz21OGLFUG6sxz4Wp5lBxLQpZSSIKDaIwYDCVJRmi611uE_xHZ2OrVi4aW9d6bX0XFZd5TijH_0IQghekoD28-gXffRfW_SdUDqy_TQG8R6MdMsHHGGylmuBWOmwUYLUtQPUFqG0BSkgFivQbl_vYbr6y5Q-_u3gPbnYg6oX9fvOvvC_2Wo7R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215398716</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Criteria for Psychological Adaptation to High-Altitude Hypoxia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Bonnon, M. ; Noël-Jorand, M-C. ; Therme, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonnon, M. ; Noël-Jorand, M-C. ; Therme, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to test an ascent program for ideal psychological adaptation to high altitudes. A psychological approach was used to test a model describing a gradual step-by-step ascent. Seven subjects spent nine days between 3,500 m and 4,400 m altitude, followed by eight days climbing 500 m each day from 3,500 m to 5,400 m. They performed a cognitive-motor task three times, once under normoxia, once under acute hypoxia, and once under chronic hypoxic conditions. Durations for these subjects were compared with those obtained by a control group tested under normoxia. Subjects' emotional state was assessed by analyzing their remarks during an interview conducted at 5,400 m and by calculating from the answers given to the three questions, a mood index for each subject. Analysis showed that the performances of both groups improved on the second and third administrations of the test. There was, however, no interaction between the group and the time of administration. Mood indexes indicated that the majority of the subjects had no trouble in adapting to the situation and few cognitive or emotional disturbances were observed. These findings may be attributed to the ascent being well designed and planned thereby preventing various possible forms of mountain sickness and other pathologies from developing in the subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-688X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10544398</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMOSAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Acclimatization - physiology ; Adaptation, Physiological ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Affect ; Altitude ; Altitude Sickness - diagnosis ; Altitude Sickness - psychology ; Analysis of Variance ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognition - physiology ; Emotions ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Male ; Models, Psychological ; Mountaineering - physiology ; Mountaineering - psychology ; Oxygen ; Perceptions ; Psychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychology ; Psychomotor Performance ; Space life sciences ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Perceptual and motor skills, 1999-08, Vol.89 (1), p.3-18</ispartof><rights>1999 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright Southern Universities Press Aug 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-a2456e1b14d5d300aa3f86be2353e4acea0628cfb1f6a879f9387a187c1c049d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-a2456e1b14d5d300aa3f86be2353e4acea0628cfb1f6a879f9387a187c1c049d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10544398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonnon, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noël-Jorand, M-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therme, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Criteria for Psychological Adaptation to High-Altitude Hypoxia</title><title>Perceptual and motor skills</title><addtitle>Percept Mot Skills</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to test an ascent program for ideal psychological adaptation to high altitudes. A psychological approach was used to test a model describing a gradual step-by-step ascent. Seven subjects spent nine days between 3,500 m and 4,400 m altitude, followed by eight days climbing 500 m each day from 3,500 m to 5,400 m. They performed a cognitive-motor task three times, once under normoxia, once under acute hypoxia, and once under chronic hypoxic conditions. Durations for these subjects were compared with those obtained by a control group tested under normoxia. Subjects' emotional state was assessed by analyzing their remarks during an interview conducted at 5,400 m and by calculating from the answers given to the three questions, a mood index for each subject. Analysis showed that the performances of both groups improved on the second and third administrations of the test. There was, however, no interaction between the group and the time of administration. Mood indexes indicated that the majority of the subjects had no trouble in adapting to the situation and few cognitive or emotional disturbances were observed. These findings may be attributed to the ascent being well designed and planned thereby preventing various possible forms of mountain sickness and other pathologies from developing in the subjects.</description><subject>Acclimatization - physiology</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Altitude Sickness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Altitude Sickness - psychology</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Mountaineering - physiology</subject><subject>Mountaineering - psychology</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0031-5125</issn><issn>1558-688X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUB_Agis7p2ZsUD55sl9f8aHIRxlAnDPSg4C1kabpFuqUmLbj_3o4NFEE8vcvnfUPeF6ELwFlOOR81q5iBlDITMoOMHKABMCZSLsTbIRpgTCBlkLMTdBrjO8aYA6XH6AQwo5RIMUC3k-BaG5xOKh-S57gxS1_7hTO6TsalblrdOr9OWp9M3WKZjuvWtV1pk-mm8Z9On6GjStfRnu_nEL3e371Mpuns6eFxMp6lhmDSpjqnjFuYAy1ZSTDWmlSCz21OGLFUG6sxz4Wp5lBxLQpZSSIKDaIwYDCVJRmi611uE_xHZ2OrVi4aW9d6bX0XFZd5TijH_0IQghekoD28-gXffRfW_SdUDqy_TQG8R6MdMsHHGGylmuBWOmwUYLUtQPUFqG0BSkgFivQbl_vYbr6y5Q-_u3gPbnYg6oX9fvOvvC_2Wo7R</recordid><startdate>199908</startdate><enddate>199908</enddate><creator>Bonnon, M.</creator><creator>Noël-Jorand, M-C.</creator><creator>Therme, P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199908</creationdate><title>Criteria for Psychological Adaptation to High-Altitude Hypoxia</title><author>Bonnon, M. ; Noël-Jorand, M-C. ; Therme, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-a2456e1b14d5d300aa3f86be2353e4acea0628cfb1f6a879f9387a187c1c049d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Acclimatization - physiology</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Altitude Sickness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Altitude Sickness - psychology</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Mountaineering - physiology</topic><topic>Mountaineering - psychology</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonnon, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noël-Jorand, M-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therme, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Perceptual and motor skills</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonnon, M.</au><au>Noël-Jorand, M-C.</au><au>Therme, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Criteria for Psychological Adaptation to High-Altitude Hypoxia</atitle><jtitle>Perceptual and motor skills</jtitle><addtitle>Percept Mot Skills</addtitle><date>1999-08</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>3-18</pages><issn>0031-5125</issn><eissn>1558-688X</eissn><coden>PMOSAZ</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to test an ascent program for ideal psychological adaptation to high altitudes. A psychological approach was used to test a model describing a gradual step-by-step ascent. Seven subjects spent nine days between 3,500 m and 4,400 m altitude, followed by eight days climbing 500 m each day from 3,500 m to 5,400 m. They performed a cognitive-motor task three times, once under normoxia, once under acute hypoxia, and once under chronic hypoxic conditions. Durations for these subjects were compared with those obtained by a control group tested under normoxia. Subjects' emotional state was assessed by analyzing their remarks during an interview conducted at 5,400 m and by calculating from the answers given to the three questions, a mood index for each subject. Analysis showed that the performances of both groups improved on the second and third administrations of the test. There was, however, no interaction between the group and the time of administration. Mood indexes indicated that the majority of the subjects had no trouble in adapting to the situation and few cognitive or emotional disturbances were observed. These findings may be attributed to the ascent being well designed and planned thereby preventing various possible forms of mountain sickness and other pathologies from developing in the subjects.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>10544398</pmid><doi>10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.3</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-5125
ispartof Perceptual and motor skills, 1999-08, Vol.89 (1), p.3-18
issn 0031-5125
1558-688X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69223460
source MEDLINE; SAGE Journals
subjects Acclimatization - physiology
Adaptation, Physiological
Adaptation, Psychological
Affect
Altitude
Altitude Sickness - diagnosis
Altitude Sickness - psychology
Analysis of Variance
Cognition & reasoning
Cognition - physiology
Emotions
Female
Humans
Interview, Psychological
Male
Models, Psychological
Mountaineering - physiology
Mountaineering - psychology
Oxygen
Perceptions
Psychological Tests - statistics & numerical data
Psychology
Psychomotor Performance
Space life sciences
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Criteria for Psychological Adaptation to High-Altitude Hypoxia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A27%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Criteria%20for%20Psychological%20Adaptation%20to%20High-Altitude%20Hypoxia&rft.jtitle=Perceptual%20and%20motor%20skills&rft.au=Bonnon,%20M.&rft.date=1999-08&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=3-18&rft.issn=0031-5125&rft.eissn=1558-688X&rft.coden=PMOSAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69223460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215398716&rft_id=info:pmid/10544398&rft_sage_id=10.2466_pms.1999.89.1.3&rfr_iscdi=true