Conservation priorities for Ethiopian sheep breeds combining threat status, breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity
Prioritizing livestock breeds for conservation needs to incorporate both genetic and non-genetic aspects important for the survival of the breeds. Here, we apply a maximum-utility-strategy to prioritize 14 traditional Ethiopian sheep breeds based on their threat status, contributions to farmer livel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genetics selection evolution (Paris) 2008-07, Vol.40 (4), p.433-447 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 447 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 433 |
container_title | Genetics selection evolution (Paris) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Gizaw, Solomon Komen, Hans Windig, Jack J Hanotte, Olivier van Arendonk, Johan A M |
description | Prioritizing livestock breeds for conservation needs to incorporate both genetic and non-genetic aspects important for the survival of the breeds. Here, we apply a maximum-utility-strategy to prioritize 14 traditional Ethiopian sheep breeds based on their threat status, contributions to farmer livelihoods (current breed merits) and contributions to genetic diversity. Contributions of the breeds to genetic diversity were quantified using Eding's marker-estimated kinship approaches. Non-genetic aspects included threats (e.g. low population size, low preferences by farmers) and current merits (economic, ecological and cultural merits). Threat analysis identified eight of the 14 breeds as threatened. Analysis of current merits showed that sub-alpine and arid-lowland breeds contribute most to farmer livelihoods in comparison to other breeds. The highest contribution to the genetic diversity conserved was from the Simien breed. Simien showed high between-breed (low between-breed kinship = 0.04) as well as high within-breed diversity (low within-breed kinship = 0.09 and high H(E) = 0.73 and allelic richness = 6.83). We combined the results on threat status, current breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity to produce a ranking of the 14 breeds for conservation purposes. Our results balance the trade-offs between conserving breeds as insurance against future uncertainties and current sustainable utilization. The ranking of breeds provides a basis for conservation strategies for Ethiopian sheep and contributes to a regional or global conservation plan. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1051/gse:2008012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69221602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69221602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-5f1c062d40fc649bbc9a92c737a178dfff91cd4b98abdfcf49573299af4177673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbFrGzEUh0VJqZ20U_egKUtziaQ7SaduwSRpINAlhW6HTvdkq_gkR08X8JR_vWds6NjpDe_jG34fIV85u-FM8ts1wnfBWMu4-ECWXBhdGdWqM7JkxpiKm_r3gpwj_mGMqUY1n8iCt1K2TMsleV-liJDfbAkp0l0OKYcSAKlPmd6XTUi7YCPFDcCO9hlgQOrS2IcY4pqWTQZbKBZbJrw-_ukIswKpjcNMxpJDPx3kSEuia4hQgqNDeIOMoew_k4_ebhG-nO4F-fVw_7L6UT3_fHxa3T1XrpayVNJzx5QYGuadakzfO2ONcLrWlut28N4b7oamN63tB-98Y6SuhTHWN1xrpesLcnX07nJ6nQBLNwZ0sN3aCGnCThkhuGLivyA3TSu5rmfw2xF0OSFm8N283mjzvuOsO4Tp5jDdKcxMX560Uz_C8I89laj_AqxAjMM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19485173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation priorities for Ethiopian sheep breeds combining threat status, breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gizaw, Solomon ; Komen, Hans ; Windig, Jack J ; Hanotte, Olivier ; van Arendonk, Johan A M</creator><creatorcontrib>Gizaw, Solomon ; Komen, Hans ; Windig, Jack J ; Hanotte, Olivier ; van Arendonk, Johan A M</creatorcontrib><description>Prioritizing livestock breeds for conservation needs to incorporate both genetic and non-genetic aspects important for the survival of the breeds. Here, we apply a maximum-utility-strategy to prioritize 14 traditional Ethiopian sheep breeds based on their threat status, contributions to farmer livelihoods (current breed merits) and contributions to genetic diversity. Contributions of the breeds to genetic diversity were quantified using Eding's marker-estimated kinship approaches. Non-genetic aspects included threats (e.g. low population size, low preferences by farmers) and current merits (economic, ecological and cultural merits). Threat analysis identified eight of the 14 breeds as threatened. Analysis of current merits showed that sub-alpine and arid-lowland breeds contribute most to farmer livelihoods in comparison to other breeds. The highest contribution to the genetic diversity conserved was from the Simien breed. Simien showed high between-breed (low between-breed kinship = 0.04) as well as high within-breed diversity (low within-breed kinship = 0.09 and high H(E) = 0.73 and allelic richness = 6.83). We combined the results on threat status, current breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity to produce a ranking of the 14 breeds for conservation purposes. Our results balance the trade-offs between conserving breeds as insurance against future uncertainties and current sustainable utilization. The ranking of breeds provides a basis for conservation strategies for Ethiopian sheep and contributes to a regional or global conservation plan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0999-193X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1297-9686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/gse:2008012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18558075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Animals ; Breeding ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Crosses, Genetic ; Culture ; Ecology ; Ethiopia ; Female ; Genetic Variation ; Genetics, Population ; Male ; Models, Genetic ; Population Density ; Sheep, Domestic - genetics ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Genetics selection evolution (Paris), 2008-07, Vol.40 (4), p.433-447</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-5f1c062d40fc649bbc9a92c737a178dfff91cd4b98abdfcf49573299af4177673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-5f1c062d40fc649bbc9a92c737a178dfff91cd4b98abdfcf49573299af4177673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18558075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gizaw, Solomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komen, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windig, Jack J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanotte, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Arendonk, Johan A M</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation priorities for Ethiopian sheep breeds combining threat status, breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity</title><title>Genetics selection evolution (Paris)</title><addtitle>Genet Sel Evol</addtitle><description>Prioritizing livestock breeds for conservation needs to incorporate both genetic and non-genetic aspects important for the survival of the breeds. Here, we apply a maximum-utility-strategy to prioritize 14 traditional Ethiopian sheep breeds based on their threat status, contributions to farmer livelihoods (current breed merits) and contributions to genetic diversity. Contributions of the breeds to genetic diversity were quantified using Eding's marker-estimated kinship approaches. Non-genetic aspects included threats (e.g. low population size, low preferences by farmers) and current merits (economic, ecological and cultural merits). Threat analysis identified eight of the 14 breeds as threatened. Analysis of current merits showed that sub-alpine and arid-lowland breeds contribute most to farmer livelihoods in comparison to other breeds. The highest contribution to the genetic diversity conserved was from the Simien breed. Simien showed high between-breed (low between-breed kinship = 0.04) as well as high within-breed diversity (low within-breed kinship = 0.09 and high H(E) = 0.73 and allelic richness = 6.83). We combined the results on threat status, current breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity to produce a ranking of the 14 breeds for conservation purposes. Our results balance the trade-offs between conserving breeds as insurance against future uncertainties and current sustainable utilization. The ranking of breeds provides a basis for conservation strategies for Ethiopian sheep and contributes to a regional or global conservation plan.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Crosses, Genetic</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ethiopia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Sheep, Domestic - genetics</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>0999-193X</issn><issn>1297-9686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkbFrGzEUh0VJqZ20U_egKUtziaQ7SaduwSRpINAlhW6HTvdkq_gkR08X8JR_vWds6NjpDe_jG34fIV85u-FM8ts1wnfBWMu4-ECWXBhdGdWqM7JkxpiKm_r3gpwj_mGMqUY1n8iCt1K2TMsleV-liJDfbAkp0l0OKYcSAKlPmd6XTUi7YCPFDcCO9hlgQOrS2IcY4pqWTQZbKBZbJrw-_ukIswKpjcNMxpJDPx3kSEuia4hQgqNDeIOMoew_k4_ebhG-nO4F-fVw_7L6UT3_fHxa3T1XrpayVNJzx5QYGuadakzfO2ONcLrWlut28N4b7oamN63tB-98Y6SuhTHWN1xrpesLcnX07nJ6nQBLNwZ0sN3aCGnCThkhuGLivyA3TSu5rmfw2xF0OSFm8N283mjzvuOsO4Tp5jDdKcxMX560Uz_C8I89laj_AqxAjMM</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Gizaw, Solomon</creator><creator>Komen, Hans</creator><creator>Windig, Jack J</creator><creator>Hanotte, Olivier</creator><creator>van Arendonk, Johan A M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Conservation priorities for Ethiopian sheep breeds combining threat status, breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity</title><author>Gizaw, Solomon ; Komen, Hans ; Windig, Jack J ; Hanotte, Olivier ; van Arendonk, Johan A M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-5f1c062d40fc649bbc9a92c737a178dfff91cd4b98abdfcf49573299af4177673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Crosses, Genetic</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ethiopia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Sheep, Domestic - genetics</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gizaw, Solomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komen, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windig, Jack J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanotte, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Arendonk, Johan A M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Genetics selection evolution (Paris)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gizaw, Solomon</au><au>Komen, Hans</au><au>Windig, Jack J</au><au>Hanotte, Olivier</au><au>van Arendonk, Johan A M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation priorities for Ethiopian sheep breeds combining threat status, breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity</atitle><jtitle>Genetics selection evolution (Paris)</jtitle><addtitle>Genet Sel Evol</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>433</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>433-447</pages><issn>0999-193X</issn><eissn>1297-9686</eissn><abstract>Prioritizing livestock breeds for conservation needs to incorporate both genetic and non-genetic aspects important for the survival of the breeds. Here, we apply a maximum-utility-strategy to prioritize 14 traditional Ethiopian sheep breeds based on their threat status, contributions to farmer livelihoods (current breed merits) and contributions to genetic diversity. Contributions of the breeds to genetic diversity were quantified using Eding's marker-estimated kinship approaches. Non-genetic aspects included threats (e.g. low population size, low preferences by farmers) and current merits (economic, ecological and cultural merits). Threat analysis identified eight of the 14 breeds as threatened. Analysis of current merits showed that sub-alpine and arid-lowland breeds contribute most to farmer livelihoods in comparison to other breeds. The highest contribution to the genetic diversity conserved was from the Simien breed. Simien showed high between-breed (low between-breed kinship = 0.04) as well as high within-breed diversity (low within-breed kinship = 0.09 and high H(E) = 0.73 and allelic richness = 6.83). We combined the results on threat status, current breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity to produce a ranking of the 14 breeds for conservation purposes. Our results balance the trade-offs between conserving breeds as insurance against future uncertainties and current sustainable utilization. The ranking of breeds provides a basis for conservation strategies for Ethiopian sheep and contributes to a regional or global conservation plan.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>18558075</pmid><doi>10.1051/gse:2008012</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0999-193X |
ispartof | Genetics selection evolution (Paris), 2008-07, Vol.40 (4), p.433-447 |
issn | 0999-193X 1297-9686 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69221602 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animals Breeding Conservation of Natural Resources Crosses, Genetic Culture Ecology Ethiopia Female Genetic Variation Genetics, Population Male Models, Genetic Population Density Sheep, Domestic - genetics Socioeconomic Factors Species Specificity |
title | Conservation priorities for Ethiopian sheep breeds combining threat status, breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A05%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20priorities%20for%20Ethiopian%20sheep%20breeds%20combining%20threat%20status,%20breed%20merits%20and%20contributions%20to%20genetic%20diversity&rft.jtitle=Genetics%20selection%20evolution%20(Paris)&rft.au=Gizaw,%20Solomon&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=433&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=433-447&rft.issn=0999-193X&rft.eissn=1297-9686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/gse:2008012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69221602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19485173&rft_id=info:pmid/18558075&rfr_iscdi=true |