A Comparison of Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Training With Guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Study objectives: To compare the current state of emergency medicine residency ultrasound training with guidelines for that training from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM). Methods: A brief questionnaire was sent to program directors from 119 emergency medicine residency programs in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of emergency medicine 1999-11, Vol.34 (5), p.604-609 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 609 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 604 |
| container_title | Annals of emergency medicine |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Witting, Michael D Euerle, Brian D Butler, Kenneth H |
| description | Study objectives: To compare the current state of emergency medicine residency ultrasound training with guidelines for that training from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM).
Methods: A brief questionnaire was sent to program directors from 119 emergency medicine residency programs in the United States. Responses were compared with the SAEM guidelines for clinical experience (150 total ultrasounds) and didactic experience (40 hours of didactic instruction).
Results: The overall response rate was 92%. Seventy-six (69%) of the programs own an ultrasound machine (ownership defined as 24-hour availability and complete discretion over use). Of these, 12 (16%) indicated that their average 1998 graduate had done at least 150 total ultrasound scans during residency, although none of the programs had average numbers that exceeded the minimum guidelines for all 4 procedure categories. Information on didactic curriculum was available from 74 ultrasound-owning programs: the duration was 0 to 20 hours in 49 (66%), 20 to 40 hours in 19 (26%), and 40 to 100 hours in 6 (8%). Only 1 program’s average graduate met or exceeded the SAEM guidelines for both didactic and clinical training.
Conclusion: Most emergency medicine residency programs own at least 1 ultrasound machine, with more than half of these obtaining their first machine within the past 3 years. Only 1 program currently meets SAEM training guidelines. [Witting MD, Euerle BD, Butler KH: A comparison of emergency medicine ultrasound training with guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Ann Emerg Med November 1999;34:604-609.] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70162-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69216106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064499701629</els_id><sourcerecordid>69216106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf18e68526feba4e59992a28642d0b1af5733d55351acb80ef8d5576c57b22813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi0EotvCI4B8QAgOgbETO_GpWq3aglTEoa04Wo4zbo0Se7ETpH17vN0VcEDiNJrR98-MPkJeMfjAgMmPN8CUrEA2zTul3rdlxCv1hKwYqLaSrYSnZPUbOSGnOX8HANVw9pycMBB1DdCuyLKmmzhtTfI5BhodvZgw3WOwO_oFB299QHo3zsnkuISB3ibjgw_39JufH-jV4gccC5L3yfkB6U20HucddTHRtTUDTt7-Y-UL8syZMePLYz0jd5cXt5tP1fXXq8-b9XVlawVz1TvWoewElw5706BQSnHDO9nwAXpmnGjrehCiFszYvgN0XelaaUXbc96x-oy8PezdpvhjwTzryWeL42gCxiVrqTiTDGQBxQG0Keac0Olt8pNJO81A733rR996L1MrpR99a1Vyr48Hln7C4a_UQXAB3hwBk60ZXTLB-vyHU6qTYn___IBhsfHTY9K5iAy2-EpoZz1E_59PfgH83py2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69216106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Training With Guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Witting, Michael D ; Euerle, Brian D ; Butler, Kenneth H</creator><creatorcontrib>Witting, Michael D ; Euerle, Brian D ; Butler, Kenneth H</creatorcontrib><description>Study objectives: To compare the current state of emergency medicine residency ultrasound training with guidelines for that training from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM).
Methods: A brief questionnaire was sent to program directors from 119 emergency medicine residency programs in the United States. Responses were compared with the SAEM guidelines for clinical experience (150 total ultrasounds) and didactic experience (40 hours of didactic instruction).
Results: The overall response rate was 92%. Seventy-six (69%) of the programs own an ultrasound machine (ownership defined as 24-hour availability and complete discretion over use). Of these, 12 (16%) indicated that their average 1998 graduate had done at least 150 total ultrasound scans during residency, although none of the programs had average numbers that exceeded the minimum guidelines for all 4 procedure categories. Information on didactic curriculum was available from 74 ultrasound-owning programs: the duration was 0 to 20 hours in 49 (66%), 20 to 40 hours in 19 (26%), and 40 to 100 hours in 6 (8%). Only 1 program’s average graduate met or exceeded the SAEM guidelines for both didactic and clinical training.
Conclusion: Most emergency medicine residency programs own at least 1 ultrasound machine, with more than half of these obtaining their first machine within the past 3 years. Only 1 program currently meets SAEM training guidelines. [Witting MD, Euerle BD, Butler KH: A comparison of emergency medicine ultrasound training with guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Ann Emerg Med November 1999;34:604-609.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70162-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10533007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEMED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Competence ; Curriculum ; Data Collection ; Emergency Medicine - education ; Emergency Medicine - standards ; Guidelines as Topic ; Internship and Residency - standards ; Medical sciences ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Societies, Medical ; Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation ; Ultrasonography ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 1999-11, Vol.34 (5), p.604-609</ispartof><rights>1999 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf18e68526feba4e59992a28642d0b1af5733d55351acb80ef8d5576c57b22813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf18e68526feba4e59992a28642d0b1af5733d55351acb80ef8d5576c57b22813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70162-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1998656$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10533007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Witting, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Euerle, Brian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Kenneth H</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Training With Guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Study objectives: To compare the current state of emergency medicine residency ultrasound training with guidelines for that training from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM).
Methods: A brief questionnaire was sent to program directors from 119 emergency medicine residency programs in the United States. Responses were compared with the SAEM guidelines for clinical experience (150 total ultrasounds) and didactic experience (40 hours of didactic instruction).
Results: The overall response rate was 92%. Seventy-six (69%) of the programs own an ultrasound machine (ownership defined as 24-hour availability and complete discretion over use). Of these, 12 (16%) indicated that their average 1998 graduate had done at least 150 total ultrasound scans during residency, although none of the programs had average numbers that exceeded the minimum guidelines for all 4 procedure categories. Information on didactic curriculum was available from 74 ultrasound-owning programs: the duration was 0 to 20 hours in 49 (66%), 20 to 40 hours in 19 (26%), and 40 to 100 hours in 6 (8%). Only 1 program’s average graduate met or exceeded the SAEM guidelines for both didactic and clinical training.
Conclusion: Most emergency medicine residency programs own at least 1 ultrasound machine, with more than half of these obtaining their first machine within the past 3 years. Only 1 program currently meets SAEM training guidelines. [Witting MD, Euerle BD, Butler KH: A comparison of emergency medicine ultrasound training with guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Ann Emerg Med November 1999;34:604-609.]</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - education</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi0EotvCI4B8QAgOgbETO_GpWq3aglTEoa04Wo4zbo0Se7ETpH17vN0VcEDiNJrR98-MPkJeMfjAgMmPN8CUrEA2zTul3rdlxCv1hKwYqLaSrYSnZPUbOSGnOX8HANVw9pycMBB1DdCuyLKmmzhtTfI5BhodvZgw3WOwO_oFB299QHo3zsnkuISB3ibjgw_39JufH-jV4gccC5L3yfkB6U20HucddTHRtTUDTt7-Y-UL8syZMePLYz0jd5cXt5tP1fXXq8-b9XVlawVz1TvWoewElw5706BQSnHDO9nwAXpmnGjrehCiFszYvgN0XelaaUXbc96x-oy8PezdpvhjwTzryWeL42gCxiVrqTiTDGQBxQG0Keac0Olt8pNJO81A733rR996L1MrpR99a1Vyr48Hln7C4a_UQXAB3hwBk60ZXTLB-vyHU6qTYn___IBhsfHTY9K5iAy2-EpoZz1E_59PfgH83py2</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>Witting, Michael D</creator><creator>Euerle, Brian D</creator><creator>Butler, Kenneth H</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Training With Guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</title><author>Witting, Michael D ; Euerle, Brian D ; Butler, Kenneth H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-bf18e68526feba4e59992a28642d0b1af5733d55351acb80ef8d5576c57b22813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - education</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Witting, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Euerle, Brian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Kenneth H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Witting, Michael D</au><au>Euerle, Brian D</au><au>Butler, Kenneth H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Training With Guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>604-609</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><coden>AEMED3</coden><abstract>Study objectives: To compare the current state of emergency medicine residency ultrasound training with guidelines for that training from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM).
Methods: A brief questionnaire was sent to program directors from 119 emergency medicine residency programs in the United States. Responses were compared with the SAEM guidelines for clinical experience (150 total ultrasounds) and didactic experience (40 hours of didactic instruction).
Results: The overall response rate was 92%. Seventy-six (69%) of the programs own an ultrasound machine (ownership defined as 24-hour availability and complete discretion over use). Of these, 12 (16%) indicated that their average 1998 graduate had done at least 150 total ultrasound scans during residency, although none of the programs had average numbers that exceeded the minimum guidelines for all 4 procedure categories. Information on didactic curriculum was available from 74 ultrasound-owning programs: the duration was 0 to 20 hours in 49 (66%), 20 to 40 hours in 19 (26%), and 40 to 100 hours in 6 (8%). Only 1 program’s average graduate met or exceeded the SAEM guidelines for both didactic and clinical training.
Conclusion: Most emergency medicine residency programs own at least 1 ultrasound machine, with more than half of these obtaining their first machine within the past 3 years. Only 1 program currently meets SAEM training guidelines. [Witting MD, Euerle BD, Butler KH: A comparison of emergency medicine ultrasound training with guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Ann Emerg Med November 1999;34:604-609.]</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>10533007</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70162-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0196-0644 |
| ispartof | Annals of emergency medicine, 1999-11, Vol.34 (5), p.604-609 |
| issn | 0196-0644 1097-6760 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69216106 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Clinical Competence Curriculum Data Collection Emergency Medicine - education Emergency Medicine - standards Guidelines as Topic Internship and Residency - standards Medical sciences Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Societies, Medical Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation Ultrasonography United States |
| title | A Comparison of Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Training With Guidelines of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A11%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Emergency%20Medicine%20Ultrasound%20Training%20With%20Guidelines%20of%20the%20Society%20for%20Academic%20Emergency%20Medicine&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Witting,%20Michael%20D&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=604-609&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft.coden=AEMED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70162-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69216106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69216106&rft_id=info:pmid/10533007&rft_els_id=S0196064499701629&rfr_iscdi=true |