Can Practice Eliminate the Psychological Refractory Period Effect?
Can people learn to perform two tasks at the same time without interference? To answer this question, the authors trained 6 participants for 36 sessions in a Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) experiment, where Task 1 required a speeded vocal response to an auditory stimulus and Task 2 required a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 1999-10, Vol.25 (5), p.1268-1283 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1283 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1268 |
| container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Selst, Mark Van Ruthruff, Eric Johnston, James C |
| description | Can people learn to perform two tasks at the same time
without interference? To answer this question, the authors trained 6
participants for 36 sessions in a Psychological Refractory Period
(PRP) experiment, where Task 1 required a speeded vocal response to
an auditory stimulus and Task 2 required a speeded manual response
to a visual stimulus. The large PRP effect found initially (353 ms
in Session 1) shrank to only about 40 ms over the course of
practice, disappearing entirely for 1 of the 6 participants. This
reduction in the PRP effect with practice is considerably larger
than has been previously reported. The obtained pattern of factor
interactions between stimulus onset asynchrony and each of three
task difficulty manipulations (Task 1 judgment difficulty, Task 2
stimulus contrast, and Task 2 mapping compatibility) supports a
postponement (bottleneck) account of dual-task interference, both
before and after practice. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1268 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69209678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69209678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a435t-13669c5d77a04cc32abde5284e426ad78aec5e4e938249a2654796e284f6afe33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r20AQhpfS0Dhpf0FDECXJTe5-r_YUGuN8QCCmtOdlshrVCrKk7MoQ__uskGlDDp3LHOaZ4Z33JeQro3NGhflOqdU5U1zMuZqrOeO6-EBmzAqbM27MRzL7SxySoxifaCpWqE_kkFElmNZiRq4W0GarAH6oPWbLpt7ULQyYDWvMVnHn113T_ak9NNlPrEasC7tshaHuymxZVeiHy8_koIIm4pd9Pya_r5e_Frf5_cPN3eLHfQ5SqCFnQmvrVWkMUOm94PBYouKFRMk1lKYA9AolWlFwaYFrJY3VmIBKQ4VCHJOL6W4fuuctxsFt6uixaaDFbhudtjz9a4oEfnsHPnXb0CZtTjMpCsXT-_-BOJPSSlWMkJggH7oYA1auD_UGws4x6sYQ3GixGy12XDnlxhDS1un-9PZxg-Wbncn1BJztAYjJ2uRr6-v4j7PKam4SdjJhLURw7RCSNEolZZIZy9L4fBpDD65PWUFIITYY3cu6fyPnFfMYoSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614385205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Practice Eliminate the Psychological Refractory Period Effect?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Selst, Mark Van ; Ruthruff, Eric ; Johnston, James C</creator><creatorcontrib>Selst, Mark Van ; Ruthruff, Eric ; Johnston, James C</creatorcontrib><description>Can people learn to perform two tasks at the same time
without interference? To answer this question, the authors trained 6
participants for 36 sessions in a Psychological Refractory Period
(PRP) experiment, where Task 1 required a speeded vocal response to
an auditory stimulus and Task 2 required a speeded manual response
to a visual stimulus. The large PRP effect found initially (353 ms
in Session 1) shrank to only about 40 ms over the course of
practice, disappearing entirely for 1 of the 6 participants. This
reduction in the PRP effect with practice is considerably larger
than has been previously reported. The obtained pattern of factor
interactions between stimulus onset asynchrony and each of three
task difficulty manipulations (Task 1 judgment difficulty, Task 2
stimulus contrast, and Task 2 mapping compatibility) supports a
postponement (bottleneck) account of dual-task interference, both
before and after practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1268</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10531663</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Legacy CDMS: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Interference (Learning) ; Learning ; Learning. Memory ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Pitch Perception - physiology ; Practice ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Refractory Period, Psychological - physiology ; Response Parameters ; Space life sciences ; Speech - physiology ; Stimulus Onset ; Task Complexity</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 1999-10, Vol.25 (5), p.1268-1283</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 1999</rights><rights>Public Domain</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a435t-13669c5d77a04cc32abde5284e426ad78aec5e4e938249a2654796e284f6afe33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1959627$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10531663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Selst, Mark Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruthruff, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, James C</creatorcontrib><title>Can Practice Eliminate the Psychological Refractory Period Effect?</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>Can people learn to perform two tasks at the same time
without interference? To answer this question, the authors trained 6
participants for 36 sessions in a Psychological Refractory Period
(PRP) experiment, where Task 1 required a speeded vocal response to
an auditory stimulus and Task 2 required a speeded manual response
to a visual stimulus. The large PRP effect found initially (353 ms
in Session 1) shrank to only about 40 ms over the course of
practice, disappearing entirely for 1 of the 6 participants. This
reduction in the PRP effect with practice is considerably larger
than has been previously reported. The obtained pattern of factor
interactions between stimulus onset asynchrony and each of three
task difficulty manipulations (Task 1 judgment difficulty, Task 2
stimulus contrast, and Task 2 mapping compatibility) supports a
postponement (bottleneck) account of dual-task interference, both
before and after practice.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interference (Learning)</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Pitch Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Refractory Period, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Response Parameters</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Speech - physiology</subject><subject>Stimulus Onset</subject><subject>Task Complexity</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r20AQhpfS0Dhpf0FDECXJTe5-r_YUGuN8QCCmtOdlshrVCrKk7MoQ__uskGlDDp3LHOaZ4Z33JeQro3NGhflOqdU5U1zMuZqrOeO6-EBmzAqbM27MRzL7SxySoxifaCpWqE_kkFElmNZiRq4W0GarAH6oPWbLpt7ULQyYDWvMVnHn113T_ak9NNlPrEasC7tshaHuymxZVeiHy8_koIIm4pd9Pya_r5e_Frf5_cPN3eLHfQ5SqCFnQmvrVWkMUOm94PBYouKFRMk1lKYA9AolWlFwaYFrJY3VmIBKQ4VCHJOL6W4fuuctxsFt6uixaaDFbhudtjz9a4oEfnsHPnXb0CZtTjMpCsXT-_-BOJPSSlWMkJggH7oYA1auD_UGws4x6sYQ3GixGy12XDnlxhDS1un-9PZxg-Wbncn1BJztAYjJ2uRr6-v4j7PKam4SdjJhLURw7RCSNEolZZIZy9L4fBpDD65PWUFIITYY3cu6fyPnFfMYoSE</recordid><startdate>19991001</startdate><enddate>19991001</enddate><creator>Selst, Mark Van</creator><creator>Ruthruff, Eric</creator><creator>Johnston, James C</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991001</creationdate><title>Can Practice Eliminate the Psychological Refractory Period Effect?</title><author>Selst, Mark Van ; Ruthruff, Eric ; Johnston, James C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a435t-13669c5d77a04cc32abde5284e426ad78aec5e4e938249a2654796e284f6afe33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interference (Learning)</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Pitch Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Refractory Period, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Response Parameters</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Speech - physiology</topic><topic>Stimulus Onset</topic><topic>Task Complexity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Selst, Mark Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruthruff, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, James C</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Selst, Mark Van</au><au>Ruthruff, Eric</au><au>Johnston, James C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Practice Eliminate the Psychological Refractory Period Effect?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>1999-10-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1268</spage><epage>1283</epage><pages>1268-1283</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>Can people learn to perform two tasks at the same time
without interference? To answer this question, the authors trained 6
participants for 36 sessions in a Psychological Refractory Period
(PRP) experiment, where Task 1 required a speeded vocal response to
an auditory stimulus and Task 2 required a speeded manual response
to a visual stimulus. The large PRP effect found initially (353 ms
in Session 1) shrank to only about 40 ms over the course of
practice, disappearing entirely for 1 of the 6 participants. This
reduction in the PRP effect with practice is considerably larger
than has been previously reported. The obtained pattern of factor
interactions between stimulus onset asynchrony and each of three
task difficulty manipulations (Task 1 judgment difficulty, Task 2
stimulus contrast, and Task 2 mapping compatibility) supports a
postponement (bottleneck) account of dual-task interference, both
before and after practice.</abstract><cop>Legacy CDMS</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>10531663</pmid><doi>10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1268</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
| ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 1999-10, Vol.25 (5), p.1268-1283 |
| issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69209678 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; NASA Technical Reports Server; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Behavior Behavioral Sciences Biological and medical sciences Experiments Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Interference (Learning) Learning Learning. Memory Photic Stimulation - methods Pitch Perception - physiology Practice Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Refractory Period, Psychological - physiology Response Parameters Space life sciences Speech - physiology Stimulus Onset Task Complexity |
| title | Can Practice Eliminate the Psychological Refractory Period Effect? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A44%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Practice%20Eliminate%20the%20Psychological%20Refractory%20Period%20Effect?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Selst,%20Mark%20Van&rft.date=1999-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1268&rft.epage=1283&rft.pages=1268-1283&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1268&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69209678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614385205&rft_id=info:pmid/10531663&rfr_iscdi=true |