How identical would cloned children be? An understanding essential to the ethical debate
The ban on human cloning in many countries worldwide is founded on an assumption that cloned children will be identical to each other and to their nuclear donor. This paper explores the scientific basis for this assumption, considering both the principles and practice of cloning in animals and compa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction update 1998-11, Vol.4 (6), p.791-811 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 811 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 791 |
| container_title | Human reproduction update |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Edwards, RG Beard, HK |
| description | The ban on human cloning in many countries worldwide is founded on an assumption that cloned children will be identical to each other and to their nuclear donor. This paper explores the scientific basis for this assumption, considering both the principles and practice of cloning in animals and comparing genetic and epigenetic variation in potential human clones with that in monozygotic twins. Keywords:cloning/epigenesis/ethics/human/monozygotic twins |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/humupd/4.6.791 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69194939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69194939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-da302550e6651edabe34caf3080193eae57b5e10bebf01211b377d3b22c93eda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFLwzAYxYMobk6vHiUnb92Spk2Wk8zhNmUiiMLYJSTNN1ft2tmkTP97MzvE0_vg_d7j4yF0SUmfEskG62bTbO0g6fO-kPQIdWnCSRQzLo_DzdI0SsSQd9CZc--EUE6H4hR1KCFymAjaRYtZtcO5hdLnmS7wrmoKi7OiKiHIOi9sDSU2cINHJW5KC7XzurR5-YbBuX0qhHyF_Row-PVvhwWjPZyjk5UuHFwctIdeJ3cv41k0f5rej0fzKAs_-shqRuI0JcB5SsFqAyzJ9IqRIaGSgYZUmBQoMWBWhMaUGiaEZSaOs2CHdA9dt73buvpswHm1yV0GRaFLqBqnuKQykUwGsN-CWV05V8NKbet8o-tvRYnab6naLVWiuApbhsDVobkxG7D_8Ha8AEQtkDsPX3--rj8UF0ykarZYqsnj88P0dikVYz8G0YE_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69194939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How identical would cloned children be? An understanding essential to the ethical debate</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Edwards, RG ; Beard, HK</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, RG ; Beard, HK</creatorcontrib><description>The ban on human cloning in many countries worldwide is founded on an assumption that cloned children will be identical to each other and to their nuclear donor. This paper explores the scientific basis for this assumption, considering both the principles and practice of cloning in animals and comparing genetic and epigenetic variation in potential human clones with that in monozygotic twins. Keywords:cloning/epigenesis/ethics/human/monozygotic twins</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-4786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humupd/4.6.791</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10098471</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bioethics ; Cell Cycle ; Cloning, Organism ; Cytogenetics ; Embryonic and Fetal Development ; Humans ; Nuclear Transfer Techniques ; Oocytes - physiology ; Twins, Monozygotic</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction update, 1998-11, Vol.4 (6), p.791-811</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-da302550e6651edabe34caf3080193eae57b5e10bebf01211b377d3b22c93eda3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10098471$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, RG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, HK</creatorcontrib><title>How identical would cloned children be? An understanding essential to the ethical debate</title><title>Human reproduction update</title><addtitle>Hum. Reprod. Update</addtitle><description>The ban on human cloning in many countries worldwide is founded on an assumption that cloned children will be identical to each other and to their nuclear donor. This paper explores the scientific basis for this assumption, considering both the principles and practice of cloning in animals and comparing genetic and epigenetic variation in potential human clones with that in monozygotic twins. Keywords:cloning/epigenesis/ethics/human/monozygotic twins</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Cell Cycle</subject><subject>Cloning, Organism</subject><subject>Cytogenetics</subject><subject>Embryonic and Fetal Development</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nuclear Transfer Techniques</subject><subject>Oocytes - physiology</subject><subject>Twins, Monozygotic</subject><issn>1355-4786</issn><issn>1460-2369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFLwzAYxYMobk6vHiUnb92Spk2Wk8zhNmUiiMLYJSTNN1ft2tmkTP97MzvE0_vg_d7j4yF0SUmfEskG62bTbO0g6fO-kPQIdWnCSRQzLo_DzdI0SsSQd9CZc--EUE6H4hR1KCFymAjaRYtZtcO5hdLnmS7wrmoKi7OiKiHIOi9sDSU2cINHJW5KC7XzurR5-YbBuX0qhHyF_Row-PVvhwWjPZyjk5UuHFwctIdeJ3cv41k0f5rej0fzKAs_-shqRuI0JcB5SsFqAyzJ9IqRIaGSgYZUmBQoMWBWhMaUGiaEZSaOs2CHdA9dt73buvpswHm1yV0GRaFLqBqnuKQykUwGsN-CWV05V8NKbet8o-tvRYnab6naLVWiuApbhsDVobkxG7D_8Ha8AEQtkDsPX3--rj8UF0ykarZYqsnj88P0dikVYz8G0YE_</recordid><startdate>199811</startdate><enddate>199811</enddate><creator>Edwards, RG</creator><creator>Beard, HK</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199811</creationdate><title>How identical would cloned children be? An understanding essential to the ethical debate</title><author>Edwards, RG ; Beard, HK</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-da302550e6651edabe34caf3080193eae57b5e10bebf01211b377d3b22c93eda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Cell Cycle</topic><topic>Cloning, Organism</topic><topic>Cytogenetics</topic><topic>Embryonic and Fetal Development</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nuclear Transfer Techniques</topic><topic>Oocytes - physiology</topic><topic>Twins, Monozygotic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, RG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, HK</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction update</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, RG</au><au>Beard, HK</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How identical would cloned children be? An understanding essential to the ethical debate</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction update</jtitle><addtitle>Hum. Reprod. Update</addtitle><date>1998-11</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>811</epage><pages>791-811</pages><issn>1355-4786</issn><eissn>1460-2369</eissn><abstract>The ban on human cloning in many countries worldwide is founded on an assumption that cloned children will be identical to each other and to their nuclear donor. This paper explores the scientific basis for this assumption, considering both the principles and practice of cloning in animals and comparing genetic and epigenetic variation in potential human clones with that in monozygotic twins. Keywords:cloning/epigenesis/ethics/human/monozygotic twins</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>10098471</pmid><doi>10.1093/humupd/4.6.791</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1355-4786 |
| ispartof | Human reproduction update, 1998-11, Vol.4 (6), p.791-811 |
| issn | 1355-4786 1460-2369 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69194939 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Animals Bioethics Cell Cycle Cloning, Organism Cytogenetics Embryonic and Fetal Development Humans Nuclear Transfer Techniques Oocytes - physiology Twins, Monozygotic |
| title | How identical would cloned children be? An understanding essential to the ethical debate |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A57%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20identical%20would%20cloned%20children%20be?%20An%20understanding%20essential%20to%20the%20ethical%20debate&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20update&rft.au=Edwards,%20RG&rft.date=1998-11&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=811&rft.pages=791-811&rft.issn=1355-4786&rft.eissn=1460-2369&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humupd/4.6.791&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69194939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69194939&rft_id=info:pmid/10098471&rfr_iscdi=true |