Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity
Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent del...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry 2008-05, Vol.32 (4), p.1057-1063 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1063 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1057 |
container_title | Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Horsley, R.R. Cassaday, H.J. |
description | Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent delivery of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is an alternative method by which the associability of CSs can be influenced. The present experiment tested effects of
d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg administered 15 min prior to conditioning) in appetitive acquisition under partial versus continuous reinforcement of alternative CSs with sucrose pellet UCS delivery. Specifically, male Wistar rats were conditioned to light and tone CSs that were followed by the UCS on 100% or 50% of trials in a cross-over design. It was predicted that amphetamine would disrupt rats' ability to select appropriately the most valid CSs for learning which would be expressed as increased conditioning to weaker, 50% valid CSs. Contrary to prediction, differential responding based on relative validity was preserved under amphetamine, for both light and tone stimuli. Instead, the results showed that responding to light CSs was generally reduced under amphetamine. Conditioning to tone CSs was higher and unaffected by amphetamine. Thus, results demonstrate that amphetamine effects are determined by the properties of the CS used for learning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69175575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278584608000535</els_id><sourcerecordid>19512822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e61feb667221b63439dd1dd634adfdc16abb75c003bd755f2929d5e2e7be0433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rHSEUxaU0JC8v-QSF4qbdvelVR2dm0UUIbVoIdJO9OHolPuZf1HmQb1_z3qPdtRs9V37ncPEQ8oFBxYCpL_tqmZZ-qThAWwGvAOQ7smFt0-5qztR7sgFetGxrdUWuU9oDABMgLskVa2tQEuSGHO7G5RmzGcOEFL1HmxMNEzXLgjnkcEBq7MsaUtHzRB0uODlaVH5GOs7ODCG_0tkf55TDuA5rotGUMZY3M9FQAiMO5ph1KLwrjhty4c2Q8PZ8b8nT929P9z92j78eft7fPe5szdq8Q8U89ko1nLNeiVp0zjHnijLOO8uU6ftGWgDRu0ZKzzveOYkcmx6hFmJLPp9ilzi_rJiyHkOyOAxmwnlNWnWs2Br5X5B1kvGW8wKKE2jjnFJEr5cYRhNfNQP9Vove62Mt-q0WDVyXWorr4zl-7Ud0fz3nHgrw6QyYZM3go5lsSH84DkLWUM4t-XrisHzaIWDUyQacLLoQS3XazeGfi_wGFqWuug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19512822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Horsley, R.R. ; Cassaday, H.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Horsley, R.R. ; Cassaday, H.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent delivery of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is an alternative method by which the associability of CSs can be influenced. The present experiment tested effects of
d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg administered 15 min prior to conditioning) in appetitive acquisition under partial versus continuous reinforcement of alternative CSs with sucrose pellet UCS delivery. Specifically, male Wistar rats were conditioned to light and tone CSs that were followed by the UCS on 100% or 50% of trials in a cross-over design. It was predicted that amphetamine would disrupt rats' ability to select appropriately the most valid CSs for learning which would be expressed as increased conditioning to weaker, 50% valid CSs. Contrary to prediction, differential responding based on relative validity was preserved under amphetamine, for both light and tone stimuli. Instead, the results showed that responding to light CSs was generally reduced under amphetamine. Conditioning to tone CSs was higher and unaffected by amphetamine. Thus, results demonstrate that amphetamine effects are determined by the properties of the CS used for learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-5846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18406505</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PNPPD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Amphetamine ; Amphetamine - pharmacology ; Animals ; Appetite - drug effects ; Appetitive conditioning ; Avoidance Learning - drug effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology ; Conditioning, Classical - drug effects ; Dopamine ; Dopamine - metabolism ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Food ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neostriatum - drug effects ; Neostriatum - metabolism ; Neuropharmacology ; Nucleus Accumbens - drug effects ; Nucleus Accumbens - metabolism ; Partial reinforcement ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer ; Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease) ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopharmacology ; Rat ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2008-05, Vol.32 (4), p.1057-1063</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e61feb667221b63439dd1dd634adfdc16abb75c003bd755f2929d5e2e7be0433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e61feb667221b63439dd1dd634adfdc16abb75c003bd755f2929d5e2e7be0433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20354020$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18406505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horsley, R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassaday, H.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity</title><title>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry</title><addtitle>Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent delivery of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is an alternative method by which the associability of CSs can be influenced. The present experiment tested effects of
d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg administered 15 min prior to conditioning) in appetitive acquisition under partial versus continuous reinforcement of alternative CSs with sucrose pellet UCS delivery. Specifically, male Wistar rats were conditioned to light and tone CSs that were followed by the UCS on 100% or 50% of trials in a cross-over design. It was predicted that amphetamine would disrupt rats' ability to select appropriately the most valid CSs for learning which would be expressed as increased conditioning to weaker, 50% valid CSs. Contrary to prediction, differential responding based on relative validity was preserved under amphetamine, for both light and tone stimuli. Instead, the results showed that responding to light CSs was generally reduced under amphetamine. Conditioning to tone CSs was higher and unaffected by amphetamine. Thus, results demonstrate that amphetamine effects are determined by the properties of the CS used for learning.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Amphetamine</subject><subject>Amphetamine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetite - drug effects</subject><subject>Appetitive conditioning</subject><subject>Avoidance Learning - drug effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical - drug effects</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Dopamine - metabolism</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neostriatum - drug effects</subject><subject>Neostriatum - metabolism</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Nucleus Accumbens - drug effects</subject><subject>Nucleus Accumbens - metabolism</subject><subject>Partial reinforcement</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer</subject><subject>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopharmacology</subject><subject>Rat</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><issn>0278-5846</issn><issn>1878-4216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rHSEUxaU0JC8v-QSF4qbdvelVR2dm0UUIbVoIdJO9OHolPuZf1HmQb1_z3qPdtRs9V37ncPEQ8oFBxYCpL_tqmZZ-qThAWwGvAOQ7smFt0-5qztR7sgFetGxrdUWuU9oDABMgLskVa2tQEuSGHO7G5RmzGcOEFL1HmxMNEzXLgjnkcEBq7MsaUtHzRB0uODlaVH5GOs7ODCG_0tkf55TDuA5rotGUMZY3M9FQAiMO5ph1KLwrjhty4c2Q8PZ8b8nT929P9z92j78eft7fPe5szdq8Q8U89ko1nLNeiVp0zjHnijLOO8uU6ftGWgDRu0ZKzzveOYkcmx6hFmJLPp9ilzi_rJiyHkOyOAxmwnlNWnWs2Br5X5B1kvGW8wKKE2jjnFJEr5cYRhNfNQP9Vove62Mt-q0WDVyXWorr4zl-7Ud0fz3nHgrw6QyYZM3go5lsSH84DkLWUM4t-XrisHzaIWDUyQacLLoQS3XazeGfi_wGFqWuug</recordid><startdate>20080515</startdate><enddate>20080515</enddate><creator>Horsley, R.R.</creator><creator>Cassaday, H.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080515</creationdate><title>Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity</title><author>Horsley, R.R. ; Cassaday, H.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e61feb667221b63439dd1dd634adfdc16abb75c003bd755f2929d5e2e7be0433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Amphetamine</topic><topic>Amphetamine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetite - drug effects</topic><topic>Appetitive conditioning</topic><topic>Avoidance Learning - drug effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical - drug effects</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Dopamine - metabolism</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neostriatum - drug effects</topic><topic>Neostriatum - metabolism</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Nucleus Accumbens - drug effects</topic><topic>Nucleus Accumbens - metabolism</topic><topic>Partial reinforcement</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer</topic><topic>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopharmacology</topic><topic>Rat</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horsley, R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassaday, H.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horsley, R.R.</au><au>Cassaday, H.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity</atitle><jtitle>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2008-05-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1057</spage><epage>1063</epage><pages>1057-1063</pages><issn>0278-5846</issn><eissn>1878-4216</eissn><coden>PNPPD7</coden><abstract>Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent delivery of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is an alternative method by which the associability of CSs can be influenced. The present experiment tested effects of
d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg administered 15 min prior to conditioning) in appetitive acquisition under partial versus continuous reinforcement of alternative CSs with sucrose pellet UCS delivery. Specifically, male Wistar rats were conditioned to light and tone CSs that were followed by the UCS on 100% or 50% of trials in a cross-over design. It was predicted that amphetamine would disrupt rats' ability to select appropriately the most valid CSs for learning which would be expressed as increased conditioning to weaker, 50% valid CSs. Contrary to prediction, differential responding based on relative validity was preserved under amphetamine, for both light and tone stimuli. Instead, the results showed that responding to light CSs was generally reduced under amphetamine. Conditioning to tone CSs was higher and unaffected by amphetamine. Thus, results demonstrate that amphetamine effects are determined by the properties of the CS used for learning.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18406505</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-5846 |
ispartof | Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2008-05, Vol.32 (4), p.1057-1063 |
issn | 0278-5846 1878-4216 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69175575 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Amphetamine Amphetamine - pharmacology Animals Appetite - drug effects Appetitive conditioning Avoidance Learning - drug effects Biological and medical sciences Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology Conditioning, Classical - drug effects Dopamine Dopamine - metabolism Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Food Male Medical sciences Neostriatum - drug effects Neostriatum - metabolism Neuropharmacology Nucleus Accumbens - drug effects Nucleus Accumbens - metabolism Partial reinforcement Pharmacology. Drug treatments Photic Stimulation Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease) Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopharmacology Rat Rats Rats, Wistar Reinforcement (Psychology) |
title | Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A41%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amphetamine%20effects%20in%20appetitive%20acquisition%20depend%20on%20the%20modality%20of%20the%20stimulus%20rather%20than%20its%20relative%20validity&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20neuro-psychopharmacology%20&%20biological%20psychiatry&rft.au=Horsley,%20R.R.&rft.date=2008-05-15&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1057&rft.epage=1063&rft.pages=1057-1063&rft.issn=0278-5846&rft.eissn=1878-4216&rft.coden=PNPPD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19512822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19512822&rft_id=info:pmid/18406505&rft_els_id=S0278584608000535&rfr_iscdi=true |