Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity

Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent del...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry 2008-05, Vol.32 (4), p.1057-1063
Hauptverfasser: Horsley, R.R., Cassaday, H.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1063
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1057
container_title Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry
container_volume 32
creator Horsley, R.R.
Cassaday, H.J.
description Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent delivery of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is an alternative method by which the associability of CSs can be influenced. The present experiment tested effects of d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg administered 15 min prior to conditioning) in appetitive acquisition under partial versus continuous reinforcement of alternative CSs with sucrose pellet UCS delivery. Specifically, male Wistar rats were conditioned to light and tone CSs that were followed by the UCS on 100% or 50% of trials in a cross-over design. It was predicted that amphetamine would disrupt rats' ability to select appropriately the most valid CSs for learning which would be expressed as increased conditioning to weaker, 50% valid CSs. Contrary to prediction, differential responding based on relative validity was preserved under amphetamine, for both light and tone stimuli. Instead, the results showed that responding to light CSs was generally reduced under amphetamine. Conditioning to tone CSs was higher and unaffected by amphetamine. Thus, results demonstrate that amphetamine effects are determined by the properties of the CS used for learning.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69175575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278584608000535</els_id><sourcerecordid>19512822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e61feb667221b63439dd1dd634adfdc16abb75c003bd755f2929d5e2e7be0433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rHSEUxaU0JC8v-QSF4qbdvelVR2dm0UUIbVoIdJO9OHolPuZf1HmQb1_z3qPdtRs9V37ncPEQ8oFBxYCpL_tqmZZ-qThAWwGvAOQ7smFt0-5qztR7sgFetGxrdUWuU9oDABMgLskVa2tQEuSGHO7G5RmzGcOEFL1HmxMNEzXLgjnkcEBq7MsaUtHzRB0uODlaVH5GOs7ODCG_0tkf55TDuA5rotGUMZY3M9FQAiMO5ph1KLwrjhty4c2Q8PZ8b8nT929P9z92j78eft7fPe5szdq8Q8U89ko1nLNeiVp0zjHnijLOO8uU6ftGWgDRu0ZKzzveOYkcmx6hFmJLPp9ilzi_rJiyHkOyOAxmwnlNWnWs2Br5X5B1kvGW8wKKE2jjnFJEr5cYRhNfNQP9Vove62Mt-q0WDVyXWorr4zl-7Ud0fz3nHgrw6QyYZM3go5lsSH84DkLWUM4t-XrisHzaIWDUyQacLLoQS3XazeGfi_wGFqWuug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19512822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Horsley, R.R. ; Cassaday, H.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Horsley, R.R. ; Cassaday, H.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent delivery of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is an alternative method by which the associability of CSs can be influenced. The present experiment tested effects of d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg administered 15 min prior to conditioning) in appetitive acquisition under partial versus continuous reinforcement of alternative CSs with sucrose pellet UCS delivery. Specifically, male Wistar rats were conditioned to light and tone CSs that were followed by the UCS on 100% or 50% of trials in a cross-over design. It was predicted that amphetamine would disrupt rats' ability to select appropriately the most valid CSs for learning which would be expressed as increased conditioning to weaker, 50% valid CSs. Contrary to prediction, differential responding based on relative validity was preserved under amphetamine, for both light and tone stimuli. Instead, the results showed that responding to light CSs was generally reduced under amphetamine. Conditioning to tone CSs was higher and unaffected by amphetamine. Thus, results demonstrate that amphetamine effects are determined by the properties of the CS used for learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-5846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18406505</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PNPPD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Amphetamine ; Amphetamine - pharmacology ; Animals ; Appetite - drug effects ; Appetitive conditioning ; Avoidance Learning - drug effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology ; Conditioning, Classical - drug effects ; Dopamine ; Dopamine - metabolism ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Food ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neostriatum - drug effects ; Neostriatum - metabolism ; Neuropharmacology ; Nucleus Accumbens - drug effects ; Nucleus Accumbens - metabolism ; Partial reinforcement ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer ; Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease) ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopharmacology ; Rat ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology &amp; biological psychiatry, 2008-05, Vol.32 (4), p.1057-1063</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e61feb667221b63439dd1dd634adfdc16abb75c003bd755f2929d5e2e7be0433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e61feb667221b63439dd1dd634adfdc16abb75c003bd755f2929d5e2e7be0433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20354020$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18406505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horsley, R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassaday, H.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity</title><title>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology &amp; biological psychiatry</title><addtitle>Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent delivery of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is an alternative method by which the associability of CSs can be influenced. The present experiment tested effects of d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg administered 15 min prior to conditioning) in appetitive acquisition under partial versus continuous reinforcement of alternative CSs with sucrose pellet UCS delivery. Specifically, male Wistar rats were conditioned to light and tone CSs that were followed by the UCS on 100% or 50% of trials in a cross-over design. It was predicted that amphetamine would disrupt rats' ability to select appropriately the most valid CSs for learning which would be expressed as increased conditioning to weaker, 50% valid CSs. Contrary to prediction, differential responding based on relative validity was preserved under amphetamine, for both light and tone stimuli. Instead, the results showed that responding to light CSs was generally reduced under amphetamine. Conditioning to tone CSs was higher and unaffected by amphetamine. Thus, results demonstrate that amphetamine effects are determined by the properties of the CS used for learning.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Amphetamine</subject><subject>Amphetamine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetite - drug effects</subject><subject>Appetitive conditioning</subject><subject>Avoidance Learning - drug effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical - drug effects</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Dopamine - metabolism</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neostriatum - drug effects</subject><subject>Neostriatum - metabolism</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Nucleus Accumbens - drug effects</subject><subject>Nucleus Accumbens - metabolism</subject><subject>Partial reinforcement</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer</subject><subject>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopharmacology</subject><subject>Rat</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><issn>0278-5846</issn><issn>1878-4216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rHSEUxaU0JC8v-QSF4qbdvelVR2dm0UUIbVoIdJO9OHolPuZf1HmQb1_z3qPdtRs9V37ncPEQ8oFBxYCpL_tqmZZ-qThAWwGvAOQ7smFt0-5qztR7sgFetGxrdUWuU9oDABMgLskVa2tQEuSGHO7G5RmzGcOEFL1HmxMNEzXLgjnkcEBq7MsaUtHzRB0uODlaVH5GOs7ODCG_0tkf55TDuA5rotGUMZY3M9FQAiMO5ph1KLwrjhty4c2Q8PZ8b8nT929P9z92j78eft7fPe5szdq8Q8U89ko1nLNeiVp0zjHnijLOO8uU6ftGWgDRu0ZKzzveOYkcmx6hFmJLPp9ilzi_rJiyHkOyOAxmwnlNWnWs2Br5X5B1kvGW8wKKE2jjnFJEr5cYRhNfNQP9Vove62Mt-q0WDVyXWorr4zl-7Ud0fz3nHgrw6QyYZM3go5lsSH84DkLWUM4t-XrisHzaIWDUyQacLLoQS3XazeGfi_wGFqWuug</recordid><startdate>20080515</startdate><enddate>20080515</enddate><creator>Horsley, R.R.</creator><creator>Cassaday, H.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080515</creationdate><title>Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity</title><author>Horsley, R.R. ; Cassaday, H.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e61feb667221b63439dd1dd634adfdc16abb75c003bd755f2929d5e2e7be0433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Amphetamine</topic><topic>Amphetamine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetite - drug effects</topic><topic>Appetitive conditioning</topic><topic>Avoidance Learning - drug effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical - drug effects</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Dopamine - metabolism</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neostriatum - drug effects</topic><topic>Neostriatum - metabolism</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Nucleus Accumbens - drug effects</topic><topic>Nucleus Accumbens - metabolism</topic><topic>Partial reinforcement</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer</topic><topic>Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopharmacology</topic><topic>Rat</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horsley, R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassaday, H.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology &amp; biological psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horsley, R.R.</au><au>Cassaday, H.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity</atitle><jtitle>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology &amp; biological psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2008-05-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1057</spage><epage>1063</epage><pages>1057-1063</pages><issn>0278-5846</issn><eissn>1878-4216</eissn><coden>PNPPD7</coden><abstract>Amphetamine has been shown previously to increase the apportioning of associative strength to weak predictors in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures such as latent inhibition and overshadowing. Manipulating the likelihood with which different conditioned stimuli (CSs) predict subsequent delivery of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is an alternative method by which the associability of CSs can be influenced. The present experiment tested effects of d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg administered 15 min prior to conditioning) in appetitive acquisition under partial versus continuous reinforcement of alternative CSs with sucrose pellet UCS delivery. Specifically, male Wistar rats were conditioned to light and tone CSs that were followed by the UCS on 100% or 50% of trials in a cross-over design. It was predicted that amphetamine would disrupt rats' ability to select appropriately the most valid CSs for learning which would be expressed as increased conditioning to weaker, 50% valid CSs. Contrary to prediction, differential responding based on relative validity was preserved under amphetamine, for both light and tone stimuli. Instead, the results showed that responding to light CSs was generally reduced under amphetamine. Conditioning to tone CSs was higher and unaffected by amphetamine. Thus, results demonstrate that amphetamine effects are determined by the properties of the CS used for learning.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18406505</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-5846
ispartof Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2008-05, Vol.32 (4), p.1057-1063
issn 0278-5846
1878-4216
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69175575
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Amphetamine
Amphetamine - pharmacology
Animals
Appetite - drug effects
Appetitive conditioning
Avoidance Learning - drug effects
Biological and medical sciences
Central Nervous System Stimulants - pharmacology
Conditioning, Classical - drug effects
Dopamine
Dopamine - metabolism
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Food
Male
Medical sciences
Neostriatum - drug effects
Neostriatum - metabolism
Neuropharmacology
Nucleus Accumbens - drug effects
Nucleus Accumbens - metabolism
Partial reinforcement
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Photic Stimulation
Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer
Psychoanaleptics: cns stimulant, antidepressant agent, nootropic agent, mood stabilizer..., (alzheimer disease)
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopharmacology
Rat
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Reinforcement (Psychology)
title Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A41%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amphetamine%20effects%20in%20appetitive%20acquisition%20depend%20on%20the%20modality%20of%20the%20stimulus%20rather%20than%20its%20relative%20validity&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20neuro-psychopharmacology%20&%20biological%20psychiatry&rft.au=Horsley,%20R.R.&rft.date=2008-05-15&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1057&rft.epage=1063&rft.pages=1057-1063&rft.issn=0278-5846&rft.eissn=1878-4216&rft.coden=PNPPD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19512822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19512822&rft_id=info:pmid/18406505&rft_els_id=S0278584608000535&rfr_iscdi=true