Magnetic resonance imaging of entheses. Part 1
Entheses are the sites of attachment of a tendon, ligament, or joint capsule to bone. Many features of entheses are adapted to disperse stress and accommodate compressive and shear forces at, or near, boundaries between tendons or ligaments and bone. Of particular interest is calcified and uncalcifi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical radiology 2008-06, Vol.63 (6), p.691-703 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 703 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 691 |
container_title | Clinical radiology |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Benjamin, M Milz, S Bydder, G.M |
description | Entheses are the sites of attachment of a tendon, ligament, or joint capsule to bone. Many features of entheses are adapted to disperse stress and accommodate compressive and shear forces at, or near, boundaries between tendons or ligaments and bone. Of particular interest is calcified and uncalcified fibrocartilage, which has mechanical properties that differ from those of tensile regions of tendons or ligaments, and from bone. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) pulse sequences can identify the specific tissue components of entheses and differentiate cortical bone, calcified fibrocartilage, uncalcified fibrocartilage, and fibrous connective tissue. Magic angle imaging can also differentiate tissues, such as fibrocartilage and tendon, which have different fibre orientations. Understanding the magnetic resonance (MR) appearance of entheses involves consideration of tissue properties, fibre-to-field angle, magic angle effects, pulse sequences, and geometrical factors including fibre-to-section orientation and partial volume effects. New approaches using MR imaging, allow entheses to be visualised with much greater detail than previously possible, and this may help in biomechanical studies, diagnosis of disease including overuse syndromes and spondyloarthropathies, as well as monitoring tissue repair and healing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.crad.2007.12.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69174037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0009926008000329</els_id><sourcerecordid>69174037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-ab1a432d7410b5de0edf5ea70de4c00c4462a6462b6538f472f29721b5fc23243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMo7bb2D3ghc6N3M56cfM2ACFJaLVQsVMG7kMmcWbPOzrTJrNB_3wy7KPRCb_IBz3tO8hzGXnGoOHD9blP56LoKAUzFsQLOn7EVF1qViM2P52wFAE3ZoIZjdpLSZrlKlEfsmNdSKaVxxaovbj3SHHwRKU2jGz0VYevWYVwXU1_QOP-kRKkqblycC_6SvejdkOjssJ-y75cX384_l9dfP12df7wuvTQwl67lTgrsjOTQqo6Aul6RM9CR9ABeSo1O56XVStS9NNhjY5C3qvcoUIpT9nZf9y5O9ztKs92G5GkY3EjTLlndcCNBmP-CCKhqpesM4h70cUopUm_vYv5ofLAc7KLTbuyi0y46LUebdebQ60P1Xbul7m_k4C8Dbw6AS94NfcwCQ_rDIQiNRi3c-z1HWdrvQNEmHyjL7kIkP9tuCv9-x4cncT-EMeSOv-iB0mbaxTGPw3KbcsDeLpNe5g51PglsxCNT-aUS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20258568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging of entheses. Part 1</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Benjamin, M ; Milz, S ; Bydder, G.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, M ; Milz, S ; Bydder, G.M</creatorcontrib><description>Entheses are the sites of attachment of a tendon, ligament, or joint capsule to bone. Many features of entheses are adapted to disperse stress and accommodate compressive and shear forces at, or near, boundaries between tendons or ligaments and bone. Of particular interest is calcified and uncalcified fibrocartilage, which has mechanical properties that differ from those of tensile regions of tendons or ligaments, and from bone. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) pulse sequences can identify the specific tissue components of entheses and differentiate cortical bone, calcified fibrocartilage, uncalcified fibrocartilage, and fibrous connective tissue. Magic angle imaging can also differentiate tissues, such as fibrocartilage and tendon, which have different fibre orientations. Understanding the magnetic resonance (MR) appearance of entheses involves consideration of tissue properties, fibre-to-field angle, magic angle effects, pulse sequences, and geometrical factors including fibre-to-section orientation and partial volume effects. New approaches using MR imaging, allow entheses to be visualised with much greater detail than previously possible, and this may help in biomechanical studies, diagnosis of disease including overuse syndromes and spondyloarthropathies, as well as monitoring tissue repair and healing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-229X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.12.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18455562</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLRAAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Biological and medical sciences ; Bone and Bones - anatomy & histology ; Fibrocartilage - anatomy & histology ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Joint Capsule - anatomy & histology ; Ligaments, Articular - anatomy & histology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Medical sciences ; Musculoskeletal System - anatomy & histology ; Radiology ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tendons - anatomy & histology]]></subject><ispartof>Clinical radiology, 2008-06, Vol.63 (6), p.691-703</ispartof><rights>The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><rights>2008 The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-ab1a432d7410b5de0edf5ea70de4c00c4462a6462b6538f472f29721b5fc23243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-ab1a432d7410b5de0edf5ea70de4c00c4462a6462b6538f472f29721b5fc23243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2007.12.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20362752$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18455562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milz, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bydder, G.M</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging of entheses. Part 1</title><title>Clinical radiology</title><addtitle>Clin Radiol</addtitle><description>Entheses are the sites of attachment of a tendon, ligament, or joint capsule to bone. Many features of entheses are adapted to disperse stress and accommodate compressive and shear forces at, or near, boundaries between tendons or ligaments and bone. Of particular interest is calcified and uncalcified fibrocartilage, which has mechanical properties that differ from those of tensile regions of tendons or ligaments, and from bone. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) pulse sequences can identify the specific tissue components of entheses and differentiate cortical bone, calcified fibrocartilage, uncalcified fibrocartilage, and fibrous connective tissue. Magic angle imaging can also differentiate tissues, such as fibrocartilage and tendon, which have different fibre orientations. Understanding the magnetic resonance (MR) appearance of entheses involves consideration of tissue properties, fibre-to-field angle, magic angle effects, pulse sequences, and geometrical factors including fibre-to-section orientation and partial volume effects. New approaches using MR imaging, allow entheses to be visualised with much greater detail than previously possible, and this may help in biomechanical studies, diagnosis of disease including overuse syndromes and spondyloarthropathies, as well as monitoring tissue repair and healing.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Fibrocartilage - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Joint Capsule - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Ligaments, Articular - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal System - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tendons - anatomy & histology</subject><issn>0009-9260</issn><issn>1365-229X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMo7bb2D3ghc6N3M56cfM2ACFJaLVQsVMG7kMmcWbPOzrTJrNB_3wy7KPRCb_IBz3tO8hzGXnGoOHD9blP56LoKAUzFsQLOn7EVF1qViM2P52wFAE3ZoIZjdpLSZrlKlEfsmNdSKaVxxaovbj3SHHwRKU2jGz0VYevWYVwXU1_QOP-kRKkqblycC_6SvejdkOjssJ-y75cX384_l9dfP12df7wuvTQwl67lTgrsjOTQqo6Aul6RM9CR9ABeSo1O56XVStS9NNhjY5C3qvcoUIpT9nZf9y5O9ztKs92G5GkY3EjTLlndcCNBmP-CCKhqpesM4h70cUopUm_vYv5ofLAc7KLTbuyi0y46LUebdebQ60P1Xbul7m_k4C8Dbw6AS94NfcwCQ_rDIQiNRi3c-z1HWdrvQNEmHyjL7kIkP9tuCv9-x4cncT-EMeSOv-iB0mbaxTGPw3KbcsDeLpNe5g51PglsxCNT-aUS</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Benjamin, M</creator><creator>Milz, S</creator><creator>Bydder, G.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging of entheses. Part 1</title><author>Benjamin, M ; Milz, S ; Bydder, G.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-ab1a432d7410b5de0edf5ea70de4c00c4462a6462b6538f472f29721b5fc23243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Fibrocartilage - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Joint Capsule - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Ligaments, Articular - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal System - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tendons - anatomy & histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milz, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bydder, G.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benjamin, M</au><au>Milz, S</au><au>Bydder, G.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging of entheses. Part 1</atitle><jtitle>Clinical radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Radiol</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>703</epage><pages>691-703</pages><issn>0009-9260</issn><eissn>1365-229X</eissn><coden>CLRAAG</coden><abstract>Entheses are the sites of attachment of a tendon, ligament, or joint capsule to bone. Many features of entheses are adapted to disperse stress and accommodate compressive and shear forces at, or near, boundaries between tendons or ligaments and bone. Of particular interest is calcified and uncalcified fibrocartilage, which has mechanical properties that differ from those of tensile regions of tendons or ligaments, and from bone. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) pulse sequences can identify the specific tissue components of entheses and differentiate cortical bone, calcified fibrocartilage, uncalcified fibrocartilage, and fibrous connective tissue. Magic angle imaging can also differentiate tissues, such as fibrocartilage and tendon, which have different fibre orientations. Understanding the magnetic resonance (MR) appearance of entheses involves consideration of tissue properties, fibre-to-field angle, magic angle effects, pulse sequences, and geometrical factors including fibre-to-section orientation and partial volume effects. New approaches using MR imaging, allow entheses to be visualised with much greater detail than previously possible, and this may help in biomechanical studies, diagnosis of disease including overuse syndromes and spondyloarthropathies, as well as monitoring tissue repair and healing.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18455562</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.crad.2007.12.011</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-9260 |
ispartof | Clinical radiology, 2008-06, Vol.63 (6), p.691-703 |
issn | 0009-9260 1365-229X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69174037 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Bone and Bones - anatomy & histology Fibrocartilage - anatomy & histology Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Joint Capsule - anatomy & histology Ligaments, Articular - anatomy & histology Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Medical sciences Musculoskeletal System - anatomy & histology Radiology Stress, Mechanical Tendons - anatomy & histology |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging of entheses. Part 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A24%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20of%20entheses.%20Part%201&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20radiology&rft.au=Benjamin,%20M&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=703&rft.pages=691-703&rft.issn=0009-9260&rft.eissn=1365-229X&rft.coden=CLRAAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.crad.2007.12.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69174037%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20258568&rft_id=info:pmid/18455562&rft_els_id=S0009926008000329&rfr_iscdi=true |