Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders

The incidence of injuries to pregnant sows kept in dynamic groups in a commercial herd was recorded over a period of 18 months. The sows were maintained in a solid-floored building with a straw-bedded lying area allowing 1.7m2 per sow and fed by means of electronic feeders. Injuries on 12 possible a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary record 1998-11, Vol.143 (22), p.604-607
Hauptverfasser: Hodgkiss, N. J., Eddison, J. C., Brooks, P. H., Bugg, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 607
container_issue 22
container_start_page 604
container_title Veterinary record
container_volume 143
creator Hodgkiss, N. J.
Eddison, J. C.
Brooks, P. H.
Bugg, P.
description The incidence of injuries to pregnant sows kept in dynamic groups in a commercial herd was recorded over a period of 18 months. The sows were maintained in a solid-floored building with a straw-bedded lying area allowing 1.7m2 per sow and fed by means of electronic feeders. Injuries on 12 possible areas of the body were assessed every week, and graded on the scale of 0 to 3 (maximum body score 36). The lesion scores sustained by the sows were very low, with a maximum of 19 and a median of 4. Lesions of the greatest severity constituted only 0.16 per cent of all the recorded injuries. The injuries were not distributed uniformly over the body, most being on the shoulders, flanks and hindquarters, with very few on the head or in the vulval region. The total injury score was related to parity, with sows in parities one, two and three sustaining more injuries than sows in later parities, and it was also related negatively to bodyweight. More agonistic interactions were observed between sows in the lying area and in the vicinity of the feeders than in the dunging area.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/vr.143.22.604
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69114933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3976614321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3967-52a0a5fc44ec7fd3010b4947862b29d7e95cbe1502b4dd3d371d65e20e72f0d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LJDEQxYO46Kh79CgEBPHSs_nqxBxV_FgQFhbda-juVI8ZutNjqluZ_97IDB48uFBQRdWvHo9HyDFnc86l_vWa5lzJuRBzzdQOmQmmRGG0Ybtkxj5mZRnbJweIS8aELaXYI3v2wnBbqhlxl4iA2EMc6dDS8RloiMspBUCKE45ViOBpvaarBItYZQqHN6TPw4R5HyJdpGFaIZ0wxAWFDpoxDTE0tAXwkPCI_GirDuHnth-Sp9ubx-v74uHP3e_ry4eillabohQVq8q2UQoa03rJOKuVVeZCi1pYb8CWTQ28ZKJW3ksvDfe6BMHAiJb5Uh6Ss43uKg0vE-Do-oANdF0VIXt12nKurJQZPP0CLocpxezNcWNyac1FpooN1aQBMUHrVin0VVo7ztxH7O41uRy7E8Ll2DN_slWd6h78J73NOd_15v4WOlh_L-b-3Tz-vboV1kiTH883j3W__I-Hd3X-m0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771776612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hodgkiss, N. J. ; Eddison, J. C. ; Brooks, P. H. ; Bugg, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodgkiss, N. J. ; Eddison, J. C. ; Brooks, P. H. ; Bugg, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The incidence of injuries to pregnant sows kept in dynamic groups in a commercial herd was recorded over a period of 18 months. The sows were maintained in a solid-floored building with a straw-bedded lying area allowing 1.7m2 per sow and fed by means of electronic feeders. Injuries on 12 possible areas of the body were assessed every week, and graded on the scale of 0 to 3 (maximum body score 36). The lesion scores sustained by the sows were very low, with a maximum of 19 and a median of 4. Lesions of the greatest severity constituted only 0.16 per cent of all the recorded injuries. The injuries were not distributed uniformly over the body, most being on the shoulders, flanks and hindquarters, with very few on the head or in the vulval region. The total injury score was related to parity, with sows in parities one, two and three sustaining more injuries than sows in later parities, and it was also related negatively to bodyweight. More agonistic interactions were observed between sows in the lying area and in the vicinity of the feeders than in the dunging area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-4900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-7670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/vr.143.22.604</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9871954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Limited</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Animals ; England - epidemiology ; Feeding Methods - instrumentation ; Feeding Methods - veterinary ; Female ; Housing, Animal ; Parity ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Animal ; Swine - injuries ; Time Factors ; Wounds and Injuries - classification ; Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology ; Wounds and Injuries - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Veterinary record, 1998-11, Vol.143 (22), p.604-607</ispartof><rights>British Veterinary Association. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>1998 British Veterinary Association</rights><rights>Copyright: 1998 British Veterinary Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3967-52a0a5fc44ec7fd3010b4947862b29d7e95cbe1502b4dd3d371d65e20e72f0d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3967-52a0a5fc44ec7fd3010b4947862b29d7e95cbe1502b4dd3d371d65e20e72f0d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1136%2Fvr.143.22.604$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1136%2Fvr.143.22.604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9871954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodgkiss, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddison, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugg, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders</title><title>Veterinary record</title><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><description>The incidence of injuries to pregnant sows kept in dynamic groups in a commercial herd was recorded over a period of 18 months. The sows were maintained in a solid-floored building with a straw-bedded lying area allowing 1.7m2 per sow and fed by means of electronic feeders. Injuries on 12 possible areas of the body were assessed every week, and graded on the scale of 0 to 3 (maximum body score 36). The lesion scores sustained by the sows were very low, with a maximum of 19 and a median of 4. Lesions of the greatest severity constituted only 0.16 per cent of all the recorded injuries. The injuries were not distributed uniformly over the body, most being on the shoulders, flanks and hindquarters, with very few on the head or in the vulval region. The total injury score was related to parity, with sows in parities one, two and three sustaining more injuries than sows in later parities, and it was also related negatively to bodyweight. More agonistic interactions were observed between sows in the lying area and in the vicinity of the feeders than in the dunging area.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Feeding Methods - instrumentation</subject><subject>Feeding Methods - veterinary</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Animal</subject><subject>Swine - injuries</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - classification</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - veterinary</subject><issn>0042-4900</issn><issn>2042-7670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LJDEQxYO46Kh79CgEBPHSs_nqxBxV_FgQFhbda-juVI8ZutNjqluZ_97IDB48uFBQRdWvHo9HyDFnc86l_vWa5lzJuRBzzdQOmQmmRGG0Ybtkxj5mZRnbJweIS8aELaXYI3v2wnBbqhlxl4iA2EMc6dDS8RloiMspBUCKE45ViOBpvaarBItYZQqHN6TPw4R5HyJdpGFaIZ0wxAWFDpoxDTE0tAXwkPCI_GirDuHnth-Sp9ubx-v74uHP3e_ry4eillabohQVq8q2UQoa03rJOKuVVeZCi1pYb8CWTQ28ZKJW3ksvDfe6BMHAiJb5Uh6Ss43uKg0vE-Do-oANdF0VIXt12nKurJQZPP0CLocpxezNcWNyac1FpooN1aQBMUHrVin0VVo7ztxH7O41uRy7E8Ll2DN_slWd6h78J73NOd_15v4WOlh_L-b-3Tz-vboV1kiTH883j3W__I-Hd3X-m0A</recordid><startdate>19981128</startdate><enddate>19981128</enddate><creator>Hodgkiss, N. J.</creator><creator>Eddison, J. C.</creator><creator>Brooks, P. H.</creator><creator>Bugg, P.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Limited</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981128</creationdate><title>Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders</title><author>Hodgkiss, N. J. ; Eddison, J. C. ; Brooks, P. H. ; Bugg, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3967-52a0a5fc44ec7fd3010b4947862b29d7e95cbe1502b4dd3d371d65e20e72f0d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Feeding Methods - instrumentation</topic><topic>Feeding Methods - veterinary</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Animal</topic><topic>Swine - injuries</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - classification</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodgkiss, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddison, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugg, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodgkiss, N. J.</au><au>Eddison, J. C.</au><au>Brooks, P. H.</au><au>Bugg, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><date>1998-11-28</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>607</epage><pages>604-607</pages><issn>0042-4900</issn><eissn>2042-7670</eissn><abstract>The incidence of injuries to pregnant sows kept in dynamic groups in a commercial herd was recorded over a period of 18 months. The sows were maintained in a solid-floored building with a straw-bedded lying area allowing 1.7m2 per sow and fed by means of electronic feeders. Injuries on 12 possible areas of the body were assessed every week, and graded on the scale of 0 to 3 (maximum body score 36). The lesion scores sustained by the sows were very low, with a maximum of 19 and a median of 4. Lesions of the greatest severity constituted only 0.16 per cent of all the recorded injuries. The injuries were not distributed uniformly over the body, most being on the shoulders, flanks and hindquarters, with very few on the head or in the vulval region. The total injury score was related to parity, with sows in parities one, two and three sustaining more injuries than sows in later parities, and it was also related negatively to bodyweight. More agonistic interactions were observed between sows in the lying area and in the vicinity of the feeders than in the dunging area.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Limited</pub><pmid>9871954</pmid><doi>10.1136/vr.143.22.604</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-4900
ispartof Veterinary record, 1998-11, Vol.143 (22), p.604-607
issn 0042-4900
2042-7670
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69114933
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aggression
Animals
England - epidemiology
Feeding Methods - instrumentation
Feeding Methods - veterinary
Female
Housing, Animal
Parity
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Animal
Swine - injuries
Time Factors
Wounds and Injuries - classification
Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology
Wounds and Injuries - veterinary
title Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A53%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20injuries%20sustained%20by%20pregnant%20sows%20housed%20in%20groups%20using%20electronic%20feeders&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20record&rft.au=Hodgkiss,%20N.%20J.&rft.date=1998-11-28&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=607&rft.pages=604-607&rft.issn=0042-4900&rft.eissn=2042-7670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/vr.143.22.604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3976614321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771776612&rft_id=info:pmid/9871954&rfr_iscdi=true