Physician's perception of mental malaise in a basic health district
a) To determine the prevalence of psychological malaise (PM) in the population-group attending. b) To find the sensitivity and specificity of diagnoses of anxiety-depression made by doctors and on the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS), using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Intervi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atención primaria 1998-11, Vol.22 (8), p.491-496 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 496 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 491 |
container_title | Atención primaria |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Barreto Ramón, P Corral Mata, M E Muñoz López, J Boncompte Vilanova, M P Sebastián Gallego, R Solà Gonfaus, M |
description | a) To determine the prevalence of psychological malaise (PM) in the population-group attending. b) To find the sensitivity and specificity of diagnoses of anxiety-depression made by doctors and on the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS), using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as gold standard. c) To study whether there are factors that might affect PM's detection.
Crossover study.
Urban health centre.
252 patients from the general population between 15 and 65 who attended for consultation for 10 days in May 1997.
The clinical diagnosis of 1266 patients was recorded. A sample was selected at random, to whom both the GADS and the MINI were administered, so as to compare the diagnoses. The prevalence of PM according to clinical judgement was similar to that found with the MINI (40.9%), with a clear overdiagnosis on the GADS. Clinical judgement mainly detected the anxiety component. The results of clinical judgement and the GADS were compared with the MINI (gold standard), and sensitivity of 73.78% and specificity of 72.48% were found for clinical judgement, and sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 64.4% for the GADS.
Prevalence of PM is high. The GADS showed it was useful for PM screening. The doctor's ability to detect PM is considerable. We found no variables that might affect diagnostic error. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69107857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69107857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p536-24362eacb08d3958f0bd1e1d46f1bdbfafdb40427347522a33c56e5299e8d6f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz71qwzAUhmENLWma9hIKmtrJIEuWbI3F9CcQaIfs5kg6wiryTy1lyN3XUE_f8vDBe0P2jJe8UFLVd-Q-pR_GONei3pGdbpTiUu1J-91fU7ABxpdEZ1wszjlMI508HXDMEOkAEUJCGkYK1MCKaY8Qc09dSHkJNj-QWw8x4eO2B3J-fzu3n8Xp6-PYvp6KWQpV8EoojmANa5zQsvHMuBJLVylfGmc8eGcqVvFaVLXkHISwUqHkWmPjViMO5Pn_dl6m3wum3A0hWYwRRpwuqVO6ZHUj6xU-bfBiBnTdvIQBlmu3RYs_taBR0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69107857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physician's perception of mental malaise in a basic health district</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Barreto Ramón, P ; Corral Mata, M E ; Muñoz López, J ; Boncompte Vilanova, M P ; Sebastián Gallego, R ; Solà Gonfaus, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Barreto Ramón, P ; Corral Mata, M E ; Muñoz López, J ; Boncompte Vilanova, M P ; Sebastián Gallego, R ; Solà Gonfaus, M</creatorcontrib><description>a) To determine the prevalence of psychological malaise (PM) in the population-group attending. b) To find the sensitivity and specificity of diagnoses of anxiety-depression made by doctors and on the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS), using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as gold standard. c) To study whether there are factors that might affect PM's detection.
Crossover study.
Urban health centre.
252 patients from the general population between 15 and 65 who attended for consultation for 10 days in May 1997.
The clinical diagnosis of 1266 patients was recorded. A sample was selected at random, to whom both the GADS and the MINI were administered, so as to compare the diagnoses. The prevalence of PM according to clinical judgement was similar to that found with the MINI (40.9%), with a clear overdiagnosis on the GADS. Clinical judgement mainly detected the anxiety component. The results of clinical judgement and the GADS were compared with the MINI (gold standard), and sensitivity of 73.78% and specificity of 72.48% were found for clinical judgement, and sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 64.4% for the GADS.
Prevalence of PM is high. The GADS showed it was useful for PM screening. The doctor's ability to detect PM is considerable. We found no variables that might affect diagnostic error.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0212-6567</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9866256</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anxiety - diagnosis ; Bipolar Disorder - diagnosis ; Cross-Over Studies ; Depression - diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Male ; Mental Disorders - diagnosis ; Mental Disorders - epidemiology ; Middle Aged ; Phobic Disorders - diagnosis ; Prevalence ; Primary Health Care ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Urban Health</subject><ispartof>Atención primaria, 1998-11, Vol.22 (8), p.491-496</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9866256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barreto Ramón, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corral Mata, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz López, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boncompte Vilanova, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastián Gallego, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solà Gonfaus, M</creatorcontrib><title>Physician's perception of mental malaise in a basic health district</title><title>Atención primaria</title><addtitle>Aten Primaria</addtitle><description>a) To determine the prevalence of psychological malaise (PM) in the population-group attending. b) To find the sensitivity and specificity of diagnoses of anxiety-depression made by doctors and on the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS), using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as gold standard. c) To study whether there are factors that might affect PM's detection.
Crossover study.
Urban health centre.
252 patients from the general population between 15 and 65 who attended for consultation for 10 days in May 1997.
The clinical diagnosis of 1266 patients was recorded. A sample was selected at random, to whom both the GADS and the MINI were administered, so as to compare the diagnoses. The prevalence of PM according to clinical judgement was similar to that found with the MINI (40.9%), with a clear overdiagnosis on the GADS. Clinical judgement mainly detected the anxiety component. The results of clinical judgement and the GADS were compared with the MINI (gold standard), and sensitivity of 73.78% and specificity of 72.48% were found for clinical judgement, and sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 64.4% for the GADS.
Prevalence of PM is high. The GADS showed it was useful for PM screening. The doctor's ability to detect PM is considerable. We found no variables that might affect diagnostic error.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anxiety - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bipolar Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Phobic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Urban Health</subject><issn>0212-6567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotz71qwzAUhmENLWma9hIKmtrJIEuWbI3F9CcQaIfs5kg6wiryTy1lyN3XUE_f8vDBe0P2jJe8UFLVd-Q-pR_GONei3pGdbpTiUu1J-91fU7ABxpdEZ1wszjlMI508HXDMEOkAEUJCGkYK1MCKaY8Qc09dSHkJNj-QWw8x4eO2B3J-fzu3n8Xp6-PYvp6KWQpV8EoojmANa5zQsvHMuBJLVylfGmc8eGcqVvFaVLXkHISwUqHkWmPjViMO5Pn_dl6m3wum3A0hWYwRRpwuqVO6ZHUj6xU-bfBiBnTdvIQBlmu3RYs_taBR0A</recordid><startdate>19981115</startdate><enddate>19981115</enddate><creator>Barreto Ramón, P</creator><creator>Corral Mata, M E</creator><creator>Muñoz López, J</creator><creator>Boncompte Vilanova, M P</creator><creator>Sebastián Gallego, R</creator><creator>Solà Gonfaus, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981115</creationdate><title>Physician's perception of mental malaise in a basic health district</title><author>Barreto Ramón, P ; Corral Mata, M E ; Muñoz López, J ; Boncompte Vilanova, M P ; Sebastián Gallego, R ; Solà Gonfaus, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p536-24362eacb08d3958f0bd1e1d46f1bdbfafdb40427347522a33c56e5299e8d6f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anxiety - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bipolar Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Phobic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Urban Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barreto Ramón, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corral Mata, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz López, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boncompte Vilanova, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastián Gallego, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solà Gonfaus, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Atención primaria</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barreto Ramón, P</au><au>Corral Mata, M E</au><au>Muñoz López, J</au><au>Boncompte Vilanova, M P</au><au>Sebastián Gallego, R</au><au>Solà Gonfaus, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physician's perception of mental malaise in a basic health district</atitle><jtitle>Atención primaria</jtitle><addtitle>Aten Primaria</addtitle><date>1998-11-15</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>491-496</pages><issn>0212-6567</issn><abstract>a) To determine the prevalence of psychological malaise (PM) in the population-group attending. b) To find the sensitivity and specificity of diagnoses of anxiety-depression made by doctors and on the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS), using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as gold standard. c) To study whether there are factors that might affect PM's detection.
Crossover study.
Urban health centre.
252 patients from the general population between 15 and 65 who attended for consultation for 10 days in May 1997.
The clinical diagnosis of 1266 patients was recorded. A sample was selected at random, to whom both the GADS and the MINI were administered, so as to compare the diagnoses. The prevalence of PM according to clinical judgement was similar to that found with the MINI (40.9%), with a clear overdiagnosis on the GADS. Clinical judgement mainly detected the anxiety component. The results of clinical judgement and the GADS were compared with the MINI (gold standard), and sensitivity of 73.78% and specificity of 72.48% were found for clinical judgement, and sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 64.4% for the GADS.
Prevalence of PM is high. The GADS showed it was useful for PM screening. The doctor's ability to detect PM is considerable. We found no variables that might affect diagnostic error.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>9866256</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0212-6567 |
ispartof | Atención primaria, 1998-11, Vol.22 (8), p.491-496 |
issn | 0212-6567 |
language | spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69107857 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Anxiety - diagnosis Bipolar Disorder - diagnosis Cross-Over Studies Depression - diagnosis Diagnosis, Differential Female Humans Interview, Psychological Male Mental Disorders - diagnosis Mental Disorders - epidemiology Middle Aged Phobic Disorders - diagnosis Prevalence Primary Health Care Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Sensitivity and Specificity Urban Health |
title | Physician's perception of mental malaise in a basic health district |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physician's%20perception%20of%20mental%20malaise%20in%20a%20basic%20health%20district&rft.jtitle=Atenci%C3%B3n%20primaria&rft.au=Barreto%20Ram%C3%B3n,%20P&rft.date=1998-11-15&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=491-496&rft.issn=0212-6567&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69107857%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69107857&rft_id=info:pmid/9866256&rfr_iscdi=true |