Extra peritoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary results

Presentation of our initial experience with the practice of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy through the extraperitoneal access (ELRP). We describe the proceeding and its technical difficulties, time consumption and complications. From January to May 2005 we have indicated 17 ELRP in our insti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archivos españoles de urología 2005-11, Vol.58 (9), p.937-946
Hauptverfasser: Peña González, Juan Antonio, González Sala, José Luis, García Rojo, Darío, Prera Vilaseca, Angel, Hannaoui, Naim, Vicente Palacio, Eduardo, Abad Gairin, Carlos, Graells Batet, Assunció, Descalzo Abdad, Maria Concepción, Prats López, Joan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 946
container_issue 9
container_start_page 937
container_title Archivos españoles de urología
container_volume 58
creator Peña González, Juan Antonio
González Sala, José Luis
García Rojo, Darío
Prera Vilaseca, Angel
Hannaoui, Naim
Vicente Palacio, Eduardo
Abad Gairin, Carlos
Graells Batet, Assunció
Descalzo Abdad, Maria Concepción
Prats López, Joan
description Presentation of our initial experience with the practice of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy through the extraperitoneal access (ELRP). We describe the proceeding and its technical difficulties, time consumption and complications. From January to May 2005 we have indicated 17 ELRP in our institution. Two of them were performed with the help of a mentor. We followed the Brussels technique but without preservation of the neuro vascular bundles. Laparoscopic approach was indicated in 17 patients, 8 of them were completed and 9 converted to open surgery. Of the cases performed without external aid (which are the analysed in this communication), 6 were pure laparoscopic and 9 were permuted to open. Of the last 6, only one was not completed by laparoscopy. Mean operative time was 304 minutes (355 for the pure laparoscopy cases). Transfusion rate was 13%. Positive surgical margins were observed in 26% of the cases (16% of the complete laparoscopic procedures). There were not major complications. Not ileus was observed. In one case, bladder catheter had to be replaced after 7 days because it was not properly placed during surgery. Conversion to open surgery during extraperitoneal laparoscopic proceeding is not very difficult but previous surgical experience is required. ELPR is feasible in an institution like ours but is necessary a team with previous experience in laparoscopic surgery and the aim of invest a big effort, specially regarding operative time. Initial learning curve has not caused any important complication.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69090296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69090296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p542-59ff68de9e447fb75c2482c86a25554252d9362d164b348a7077e204c721148c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jz1rwzAURTW0NGmav1A8dXOR9a2xhLQJBNohu5HlZ1CQbVWSofn3FTSdHtx7uJx3h9YYY1Zj0bAVekzpgjFVDecPaNUIRktH1uiw_8nRVAGiy_MExlfeBBPnZOfgbBVN72wJQ0myyWDzPF5fq68I3o1uMvFaRUiLz-kJ3Q_GJ9je7gad3_fn3aE-fX4cd2-nOnBGaq6HQageNDAmh05yS5giVglDOC8AJ72mgvRFsKNMGYmlBIKZlaRpmLJ0g17-ZovR9wIpt6NLFrw3E8xLaoXGGhMtCvh8A5duhL4N0Y1Ft_1_nf4CqWJT4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69090296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extra peritoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary results</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Peña González, Juan Antonio ; González Sala, José Luis ; García Rojo, Darío ; Prera Vilaseca, Angel ; Hannaoui, Naim ; Vicente Palacio, Eduardo ; Abad Gairin, Carlos ; Graells Batet, Assunció ; Descalzo Abdad, Maria Concepción ; Prats López, Joan</creator><creatorcontrib>Peña González, Juan Antonio ; González Sala, José Luis ; García Rojo, Darío ; Prera Vilaseca, Angel ; Hannaoui, Naim ; Vicente Palacio, Eduardo ; Abad Gairin, Carlos ; Graells Batet, Assunció ; Descalzo Abdad, Maria Concepción ; Prats López, Joan</creatorcontrib><description>Presentation of our initial experience with the practice of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy through the extraperitoneal access (ELRP). We describe the proceeding and its technical difficulties, time consumption and complications. From January to May 2005 we have indicated 17 ELRP in our institution. Two of them were performed with the help of a mentor. We followed the Brussels technique but without preservation of the neuro vascular bundles. Laparoscopic approach was indicated in 17 patients, 8 of them were completed and 9 converted to open surgery. Of the cases performed without external aid (which are the analysed in this communication), 6 were pure laparoscopic and 9 were permuted to open. Of the last 6, only one was not completed by laparoscopy. Mean operative time was 304 minutes (355 for the pure laparoscopy cases). Transfusion rate was 13%. Positive surgical margins were observed in 26% of the cases (16% of the complete laparoscopic procedures). There were not major complications. Not ileus was observed. In one case, bladder catheter had to be replaced after 7 days because it was not properly placed during surgery. Conversion to open surgery during extraperitoneal laparoscopic proceeding is not very difficult but previous surgical experience is required. ELPR is feasible in an institution like ours but is necessary a team with previous experience in laparoscopic surgery and the aim of invest a big effort, specially regarding operative time. Initial learning curve has not caused any important complication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16430042</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Aged ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peritoneum ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Archivos españoles de urología, 2005-11, Vol.58 (9), p.937-946</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16430042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peña González, Juan Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González Sala, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Rojo, Darío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prera Vilaseca, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannaoui, Naim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente Palacio, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad Gairin, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graells Batet, Assunció</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Descalzo Abdad, Maria Concepción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prats López, Joan</creatorcontrib><title>Extra peritoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary results</title><title>Archivos españoles de urología</title><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><description>Presentation of our initial experience with the practice of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy through the extraperitoneal access (ELRP). We describe the proceeding and its technical difficulties, time consumption and complications. From January to May 2005 we have indicated 17 ELRP in our institution. Two of them were performed with the help of a mentor. We followed the Brussels technique but without preservation of the neuro vascular bundles. Laparoscopic approach was indicated in 17 patients, 8 of them were completed and 9 converted to open surgery. Of the cases performed without external aid (which are the analysed in this communication), 6 were pure laparoscopic and 9 were permuted to open. Of the last 6, only one was not completed by laparoscopy. Mean operative time was 304 minutes (355 for the pure laparoscopy cases). Transfusion rate was 13%. Positive surgical margins were observed in 26% of the cases (16% of the complete laparoscopic procedures). There were not major complications. Not ileus was observed. In one case, bladder catheter had to be replaced after 7 days because it was not properly placed during surgery. Conversion to open surgery during extraperitoneal laparoscopic proceeding is not very difficult but previous surgical experience is required. ELPR is feasible in an institution like ours but is necessary a team with previous experience in laparoscopic surgery and the aim of invest a big effort, specially regarding operative time. Initial learning curve has not caused any important complication.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0004-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jz1rwzAURTW0NGmav1A8dXOR9a2xhLQJBNohu5HlZ1CQbVWSofn3FTSdHtx7uJx3h9YYY1Zj0bAVekzpgjFVDecPaNUIRktH1uiw_8nRVAGiy_MExlfeBBPnZOfgbBVN72wJQ0myyWDzPF5fq68I3o1uMvFaRUiLz-kJ3Q_GJ9je7gad3_fn3aE-fX4cd2-nOnBGaq6HQageNDAmh05yS5giVglDOC8AJ72mgvRFsKNMGYmlBIKZlaRpmLJ0g17-ZovR9wIpt6NLFrw3E8xLaoXGGhMtCvh8A5duhL4N0Y1Ft_1_nf4CqWJT4w</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>Peña González, Juan Antonio</creator><creator>González Sala, José Luis</creator><creator>García Rojo, Darío</creator><creator>Prera Vilaseca, Angel</creator><creator>Hannaoui, Naim</creator><creator>Vicente Palacio, Eduardo</creator><creator>Abad Gairin, Carlos</creator><creator>Graells Batet, Assunció</creator><creator>Descalzo Abdad, Maria Concepción</creator><creator>Prats López, Joan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Extra peritoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary results</title><author>Peña González, Juan Antonio ; González Sala, José Luis ; García Rojo, Darío ; Prera Vilaseca, Angel ; Hannaoui, Naim ; Vicente Palacio, Eduardo ; Abad Gairin, Carlos ; Graells Batet, Assunció ; Descalzo Abdad, Maria Concepción ; Prats López, Joan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p542-59ff68de9e447fb75c2482c86a25554252d9362d164b348a7077e204c721148c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peña González, Juan Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González Sala, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Rojo, Darío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prera Vilaseca, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannaoui, Naim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente Palacio, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad Gairin, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graells Batet, Assunció</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Descalzo Abdad, Maria Concepción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prats López, Joan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peña González, Juan Antonio</au><au>González Sala, José Luis</au><au>García Rojo, Darío</au><au>Prera Vilaseca, Angel</au><au>Hannaoui, Naim</au><au>Vicente Palacio, Eduardo</au><au>Abad Gairin, Carlos</au><au>Graells Batet, Assunció</au><au>Descalzo Abdad, Maria Concepción</au><au>Prats López, Joan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extra peritoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary results</atitle><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>937</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>937-946</pages><issn>0004-0614</issn><abstract>Presentation of our initial experience with the practice of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy through the extraperitoneal access (ELRP). We describe the proceeding and its technical difficulties, time consumption and complications. From January to May 2005 we have indicated 17 ELRP in our institution. Two of them were performed with the help of a mentor. We followed the Brussels technique but without preservation of the neuro vascular bundles. Laparoscopic approach was indicated in 17 patients, 8 of them were completed and 9 converted to open surgery. Of the cases performed without external aid (which are the analysed in this communication), 6 were pure laparoscopic and 9 were permuted to open. Of the last 6, only one was not completed by laparoscopy. Mean operative time was 304 minutes (355 for the pure laparoscopy cases). Transfusion rate was 13%. Positive surgical margins were observed in 26% of the cases (16% of the complete laparoscopic procedures). There were not major complications. Not ileus was observed. In one case, bladder catheter had to be replaced after 7 days because it was not properly placed during surgery. Conversion to open surgery during extraperitoneal laparoscopic proceeding is not very difficult but previous surgical experience is required. ELPR is feasible in an institution like ours but is necessary a team with previous experience in laparoscopic surgery and the aim of invest a big effort, specially regarding operative time. Initial learning curve has not caused any important complication.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>16430042</pmid><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0614
ispartof Archivos españoles de urología, 2005-11, Vol.58 (9), p.937-946
issn 0004-0614
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69090296
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Aged
Humans
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Peritoneum
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
title Extra peritoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A12%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extra%20peritoneal%20laparoscopic%20radical%20prostatectomy.%20Preliminary%20results&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20espa%C3%B1oles%20de%20urolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=Pe%C3%B1a%20Gonz%C3%A1lez,%20Juan%20Antonio&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=937&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=937-946&rft.issn=0004-0614&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69090296%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69090296&rft_id=info:pmid/16430042&rfr_iscdi=true