The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations
Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Sca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998-12, Vol.104 (6), p.3651-3664 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3664 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 3651 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Mast, T D Hinkelman, L M Orr, M J Waag, R C |
description | Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/1.423947 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69089635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69089635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-1be7a4785df5c64d8dd97082a7abce5090dc90203d4106767d96139c89f4a8223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtLwzAAhYMoc07BPyDkSXxpTdJcH2V4GQwUnG9CSZPUVdKmJi2yf2_Hhk-Hc_g4Dx8A1xjlGBN8j3NKCkXFCZhjRlAmGaGnYI4QwhlVnJ-Di5S-p8pkoWZgpiQTjJA5-NxsHXR17cwAQw11ZUPbdNrDX-09bEPst8GHrx0MHRz9EHUKXWNgP_rkoG3SEOLQhC6HbzoOcLXK4XvTjl7vx3QJzmo9gVfHXICPp8fN8iVbvz6vlg_rzBCJhgxXTmgqJLM1M5xaaa0SSBItdGUcQwpZoxBBhaUYccGFVRwXykhVUy0JKRbg9vDbx_AzujSUbZOM8153Loyp5ApJxQs2gXcH0MSQUnR12cem1XFXYlTuRZa4PIic0Jvj51i1zv6DR3PFH33VbNY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69089635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Mast, T D ; Hinkelman, L M ; Orr, M J ; Waag, R C</creator><creatorcontrib>Mast, T D ; Hinkelman, L M ; Orr, M J ; Waag, R C</creatorcontrib><description>Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.423947</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9857522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Abdominal Muscles - anatomy & histology ; Abdominal Muscles - diagnostic imaging ; Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology ; Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging ; Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology ; Connective Tissue - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Models, Biological ; Muscles - anatomy & histology ; Muscles - diagnostic imaging ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998-12, Vol.104 (6), p.3651-3664</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-1be7a4785df5c64d8dd97082a7abce5090dc90203d4106767d96139c89f4a8223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-1be7a4785df5c64d8dd97082a7abce5090dc90203d4106767d96139c89f4a8223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9857522$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mast, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkelman, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waag, R C</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses.</description><subject>Abdominal Muscles - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Abdominal Muscles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Muscles - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Muscles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kFtLwzAAhYMoc07BPyDkSXxpTdJcH2V4GQwUnG9CSZPUVdKmJi2yf2_Hhk-Hc_g4Dx8A1xjlGBN8j3NKCkXFCZhjRlAmGaGnYI4QwhlVnJ-Di5S-p8pkoWZgpiQTjJA5-NxsHXR17cwAQw11ZUPbdNrDX-09bEPst8GHrx0MHRz9EHUKXWNgP_rkoG3SEOLQhC6HbzoOcLXK4XvTjl7vx3QJzmo9gVfHXICPp8fN8iVbvz6vlg_rzBCJhgxXTmgqJLM1M5xaaa0SSBItdGUcQwpZoxBBhaUYccGFVRwXykhVUy0JKRbg9vDbx_AzujSUbZOM8153Loyp5ApJxQs2gXcH0MSQUnR12cem1XFXYlTuRZa4PIic0Jvj51i1zv6DR3PFH33VbNY</recordid><startdate>19981201</startdate><enddate>19981201</enddate><creator>Mast, T D</creator><creator>Hinkelman, L M</creator><creator>Orr, M J</creator><creator>Waag, R C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981201</creationdate><title>The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations</title><author>Mast, T D ; Hinkelman, L M ; Orr, M J ; Waag, R C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-1be7a4785df5c64d8dd97082a7abce5090dc90203d4106767d96139c89f4a8223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Muscles - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Abdominal Muscles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Muscles - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Muscles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mast, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkelman, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waag, R C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mast, T D</au><au>Hinkelman, L M</au><au>Orr, M J</au><au>Waag, R C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>1998-12-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3651</spage><epage>3664</epage><pages>3651-3664</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>9857522</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.423947</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998-12, Vol.104 (6), p.3651-3664 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69089635 |
source | MEDLINE; AIP Acoustical Society of America |
subjects | Abdominal Muscles - anatomy & histology Abdominal Muscles - diagnostic imaging Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology Connective Tissue - diagnostic imaging Humans Models, Biological Muscles - anatomy & histology Muscles - diagnostic imaging Ultrasonography |
title | The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T22%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20abdominal%20wall%20morphology%20on%20ultrasonic%20pulse%20distortion.%20Part%20II.%20Simulations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Mast,%20T%20D&rft.date=1998-12-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3651&rft.epage=3664&rft.pages=3651-3664&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.423947&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69089635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69089635&rft_id=info:pmid/9857522&rfr_iscdi=true |