The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations

Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Sca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998-12, Vol.104 (6), p.3651-3664
Hauptverfasser: Mast, T D, Hinkelman, L M, Orr, M J, Waag, R C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3664
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3651
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 104
creator Mast, T D
Hinkelman, L M
Orr, M J
Waag, R C
description Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.423947
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69089635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69089635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-1be7a4785df5c64d8dd97082a7abce5090dc90203d4106767d96139c89f4a8223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtLwzAAhYMoc07BPyDkSXxpTdJcH2V4GQwUnG9CSZPUVdKmJi2yf2_Hhk-Hc_g4Dx8A1xjlGBN8j3NKCkXFCZhjRlAmGaGnYI4QwhlVnJ-Di5S-p8pkoWZgpiQTjJA5-NxsHXR17cwAQw11ZUPbdNrDX-09bEPst8GHrx0MHRz9EHUKXWNgP_rkoG3SEOLQhC6HbzoOcLXK4XvTjl7vx3QJzmo9gVfHXICPp8fN8iVbvz6vlg_rzBCJhgxXTmgqJLM1M5xaaa0SSBItdGUcQwpZoxBBhaUYccGFVRwXykhVUy0JKRbg9vDbx_AzujSUbZOM8153Loyp5ApJxQs2gXcH0MSQUnR12cem1XFXYlTuRZa4PIic0Jvj51i1zv6DR3PFH33VbNY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69089635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Mast, T D ; Hinkelman, L M ; Orr, M J ; Waag, R C</creator><creatorcontrib>Mast, T D ; Hinkelman, L M ; Orr, M J ; Waag, R C</creatorcontrib><description>Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.423947</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9857522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Abdominal Muscles - anatomy &amp; histology ; Abdominal Muscles - diagnostic imaging ; Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology ; Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging ; Connective Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology ; Connective Tissue - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Models, Biological ; Muscles - anatomy &amp; histology ; Muscles - diagnostic imaging ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998-12, Vol.104 (6), p.3651-3664</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-1be7a4785df5c64d8dd97082a7abce5090dc90203d4106767d96139c89f4a8223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-1be7a4785df5c64d8dd97082a7abce5090dc90203d4106767d96139c89f4a8223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9857522$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mast, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkelman, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waag, R C</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses.</description><subject>Abdominal Muscles - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Abdominal Muscles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Muscles - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Muscles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kFtLwzAAhYMoc07BPyDkSXxpTdJcH2V4GQwUnG9CSZPUVdKmJi2yf2_Hhk-Hc_g4Dx8A1xjlGBN8j3NKCkXFCZhjRlAmGaGnYI4QwhlVnJ-Di5S-p8pkoWZgpiQTjJA5-NxsHXR17cwAQw11ZUPbdNrDX-09bEPst8GHrx0MHRz9EHUKXWNgP_rkoG3SEOLQhC6HbzoOcLXK4XvTjl7vx3QJzmo9gVfHXICPp8fN8iVbvz6vlg_rzBCJhgxXTmgqJLM1M5xaaa0SSBItdGUcQwpZoxBBhaUYccGFVRwXykhVUy0JKRbg9vDbx_AzujSUbZOM8153Loyp5ApJxQs2gXcH0MSQUnR12cem1XFXYlTuRZa4PIic0Jvj51i1zv6DR3PFH33VbNY</recordid><startdate>19981201</startdate><enddate>19981201</enddate><creator>Mast, T D</creator><creator>Hinkelman, L M</creator><creator>Orr, M J</creator><creator>Waag, R C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981201</creationdate><title>The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations</title><author>Mast, T D ; Hinkelman, L M ; Orr, M J ; Waag, R C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-1be7a4785df5c64d8dd97082a7abce5090dc90203d4106767d96139c89f4a8223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Muscles - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Abdominal Muscles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Muscles - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Muscles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mast, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkelman, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waag, R C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mast, T D</au><au>Hinkelman, L M</au><au>Orr, M J</au><au>Waag, R C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>1998-12-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3651</spage><epage>3664</epage><pages>3651-3664</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Wavefront propagation through the abdominal wall was simulated using a finite-difference time-domain implementation of the linearized wave propagation equations for a lossless, inhomogeneous, two-dimensional fluid as well as a simplified straight-ray model for a two-dimensional absorbing medium. Scanned images of six human abdominal wall cross sections provided the data for the propagation media in the simulations. The images were mapped into regions of fat, muscle, and connective tissue, each of which was assigned uniform sound speed, density, and absorption values. Propagation was simulated through each whole specimen as well as through each fat layer and muscle layer individually. Wavefronts computed by the finite-difference method contained arrival time, energy level, and wave shape distortion similar to that in measurements. Straight-ray simulations produced arrival time fluctuations similar to measurements but produced much smaller energy level fluctuations. These simulations confirm that both fat and muscle produce significant wavefront distortion and that distortion produced by fat sections differs from that produced by muscle sections. Spatial correlation of distortion with tissue composition suggests that most major arrival time fluctuations are caused by propagation through large-scale inhomogeneities such as fatty regions within muscle layers, while most amplitude and waveform variations are the result of scattering from smaller inhomogeneities such as septa within the subcutaneous fat. Additional finite-difference simulations performed using uniform-layer models of the abdominal wall indicate that wavefront distortion is primarily caused by tissue structures and inhomogeneities rather than by refraction at layer interfaces or by variations in layer thicknesses.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>9857522</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.423947</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998-12, Vol.104 (6), p.3651-3664
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69089635
source MEDLINE; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Abdominal Muscles - anatomy & histology
Abdominal Muscles - diagnostic imaging
Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology
Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging
Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology
Connective Tissue - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Models, Biological
Muscles - anatomy & histology
Muscles - diagnostic imaging
Ultrasonography
title The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T22%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20abdominal%20wall%20morphology%20on%20ultrasonic%20pulse%20distortion.%20Part%20II.%20Simulations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Mast,%20T%20D&rft.date=1998-12-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3651&rft.epage=3664&rft.pages=3651-3664&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.423947&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69089635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69089635&rft_id=info:pmid/9857522&rfr_iscdi=true