An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1998-12, Vol.179 (6), p.1451-1457
Hauptverfasser: Cundiff, Geoffrey W., Weidner, Alison C., Visco, Anthony G., Addison, W.Allen, Bump, Richard C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1457
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1451
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 179
creator Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
Weidner, Alison C.
Visco, Anthony G.
Addison, W.Allen
Bump, Richard C.
description Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate. Results: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean values for the points describing the posterior vaginal wall improved >2 cm ( P < .0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2.3 cm ( P < .0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms. Conclusions: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1451-7.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69087426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937898700092</els_id><sourcerecordid>69087426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-28beec4e703925106934770b713284262d8726e03f80f843a6e8acbca90f82fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhlloaq0-QpNZGV2MMswFWJnGeEtqXKhrwjCHiJmBCoyJby_TNt26gf_nXPkQWhb4usBFc_OGMSY5Lym75OyKJsdzcoTmh-cTdBrC12QJJzM046yua4bn6GVlM2lldINRSXSZHq2KxlnZZzIECGEAGzOns_gJWWeC8hCTAA0qZj4dTkEPSW2k8WfoWMs-wPn-XqCPh_v3u6d8_fr4fLda56qq65gT1gKoCiguOakL3PCyohS3tCgJq0hDOkZJA7jUDGtWlbIBJlWrJE-W6LZcoItd34133yOEKIa0GfS9tODGIBqOGU2NUmK9S1TeheBBi403g_S_osBiQie26MTESHAmtugESXXL_YCxHaA7VO25pfjtLg7plz8GvAjKgFXQmYmJ6Jz5Z8IfC-B_hQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69087426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Cundiff, Geoffrey W. ; Weidner, Alison C. ; Visco, Anthony G. ; Addison, W.Allen ; Bump, Richard C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cundiff, Geoffrey W. ; Weidner, Alison C. ; Visco, Anthony G. ; Addison, W.Allen ; Bump, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate. Results: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean values for the points describing the posterior vaginal wall improved &gt;2 cm ( P &lt; .0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2.3 cm ( P &lt; .0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms. Conclusions: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1451-7.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9855580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Constipation - etiology ; Fecal Incontinence - etiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Perineal descent ; perineorrhaphy ; posterior colporrhaphy ; posterior repair ; Rectocele - classification ; Rectocele - complications ; Rectocele - surgery ; rectocele repair ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Vagina - surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1998-12, Vol.179 (6), p.1451-1457</ispartof><rights>1998 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-28beec4e703925106934770b713284262d8726e03f80f843a6e8acbca90f82fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-28beec4e703925106934770b713284262d8726e03f80f843a6e8acbca90f82fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9855580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cundiff, Geoffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidner, Alison C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visco, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addison, W.Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bump, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><title>An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate. Results: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean values for the points describing the posterior vaginal wall improved &gt;2 cm ( P &lt; .0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2.3 cm ( P &lt; .0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms. Conclusions: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1451-7.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Constipation - etiology</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Perineal descent</subject><subject>perineorrhaphy</subject><subject>posterior colporrhaphy</subject><subject>posterior repair</subject><subject>Rectocele - classification</subject><subject>Rectocele - complications</subject><subject>Rectocele - surgery</subject><subject>rectocele repair</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vagina - surgery</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhlloaq0-QpNZGV2MMswFWJnGeEtqXKhrwjCHiJmBCoyJby_TNt26gf_nXPkQWhb4usBFc_OGMSY5Lym75OyKJsdzcoTmh-cTdBrC12QJJzM046yua4bn6GVlM2lldINRSXSZHq2KxlnZZzIECGEAGzOns_gJWWeC8hCTAA0qZj4dTkEPSW2k8WfoWMs-wPn-XqCPh_v3u6d8_fr4fLda56qq65gT1gKoCiguOakL3PCyohS3tCgJq0hDOkZJA7jUDGtWlbIBJlWrJE-W6LZcoItd34133yOEKIa0GfS9tODGIBqOGU2NUmK9S1TeheBBi403g_S_osBiQie26MTESHAmtugESXXL_YCxHaA7VO25pfjtLg7plz8GvAjKgFXQmYmJ6Jz5Z8IfC-B_hQ</recordid><startdate>19981201</startdate><enddate>19981201</enddate><creator>Cundiff, Geoffrey W.</creator><creator>Weidner, Alison C.</creator><creator>Visco, Anthony G.</creator><creator>Addison, W.Allen</creator><creator>Bump, Richard C.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981201</creationdate><title>An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair</title><author>Cundiff, Geoffrey W. ; Weidner, Alison C. ; Visco, Anthony G. ; Addison, W.Allen ; Bump, Richard C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-28beec4e703925106934770b713284262d8726e03f80f843a6e8acbca90f82fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Constipation - etiology</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Perineal descent</topic><topic>perineorrhaphy</topic><topic>posterior colporrhaphy</topic><topic>posterior repair</topic><topic>Rectocele - classification</topic><topic>Rectocele - complications</topic><topic>Rectocele - surgery</topic><topic>rectocele repair</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vagina - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cundiff, Geoffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidner, Alison C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visco, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addison, W.Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bump, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cundiff, Geoffrey W.</au><au>Weidner, Alison C.</au><au>Visco, Anthony G.</au><au>Addison, W.Allen</au><au>Bump, Richard C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1998-12-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>179</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1451</spage><epage>1457</epage><pages>1451-1457</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate. Results: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean values for the points describing the posterior vaginal wall improved &gt;2 cm ( P &lt; .0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2.3 cm ( P &lt; .0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms. Conclusions: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1451-7.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9855580</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1998-12, Vol.179 (6), p.1451-1457
issn 0002-9378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69087426
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Constipation - etiology
Fecal Incontinence - etiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Humans
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Perineal descent
perineorrhaphy
posterior colporrhaphy
posterior repair
Rectocele - classification
Rectocele - complications
Rectocele - surgery
rectocele repair
Severity of Illness Index
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology
Treatment Outcome
Vagina - surgery
title An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20anatomic%20and%20functional%20assessment%20of%20the%20discrete%20defect%20rectocele%20repair&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Cundiff,%20Geoffrey%20W.&rft.date=1998-12-01&rft.volume=179&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1451&rft.epage=1457&rft.pages=1451-1457&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69087426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69087426&rft_id=info:pmid/9855580&rft_els_id=S0002937898700092&rfr_iscdi=true