An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair
Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1998-12, Vol.179 (6), p.1451-1457 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1457 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1451 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 179 |
creator | Cundiff, Geoffrey W. Weidner, Alison C. Visco, Anthony G. Addison, W.Allen Bump, Richard C. |
description | Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair.
Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate.
Results: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean values for the points describing the posterior vaginal wall improved >2 cm (
P < .0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2.3 cm (
P < .0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms.
Conclusions: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1451-7.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69087426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937898700092</els_id><sourcerecordid>69087426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-28beec4e703925106934770b713284262d8726e03f80f843a6e8acbca90f82fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhlloaq0-QpNZGV2MMswFWJnGeEtqXKhrwjCHiJmBCoyJby_TNt26gf_nXPkQWhb4usBFc_OGMSY5Lym75OyKJsdzcoTmh-cTdBrC12QJJzM046yua4bn6GVlM2lldINRSXSZHq2KxlnZZzIECGEAGzOns_gJWWeC8hCTAA0qZj4dTkEPSW2k8WfoWMs-wPn-XqCPh_v3u6d8_fr4fLda56qq65gT1gKoCiguOakL3PCyohS3tCgJq0hDOkZJA7jUDGtWlbIBJlWrJE-W6LZcoItd34133yOEKIa0GfS9tODGIBqOGU2NUmK9S1TeheBBi403g_S_osBiQie26MTESHAmtugESXXL_YCxHaA7VO25pfjtLg7plz8GvAjKgFXQmYmJ6Jz5Z8IfC-B_hQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69087426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Cundiff, Geoffrey W. ; Weidner, Alison C. ; Visco, Anthony G. ; Addison, W.Allen ; Bump, Richard C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cundiff, Geoffrey W. ; Weidner, Alison C. ; Visco, Anthony G. ; Addison, W.Allen ; Bump, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair.
Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate.
Results: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean values for the points describing the posterior vaginal wall improved >2 cm (
P < .0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2.3 cm (
P < .0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms.
Conclusions: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1451-7.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9855580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Constipation - etiology ; Fecal Incontinence - etiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Perineal descent ; perineorrhaphy ; posterior colporrhaphy ; posterior repair ; Rectocele - classification ; Rectocele - complications ; Rectocele - surgery ; rectocele repair ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Vagina - surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1998-12, Vol.179 (6), p.1451-1457</ispartof><rights>1998 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-28beec4e703925106934770b713284262d8726e03f80f843a6e8acbca90f82fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-28beec4e703925106934770b713284262d8726e03f80f843a6e8acbca90f82fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9855580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cundiff, Geoffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidner, Alison C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visco, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addison, W.Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bump, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><title>An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair.
Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate.
Results: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean values for the points describing the posterior vaginal wall improved >2 cm (
P < .0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2.3 cm (
P < .0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms.
Conclusions: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1451-7.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Constipation - etiology</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Perineal descent</subject><subject>perineorrhaphy</subject><subject>posterior colporrhaphy</subject><subject>posterior repair</subject><subject>Rectocele - classification</subject><subject>Rectocele - complications</subject><subject>Rectocele - surgery</subject><subject>rectocele repair</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vagina - surgery</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhlloaq0-QpNZGV2MMswFWJnGeEtqXKhrwjCHiJmBCoyJby_TNt26gf_nXPkQWhb4usBFc_OGMSY5Lym75OyKJsdzcoTmh-cTdBrC12QJJzM046yua4bn6GVlM2lldINRSXSZHq2KxlnZZzIECGEAGzOns_gJWWeC8hCTAA0qZj4dTkEPSW2k8WfoWMs-wPn-XqCPh_v3u6d8_fr4fLda56qq65gT1gKoCiguOakL3PCyohS3tCgJq0hDOkZJA7jUDGtWlbIBJlWrJE-W6LZcoItd34133yOEKIa0GfS9tODGIBqOGU2NUmK9S1TeheBBi403g_S_osBiQie26MTESHAmtugESXXL_YCxHaA7VO25pfjtLg7plz8GvAjKgFXQmYmJ6Jz5Z8IfC-B_hQ</recordid><startdate>19981201</startdate><enddate>19981201</enddate><creator>Cundiff, Geoffrey W.</creator><creator>Weidner, Alison C.</creator><creator>Visco, Anthony G.</creator><creator>Addison, W.Allen</creator><creator>Bump, Richard C.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981201</creationdate><title>An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair</title><author>Cundiff, Geoffrey W. ; Weidner, Alison C. ; Visco, Anthony G. ; Addison, W.Allen ; Bump, Richard C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-28beec4e703925106934770b713284262d8726e03f80f843a6e8acbca90f82fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Constipation - etiology</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Perineal descent</topic><topic>perineorrhaphy</topic><topic>posterior colporrhaphy</topic><topic>posterior repair</topic><topic>Rectocele - classification</topic><topic>Rectocele - complications</topic><topic>Rectocele - surgery</topic><topic>rectocele repair</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vagina - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cundiff, Geoffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidner, Alison C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visco, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addison, W.Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bump, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cundiff, Geoffrey W.</au><au>Weidner, Alison C.</au><au>Visco, Anthony G.</au><au>Addison, W.Allen</au><au>Bump, Richard C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1998-12-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>179</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1451</spage><epage>1457</epage><pages>1451-1457</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional results of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair.
Study Design: Sixty-nine women underwent rectocele repair at Duke University Medical Center during a 3-year period beginning January 1, 1994. Repair was limited to reapproximation of discrete defects in the rectovaginal fascia, without levator plication or perineorrhaphy. Outcome measures included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation measurements, prolapse stage, and a symptom questionnaire. Univariate and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate.
Results: Before the operation 46% patients (32/69) reported constipation, 39% (27/69) reported splinting, 32% (22/69) reported tenesmus, and 13% (9/69) reported fecal incontinence. The median preoperative posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage was 2 (1-4). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation stage had improved for all but 2 women at 6 weeks. Eighteen percent (8/43) had recurrent rectoceles at 12 months. Mean values for the points describing the posterior vaginal wall improved >2 cm (
P < .0001). Although perineorrhaphy was not performed, the genital hiatus decreased by 2.3 cm (
P < .0001), with no significant change in the length of the perineal body. Functional results mirrored anatomic results, with statistically significant improvements for all symptoms.
Conclusions: The discrete defect rectocele repair provides anatomic correction of rectoceles with alleviation of associated symptoms for most women. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1451-7.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9855580</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1998-12, Vol.179 (6), p.1451-1457 |
issn | 0002-9378 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69087426 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Constipation - etiology Fecal Incontinence - etiology Female Follow-Up Studies Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods Humans Middle Aged Patient Satisfaction Perineal descent perineorrhaphy posterior colporrhaphy posterior repair Rectocele - classification Rectocele - complications Rectocele - surgery rectocele repair Severity of Illness Index Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological - etiology Treatment Outcome Vagina - surgery |
title | An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20anatomic%20and%20functional%20assessment%20of%20the%20discrete%20defect%20rectocele%20repair&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Cundiff,%20Geoffrey%20W.&rft.date=1998-12-01&rft.volume=179&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1451&rft.epage=1457&rft.pages=1451-1457&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69087426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69087426&rft_id=info:pmid/9855580&rft_els_id=S0002937898700092&rfr_iscdi=true |