Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate angiographic and long-term results of debulking versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation lesions. Background. Previous studies have shown true bifurcation lesions to be a high risk morphological subset for percuta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1998-12, Vol.32 (7), p.1845-1852
Hauptverfasser: Dauerman, Harold L., Higgins, Peter J., Sparano, Anthony M., Gibson, C.Michael, Garber, Gary R., Carrozza, Joseph P., Kuntz, Richard E., Laham, Roger J., Shubrooks, Samuel J., Baim, Donald S., Cohen, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1852
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1845
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 32
creator Dauerman, Harold L.
Higgins, Peter J.
Sparano, Anthony M.
Gibson, C.Michael
Garber, Gary R.
Carrozza, Joseph P.
Kuntz, Richard E.
Laham, Roger J.
Shubrooks, Samuel J.
Baim, Donald S.
Cohen, David J.
description Objectives. The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate angiographic and long-term results of debulking versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation lesions. Background. Previous studies have shown true bifurcation lesions to be a high risk morphological subset for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Although atherectomy devices have been used to treat bifurcation lesions, no studies have compared the outcomes of these alternative treatment modalities. Methods. Between January 1992 and May 1997, we treated 70 consecutive patients with true bifurcationlesions (defined as a greater than 50% stenosis in both the parent vessel and contiguous side branch) with conventional PTCA (n = 30) or debulking (with rotational or directional atherectomy) plus adjunctive PTCA (n = 40). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. Results. Acute procedural success was 73% in the PTCA group and 97% in the debulking group (p = 0.01). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two patients in the PTCA group and one in the debulking group. Treatment with atherectomy plus PTCA resulted in lower postprocedure residual stenoses than PTCA alone (16 ± 15% vs. 33 ± 17% in the parent vessel, and 6 ± 15% vs. 39 ± 22% in the side branch; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). At 1 year follow-up, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 53% in the PTCA group as compared with 28% in the debulking group (p = 0.05). Independent predictors of the need for repeat TVR were side branch diameter >2.3 mm, longer lesion lengths, and treatment with PTCA alone. Conclusions. For the treatment of true bifurcation lesions, atherectomy with adjunctive PTCA is safe, improves acute angiographic results, and decreases target vessel revascularization compared to PTCA alone. The benefits of debulking for bifurcation lesions were especially seen in lesions involving large side branches.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00488-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69082111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109798004884</els_id><sourcerecordid>69082111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-fae29b364e7b5362af7bca25c11e7f8ed6040a3155590b315366d9e147019ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWh8_oZCV6GI06UwyyUqk-IKKC91KyGTu1Gg6qUmm0H9vbItbV4fLPedezofQmJIrSii_fiV1yQpKZH0hxSUhlRBFtYdGlDFRlEzW-2j0ZzlCxzF-EkK4oPIQHUrBasHpCL0_g_nQvTXa4RaawX3Zfo5XEOIQcaOd877Hup9bv3Q6pjXufMDpA3AKoNMC-oR9l4cBcGO7IRidbE44iFniKTrotItwttMT9HZ_9zZ9LGYvD0_T21lhGBGp6DRMZFPyCuqGlXyiu7oxesIMpVB3AlpOKqLL3IxJ0mQtOW8l0KomVOq2PEHn27PL4L8HiEktbDTgnO7BD1FxScSEUpqNbGs0wccYoFPLYBc6rBUl6peq2lBVv8iUFGpDVVU5N949GJoFtH-pHca8v9nuIZdcWQgqGgu9gdYGMEm13v7z4QeXM4h1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69082111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dauerman, Harold L. ; Higgins, Peter J. ; Sparano, Anthony M. ; Gibson, C.Michael ; Garber, Gary R. ; Carrozza, Joseph P. ; Kuntz, Richard E. ; Laham, Roger J. ; Shubrooks, Samuel J. ; Baim, Donald S. ; Cohen, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dauerman, Harold L. ; Higgins, Peter J. ; Sparano, Anthony M. ; Gibson, C.Michael ; Garber, Gary R. ; Carrozza, Joseph P. ; Kuntz, Richard E. ; Laham, Roger J. ; Shubrooks, Samuel J. ; Baim, Donald S. ; Cohen, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate angiographic and long-term results of debulking versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation lesions. Background. Previous studies have shown true bifurcation lesions to be a high risk morphological subset for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Although atherectomy devices have been used to treat bifurcation lesions, no studies have compared the outcomes of these alternative treatment modalities. Methods. Between January 1992 and May 1997, we treated 70 consecutive patients with true bifurcationlesions (defined as a greater than 50% stenosis in both the parent vessel and contiguous side branch) with conventional PTCA (n = 30) or debulking (with rotational or directional atherectomy) plus adjunctive PTCA (n = 40). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. Results. Acute procedural success was 73% in the PTCA group and 97% in the debulking group (p = 0.01). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two patients in the PTCA group and one in the debulking group. Treatment with atherectomy plus PTCA resulted in lower postprocedure residual stenoses than PTCA alone (16 ± 15% vs. 33 ± 17% in the parent vessel, and 6 ± 15% vs. 39 ± 22% in the side branch; p &lt; 0.001 for both comparisons). At 1 year follow-up, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 53% in the PTCA group as compared with 28% in the debulking group (p = 0.05). Independent predictors of the need for repeat TVR were side branch diameter &gt;2.3 mm, longer lesion lengths, and treatment with PTCA alone. Conclusions. For the treatment of true bifurcation lesions, atherectomy with adjunctive PTCA is safe, improves acute angiographic results, and decreases target vessel revascularization compared to PTCA alone. The benefits of debulking for bifurcation lesions were especially seen in lesions involving large side branches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00488-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9857861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; Atherectomy, Coronary ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Disease - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Regression Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998-12, Vol.32 (7), p.1845-1852</ispartof><rights>1998 American College of Cardiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-fae29b364e7b5362af7bca25c11e7f8ed6040a3155590b315366d9e147019ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-fae29b364e7b5362af7bca25c11e7f8ed6040a3155590b315366d9e147019ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00488-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9857861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dauerman, Harold L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparano, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, C.Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garber, Gary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrozza, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuntz, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laham, Roger J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shubrooks, Samuel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baim, Donald S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>Objectives. The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate angiographic and long-term results of debulking versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation lesions. Background. Previous studies have shown true bifurcation lesions to be a high risk morphological subset for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Although atherectomy devices have been used to treat bifurcation lesions, no studies have compared the outcomes of these alternative treatment modalities. Methods. Between January 1992 and May 1997, we treated 70 consecutive patients with true bifurcationlesions (defined as a greater than 50% stenosis in both the parent vessel and contiguous side branch) with conventional PTCA (n = 30) or debulking (with rotational or directional atherectomy) plus adjunctive PTCA (n = 40). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. Results. Acute procedural success was 73% in the PTCA group and 97% in the debulking group (p = 0.01). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two patients in the PTCA group and one in the debulking group. Treatment with atherectomy plus PTCA resulted in lower postprocedure residual stenoses than PTCA alone (16 ± 15% vs. 33 ± 17% in the parent vessel, and 6 ± 15% vs. 39 ± 22% in the side branch; p &lt; 0.001 for both comparisons). At 1 year follow-up, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 53% in the PTCA group as compared with 28% in the debulking group (p = 0.05). Independent predictors of the need for repeat TVR were side branch diameter &gt;2.3 mm, longer lesion lengths, and treatment with PTCA alone. Conclusions. For the treatment of true bifurcation lesions, atherectomy with adjunctive PTCA is safe, improves acute angiographic results, and decreases target vessel revascularization compared to PTCA alone. The benefits of debulking for bifurcation lesions were especially seen in lesions involving large side branches.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary</subject><subject>Atherectomy, Coronary</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWh8_oZCV6GI06UwyyUqk-IKKC91KyGTu1Gg6qUmm0H9vbItbV4fLPedezofQmJIrSii_fiV1yQpKZH0hxSUhlRBFtYdGlDFRlEzW-2j0ZzlCxzF-EkK4oPIQHUrBasHpCL0_g_nQvTXa4RaawX3Zfo5XEOIQcaOd877Hup9bv3Q6pjXufMDpA3AKoNMC-oR9l4cBcGO7IRidbE44iFniKTrotItwttMT9HZ_9zZ9LGYvD0_T21lhGBGp6DRMZFPyCuqGlXyiu7oxesIMpVB3AlpOKqLL3IxJ0mQtOW8l0KomVOq2PEHn27PL4L8HiEktbDTgnO7BD1FxScSEUpqNbGs0wccYoFPLYBc6rBUl6peq2lBVv8iUFGpDVVU5N949GJoFtH-pHca8v9nuIZdcWQgqGgu9gdYGMEm13v7z4QeXM4h1</recordid><startdate>199812</startdate><enddate>199812</enddate><creator>Dauerman, Harold L.</creator><creator>Higgins, Peter J.</creator><creator>Sparano, Anthony M.</creator><creator>Gibson, C.Michael</creator><creator>Garber, Gary R.</creator><creator>Carrozza, Joseph P.</creator><creator>Kuntz, Richard E.</creator><creator>Laham, Roger J.</creator><creator>Shubrooks, Samuel J.</creator><creator>Baim, Donald S.</creator><creator>Cohen, David J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199812</creationdate><title>Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions</title><author>Dauerman, Harold L. ; Higgins, Peter J. ; Sparano, Anthony M. ; Gibson, C.Michael ; Garber, Gary R. ; Carrozza, Joseph P. ; Kuntz, Richard E. ; Laham, Roger J. ; Shubrooks, Samuel J. ; Baim, Donald S. ; Cohen, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-fae29b364e7b5362af7bca25c11e7f8ed6040a3155590b315366d9e147019ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary</topic><topic>Atherectomy, Coronary</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dauerman, Harold L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparano, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, C.Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garber, Gary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrozza, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuntz, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laham, Roger J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shubrooks, Samuel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baim, Donald S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dauerman, Harold L.</au><au>Higgins, Peter J.</au><au>Sparano, Anthony M.</au><au>Gibson, C.Michael</au><au>Garber, Gary R.</au><au>Carrozza, Joseph P.</au><au>Kuntz, Richard E.</au><au>Laham, Roger J.</au><au>Shubrooks, Samuel J.</au><au>Baim, Donald S.</au><au>Cohen, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>1998-12</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1845</spage><epage>1852</epage><pages>1845-1852</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Objectives. The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate angiographic and long-term results of debulking versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation lesions. Background. Previous studies have shown true bifurcation lesions to be a high risk morphological subset for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Although atherectomy devices have been used to treat bifurcation lesions, no studies have compared the outcomes of these alternative treatment modalities. Methods. Between January 1992 and May 1997, we treated 70 consecutive patients with true bifurcationlesions (defined as a greater than 50% stenosis in both the parent vessel and contiguous side branch) with conventional PTCA (n = 30) or debulking (with rotational or directional atherectomy) plus adjunctive PTCA (n = 40). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. Results. Acute procedural success was 73% in the PTCA group and 97% in the debulking group (p = 0.01). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two patients in the PTCA group and one in the debulking group. Treatment with atherectomy plus PTCA resulted in lower postprocedure residual stenoses than PTCA alone (16 ± 15% vs. 33 ± 17% in the parent vessel, and 6 ± 15% vs. 39 ± 22% in the side branch; p &lt; 0.001 for both comparisons). At 1 year follow-up, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 53% in the PTCA group as compared with 28% in the debulking group (p = 0.05). Independent predictors of the need for repeat TVR were side branch diameter &gt;2.3 mm, longer lesion lengths, and treatment with PTCA alone. Conclusions. For the treatment of true bifurcation lesions, atherectomy with adjunctive PTCA is safe, improves acute angiographic results, and decreases target vessel revascularization compared to PTCA alone. The benefits of debulking for bifurcation lesions were especially seen in lesions involving large side branches.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9857861</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00488-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998-12, Vol.32 (7), p.1845-1852
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69082111
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
Atherectomy, Coronary
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Disease - therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Regression Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A58%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanical%20debulking%20versus%20balloon%20angioplasty%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20true%20bifurcation%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Dauerman,%20Harold%20L.&rft.date=1998-12&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1845&rft.epage=1852&rft.pages=1845-1852&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00488-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69082111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69082111&rft_id=info:pmid/9857861&rft_els_id=S0735109798004884&rfr_iscdi=true