Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung

Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The vali...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Nippon Medical School 2007, Vol.74(6), pp.402-408
Hauptverfasser: Saitoh, Erika, Yokomizo, Yuki, Chang, Chih-Hung, Eremenco, Sonya, Kaneko, Hiyori, Kobayashi, Kunihiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 408
container_issue 6
container_start_page 402
container_title Journal of Nippon Medical School
container_volume 74
creator Saitoh, Erika
Yokomizo, Yuki
Chang, Chih-Hung
Eremenco, Sonya
Kaneko, Hiyori
Kobayashi, Kunihiko
description Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The validation of the Japanese FACT-G was reported previously, and this report describes the cross-cultural validation of the LCS. Methods: The Japanese version of the LCS was developed through an iterative forward-backward translation sequence used throughout the FACT Multilingual Translation Project. In evaluating psychometric performance, its construct validity was investigated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Clinical validities of a known-groups comparison and longitudinal validity were also investigated. Results: The FACT-L was administered twice to 180 patients with lung cancer within 2 weeks. The Japanese LCS had borderline values for Cronbachs alpha coefficients (0.62-0.67). Factor analysis indicated that the LCS had the three dimensions of respiratory symptoms, appetite plus body weight, and clear thinking. For clinical validity, a known-groups comparison showed that the LCS could differentiate patients according to truth disclosure, as Japanese doctors sometimes do not fully inform terminally ill patients. However, responsiveness was not proved when performance status was used as an anchor, probably owing to the short interval between the administration of the two measures. Conclusion: The Japanese version of the LCS asked questions about multiple symptoms of patients with lung cancer, as did the original English LCS. The longitudinal clinical validity of the Japanese version should be investigated in future clinical trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1272/jnms.74.402
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69067714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69067714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-1319050c0193d6dc87860d94e196c5fbc84bb691dabaa7728fcab50b8b916f983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtv1DAUhS1ERUthxR5lxQZlasfP7KhGDA-N1AWlW8t2bjqJEmewE1Vd8s-xyVC68LXlc-7n64PQO4I3pJLVVe_HuJFsw3D1Al0QymRJGa5f_j3zkgkpztHrGHuMKeVcvELnRGHFCKUX6Pc2TDGWbhnmJZihuDND15i5m3wxtcV8gOK7ORoPEYo7CPHZ_X7x98XWeAeh-LHY6MwARZKztlu8y4wEvI4RYhzBz7nx5L89QDDHxzIz3qCz1gwR3p72S_Rz9_l2-7Xc33z5tr3el45zXJWEkhpz7DCpaSMap6QSuKkZkFo43lqnmLWiJo2xxkhZqdYZy7FVtiairRW9RB9W7jFMvxaIsx676GAY0u-mJWpRYyElYcn4cTW6HE2AVh9DN5rwqAnWOXGdE9eS6ZR4cr8_YRc7QvPfe4o4GXarIaldCmnyQ-dB99MSUj5RuwfSTxlYYSx1WgyLtDGNEz4XpZggPM_1aQX1cTb38PSSCXPnBniaSqwld_-T3MEEDZ7-ASHPqzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69067714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science &amp; Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><source>Open Access Titles of Japan</source><creator>Saitoh, Erika ; Yokomizo, Yuki ; Chang, Chih-Hung ; Eremenco, Sonya ; Kaneko, Hiyori ; Kobayashi, Kunihiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Erika ; Yokomizo, Yuki ; Chang, Chih-Hung ; Eremenco, Sonya ; Kaneko, Hiyori ; Kobayashi, Kunihiko ; Komagome Hospital ; Evanston ; Buehler Center on Aging ; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine ; Saitama Medical University ; Health and Society ; Research and Education ; Evanston Nothwestern Healthcare ; Nippon Medical School ; East Japan Chesters Group ; Center on Outcomes ; Department of Respiratory Medicine ; Graduate School of Medicine ; Department of Pulmonary Medicine/Infection and Oncology</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The validation of the Japanese FACT-G was reported previously, and this report describes the cross-cultural validation of the LCS. Methods: The Japanese version of the LCS was developed through an iterative forward-backward translation sequence used throughout the FACT Multilingual Translation Project. In evaluating psychometric performance, its construct validity was investigated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Clinical validities of a known-groups comparison and longitudinal validity were also investigated. Results: The FACT-L was administered twice to 180 patients with lung cancer within 2 weeks. The Japanese LCS had borderline values for Cronbachs alpha coefficients (0.62-0.67). Factor analysis indicated that the LCS had the three dimensions of respiratory symptoms, appetite plus body weight, and clear thinking. For clinical validity, a known-groups comparison showed that the LCS could differentiate patients according to truth disclosure, as Japanese doctors sometimes do not fully inform terminally ill patients. However, responsiveness was not proved when performance status was used as an anchor, probably owing to the short interval between the administration of the two measures. Conclusion: The Japanese version of the LCS asked questions about multiple symptoms of patients with lung cancer, as did the original English LCS. The longitudinal clinical validity of the Japanese version should be investigated in future clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1345-4676</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-3409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1272/jnms.74.402</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18084133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Female ; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung ; Humans ; Japan ; Japanese ; Lung Cancer Subscale ; lung carcinoma ; Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Lung Neoplasms - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; questionnaire ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translating</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nippon Medical School, 2007, Vol.74(6), pp.402-408</ispartof><rights>2007 by the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-1319050c0193d6dc87860d94e196c5fbc84bb691dabaa7728fcab50b8b916f983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-1319050c0193d6dc87860d94e196c5fbc84bb691dabaa7728fcab50b8b916f983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1876,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18084133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokomizo, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eremenco, Sonya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Hiyori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Kunihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komagome Hospital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evanston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buehler Center on Aging</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saitama Medical University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Health and Society</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Research and Education</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evanston Nothwestern Healthcare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nippon Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East Japan Chesters Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center on Outcomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Respiratory Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graduate School of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pulmonary Medicine/Infection and Oncology</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</title><title>Journal of Nippon Medical School</title><addtitle>J Nippon Med Sch</addtitle><description>Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The validation of the Japanese FACT-G was reported previously, and this report describes the cross-cultural validation of the LCS. Methods: The Japanese version of the LCS was developed through an iterative forward-backward translation sequence used throughout the FACT Multilingual Translation Project. In evaluating psychometric performance, its construct validity was investigated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Clinical validities of a known-groups comparison and longitudinal validity were also investigated. Results: The FACT-L was administered twice to 180 patients with lung cancer within 2 weeks. The Japanese LCS had borderline values for Cronbachs alpha coefficients (0.62-0.67). Factor analysis indicated that the LCS had the three dimensions of respiratory symptoms, appetite plus body weight, and clear thinking. For clinical validity, a known-groups comparison showed that the LCS could differentiate patients according to truth disclosure, as Japanese doctors sometimes do not fully inform terminally ill patients. However, responsiveness was not proved when performance status was used as an anchor, probably owing to the short interval between the administration of the two measures. Conclusion: The Japanese version of the LCS asked questions about multiple symptoms of patients with lung cancer, as did the original English LCS. The longitudinal clinical validity of the Japanese version should be investigated in future clinical trials.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Japanese</subject><subject>Lung Cancer Subscale</subject><subject>lung carcinoma</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translating</subject><issn>1345-4676</issn><issn>1347-3409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtv1DAUhS1ERUthxR5lxQZlasfP7KhGDA-N1AWlW8t2bjqJEmewE1Vd8s-xyVC68LXlc-7n64PQO4I3pJLVVe_HuJFsw3D1Al0QymRJGa5f_j3zkgkpztHrGHuMKeVcvELnRGHFCKUX6Pc2TDGWbhnmJZihuDND15i5m3wxtcV8gOK7ORoPEYo7CPHZ_X7x98XWeAeh-LHY6MwARZKztlu8y4wEvI4RYhzBz7nx5L89QDDHxzIz3qCz1gwR3p72S_Rz9_l2-7Xc33z5tr3el45zXJWEkhpz7DCpaSMap6QSuKkZkFo43lqnmLWiJo2xxkhZqdYZy7FVtiairRW9RB9W7jFMvxaIsx676GAY0u-mJWpRYyElYcn4cTW6HE2AVh9DN5rwqAnWOXGdE9eS6ZR4cr8_YRc7QvPfe4o4GXarIaldCmnyQ-dB99MSUj5RuwfSTxlYYSx1WgyLtDGNEz4XpZggPM_1aQX1cTb38PSSCXPnBniaSqwld_-T3MEEDZ7-ASHPqzg</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Saitoh, Erika</creator><creator>Yokomizo, Yuki</creator><creator>Chang, Chih-Hung</creator><creator>Eremenco, Sonya</creator><creator>Kaneko, Hiyori</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Kunihiko</creator><general>The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</title><author>Saitoh, Erika ; Yokomizo, Yuki ; Chang, Chih-Hung ; Eremenco, Sonya ; Kaneko, Hiyori ; Kobayashi, Kunihiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-1319050c0193d6dc87860d94e196c5fbc84bb691dabaa7728fcab50b8b916f983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Japanese</topic><topic>Lung Cancer Subscale</topic><topic>lung carcinoma</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokomizo, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eremenco, Sonya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Hiyori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Kunihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komagome Hospital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evanston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buehler Center on Aging</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saitama Medical University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Health and Society</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Research and Education</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evanston Nothwestern Healthcare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nippon Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East Japan Chesters Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center on Outcomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Respiratory Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graduate School of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pulmonary Medicine/Infection and Oncology</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nippon Medical School</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saitoh, Erika</au><au>Yokomizo, Yuki</au><au>Chang, Chih-Hung</au><au>Eremenco, Sonya</au><au>Kaneko, Hiyori</au><au>Kobayashi, Kunihiko</au><aucorp>Komagome Hospital</aucorp><aucorp>Evanston</aucorp><aucorp>Buehler Center on Aging</aucorp><aucorp>Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>Saitama Medical University</aucorp><aucorp>Health and Society</aucorp><aucorp>Research and Education</aucorp><aucorp>Evanston Nothwestern Healthcare</aucorp><aucorp>Nippon Medical School</aucorp><aucorp>East Japan Chesters Group</aucorp><aucorp>Center on Outcomes</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Respiratory Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>Graduate School of Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Pulmonary Medicine/Infection and Oncology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nippon Medical School</jtitle><addtitle>J Nippon Med Sch</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>402</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>402-408</pages><issn>1345-4676</issn><eissn>1347-3409</eissn><abstract>Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The validation of the Japanese FACT-G was reported previously, and this report describes the cross-cultural validation of the LCS. Methods: The Japanese version of the LCS was developed through an iterative forward-backward translation sequence used throughout the FACT Multilingual Translation Project. In evaluating psychometric performance, its construct validity was investigated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Clinical validities of a known-groups comparison and longitudinal validity were also investigated. Results: The FACT-L was administered twice to 180 patients with lung cancer within 2 weeks. The Japanese LCS had borderline values for Cronbachs alpha coefficients (0.62-0.67). Factor analysis indicated that the LCS had the three dimensions of respiratory symptoms, appetite plus body weight, and clear thinking. For clinical validity, a known-groups comparison showed that the LCS could differentiate patients according to truth disclosure, as Japanese doctors sometimes do not fully inform terminally ill patients. However, responsiveness was not proved when performance status was used as an anchor, probably owing to the short interval between the administration of the two measures. Conclusion: The Japanese version of the LCS asked questions about multiple symptoms of patients with lung cancer, as did the original English LCS. The longitudinal clinical validity of the Japanese version should be investigated in future clinical trials.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</pub><pmid>18084133</pmid><doi>10.1272/jnms.74.402</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1345-4676
ispartof Journal of Nippon Medical School, 2007, Vol.74(6), pp.402-408
issn 1345-4676
1347-3409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69067714
source MEDLINE; J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese; Open Access Titles of Japan
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Female
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung
Humans
Japan
Japanese
Lung Cancer Subscale
lung carcinoma
Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology
Lung Neoplasms - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Psychometrics
Quality of Life
questionnaire
Surveys and Questionnaires
Translating
title Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A13%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-cultural%20Validation%20of%20the%20Japanese%20Version%20of%20the%20Lung%20Cancer%20Subscale%20on%20the%20Functional%20Assessment%20of%20Cancer%20Therapy-Lung&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nippon%20Medical%20School&rft.au=Saitoh,%20Erika&rft.aucorp=Komagome%20Hospital&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=402&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=402-408&rft.issn=1345-4676&rft.eissn=1347-3409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1272/jnms.74.402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69067714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69067714&rft_id=info:pmid/18084133&rfr_iscdi=true