Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung
Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The vali...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Nippon Medical School 2007, Vol.74(6), pp.402-408 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 408 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 402 |
container_title | Journal of Nippon Medical School |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Saitoh, Erika Yokomizo, Yuki Chang, Chih-Hung Eremenco, Sonya Kaneko, Hiyori Kobayashi, Kunihiko |
description | Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The validation of the Japanese FACT-G was reported previously, and this report describes the cross-cultural validation of the LCS. Methods: The Japanese version of the LCS was developed through an iterative forward-backward translation sequence used throughout the FACT Multilingual Translation Project. In evaluating psychometric performance, its construct validity was investigated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Clinical validities of a known-groups comparison and longitudinal validity were also investigated. Results: The FACT-L was administered twice to 180 patients with lung cancer within 2 weeks. The Japanese LCS had borderline values for Cronbachs alpha coefficients (0.62-0.67). Factor analysis indicated that the LCS had the three dimensions of respiratory symptoms, appetite plus body weight, and clear thinking. For clinical validity, a known-groups comparison showed that the LCS could differentiate patients according to truth disclosure, as Japanese doctors sometimes do not fully inform terminally ill patients. However, responsiveness was not proved when performance status was used as an anchor, probably owing to the short interval between the administration of the two measures. Conclusion: The Japanese version of the LCS asked questions about multiple symptoms of patients with lung cancer, as did the original English LCS. The longitudinal clinical validity of the Japanese version should be investigated in future clinical trials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1272/jnms.74.402 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69067714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69067714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-1319050c0193d6dc87860d94e196c5fbc84bb691dabaa7728fcab50b8b916f983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtv1DAUhS1ERUthxR5lxQZlasfP7KhGDA-N1AWlW8t2bjqJEmewE1Vd8s-xyVC68LXlc-7n64PQO4I3pJLVVe_HuJFsw3D1Al0QymRJGa5f_j3zkgkpztHrGHuMKeVcvELnRGHFCKUX6Pc2TDGWbhnmJZihuDND15i5m3wxtcV8gOK7ORoPEYo7CPHZ_X7x98XWeAeh-LHY6MwARZKztlu8y4wEvI4RYhzBz7nx5L89QDDHxzIz3qCz1gwR3p72S_Rz9_l2-7Xc33z5tr3el45zXJWEkhpz7DCpaSMap6QSuKkZkFo43lqnmLWiJo2xxkhZqdYZy7FVtiairRW9RB9W7jFMvxaIsx676GAY0u-mJWpRYyElYcn4cTW6HE2AVh9DN5rwqAnWOXGdE9eS6ZR4cr8_YRc7QvPfe4o4GXarIaldCmnyQ-dB99MSUj5RuwfSTxlYYSx1WgyLtDGNEz4XpZggPM_1aQX1cTb38PSSCXPnBniaSqwld_-T3MEEDZ7-ASHPqzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69067714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><source>Open Access Titles of Japan</source><creator>Saitoh, Erika ; Yokomizo, Yuki ; Chang, Chih-Hung ; Eremenco, Sonya ; Kaneko, Hiyori ; Kobayashi, Kunihiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Erika ; Yokomizo, Yuki ; Chang, Chih-Hung ; Eremenco, Sonya ; Kaneko, Hiyori ; Kobayashi, Kunihiko ; Komagome Hospital ; Evanston ; Buehler Center on Aging ; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine ; Saitama Medical University ; Health and Society ; Research and Education ; Evanston Nothwestern Healthcare ; Nippon Medical School ; East Japan Chesters Group ; Center on Outcomes ; Department of Respiratory Medicine ; Graduate School of Medicine ; Department of Pulmonary Medicine/Infection and Oncology</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The validation of the Japanese FACT-G was reported previously, and this report describes the cross-cultural validation of the LCS. Methods: The Japanese version of the LCS was developed through an iterative forward-backward translation sequence used throughout the FACT Multilingual Translation Project. In evaluating psychometric performance, its construct validity was investigated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Clinical validities of a known-groups comparison and longitudinal validity were also investigated. Results: The FACT-L was administered twice to 180 patients with lung cancer within 2 weeks. The Japanese LCS had borderline values for Cronbachs alpha coefficients (0.62-0.67). Factor analysis indicated that the LCS had the three dimensions of respiratory symptoms, appetite plus body weight, and clear thinking. For clinical validity, a known-groups comparison showed that the LCS could differentiate patients according to truth disclosure, as Japanese doctors sometimes do not fully inform terminally ill patients. However, responsiveness was not proved when performance status was used as an anchor, probably owing to the short interval between the administration of the two measures. Conclusion: The Japanese version of the LCS asked questions about multiple symptoms of patients with lung cancer, as did the original English LCS. The longitudinal clinical validity of the Japanese version should be investigated in future clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1345-4676</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-3409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1272/jnms.74.402</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18084133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Female ; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung ; Humans ; Japan ; Japanese ; Lung Cancer Subscale ; lung carcinoma ; Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Lung Neoplasms - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; questionnaire ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translating</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nippon Medical School, 2007, Vol.74(6), pp.402-408</ispartof><rights>2007 by the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-1319050c0193d6dc87860d94e196c5fbc84bb691dabaa7728fcab50b8b916f983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-1319050c0193d6dc87860d94e196c5fbc84bb691dabaa7728fcab50b8b916f983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1876,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18084133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokomizo, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eremenco, Sonya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Hiyori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Kunihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komagome Hospital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evanston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buehler Center on Aging</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saitama Medical University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Health and Society</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Research and Education</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evanston Nothwestern Healthcare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nippon Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East Japan Chesters Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center on Outcomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Respiratory Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graduate School of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pulmonary Medicine/Infection and Oncology</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</title><title>Journal of Nippon Medical School</title><addtitle>J Nippon Med Sch</addtitle><description>Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The validation of the Japanese FACT-G was reported previously, and this report describes the cross-cultural validation of the LCS. Methods: The Japanese version of the LCS was developed through an iterative forward-backward translation sequence used throughout the FACT Multilingual Translation Project. In evaluating psychometric performance, its construct validity was investigated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Clinical validities of a known-groups comparison and longitudinal validity were also investigated. Results: The FACT-L was administered twice to 180 patients with lung cancer within 2 weeks. The Japanese LCS had borderline values for Cronbachs alpha coefficients (0.62-0.67). Factor analysis indicated that the LCS had the three dimensions of respiratory symptoms, appetite plus body weight, and clear thinking. For clinical validity, a known-groups comparison showed that the LCS could differentiate patients according to truth disclosure, as Japanese doctors sometimes do not fully inform terminally ill patients. However, responsiveness was not proved when performance status was used as an anchor, probably owing to the short interval between the administration of the two measures. Conclusion: The Japanese version of the LCS asked questions about multiple symptoms of patients with lung cancer, as did the original English LCS. The longitudinal clinical validity of the Japanese version should be investigated in future clinical trials.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Japanese</subject><subject>Lung Cancer Subscale</subject><subject>lung carcinoma</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translating</subject><issn>1345-4676</issn><issn>1347-3409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtv1DAUhS1ERUthxR5lxQZlasfP7KhGDA-N1AWlW8t2bjqJEmewE1Vd8s-xyVC68LXlc-7n64PQO4I3pJLVVe_HuJFsw3D1Al0QymRJGa5f_j3zkgkpztHrGHuMKeVcvELnRGHFCKUX6Pc2TDGWbhnmJZihuDND15i5m3wxtcV8gOK7ORoPEYo7CPHZ_X7x98XWeAeh-LHY6MwARZKztlu8y4wEvI4RYhzBz7nx5L89QDDHxzIz3qCz1gwR3p72S_Rz9_l2-7Xc33z5tr3el45zXJWEkhpz7DCpaSMap6QSuKkZkFo43lqnmLWiJo2xxkhZqdYZy7FVtiairRW9RB9W7jFMvxaIsx676GAY0u-mJWpRYyElYcn4cTW6HE2AVh9DN5rwqAnWOXGdE9eS6ZR4cr8_YRc7QvPfe4o4GXarIaldCmnyQ-dB99MSUj5RuwfSTxlYYSx1WgyLtDGNEz4XpZggPM_1aQX1cTb38PSSCXPnBniaSqwld_-T3MEEDZ7-ASHPqzg</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Saitoh, Erika</creator><creator>Yokomizo, Yuki</creator><creator>Chang, Chih-Hung</creator><creator>Eremenco, Sonya</creator><creator>Kaneko, Hiyori</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Kunihiko</creator><general>The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</title><author>Saitoh, Erika ; Yokomizo, Yuki ; Chang, Chih-Hung ; Eremenco, Sonya ; Kaneko, Hiyori ; Kobayashi, Kunihiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5502-1319050c0193d6dc87860d94e196c5fbc84bb691dabaa7728fcab50b8b916f983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Japanese</topic><topic>Lung Cancer Subscale</topic><topic>lung carcinoma</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saitoh, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokomizo, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eremenco, Sonya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Hiyori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Kunihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komagome Hospital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evanston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buehler Center on Aging</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saitama Medical University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Health and Society</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Research and Education</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evanston Nothwestern Healthcare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nippon Medical School</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East Japan Chesters Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Center on Outcomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Respiratory Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graduate School of Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pulmonary Medicine/Infection and Oncology</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nippon Medical School</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saitoh, Erika</au><au>Yokomizo, Yuki</au><au>Chang, Chih-Hung</au><au>Eremenco, Sonya</au><au>Kaneko, Hiyori</au><au>Kobayashi, Kunihiko</au><aucorp>Komagome Hospital</aucorp><aucorp>Evanston</aucorp><aucorp>Buehler Center on Aging</aucorp><aucorp>Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>Saitama Medical University</aucorp><aucorp>Health and Society</aucorp><aucorp>Research and Education</aucorp><aucorp>Evanston Nothwestern Healthcare</aucorp><aucorp>Nippon Medical School</aucorp><aucorp>East Japan Chesters Group</aucorp><aucorp>Center on Outcomes</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Respiratory Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>Graduate School of Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Pulmonary Medicine/Infection and Oncology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nippon Medical School</jtitle><addtitle>J Nippon Med Sch</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>402</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>402-408</pages><issn>1345-4676</issn><eissn>1347-3409</eissn><abstract>Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, which consists of a core questionnaire (the General Measure of FACT [FACT-G]) and a 9-item Additional Concerns comprised of a 7-item Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), was developed in an English-speaking culture. The validation of the Japanese FACT-G was reported previously, and this report describes the cross-cultural validation of the LCS. Methods: The Japanese version of the LCS was developed through an iterative forward-backward translation sequence used throughout the FACT Multilingual Translation Project. In evaluating psychometric performance, its construct validity was investigated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Clinical validities of a known-groups comparison and longitudinal validity were also investigated. Results: The FACT-L was administered twice to 180 patients with lung cancer within 2 weeks. The Japanese LCS had borderline values for Cronbachs alpha coefficients (0.62-0.67). Factor analysis indicated that the LCS had the three dimensions of respiratory symptoms, appetite plus body weight, and clear thinking. For clinical validity, a known-groups comparison showed that the LCS could differentiate patients according to truth disclosure, as Japanese doctors sometimes do not fully inform terminally ill patients. However, responsiveness was not proved when performance status was used as an anchor, probably owing to the short interval between the administration of the two measures. Conclusion: The Japanese version of the LCS asked questions about multiple symptoms of patients with lung cancer, as did the original English LCS. The longitudinal clinical validity of the Japanese version should be investigated in future clinical trials.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>The Medical Association of Nippon Medical School</pub><pmid>18084133</pmid><doi>10.1272/jnms.74.402</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1345-4676 |
ispartof | Journal of Nippon Medical School, 2007, Vol.74(6), pp.402-408 |
issn | 1345-4676 1347-3409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69067714 |
source | MEDLINE; J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese; Open Access Titles of Japan |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cross-Cultural Comparison Female Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Humans Japan Japanese Lung Cancer Subscale lung carcinoma Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology Lung Neoplasms - therapy Male Middle Aged Psychometrics Quality of Life questionnaire Surveys and Questionnaires Translating |
title | Cross-cultural Validation of the Japanese Version of the Lung Cancer Subscale on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A13%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-cultural%20Validation%20of%20the%20Japanese%20Version%20of%20the%20Lung%20Cancer%20Subscale%20on%20the%20Functional%20Assessment%20of%20Cancer%20Therapy-Lung&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nippon%20Medical%20School&rft.au=Saitoh,%20Erika&rft.aucorp=Komagome%20Hospital&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=402&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=402-408&rft.issn=1345-4676&rft.eissn=1347-3409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1272/jnms.74.402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69067714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69067714&rft_id=info:pmid/18084133&rfr_iscdi=true |