Fruit and Vegetable Distribution Program Versus a Multicomponent Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Which Should Be Recommended for Implementation?
ABSTRACT Background: Two primary school–based interventions were implemented, aimed at increasing fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption by children, both with proven effectiveness: (1) a free daily F&V distribution scheme for all primary school children and (2) a multicomponent, age‐specifi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of school health 2007-12, Vol.77 (10), p.679-686 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 686 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 679 |
| container_title | The Journal of school health |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | Reinaerts, Evelien B.M. De Nooijer, Jascha De Vries, Nanne K. |
| description | ABSTRACT
Background: Two primary school–based interventions were implemented, aimed at increasing fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption by children, both with proven effectiveness: (1) a free daily F&V distribution scheme for all primary school children and (2) a multicomponent, age‐specific program consisting of a classroom curriculum, parental involvement, and an environmental component. This article describes and compares the implementation, evaluation, and potential for adoption of the 2 interventions.
Methods: A total of 48 teachers who worked with either of these programs filled out a questionnaire at the end of the intervention period. Additionally, 24 of the teachers who worked with the multicomponent program filled out periodic monitoring reports during the intervention.
Results: Compared to the F&V distribution, the multicomponent program was less fully implemented and that implementation of activities decreased over time. Both programs were evaluated favorably, and about half of the teachers indicated that they were willing to use the program again in the following school year. Teachers who used the multicomponent program experienced more social pressure to implement the program. They rated the program they had used as more complex and risky than the other group rated the distribution program.
Conclusions: The free distribution program has the greatest potential for being adopted by schoolteachers, but that efforts must be made to acquire funding for it. Until these resources are available, the multicomponent program seems to be a good alternative if improved as suggested. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00251.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69055054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ854538</ericid><sourcerecordid>1403838771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-f5a53440caf5d204ce50436abdc3e2f69662bfd54c71763658ff09d4fadf07e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUltv0zAUthCIlcI_QMjigbcUO74kRUIIytZ12tjEBnu0HOd4TUniYiei-0H8TxxSFQnxwHnx5bvYOt9BCFMyo7Feb2Y04zKhQtJZSkg2IyQVdLZ7gCYH4CGaxNs04WxOj9CTEDYkVsayx-iI5iSTnLIJ-nni-6rDui3xV7iDThc14I9V6HxV9F3lWnzl3Z3XTYR96APW-KKvu8q4ZutaaLsD3jm8ao0HHQD_y3Th2tA328HzDb5dV2aNr9eur0v8AfBniIYNtCWU2DqPV822hnju9MB_9xQ9sroO8Gy_TtGXk-ObxWlyfrlcLd6fJ4bljCZWaME4J0ZbUaaEGxCEM6mL0jBIrZxLmRa2FNxkNJNMitxaMi-51aUlGVA2Ra9G361333sInWqqYKCudQuuD0rOiRBE8Eh8-Rdx43rfxr-pNDY_4ywf3PKRZLwLwYNVW1812t8rStSQo9qoIS41xKWGHNXvHNUuSl_s_fuigfKPcB9cJDwfCeArc4CPz3LBRezFFL0d4R9VDff__a46u7w-jbuoT0Z9nATYHfTaf1MyjpBQt5-WaiGubi6WMlcZ-wWSucaj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215674381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fruit and Vegetable Distribution Program Versus a Multicomponent Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Which Should Be Recommended for Implementation?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Reinaerts, Evelien B.M. ; De Nooijer, Jascha ; De Vries, Nanne K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reinaerts, Evelien B.M. ; De Nooijer, Jascha ; De Vries, Nanne K.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Background: Two primary school–based interventions were implemented, aimed at increasing fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption by children, both with proven effectiveness: (1) a free daily F&V distribution scheme for all primary school children and (2) a multicomponent, age‐specific program consisting of a classroom curriculum, parental involvement, and an environmental component. This article describes and compares the implementation, evaluation, and potential for adoption of the 2 interventions.
Methods: A total of 48 teachers who worked with either of these programs filled out a questionnaire at the end of the intervention period. Additionally, 24 of the teachers who worked with the multicomponent program filled out periodic monitoring reports during the intervention.
Results: Compared to the F&V distribution, the multicomponent program was less fully implemented and that implementation of activities decreased over time. Both programs were evaluated favorably, and about half of the teachers indicated that they were willing to use the program again in the following school year. Teachers who used the multicomponent program experienced more social pressure to implement the program. They rated the program they had used as more complex and risky than the other group rated the distribution program.
Conclusions: The free distribution program has the greatest potential for being adopted by schoolteachers, but that efforts must be made to acquire funding for it. Until these resources are available, the multicomponent program seems to be a good alternative if improved as suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-1561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00251.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18076413</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSHEAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adoption ; Behavior ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children & youth ; Curriculum ; diet ; Eating Habits ; Elementary Education ; Elementary School Students ; Elementary School Teachers ; Elementary schools ; evaluation ; Faculty ; Feeding Behavior ; Food ; Formative Evaluation ; Fruit ; Fruit juices ; Health Education - methods ; Health Promotion ; Health Promotion - methods ; Health services ; Humans ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Instructional Materials ; Intervention ; Nursing ; nutrition ; Outcome Measures ; Parent Participation ; Parent School Relationship ; Pretests Posttests ; Program Descriptions ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Evaluation ; Program Implementation ; Questionnaires ; school health instruction ; School Health Services ; Social Influences ; Studies ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teaching Methods ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>The Journal of school health, 2007-12, Vol.77 (10), p.679-686</ispartof><rights>Copyright American School Health Association Dec 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-f5a53440caf5d204ce50436abdc3e2f69662bfd54c71763658ff09d4fadf07e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-f5a53440caf5d204ce50436abdc3e2f69662bfd54c71763658ff09d4fadf07e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1746-1561.2007.00251.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1746-1561.2007.00251.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,12825,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ854538$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18076413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reinaerts, Evelien B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Nooijer, Jascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vries, Nanne K.</creatorcontrib><title>Fruit and Vegetable Distribution Program Versus a Multicomponent Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Which Should Be Recommended for Implementation?</title><title>The Journal of school health</title><addtitle>J Sch Health</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Background: Two primary school–based interventions were implemented, aimed at increasing fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption by children, both with proven effectiveness: (1) a free daily F&V distribution scheme for all primary school children and (2) a multicomponent, age‐specific program consisting of a classroom curriculum, parental involvement, and an environmental component. This article describes and compares the implementation, evaluation, and potential for adoption of the 2 interventions.
Methods: A total of 48 teachers who worked with either of these programs filled out a questionnaire at the end of the intervention period. Additionally, 24 of the teachers who worked with the multicomponent program filled out periodic monitoring reports during the intervention.
Results: Compared to the F&V distribution, the multicomponent program was less fully implemented and that implementation of activities decreased over time. Both programs were evaluated favorably, and about half of the teachers indicated that they were willing to use the program again in the following school year. Teachers who used the multicomponent program experienced more social pressure to implement the program. They rated the program they had used as more complex and risky than the other group rated the distribution program.
Conclusions: The free distribution program has the greatest potential for being adopted by schoolteachers, but that efforts must be made to acquire funding for it. Until these resources are available, the multicomponent program seems to be a good alternative if improved as suggested.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adoption</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>diet</subject><subject>Eating Habits</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Faculty</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Fruit</subject><subject>Fruit juices</subject><subject>Health Education - methods</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>nutrition</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Parent Participation</subject><subject>Parent School Relationship</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Program Descriptions</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>school health instruction</subject><subject>School Health Services</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0022-4391</issn><issn>1746-1561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUltv0zAUthCIlcI_QMjigbcUO74kRUIIytZ12tjEBnu0HOd4TUniYiei-0H8TxxSFQnxwHnx5bvYOt9BCFMyo7Feb2Y04zKhQtJZSkg2IyQVdLZ7gCYH4CGaxNs04WxOj9CTEDYkVsayx-iI5iSTnLIJ-nni-6rDui3xV7iDThc14I9V6HxV9F3lWnzl3Z3XTYR96APW-KKvu8q4ZutaaLsD3jm8ao0HHQD_y3Th2tA328HzDb5dV2aNr9eur0v8AfBniIYNtCWU2DqPV822hnju9MB_9xQ9sroO8Gy_TtGXk-ObxWlyfrlcLd6fJ4bljCZWaME4J0ZbUaaEGxCEM6mL0jBIrZxLmRa2FNxkNJNMitxaMi-51aUlGVA2Ra9G361333sInWqqYKCudQuuD0rOiRBE8Eh8-Rdx43rfxr-pNDY_4ywf3PKRZLwLwYNVW1812t8rStSQo9qoIS41xKWGHNXvHNUuSl_s_fuigfKPcB9cJDwfCeArc4CPz3LBRezFFL0d4R9VDff__a46u7w-jbuoT0Z9nATYHfTaf1MyjpBQt5-WaiGubi6WMlcZ-wWSucaj</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Reinaerts, Evelien B.M.</creator><creator>De Nooijer, Jascha</creator><creator>De Vries, Nanne K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Fruit and Vegetable Distribution Program Versus a Multicomponent Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Which Should Be Recommended for Implementation?</title><author>Reinaerts, Evelien B.M. ; De Nooijer, Jascha ; De Vries, Nanne K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-f5a53440caf5d204ce50436abdc3e2f69662bfd54c71763658ff09d4fadf07e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adoption</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>diet</topic><topic>Eating Habits</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Faculty</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Fruit</topic><topic>Fruit juices</topic><topic>Health Education - methods</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>nutrition</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Parent Participation</topic><topic>Parent School Relationship</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Program Descriptions</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>school health instruction</topic><topic>School Health Services</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reinaerts, Evelien B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Nooijer, Jascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vries, Nanne K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of school health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reinaerts, Evelien B.M.</au><au>De Nooijer, Jascha</au><au>De Vries, Nanne K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ854538</ericid><atitle>Fruit and Vegetable Distribution Program Versus a Multicomponent Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Which Should Be Recommended for Implementation?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of school health</jtitle><addtitle>J Sch Health</addtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>679</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>679-686</pages><issn>0022-4391</issn><eissn>1746-1561</eissn><coden>JSHEAZ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Background: Two primary school–based interventions were implemented, aimed at increasing fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption by children, both with proven effectiveness: (1) a free daily F&V distribution scheme for all primary school children and (2) a multicomponent, age‐specific program consisting of a classroom curriculum, parental involvement, and an environmental component. This article describes and compares the implementation, evaluation, and potential for adoption of the 2 interventions.
Methods: A total of 48 teachers who worked with either of these programs filled out a questionnaire at the end of the intervention period. Additionally, 24 of the teachers who worked with the multicomponent program filled out periodic monitoring reports during the intervention.
Results: Compared to the F&V distribution, the multicomponent program was less fully implemented and that implementation of activities decreased over time. Both programs were evaluated favorably, and about half of the teachers indicated that they were willing to use the program again in the following school year. Teachers who used the multicomponent program experienced more social pressure to implement the program. They rated the program they had used as more complex and risky than the other group rated the distribution program.
Conclusions: The free distribution program has the greatest potential for being adopted by schoolteachers, but that efforts must be made to acquire funding for it. Until these resources are available, the multicomponent program seems to be a good alternative if improved as suggested.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>18076413</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00251.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-4391 |
| ispartof | The Journal of school health, 2007-12, Vol.77 (10), p.679-686 |
| issn | 0022-4391 1746-1561 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69055054 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adolescent Adoption Behavior Child Child, Preschool Children & youth Curriculum diet Eating Habits Elementary Education Elementary School Students Elementary School Teachers Elementary schools evaluation Faculty Feeding Behavior Food Formative Evaluation Fruit Fruit juices Health Education - methods Health Promotion Health Promotion - methods Health services Humans Innovation Innovations Instructional Materials Intervention Nursing nutrition Outcome Measures Parent Participation Parent School Relationship Pretests Posttests Program Descriptions Program Effectiveness Program Evaluation Program Implementation Questionnaires school health instruction School Health Services Social Influences Studies Teacher Attitudes Teaching Methods Vegetables |
| title | Fruit and Vegetable Distribution Program Versus a Multicomponent Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Which Should Be Recommended for Implementation? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T23%3A34%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fruit%20and%20Vegetable%20Distribution%20Program%20Versus%20a%20Multicomponent%20Program%20to%20Increase%20Fruit%20and%20Vegetable%20Consumption:%20Which%20Should%20Be%20Recommended%20for%20Implementation?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20school%20health&rft.au=Reinaerts,%20Evelien%20B.M.&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=679&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=679-686&rft.issn=0022-4391&rft.eissn=1746-1561&rft.coden=JSHEAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00251.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1403838771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215674381&rft_id=info:pmid/18076413&rft_ericid=EJ854538&rfr_iscdi=true |