Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?
Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. M...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2007-11, Vol.85 (2), p.251-259 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 259 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Radiotherapy and oncology |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Melancon, Adam D O’Daniel, Jennifer C Zhang, Lifei Kudchadker, Rajat J Kuban, Deborah A Lee, Andrew K Cheung, Rex M de Crevoisier, Renaud Tucker, Susan L Newhauser, Wayne D Mohan, Radhe Dong, Lei |
description | Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. Materials and methods In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set. Results During one treatment fraction (21.4 ± 5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p < 0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm3 of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p < 0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients’ prostates and eight patients’ SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy ( p < 0.02). Conclusions The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69044574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167814007004318</els_id><sourcerecordid>69044574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-a7f47d17e270683aa223c99f0955aaf81f27da1ebd0c3af9a12aaa5470c68ee03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6D0SyclflTaqqk9ooMvgYGHChrsOd5KZNW482SQ0U-ONN0Q2CG1eB5JyTc7_L2EsBtQCxf3OsI7p5srUEUDXoGkA_YjuhVV-B1uox2xWZqrRo4Yo9S-kIABIa9ZRdCaV72QPs2O_bxJE31TjyMOWIPqLNYZ5w4CPGQ5h4WrwPNtCUuZ8jdxiGlYcRD1QdluDIbUaaUshrNc5uGTCXu9It4BbE8w-KeFr57PkpzimXZ25xshTfPWdPPA6JXlzOa_b944dvN5-ruy-fbm_e31W2kypXqHyrnFAkFex1gyhlY_veQ991iF4LL5VDQfcObIO-RyERsWsV2L0mguaavT7nlgK_FkrZjCFZGgacaF6S2ffQtp1qi7A9C21pmiJ5c4pl1LgaAWajbo7mTN1s1A1oU6gX26tL_nI_kvtrumAugrdnAZUpHwJFkzaillyIZLNxc_jfD_8G2CFMweLwk1ZKx3mJZWXJCJOkAfN12_y2eFAAbSN08wfPhqyn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69044574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Melancon, Adam D ; O’Daniel, Jennifer C ; Zhang, Lifei ; Kudchadker, Rajat J ; Kuban, Deborah A ; Lee, Andrew K ; Cheung, Rex M ; de Crevoisier, Renaud ; Tucker, Susan L ; Newhauser, Wayne D ; Mohan, Radhe ; Dong, Lei</creator><creatorcontrib>Melancon, Adam D ; O’Daniel, Jennifer C ; Zhang, Lifei ; Kudchadker, Rajat J ; Kuban, Deborah A ; Lee, Andrew K ; Cheung, Rex M ; de Crevoisier, Renaud ; Tucker, Susan L ; Newhauser, Wayne D ; Mohan, Radhe ; Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. Materials and methods In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set. Results During one treatment fraction (21.4 ± 5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p < 0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm3 of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p < 0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients’ prostates and eight patients’ SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy ( p < 0.02). Conclusions The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17892900</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; IMRT ; Intrafractional variation ; Male ; Organ motion ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Seminal Vesicles - diagnostic imaging ; Setup error ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment margin</subject><ispartof>Radiotherapy and oncology, 2007-11, Vol.85 (2), p.251-259</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-a7f47d17e270683aa223c99f0955aaf81f27da1ebd0c3af9a12aaa5470c68ee03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-a7f47d17e270683aa223c99f0955aaf81f27da1ebd0c3af9a12aaa5470c68ee03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17892900$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melancon, Adam D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Daniel, Jennifer C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudchadker, Rajat J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuban, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Andrew K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Rex M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Crevoisier, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Susan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newhauser, Wayne D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Radhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><title>Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?</title><title>Radiotherapy and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. Materials and methods In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set. Results During one treatment fraction (21.4 ± 5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p < 0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm3 of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p < 0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients’ prostates and eight patients’ SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy ( p < 0.02). Conclusions The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage.</description><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IMRT</subject><subject>Intrafractional variation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Organ motion</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Seminal Vesicles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Setup error</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment margin</subject><issn>0167-8140</issn><issn>1879-0887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6D0SyclflTaqqk9ooMvgYGHChrsOd5KZNW482SQ0U-ONN0Q2CG1eB5JyTc7_L2EsBtQCxf3OsI7p5srUEUDXoGkA_YjuhVV-B1uox2xWZqrRo4Yo9S-kIABIa9ZRdCaV72QPs2O_bxJE31TjyMOWIPqLNYZ5w4CPGQ5h4WrwPNtCUuZ8jdxiGlYcRD1QdluDIbUaaUshrNc5uGTCXu9It4BbE8w-KeFr57PkpzimXZ25xshTfPWdPPA6JXlzOa_b944dvN5-ruy-fbm_e31W2kypXqHyrnFAkFex1gyhlY_veQ991iF4LL5VDQfcObIO-RyERsWsV2L0mguaavT7nlgK_FkrZjCFZGgacaF6S2ffQtp1qi7A9C21pmiJ5c4pl1LgaAWajbo7mTN1s1A1oU6gX26tL_nI_kvtrumAugrdnAZUpHwJFkzaillyIZLNxc_jfD_8G2CFMweLwk1ZKx3mJZWXJCJOkAfN12_y2eFAAbSN08wfPhqyn</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Melancon, Adam D</creator><creator>O’Daniel, Jennifer C</creator><creator>Zhang, Lifei</creator><creator>Kudchadker, Rajat J</creator><creator>Kuban, Deborah A</creator><creator>Lee, Andrew K</creator><creator>Cheung, Rex M</creator><creator>de Crevoisier, Renaud</creator><creator>Tucker, Susan L</creator><creator>Newhauser, Wayne D</creator><creator>Mohan, Radhe</creator><creator>Dong, Lei</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?</title><author>Melancon, Adam D ; O’Daniel, Jennifer C ; Zhang, Lifei ; Kudchadker, Rajat J ; Kuban, Deborah A ; Lee, Andrew K ; Cheung, Rex M ; de Crevoisier, Renaud ; Tucker, Susan L ; Newhauser, Wayne D ; Mohan, Radhe ; Dong, Lei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-a7f47d17e270683aa223c99f0955aaf81f27da1ebd0c3af9a12aaa5470c68ee03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IMRT</topic><topic>Intrafractional variation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Organ motion</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Seminal Vesicles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Setup error</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment margin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melancon, Adam D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Daniel, Jennifer C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudchadker, Rajat J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuban, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Andrew K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Rex M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Crevoisier, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Susan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newhauser, Wayne D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Radhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melancon, Adam D</au><au>O’Daniel, Jennifer C</au><au>Zhang, Lifei</au><au>Kudchadker, Rajat J</au><au>Kuban, Deborah A</au><au>Lee, Andrew K</au><au>Cheung, Rex M</au><au>de Crevoisier, Renaud</au><au>Tucker, Susan L</au><au>Newhauser, Wayne D</au><au>Mohan, Radhe</au><au>Dong, Lei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?</atitle><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>251-259</pages><issn>0167-8140</issn><eissn>1879-0887</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. Materials and methods In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set. Results During one treatment fraction (21.4 ± 5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p < 0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm3 of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p < 0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients’ prostates and eight patients’ SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy ( p < 0.02). Conclusions The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>17892900</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-8140 |
ispartof | Radiotherapy and oncology, 2007-11, Vol.85 (2), p.251-259 |
issn | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69044574 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans IMRT Intrafractional variation Male Organ motion Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods Seminal Vesicles - diagnostic imaging Setup error Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment margin |
title | Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A54%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20a%203-mm%20intrafractional%20margin%20sufficient%20for%20daily%20image-guided%20intensity-modulated%20radiation%20therapy%20of%20prostate%20cancer?&rft.jtitle=Radiotherapy%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Melancon,%20Adam%20D&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=251-259&rft.issn=0167-8140&rft.eissn=1879-0887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69044574%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69044574&rft_id=info:pmid/17892900&rft_els_id=S0167814007004318&rfr_iscdi=true |