Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?

Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiotherapy and oncology 2007-11, Vol.85 (2), p.251-259
Hauptverfasser: Melancon, Adam D, O’Daniel, Jennifer C, Zhang, Lifei, Kudchadker, Rajat J, Kuban, Deborah A, Lee, Andrew K, Cheung, Rex M, de Crevoisier, Renaud, Tucker, Susan L, Newhauser, Wayne D, Mohan, Radhe, Dong, Lei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 259
container_issue 2
container_start_page 251
container_title Radiotherapy and oncology
container_volume 85
creator Melancon, Adam D
O’Daniel, Jennifer C
Zhang, Lifei
Kudchadker, Rajat J
Kuban, Deborah A
Lee, Andrew K
Cheung, Rex M
de Crevoisier, Renaud
Tucker, Susan L
Newhauser, Wayne D
Mohan, Radhe
Dong, Lei
description Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. Materials and methods In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set. Results During one treatment fraction (21.4 ± 5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p < 0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm3 of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p < 0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients’ prostates and eight patients’ SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy ( p < 0.02). Conclusions The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69044574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167814007004318</els_id><sourcerecordid>69044574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-a7f47d17e270683aa223c99f0955aaf81f27da1ebd0c3af9a12aaa5470c68ee03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6D0SyclflTaqqk9ooMvgYGHChrsOd5KZNW482SQ0U-ONN0Q2CG1eB5JyTc7_L2EsBtQCxf3OsI7p5srUEUDXoGkA_YjuhVV-B1uox2xWZqrRo4Yo9S-kIABIa9ZRdCaV72QPs2O_bxJE31TjyMOWIPqLNYZ5w4CPGQ5h4WrwPNtCUuZ8jdxiGlYcRD1QdluDIbUaaUshrNc5uGTCXu9It4BbE8w-KeFr57PkpzimXZ25xshTfPWdPPA6JXlzOa_b944dvN5-ruy-fbm_e31W2kypXqHyrnFAkFex1gyhlY_veQ991iF4LL5VDQfcObIO-RyERsWsV2L0mguaavT7nlgK_FkrZjCFZGgacaF6S2ffQtp1qi7A9C21pmiJ5c4pl1LgaAWajbo7mTN1s1A1oU6gX26tL_nI_kvtrumAugrdnAZUpHwJFkzaillyIZLNxc_jfD_8G2CFMweLwk1ZKx3mJZWXJCJOkAfN12_y2eFAAbSN08wfPhqyn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69044574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Melancon, Adam D ; O’Daniel, Jennifer C ; Zhang, Lifei ; Kudchadker, Rajat J ; Kuban, Deborah A ; Lee, Andrew K ; Cheung, Rex M ; de Crevoisier, Renaud ; Tucker, Susan L ; Newhauser, Wayne D ; Mohan, Radhe ; Dong, Lei</creator><creatorcontrib>Melancon, Adam D ; O’Daniel, Jennifer C ; Zhang, Lifei ; Kudchadker, Rajat J ; Kuban, Deborah A ; Lee, Andrew K ; Cheung, Rex M ; de Crevoisier, Renaud ; Tucker, Susan L ; Newhauser, Wayne D ; Mohan, Radhe ; Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. Materials and methods In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set. Results During one treatment fraction (21.4 ± 5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p &lt; 0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm3 of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p &lt; 0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients’ prostates and eight patients’ SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy ( p &lt; 0.02). Conclusions The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17892900</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; IMRT ; Intrafractional variation ; Male ; Organ motion ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Seminal Vesicles - diagnostic imaging ; Setup error ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment margin</subject><ispartof>Radiotherapy and oncology, 2007-11, Vol.85 (2), p.251-259</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-a7f47d17e270683aa223c99f0955aaf81f27da1ebd0c3af9a12aaa5470c68ee03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-a7f47d17e270683aa223c99f0955aaf81f27da1ebd0c3af9a12aaa5470c68ee03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17892900$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melancon, Adam D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Daniel, Jennifer C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudchadker, Rajat J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuban, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Andrew K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Rex M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Crevoisier, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Susan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newhauser, Wayne D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Radhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><title>Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?</title><title>Radiotherapy and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. Materials and methods In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set. Results During one treatment fraction (21.4 ± 5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p &lt; 0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm3 of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p &lt; 0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients’ prostates and eight patients’ SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy ( p &lt; 0.02). Conclusions The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage.</description><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IMRT</subject><subject>Intrafractional variation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Organ motion</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Seminal Vesicles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Setup error</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment margin</subject><issn>0167-8140</issn><issn>1879-0887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6D0SyclflTaqqk9ooMvgYGHChrsOd5KZNW482SQ0U-ONN0Q2CG1eB5JyTc7_L2EsBtQCxf3OsI7p5srUEUDXoGkA_YjuhVV-B1uox2xWZqrRo4Yo9S-kIABIa9ZRdCaV72QPs2O_bxJE31TjyMOWIPqLNYZ5w4CPGQ5h4WrwPNtCUuZ8jdxiGlYcRD1QdluDIbUaaUshrNc5uGTCXu9It4BbE8w-KeFr57PkpzimXZ25xshTfPWdPPA6JXlzOa_b944dvN5-ruy-fbm_e31W2kypXqHyrnFAkFex1gyhlY_veQ991iF4LL5VDQfcObIO-RyERsWsV2L0mguaavT7nlgK_FkrZjCFZGgacaF6S2ffQtp1qi7A9C21pmiJ5c4pl1LgaAWajbo7mTN1s1A1oU6gX26tL_nI_kvtrumAugrdnAZUpHwJFkzaillyIZLNxc_jfD_8G2CFMweLwk1ZKx3mJZWXJCJOkAfN12_y2eFAAbSN08wfPhqyn</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Melancon, Adam D</creator><creator>O’Daniel, Jennifer C</creator><creator>Zhang, Lifei</creator><creator>Kudchadker, Rajat J</creator><creator>Kuban, Deborah A</creator><creator>Lee, Andrew K</creator><creator>Cheung, Rex M</creator><creator>de Crevoisier, Renaud</creator><creator>Tucker, Susan L</creator><creator>Newhauser, Wayne D</creator><creator>Mohan, Radhe</creator><creator>Dong, Lei</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?</title><author>Melancon, Adam D ; O’Daniel, Jennifer C ; Zhang, Lifei ; Kudchadker, Rajat J ; Kuban, Deborah A ; Lee, Andrew K ; Cheung, Rex M ; de Crevoisier, Renaud ; Tucker, Susan L ; Newhauser, Wayne D ; Mohan, Radhe ; Dong, Lei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-a7f47d17e270683aa223c99f0955aaf81f27da1ebd0c3af9a12aaa5470c68ee03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IMRT</topic><topic>Intrafractional variation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Organ motion</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Seminal Vesicles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Setup error</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment margin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melancon, Adam D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Daniel, Jennifer C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudchadker, Rajat J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuban, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Andrew K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Rex M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Crevoisier, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Susan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newhauser, Wayne D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Radhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melancon, Adam D</au><au>O’Daniel, Jennifer C</au><au>Zhang, Lifei</au><au>Kudchadker, Rajat J</au><au>Kuban, Deborah A</au><au>Lee, Andrew K</au><au>Cheung, Rex M</au><au>de Crevoisier, Renaud</au><au>Tucker, Susan L</au><au>Newhauser, Wayne D</au><au>Mohan, Radhe</au><au>Dong, Lei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?</atitle><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>251-259</pages><issn>0167-8140</issn><eissn>1879-0887</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction. Materials and methods In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set. Results During one treatment fraction (21.4 ± 5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p &lt; 0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm3 of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p &lt; 0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients’ prostates and eight patients’ SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy ( p &lt; 0.02). Conclusions The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>17892900</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8140
ispartof Radiotherapy and oncology, 2007-11, Vol.85 (2), p.251-259
issn 0167-8140
1879-0887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69044574
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
IMRT
Intrafractional variation
Male
Organ motion
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Seminal Vesicles - diagnostic imaging
Setup error
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment margin
title Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A54%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20a%203-mm%20intrafractional%20margin%20sufficient%20for%20daily%20image-guided%20intensity-modulated%20radiation%20therapy%20of%20prostate%20cancer?&rft.jtitle=Radiotherapy%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Melancon,%20Adam%20D&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=251-259&rft.issn=0167-8140&rft.eissn=1879-0887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69044574%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69044574&rft_id=info:pmid/17892900&rft_els_id=S0167814007004318&rfr_iscdi=true